
‘I would not have left': An Indian student went home after the US terminated his status. Now he can't come back.
Some foreign students made the wrenching decision to drop everything and leave. The PhD student was among them. He bought a one-way ticket from Boston to Mumbai, and left April 5.
Advertisement
What these students couldn't have known: The federal government would soon restore most international students' statuses in its Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (SEVIS)
The problem, immigration lawyers said, is that the State Department did not automatically restore their visas, which allow international travel. With a revoked visa, anyone who leaves and tries to come back could be stopped by airport officers and barred from reentering the United States, or risk getting stuck abroad because of security delays.
Back in India, the PhD student applied for a new visa May 9, but got denied two weeks later. He has an 'active' status in the SEVIS database, 'as though the termination did not happen,' according to a notice sent by ICE in June and reviewed by the Globe. But without a valid visa he is physically locked out of the country.
Advertisement
While the story of a PhD marooned in Mumbai may seem distant, it illustrates how compliance with the letter of the law doesn't always ensure protection. It also shows how difficult it is to bring people back once they've removed themselves from the country, said immigration lawyers.
'I did all the things right. I was compliant. They asked me to leave. I left the country,' said the PhD student. In doing so, 'I became a statistic to their self-deportation [initiative].'
If he had to do it all over again, he said, 'I would not have left.'
Lawyers said they generally advised students who had their statuses terminated this spring to stay in the United States, or made sure students at least knew their options.
'We know of cases where individuals did decide that 'I'm not going to fight,' for whatever reason,' said Boston-based attorney Elizabeth Goss.
It's hard to know how many students left, or where they ended up. A sizable number seem to hail from India, which
The State Department, in an email to the Globe, said that 'whenever an individual's visa is revoked, he or she may reapply at one of our consulates or embassies overseas at any time.'
Advertisement
But some students have been denied authorization for reentry, and in late May, the US
The way Cambridge-based lawyer Stephanie Marzouk sees it, the Trump administration 'doesn't want foreign students here' and is 'pursuing this scorched-earth strategy of doing everything they can to dissuade people from coming to the US to study.'
The Indian PhD student, who didn't want to identify his school, applied for his visa before the United States suspended new interviews, but he was rejected under Immigration and Nationality Act's Section 214(b) because he didn't sufficiently demonstrate 'strong ties' to his native country that would compel him to return home.
He questioned why that concern was never flagged previously: 'I've done two visas before this [one], and I've presented my strong ties to them successfully.'
'My dad is a heart patient while my mother is a breast cancer patient,' he added. 'I'm not interested in leaving them.'
Soon after his rejection, he created a poll in his WhatsApp chat group of Indian students and found at least 14 others denied for the same reason.
Dahlia French, an immigration lawyer based in Texas, has met with around 11 students and heard of another 25 or so rejected on these grounds.
'Almost all are Indian,' she said.
Charles Kuck, a lawyer based in Atlanta, , said he's only heard of two students who have been approved for new visas since they returned home, 'but I've got at least 60 who have been denied' for 214(b), and 'they were all from India.'
Advertisement
Reversing a visa denial is practically unheard of because of the judicial doctrine of
Kuck advised clients who left not to reapply for a visa. 'If the revocations were illegal, which we believe they were, then these students don't need to go back to the consulate; they can just come in on their current visas,' he said.
Simii, who asked to be identified by her first name only to protect her privacy, is a 30-year-old who graduated from Northeastern in 2022. The software engineer was in her third year of employment related to her field of study when she learned her SEVIS status was terminated and her visa revoked.
She returned to India, only to learn her SEVIS record had been reactivated. But with only a few months left before her student status runs out, she doubts the government will grant her another visa.
The PhD candidate had been studying neurodevelopmental disorders in his university lab in Boston when he found out ICE terminated his record. The reason he was given, he said, was
'otherwise failing to maintain status -- Individual identified in criminal records check and/or has had VISA revoked.'
Around five years ago, he was picked up in New York state for driving while ability impaired,
Advertisement
'I was 21 at the time, and that was definitely a stupid mistake,' he said.
