AI-powered drones track down fires in German forests
The installation, resembling a giant golf ball covered in solar panels, is the hangar for an AI-powered drone that its developer hopes one day will be able to sniff out and extinguish new blazes in minutes.
"Fires are spreading much faster and more aggressively than in the past. That also means we have to react more quickly," Carsten Brinkschulte, the CEO of the German firm Dryad, told AFP at a demonstration of the technology outside Berlin.
Once a rarity, the German capital has to get used to more wildfires. Flames ripped through a forest on the city's western edge in the midst of a 2022 heatwave that saw several wildfires spring up in Germany.
The sort of tinderbox conditions which promote blazes -- where heat, drought and strong winds dry out the landscape -- have increased with climate change.
Wildfires have reached the point where they were "basically unstoppable", said Lindon Pronto, senior wildfire management expert at the European Forest Institute.
That is why action is needed to develop tools to "address fire in the prevention phase, during the operational phase, and also post-fire", said Pronto.
Advertisement
'Prevent a disaster'
Dryad is in the running with 29 other teams from around the globe for a multi-million-dollar prize to develop the ability to autonomously put out fires within 10 minutes.
During Dryad's demonstration on Thursday -- the first for a computer-steered wildfire detection drone according to the company -- chemicals in smoke from burning wood were picked up by sensors distributed in the forest.
The signal was relayed back to the company's platform which released the drone from the orb. The unit rose above the trees, charting a zig-zag course to track down the precise location and extent of the fire.
Firefighters using the information collected by the drone would be able "to respond much more efficiently and quickly and prevent a disaster", Brinkschulte said.
Dryad eventually hopes to have the drone descend below the canopy and put out the fire using a novel technology: a "sonic cannon" blasting low-frequency sound waves at the right pressure to suppress small fires.
An experimental acoustic suppression method, if it can be realised, would save the drone from carrying "large amounts of heavy water", making the unit more nimble and effective, according to Brinkschulte.
Advertisement
'Civilisation meets nature'
Technologies like Dryad's are a step towards putting out fires "without putting people's lives in danger", said Pronto, a native of California, where recent wildfires have had a devastating impact.
Huge blazes in Los Angeles in January killed 29 people, razed more than 10,000 homes and caused some $250 billion (€231 billion) in damage, according to estimates by the private meteorological firm AccuWeather.
The greatest benefits of an autonomous fire prevention system would be in areas where "civilisation meets nature", Brinkschulte said.
Such crossover zones are the most vulnerable to man-made wildfires and "where the risk to life and limb is naturally highest".
The company hopes to bring the drone to market in 2026, with the first deployment likely to be outside Europe.
"These systems still need to have the regulatory framework to be able to operate commercially," Brinkschulte said, adding that Dryad was aiming for deployment in Europe in the "coming years"
A couple of kinks need to be worked out before then, however. The first attempt to respond to the dummy fire on Thursday was held up by a faulty GPS signal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
9 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
AI Isn't Fully Automated — It Runs on Hidden Human Labor
Welcome to Tech Times' AI EXPLAINED, where we look at the tech of today and tomorrow. Brought to you by Imagine this scenario, one that's increasingly common: You have a voice AI listen to your meeting at work, you get a summary and analysis of that meeting, and you assume AI did all the work. In reality, though, none of these tools work alone. PLAUD AI, Rabbit, ChatGPT, and more all rely on a layer of human labor that most of us don't hear about. Behind that clean chat interface on your phone or computer, there are data labelers that tag speech samples, contractors that rate AI answers , and testers feeding the system more examples to learn from. Some are highly trained while others focus on more of the tedious aspects of the work. No matter what, though, your AI isn't just automated - it's a complex blend of code and human effort. Without it, your AI wouldn't work at all. The Invisible Workforce Behind Everyday AI AI tools don't just appear out of thin air, of course. They learn similarly to the way we do: by example. That learning process often relies on what's called human-in-the-loop (HITL) training. As data-annotation company Encord says in a blog post: "In machine learning and computer vision training, Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) is a concept whereby humans play an interactive and iterative role in a model's development. To create and deploy most machine learning models, humans are needed to curate and annotate the data before it is fed back to the AI. The interaction is key for the model to learn and function successfully," the company wrote. Annotators, data scientists, and data operations teams play a significant role in collecting, supplying, and annotating the necessary data, the post continued. The amount of human input varies with how involved the data is and how much human interaction it will be expected to offer. Of course, as with many business activities, there are ethical concerns. Many content moderators complain of low pay and traumatic content to review. There can also be a language bias in AI training , something researchers and companies are likely working on to solve as AI becomes more complex and global. Case Study: PLAUD AI Various ways users wear the PLAUD Note device—on a wristband, clipped to a lapel, or hanging as a pendant—highlighting its flexibility for hands-free voice capture throughout the day. PLAUD AI PLAUD AI's voice assistant offers an easy, one-button experience. Just press a button, speak, and then let it handle the rest. As the company said on its website , the voice assistant lets you "turn voices and conversations into actionable insights." Behind the scenes, this "magic" started with pre-trained