
Welcome to the Age of Jerks
I've always had a soft spot for the word. When I was at Downing College, Cambridge, my don said that when he sat the All Souls exam in Oxford, where you write about one word for three hours, his word was 'radical'. It comes from Latin radix, for root. Though now associated with upheaval, the etymology carries a different sense, closer to 'the root of the matter'. If writing about the word today, I would argue that the radical spirit, long associated with the left, now animates the transatlantic right.
On last week's episode, Dr James Orr, the Cambridge theologian and friend of J.D. Vance who is becoming to Nigel Farage what Keith Joseph was to Mrs Thatcher, described the ambition of his new thinktank, the Centre for a Better Britain. I reminded him of the lovely line from William Buckley, in his 1955 opening editorial for the National Review, that a conservative is one who 'stands athwart history, yelling Stop!' I suggested the elegiac conservatism of Michael Oakeshott and Roger Scruton has been succeeded by the missionary zeal of Peter Thiel and Elon Musk, who stand afore history, yelling 'Go!' Dr Orr believes this is not just because of the marriage between MAGA and assorted techno-utopians; nor is it a response merely to the rampaging globalisation chronicled in Vance's memoir, with its Scrutonian title of Hillbilly Elegy. He argues that 1789 to 2016 was an Age of Liberalism, and now we're suffering the birth pangs of a new epoch.
What should we call it? Such is the rate of technological innovation today, some people call it The Great Acceleration. Sadly, that's been and gone. AI, which is underhyped rather than overhyped, will speed up history as never before. For instance, I suspect the future of work is Head (AI), Hand (Robots), Heart (Us, we hope). Acceleration is the rate of change of speed. The rate of change of acceleration is jerks. This is the Age of Jerks.
At Lord's the other week, I spoke to a former prime minister. This kind soul wondered aloud if PMQs is the optimal use of a PM's time. It eliminates half of Wednesday and much of Tuesday, so around 20 per cent of the week. The arguments for PMQs are familiar. Of course PMs hate it, you may say. But would a monthly interrogation by the liaison committee, while annoying for bulletin editors and keyboard warriors, better serve democracy?
I put this to Kemi Badenoch, whom I have just interviewed for TV. She said she likes the current arrangement. I shall remind her of that if she becomes prime minister. Watching the edit, I wondered if I am encouraging too many tears on television. Recently, in a BBC pilgrimage to India, I cried when thinking about my dear departed dad. Mrs Badenoch has a similar moment when talking about her late father. It was a revealing moment from a politician who's not normally known for her vulnerability.
I strongly believe in rote learning poetry. I can recite, verbatim, most of Gray's 'Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard', Satan's unanswerable temptation in Book IX of Paradise Lost, and several of Shakespeare's sonnets. I do it partly to combat cognitive decline. In the week of BBC scandals about Gaza, Glastonbury and MasterChef, I dutifully turned my attention to a denser verse – the BBC editorial guidelines – but found the decline accelerated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
15 hours ago
- The Independent
Britain isn't broken, but people believe it is, and that is a big problem for Keir Starmer
Fraser Nelson, the former editor of The Spectator, the Conservative weekly, is having a remarkable afterlife as a great defender of the Labour government. He has gone head to head with Nigel Farage over the Reform leader's claim that we are living in 'lawless Britain'. There is less crime in Britain today than there has been for decades, Nelson pointed out at one of Farage's media conferences this week. This reduction in crime is nothing to do with people not bothering to report crime to the police any more, because the figures come from the Crime Survey for England and Wales, a large survey of a representative sample of the population that asks people if they have been the victim of a crime in the previous 12 months. The number of crimes has fallen by four-fifths since 1995. Farage waved the Crime Survey aside, saying it was 'discredited' because it does not include shoplifting. It doesn't, because it asks people about crimes of which they have personally been the victim, and it is true that shoplifting has increased. But that does not mean the Crime Survey is discredited. On the contrary, it is the best and most reliable evidence, and it is especially useful for measuring trends over time, because it is not affected by changes in the way police record crime. What did Farage say to that? 'We all know that crime has risen significantly over the course of the last few years.' A big welcome back, please, to that dread phrase, 'we all know'. For years I would point out that four public inquiries had found that Tony Blair told the truth about Iraq, only to be told that 'we all know' he didn't. As Nelson comments: 'This is the politics of perception.' As he points out in an excellent article in The Times today, it is the same with road safety, air pollution, sewage, and living standards. 'We all know' they are getting worse – when in actual fact they are getting better. So it does not matter to most people what the Crime Survey says. Most people believe that crime is rising, and the numbers who believe that have not changed over the years that crime has been falling. People are influenced by reports of terrible things happening to other people, and misremember their own experience. Anything more than five or 10 years ago was a golden age when there was some decent music in the charts and Mars bars weren't behind perspex screens. Why, though, has what 'we all know' become so much worse in the past year? Probably because some highly visible crimes have increased: shoplifting, phone thefts and graffiti. These are crimes that make people feel threatened by disorder, even as more of us than ever report feeling safe walking alone in their local area at night. What is corrosive is the perception – 'we all know' – that the authorities are not securely in control. Behind that perception lies the reality of asylum-seeker hotels and a government that is powerless to stop the boats. What has changed since the election is that Farage is more active, at the head of a social-media movement and a TV channel, GB News, dedicated to portraying the country as a hellhole. The intensity of this campaign to spread fear and insecurity seems to have reached a critical mass that is dangerous to Keir Starmer. He cannot fight it with facts – or not only with facts – because the answer will always be that 'we all know' that