When he applied for a visa for his PhD program, he declared the prior DWAI conviction, then completed another round of medical and psychological evaluations before it was approved.
After his recent visa rejection, he's struggling to find a lawyer.
For these students, 'all that can be done is they can be better prepared to go back on a second consular interview,' and try to prove they do maintain strong ties to their country, said Kuck.
Simii, the Northeastern graduate, said she no longer sees the point in reapplying. Instead, she's traveling around India before looking for a job.
'I didn't leave because I gave up. I left because I refused to live in fear, uncertainty, and anxiety created by the immigration system,' she wrote in an email.
'I am sharing my story so that other students who feel scared, stuck, or ashamed because of a system that failed them can feel seen and heard.'
Globe correspondent Jade Lozada contributed to this report.
Brooke Hauser can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
White House gets key facts wrong as it blames California for 3 traffic deaths in Florida
SACRAMENTO — The White House on Monday blamed California's 'sanctuary' policies for a fatal crash in Florida allegedly caused by an undocumented semitruck driver, even though state law does not allow undocumented immigrants to obtain commercial trucking licenses. The accusation prompted a new round of fighting between President Donald Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and became the latest tragedy to stand in for the broader debate about immigration. It appears that once again the White House has gotten key facts wrong as it attempts to seize on a devastating accident in order to harness public sympathy for its efforts to swiftly remove thousands of immigrants from the country. The White House has targeted California in particular as it carries out its deportation campaign, including by sending military troops into Los Angeles, and an incident last week in which Border Patrol officials crashed a Newsom press conference. Harjinder Singh, 28, of Stockton, was arrested on charges of vehicular homicide following the deaths of three people on the Florida turnpike last week. Florida Highway Patrol said Singh, the driver of the semitruck, 'recklessly, and without regard for the safety of others' attempted an illegal U-turn and hit a minivan. 'The illegal alien is an Indian national who was granted a commercial driver's license by the so-called 'sanctuary state' of California, whose reckless policies put the lives of American citizens at risk every single day,' White House staff wrote in a press release Monday morning. 'But instead of acknowledging the tragedy, criminal illegal alien sympathizer Gavin Newsom callously doubled down, claiming that giving driver's licenses to illegals 'improves public safety.'' The White House's characterization of Singh echoed similar accusations made by Florida law enforcement officials about the accident days earlier. Florida troopers said during the criminal investigation — which was assisted by ICE — investigators determined Singh entered the country illegally by crossing the Mexico border in 2018. The Highway Patrol said he obtained his commercial driving license in the state of California. Singh, however, was granted a federal work permit and appears to have an ongoing asylum claim allowing him to legally remain in the country while it makes its way through court. Federal court documents show that someone named Harjinder Singh was initially charged with illegal entry, a misdemeanor, shortly after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border in 2018, but the charges were dismissed the same year. In a transcript of court proceedings in the case, Singh's lawyer said his client was trying to obtain asylum. California lawmakers in 2013 passed a law allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain drivers licenses. But that law explicitly does not apply to commercial licenses, a higher level of certification required for commercial truck drivers. California separately has a so-called sanctuary state law that limits when local police can cooperate with federal immigration agents, but it would not apply in a case like this because vehicular homicide is one of the many exemptions in the law. Both laws were signed into law by former Gov. Jerry Brown, Newsom's predecessor. Diana Crofts-Pelayo, a spokesperson for Newsom, confirmed that Singh had a commercial drivers license, but blamed the Trump administration for granting Singh a work permit, which allowed him to obtain the license. 'He would have been eligible in any state,' she wrote. 'California followed federal law, something the President knows nothing about.' David Kerner, the head of Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, said Singh is now in custody on homicide charges and immigration violations. 'He will no longer be able to damage and destroy the lives of Floridians and visitors,' Kern said in a statement. 'At the conclusion of his state charges, he will be deported. The Florida Highway Patrol remains committed to enforcing both state and federal law to ensure that people that are a danger to others face justice behind bars.' Florida troopers responded to the crash on the afternoon Aug. 12 on Florida's Turnpike in St. Lucie County. Singh's semitruck was traveling north and began making a U-turn at an 'official use only' turnaround, which crossed all northbound lanes. Troopers said in a statement that the minivan's 30-year-old driver was unable to avoid the truck. The left side of the trailer collided with the van, wedging it beneath. The van's passengers, 37 and 54, died at the scene. The driver died a couple hours later from his injuries.


