Elon Musk said Social Security is a 'Ponzi scheme.' It's the opposite.
Mega-billionaire and DOGE chief Elon Musk told Joe Rogan last week that he believes Social Security is 'the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time' and suggested the program is wracked by fraud. That's ironic coming from a plutocrat who is peddling false 'savings' to provide cover for his project to hobble the federal government.
It was also ironic because Social Security is a highly functioning, universal and exceptionally efficient part of the American social safety net. It's the opposite of a Ponzi scheme. Which is why the overwhelming majority of Americans oppose cutting it.
In a Ponzi scheme a scam artist lures investors into a fake investment project, pockets a lot of the cash and uses new 'investors' to funnel cash to the older ones — until new recruits slow down and the whole thing collapses. Everyone is being lied to, and nobody is really getting returns on their investment.
Social Security, which has been around since the 1930s, is politically toxic to touch precisely because it does pay everybody out. It is not some kind of black box in which money sloshes around mysteriously but a simple 'pay as you go' program, wherein current workers, via the payroll tax, fund payouts for retirees and disabled people. In 2024, about 1 in 5 U.S. residents received Social Security.
As the Social Security Administration explains, 'In 2025, when you work, about 85 cents of every Social Security tax dollar you pay goes to a trust fund. This fund pays monthly benefits to current retirees and their families and to surviving spouses and children of workers who have died. About 15 cents goes to a trust fund that pays benefits to people with disabilities and their families.'
And as the Center on Budget Policy and Priorities notes, in part because Social Security is universal and isn't means-tested, it's extremely cost-effective: Managing the program costs less than 1% of the revenue that funds the program.
Social Security isn't unreliable — almost all retired Americans pay into it and draw from it. And, as the CBPP explains, Social Security is 'most workers' only source of guaranteed retirement income that is not subject to investment risk or financial market fluctuations.'
Musk's argument that Social Security is some kind of scheme to defraud the public rests in part on misinformation about dead people getting payouts. In the interview, Musk repeated a claim about tens of millions of people incorrectly being marked as 'alive' in the Social Security database. But experts have debunked this claim by explaining that Musk has conflated Social Security number figures with actual beneficiaries and said there's no evidence of widespread fraud. The SSA's inspector general found in 2024 that only 0.84% of the trillions of dollars disbursed from 2015 to 2022 were improperly allocated. Most of those improper payments were overpayments, and some of them were recovered.
The other thing Musk cites as evidence that Social Security is a scheme are the numbers that show Social Security obligations exceed projected tax revenue. That's true and universally acknowledged — and not remotely scandalous. With people living longer lives and the birth rate decreasing, there will need to be a change to Social Security funding in order to keep the program working at the level it currently works at. There are a number of strategies for dealing with this that have to do with changing the way taxes fund Social Security.
The only people in American politics who are likely to pull the rug out from under retirees is today's Republican Party. Musk's misinformation about Social Security, his and President Donald Trump's constant claims that it needs to be probed for a nonexistent mass waste and fraud problems and massive cuts to the Social Security Administration's workforce are themselves the red flags that should have American taxpayers who've paid into the system worried about being taken for a ride.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
32 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Alert: Republicans are less enthusiastic about Musk after his feud with Trump, a new AP-NORC poll finds
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans are less enthusiastic about Musk after his feud with Trump, a new AP-NORC poll finds.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
My mother-in-law thought the world's richest man needed Apple gift cards. How on Earth could she fall for this scam?
We just found out that my 75-year-old mother-in-law is a victim of an online scammer. Her cognition is clearly impaired. She has several health problems. We are getting power of attorney and access to her bank accounts. She is definitely lonely. That, I believe, is the root cause. But that's not an excuse to believe that the world's richest man needs you to send him Apple AAPL gift cards. Her siblings are all shocked that she would believe this. How could this happen? Her only income is Social Security and a small pension. Her only asset is her home. It's paid off. My husband had a brief meeting with a lawyer who offered to transfer the deed to my husband to avoid the five-year look-back rule etc. (His mother agreed to it.) My mother-in-law currently gets a large senior tax break on her property taxes of $4,000 a year, which will go away if we transfer the deed. Should we put the house in a trust? What happens to the proceeds when sold? Israel-Iran clash delivers a fresh shock to investors. History suggests this is the move to make. 'I'm 68 and my 401(k) has dwindled to $82,000': My husband committed financial infidelity and has $50,000 in credit-card debt. What now? I'm in my 80s and have 2 kids. How do I choose between them to be my executor? Here's why stocks, bitcoin and gold are racing to record highs at the same time. It hasn't happened in over 10 years. Walmart's stock looks like it's in trouble. What the chart says may come next. Daughter-in-Law Related: I'm 57 and ready to retire next year on $7,500 a month, but my wife says no. Who's right? You have answered your first question. Loneliness and impaired cognition is a potent combination for scammers and fraudsters. Your mother-in-law wants to believe there's another person out there in the ether who takes an interest in her, and 'sees' her literally and figuratively, but her ability to process what is real and what is fake may also be impaired. The smartest people can fall victim to scams at a vulnerable moment and suspend their disbelief, as if watching a play, until it's too late. There have been cases recently where older people were