the facts are wrong. As Ian Leslie, the advertising executive turned social commentator says, 'Instead of asking, 'Why are people angry?' we should ask, 'What are we missing?'' What the government needs is to take visible and forceful action on the things that people care about, the shoplifting, phone snatching and graffiti, but above all on asylum hotels and stopping the boats. So far, Starmer has tried to do all these things, but limply. There have been roundtables at No 10 with the police and representatives of the retail industry and phone companies. Even these feeble initiatives have been undermined by people in authority doing foolish things, such as the police in Wales telling off a shopkeeper for calling thieves 'scumbags' and Andy Lord, the London Underground boss who accused citizen graffiti-removers of defacing trains themselves so that they could pose as heroes for cleaning it up. Most importantly, Starmer now has a treaty with France to return some of the cross-Channel migrants, but it will take a long time to build up to returning all or nearly all those who arrive – at which point the crossings would stop – and it is not clear that the French are in it for the long haul. One thing that Tony Blair understood, as he faced spikes of street crime, anti-social behaviour and asylum-seeker numbers, was the importance of 'grip'. It may sound like annoying spin-speak, but it was critical to communicating that he understood how people felt and he was doing something about it. Starmer should be grateful to Fraser Nelson, formerly of The Spectator, for pointing out that we are safer, richer and healthier than ever before – but if the perception is that we are not, the government has to get a grip on what 'we all know'.


Glasgow Times
2 days ago
- Glasgow Times
Restriction zones will ‘unduly influence' release of offenders, warns PCC
Ministers are seeking to introduce restriction zones that will limit where abusers can go, to allow survivors to go about their daily lives without fear of seeing their offender. Sexual and violent offenders could be restricted to certain locations and tracked with technology, and would face jail time for breaching the conditions under new proposals. Until now exclusion zones exist to stop perpetrators from going to where their victims live. The measure comes as the Government plans to overhaul the prison system to curb overcrowding, which could see violent and sexual offenders released from jail earlier, and for more criminals to serve sentences in the community. Tens of thousands of offenders would be tagged, prompting concerns from the victims' commissioner for England and Wales over the Probation Service's ability to cope with rising numbers. Hampshire and Isle of Wight Police and Crime Commissioner Donna Jones said that the new restriction zones were 'welcome' but 'caution is needed'. Ms Jones added: 'I'm concerned they will unduly influence the Government's decision on which offenders to release under its Early Release Scheme. 'I would like clarification over the length of sentence violent offenders will receive if they're recalled to prison. 'The current 28 days put in place by the Government as an emergency measure to free up prison places is clearly not a deterrent.' A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'New restriction zones will curb the freedoms of the most serious sexual and violent offenders by 'locking' them into specific areas. Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones with Christine Losecaat (right), chairwoman of the Board of Trustees at Advance, and Amy Glover (left), director of domestic abuse service at Advance (Ben Whitley/PA) 'Offenders will lose their freedom to move at will, and we'll give victims the confidence to go about their lives without fear of encountering them. 'They are not an alternative to custody and will have no impact on who and when an offender is released.' The mother of a woman who was killed by her estranged husband said she is praying he is given a restricted zone if he is released. Joanna Simpson, 46, was killed by her estranged husband Robert Brown in 2010 when he attacked her with a claw hammer in the family home. Brown was sentenced to 24 years in prison for manslaughter and a further two years for an offence of obstructing a coroner in the execution of his duty. Ms Simpson's mother, Diana Parkes, said she was 'delighted' about the new plans to restrict the movement of domestic abuse perpetrators. Discussing her daughter's killer, Ms Parkes told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'He's coming up for parole in January, I just heard yesterday. 'So hopefully when he comes out, we pray that he will be put in a restricted zone with a tag.' Ms Parkes, who was made a CBE for services to vulnerable children suffering from domestic abuse and domestic homicide, added: 'It's essential that victims of violent crimes should not live in fear when their perpetrators come out of prison on licence to serve the rest of their sentence, as it does at the present time. 'The perpetrator knows exactly where the victims are as they have exclusion zones, which are supposedly safe areas for the victims, but of course, the perpetrators know where they are and the minute they come out of their exclusion zone, the perpetrators could grab them or hurt them. 'Everyone has to worry all the time about where the perpetrator is when they live their normal life, because we're never told where they are at the moment.' Brown killed his millionaire wife one week before the finalisation of their divorce. He buried her body in a pre-dug grave in Windsor Great Park and confessed to police the following day. He was cleared of murder after a trial, but admitted manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility, with a psychiatric report saying he suffered from an 'adjustment disorder'. The Government has announced £700 million of funding until 2028/29 for the Probation Service to back up its reforms, as well as the recruitment of 1,300 new probation officers by March 2026. For the new restriction zones, probation officers will work with survivors to decide on banned locations for perpetrators, and will carry out detailed risk assessments. Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones announced the new measure at the charity Advance in London on Friday. The victims minister said perpetrators will be GPS-monitored to have real-time data about where they are going, and will be subject to 'virtual boundaries' which if breached could mean they go to prison. She said: 'We're putting really strong safeguards attached to these so that we can give victims and survivors the confidence to carry on with their everyday lives. 'We're going to be outlining more details on this as well, as we're bringing in the legislation in the autumn.'