UPI
13 minutes ago
- UPI
$1M will be awarded to transportation innovators with cost-saving ideas
Aug. 18 (UPI) -- The U.S. Department of Transportation on Monday launched its new million-dollar idea challenge targeted at the future of American transportation and infrastructure initiatives that will lower costs and improve safety. The infrastructure unit in DOT's version of its federal Advanced Research Projects Agency unveiled its new open-call challenge to U.S. innovators in both public and private sectors as an opportunity to "transform" the future of American transportation. "Our new Ideas Challenge will continue that proud tradition and support the development of new 21st century technologies to launch us forward," Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement. Federal transportation officials characterized it as a "showcase" that will highlight "innovative concepts" that ultimately will "improve safety, lower costs and enhance America's infrastructure." Duffy said the United States "invented transportation innovation," noting everything from Wilbur and Orville Wright's historic first manned flight to the U.S. Apollo space missions. According to DOT officials, the total prize purse for all Stage 1 and 2 cash prizes awarded will be a maximum of $1 million. Winners will be recognized by USDOT leadership and a "distinguished panel" of private and public sector judges. They will also be included in "in-depth" policy discussions over their ideas and proposals. The two-stage challenge unfolds by first identifying a "critical transportation infrastructure challenge" with initial concept papers due by September 17. The winners in the Round 1 phase will then be invited to a workshop in the fall in order to present to stakeholders and department leadership, and then urged to submit a detailed proposal for Stage 2. Only the first 10 finalists will be chosen to advance to early next year's ARPA-I Ideas Challenge Final. On Monday, officials at Washington-based Transportation for America said in a social media post it's past time that politicians "stop whining about potholes and actually require their state DOTs to set targets" to improve road conditions. States like Pennsylvania and New Jersey have long been mocked for its notoriously bumpy road conditions with road construction a year-round process. The Smart Growth for America-backed group said such targets included improving pavement both on U.S. interstates and legacy highways "that run through so many of our communities," they wrote. "Start your innovation engines!" the U.S. transportation chief declared in the open invite to American innovators. A pre-registered webinar is slated for Wednesday.


New York Post
42 minutes ago
- New York Post
Putin claims Ukraine should give up Donetsk because Russia will conquer region by October —despite a decade of failing to do so
Russian leader Vladimir Putin reportedly told President Trump his forces could conquer the long-sought-after Donetsk region by October if Ukraine didn't give up the land as part of a peace deal — but Kyiv and US observers point out that the Kremlin has failed to take it for more than a decade. While intelligence varies on Russia's advancements along the frontlines, one US assessment agrees that Putin could succeed in conquering the remaining 30% of Donetsk that he does not control by October, Axios reported. Experts at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a Washington-based think tank that has tracked the granular progress of the war since its start, however, point out that Russia has been unable to seize the region through three and a half years of bloody war — and 11 years of Kremlin-backed rebellion before that. 6 Russian President Vladimir Putin reportedly told President Trump at the Alaska summit last week that he will be able to capture Ukraine's Donetsk region by October. POOL/AFP via Getty Images And there's no reason Moscow will suddenly break through Ukraine's most heavily fortified frontline. 'Even if we're being generous to the Russians and say they can maintain their current advance, which we know they can't keep up and have been pushed back from… It would take about 475 days for Russia to take the entirety of Donetsk, that's December 2026,' George Barros, the head of the ISW's Russia team, told the Post. 'And I think that's putting it generously. To say Moscow can take it by October seems hyperbolic.' Ukrainian sources who also spoke with The Post were incredulous about the alleged intelligence assessment that Kyiv could lose Donetsk. 