scammed of six figures by thieves using AI and/or pretending to be famous people. In January, a French woman said she was conned out of €830,000 (approximately $868,000) by someone pretending to be the actor Brad Pitt. She received even more online abuse from people mocking her. She told reporters: 'I came forward because I am not the only one.' While your husband's power-of-attorney document will expire after your mother-in-law's death, estate plans often include what's called a 'durable' power of attorney. This permits the trusted individual (in this case, your husband) to retain power of attorney if and/or when your mother-in-law can no longer make decisions for herself. A conservatorship is an involuntary process and takes place when a person is unable to take care of their finances. Each state has its own rules for guardianships and conservatorships. To apply to be a conservator, your husband would need to file a petition with the probate court in the county where your mother-in-law lives and detail all the responsibilities, powers and duties he intends to take on for her. He would also need to submit a plan for her care. That does not, from what you say, appear to be required in this case. Your mother-in-law or her POA should also freeze her credit with all three major credit bureaus — Experian EXPGF, TransUnion TRU and Equifax EFX EFX — so no one can take out loans or open accounts in her name. People 60 and older are five times as likely as younger consumers to report losing money to tech-related scams, according to the Federal Trade Commission. Phone scams are the No. 1 scam affecting older people, followed by computer-related fraud. You should consult an attorney who specializes in elder law. A person's home is generally exempt as long as it is a principal residence and your equity doesn't exceed a certain amount. Other exemptions, depending on where you live, include one automobile as long as it's used to get to and from work, used to obtain medical treatment or is essential because you have a disability. Personal property used as investments — such as artwork — may not be exempt. The laws on property also vary, depending on where she lives. Several states, including Florida, New York and California, have rules that exempt a primary residence from assets calculated by Medicaid under certain circumstances. In many states, your mother-in-law or her spouse (if he were alive) would need to live in the home or have plans to return to it (if it's empty) if you wish the property to remain exempt from Medicaid. While one's primary home is generally not counted toward Medicaid's asset limit, it is not exempt from Medicaid's Estate Recovery Program, the American Council on Aging says. Your state Medicaid agency may attempt reimbursement of care costs through whatever estate of the deceased remains, and that includes the home. Furthermore, if your mother-in-law signs over her home to your husband, he will lose his step-up in-basis tax advantage. As you suggest, some people plan ahead by establishing an irrevocable trust before the five-year look-back rule. By transferring your assets into an irrevocable trust, you no longer own them and, therefore, they are exempt from Medicaid. 'They also protect assets for one's children and other relatives, which is a win-win for Medicaid applicants and their families,' says the American Council on Aging. A Medicaid Asset Protection Trust (or irrevocable income-only trust) can protect the assets of a person who wishes to apply for Medicaid, as long as this is done before the look-back period. You can include stocks and bonds, bank accounts and CDs, and secondary properties. With a MAPT, you are giving up control of these assets. Medicaid can challenge the trust, and the challenge can be complex and expensive. It will be an easier path ahead if your mother-in-law is open to help. Related: My wife asked for a divorce after 21 years. She wants to buy a house with our savings, but promises to help pay my mortgage. Previous columns by Quentin Fottrell: My husband will inherit $180K. I think we should invest the money. He wants to pay off his $168K mortgage. Who's right? 'I'm at a loss': My boyfriend of nearly 10 years is naming his elderly parents as beneficiaries and giving them power of attorney. Am I right to be upset? 'We have no prenuptial agreement': Will my wife be able to take my money if I transfer it to my retirement account? . My friend, 83, wants to add me to his bank account to pay his bills. What could go wrong? 'It might be another Apple or Microsoft': My wife invested $100K in one stock and it exploded 1,500%. Do we sell? My life partner is 18 years my senior. He wants to leave his $4.5 million fortune to me — not his two kids. Do we tell them? 'I prepaid our mom's rent for a year': My sister is a millionaire and never helps our mother. How do I cut her out of her will? 'I am getting very frustrated': My mother's adviser has not returned my calls. He manages $1 million. Is this normal?


USA Today
38 minutes ago
- USA Today
See photos: The last large-scale military parade in Washington DC in 1991
See photos: The last large-scale military parade in Washington DC in 1991 Show Caption Hide Caption Armored tanks arrive in DC for Trump's military birthday parade As Washington, D.C. prepares for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, armored tanks have begun to arrive ahead of Saturday's celebration. Thousands of soldiers, military equipment, musical performances and more are set for this weekend in Washington D.C. for the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebration. Happening along the National Mall on Saturday, June 14, the event is also falling on the same day as President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, but the administration has insisted that the Army's anniversary and Trump's birthday are a coincidence and that the parade is justified to honor soldiers' sacrifice. Army parachutists jumping from aircraft are set to land and give Trump an American flag for his birthday, Pentagon officials said, according to Axios. A rare sight in Washington D.C., the last major military parade was held in 1991 to celebrate the end of the first Gulf War. Before 1991, large-scale military parades were held following the American victory in World War I and World War II. According to the National Park Service, "debates over military policy" that occurred during the Korean and Vietnam wars forced parades to be more "subdued." Photos: The last large military parade in Washington DC Contributing: Kathryn Palmer and staff, USA TODAY Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.