North Wales Chronicle
2 days ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Restriction zones will ‘unduly influence' release of offenders, warns PCC
Ministers are seeking to introduce restriction zones that will limit where abusers can go, to allow survivors to go about their daily lives without fear of seeing their offender. Sexual and violent offenders could be restricted to certain locations and tracked with technology, and would face jail time for breaching the conditions under new proposals. Until now exclusion zones exist to stop perpetrators from going to where their victims live. The measure comes as the Government plans to overhaul the prison system to curb overcrowding, which could see violent and sexual offenders released from jail earlier, and for more criminals to serve sentences in the community. Tens of thousands of offenders would be tagged, prompting concerns from the victims' commissioner for England and Wales over the Probation Service's ability to cope with rising numbers. Hampshire and Isle of Wight Police and Crime Commissioner Donna Jones said that the new restriction zones were 'welcome' but 'caution is needed'. Ms Jones added: 'I'm concerned they will unduly influence the Government's decision on which offenders to release under its Early Release Scheme. 'I would like clarification over the length of sentence violent offenders will receive if they're recalled to prison. 'The current 28 days put in place by the Government as an emergency measure to free up prison places is clearly not a deterrent.' The Ministry of Justice has been approached for comment. The mother of a woman who was killed by her estranged husband said she is praying he is given a restricted zone if he is released. Joanna Simpson, 46, was killed by her estranged husband Robert Brown in 2010 when he attacked her with a claw hammer in the family home. Brown was sentenced to 24 years in prison for manslaughter and a further two years for an offence of obstructing a coroner in the execution of his duty. Ms Simpson's mother, Diana Parkes, said she was 'delighted' about the new plans to restrict the movement of domestic abuse perpetrators. Discussing her daughter's killer, Ms Parkes told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'He's coming up for parole in January, I just heard yesterday. 'So hopefully when he comes out, we pray that he will be put in a restricted zone with a tag.' Ms Parkes, who was made a CBE for services to vulnerable children suffering from domestic abuse and domestic homicide, added: 'It's essential that victims of violent crimes should not live in fear when their perpetrators come out of prison on licence to serve the rest of their sentence, as it does at the present time. 'The perpetrator knows exactly where the victims are as they have exclusion zones, which are supposedly safe areas for the victims, but of course, the perpetrators know where they are and the minute they come out of their exclusion zone, the perpetrators could grab them or hurt them. 'Everyone has to worry all the time about where the perpetrator is when they live their normal life, because we're never told where they are at the moment.' Brown killed his millionaire wife one week before the finalisation of their divorce. He buried her body in a pre-dug grave in Windsor Great Park and confessed to police the following day. He was cleared of murder after a trial, but admitted manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility, with a psychiatric report saying he suffered from an 'adjustment disorder'. The Government has announced £700 million of funding until 2028/29 for the Probation Service to back up its reforms, as well as the recruitment of 1,300 new probation officers by March 2026. For the new restriction zones, probation officers will work with survivors to decide on banned locations for perpetrators, and will carry out detailed risk assessments. Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones announced the new measure at the charity Advance in London on Friday. The victims minister said perpetrators will be GPS-monitored to have real-time data about where they are going, and will be subject to 'virtual boundaries' which if breached could mean they go to prison. She said: 'We're putting really strong safeguards attached to these so that we can give victims and survivors the confidence to carry on with their everyday lives. 'We're going to be outlining more details on this as well, as we're bringing in the legislation in the autumn.'