'Donetsk by October? They've been saying that since February of '22,' an American serving in the Ukrainian Armed Services said. 6 A Ukrainian soldier giving an order to a captured Russian troop in the Donetsk region on Aug. 17, 2025. Getty Images Speaking with Trump in Alaska on Friday, Putin demanded Donetsk be handed to him as a condition for ending his full-scale invasion of Ukraine, along with demanding the Luhansk, Crimea, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has scoffed at the proposal to give up land where his forces have fended off Russian soldiers who have outgunned and outnumbered the defenders. A source familiar with the talks described negotiations over the fate of Donetsk as 'the ball game.' 'Every issue is an ancillary issue, except Donetsk,' the source previously told The Post. 6 Ukrainians firing an anti-aircraft gun at Russian drones in the Donetsk region on Aug. 15, 2025. Getty Images Moscow has launched four notable campaigns over the last year to take the remainder of Donetsk, with each major operation failing and resulting in Russia's advancement of just over six miles, according to the ISW. The quagmire is emblematic in the Russian operation to take the town of Toretsk, which finally fell under Moscow's control on Aug. 1 after 14 months of fighting, with the Kremlin currently struggling to keep the 6.4 miles of land. 'Russia's big push is happening in the summer, which has always been the case, but come fall, with the muddy season, things are going to slow down again,' Barros noted. 'Russia won't be able to sustain this push.' 6 Putin demanded that Ukraine give up Donetsk as a condition for ending the invasion. Vyacheslav Prokofyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP Moscow faced a similar struggle in taking the city of Avdiivka, with a US military veteran, known by the callsign 'Jackie,' noting that Ukraine's defenses continue to defy the odds. 'It took the Russians from 2017 to 2024 to take Avdiivka,' Jakie, a spokesman with the 3rd Assault Battalion said. 'I fought in the Battle of Bahkmut where I counted eight Russian shells fired for every one Ukrainian response. 'And that was during the lulls, during enemy pushes they were shooting 15-to-1 and it still took them 10 months,' he added. 6 A man carrying his belongings out of a building hit by a Russian strike in Bilozerske in Ukraine's Donetsk region on Aug. 12, 2025. Photo by GENYA SAVILOV/AFP via Getty Images After claiming Avdiivka, Moscow set its sights on Pokrovsk, a logistical hub in eastern Ukraine that Russia claimed to be making advancements in last week along with Dobropillia. The city, however, continues to repel Russia's soldiers, with more than 400 Moscow troops killed after last week's push, according to Kyiv. Zelensky and his top commanders also noted that Kyiv still holds the strategic cities of Sloviansk and Kramators, which have served as a 'fortress belt' protecting Donbas, the land comprised of the Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts. 6 A house destroyed by Russian shelling in Donetsk seen on Aug. 18, 2025. REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko 'They remain Ukraine's main strongholds in Donbas, and the enemy does not have sufficient forces to storm them,' Kyiv said in a statement. 'Russia's capture of the entire Donetsk region — including the cities of Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, Dobropillia, and others — by October is impossible given the scale of losses and the inability of Russian forces to advance at the required pace,' the officials added. Kyiv claims that Russia is suffering 1,200 casualties per day, matching estimates from western officials and think tanks, with the US veteran Jackie saying that Ukrainian soldiers will continue to fight to the last man to keep the invaders out of Donbas. 'If you think Ukrainians are going to give up Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, I suggest asking a Texan if Davy Crockett should have given up the Alamo,' the American said. Despite the Trump administration's latest suggestion that Ukraine will have to concede land to end the war, Kyiv maintains that territory not currently occupied by Russian soldiers is off the table. 'It's not acceptable, but we don't want to be the person who said 'no,' because for us, it's important to go forward [with the US],' a Kyiv official exclusively told The Post. 'We definitely, honestly, believe that just Trump can end this war.'