automatic speech recognition (ASR) models like Whisper or other custom variants , that have been refined with actual user recordings. The models not only have to transcribe words, but also try to understand the structure, detect speakers , and interpret tone of voice. The training involves hours and hours of labeled audio and feedback from real conversations. It's likely that every time you see an improvement in the output, it's thanks to thousands of micro-adjustments based on user corrections or behind-the-scenes testing. According to reviewers, PLAUD AI leverages OpenAI's Whisper speech-to-text model running on its own servers. There are likely many people managing the PLAUD AI version of the model for its products, too. Every neat paragraph that comes out of the voice assistant likely reflects countless iterations of fine-tuning and A/B testing by prompt engineers and quality reviewers. That's how you get your results without having to deal with all that back-end work yourself. Case Study 2: ChatGPT and The ChatGPT logo represents one of the most widely used AI assistants—powered not just by models, but by human trainers, raters, and user feedback. ilgmyzin/Unsplash When you use ChatGPT, it can feel like an all-knowing helpful assistant with a polished tone and helpful answers. Those are based, of course, on a foundation of human work. OpenAI used reinforcement learning from human feedback , or RLHF, to train its models. That means actual humans rating responses so the system could learn what responses were the most helpful or accurate, not to mention the most polite. "On prompts submitted by our customers to the API, our labelers provide demonstrations of the desired model behavior and rank several outputs from our models," wrote the company in a blog post . "We then use(d) this data to fine-tune GPT‑3." a popular online voice transcription service, also relies on human work to improve its output. It doesn't use RLHF like OpenAI does, but it does include feedback tools for users to note inaccurate transcriptions, which the company then uses to fine-tune its own models. The company also uses synthetic data (generated pairs of audio and text) to help train its models, but without user corrections, these synthetic transcripts can struggle with accents, cross talk, or industry jargon; things only humans can fix. Case Study 3: Rabbit R1's Big Promise Still Needs Human Help The Rabbit R1 made a splash with its debut: a palm-sized orange gadget promising to run your apps for you, no screen-tapping required. Just talk to it, and it's supposed to handle things like ordering takeout or cueing up a playlist. At least, that's the idea. Rabbit says it built the device around something called a Large Action Model (LAM), which is supposed to "learn" how apps work by watching people use them. What that means in practice is that humans record themselves doing things like opening apps, clicking through menus, or completing tasks and those recordings become training data. The R1 didn't figure all this out on its own; it was shown how to do it, over and over. Since launch, people testing the R1 have noticed that it doesn't always feel as fluid or "intelligent" as expected. Some features seem more like pre-programmed flows than adaptive tools. In short, it's not magic—it's a system that still leans on human-made examples, feedback, and fixes to keep improving. That's the pattern with almost every AI assistant right now: what feels effortless in the moment is usually the result of hours of grunt work—labeling, testing, and tuning—done by people you'll never see. AI Still Relies On Human Labor For all the talk of artificial intelligence replacing human jobs, the truth is that AI still leans hard on human labor to work at all. From data labelers and prompt raters to everyday users correcting transcripts, real people are constantly training, guiding, and cleaning up after the machines. The smartest AI you use today is only as good as the humans behind it. For now, that's the part no algorithm can automate away. Originally published on Tech Times
DW
11 hours ago
- DW
German drone industry takes off – DW – 05/30/2025
Carmakers shift to drone production Germany, long known for its automotive prowess, is witnessing a quiet but significant transformation. As traditional car production slows, a new industry is taking flight—literally. Across southern Germany, start-ups and engineers are pivoting from cars to combat drones. One such innovation is the 'Falke,' a drone designed for both civilian and military use, capable of high speeds and long-range missions. Its creators emphasize affordability and mass production, leveraging materials and techniques from the automotive sector. This shift is not isolated. Near Munich, drone developers are collaborating with car part suppliers, repurposing their expertise and infrastructure to meet the growing demand for military-grade drones. Ukraine war has changed German mindset The war in Ukraine has accelerated this trend. Companies like High Cat are already supplying drones to the front lines, designed to resist jamming and deliver real-time reconnaissance. These aren't just tech experiments—they're the result of serious engineering, often funded by private investors who once shied away from defense ventures. Even packaging companies are adapting, creating climate-controlled transport cases for drones. The transformation is industrial and cultural: Engineers and entrepreneurs are learning to think like soldiers, designing for battlefield conditions. Automotive suppliers, facing declining orders, are finding new life in defense manufacturing, applying their precision and scale to drone production. Tapping into the €500 billion fund Germany's defense sector is poised for further growth, thanks to a €500 billion special fund aimed at strengthening national security. This fund opens doors for manufacturers across the country, especially those with existing capabilities in high-precision production. Companies that once hesitated to enter the arms industry are now reconsidering, driven by both financial incentives and a growing sense of responsibility to defend democratic values. With the right support and strategic partnerships, Germany's factories could become key players in Europe's defense landscape—transforming economic uncertainty into industrial opportunity. This video summary was created by AI from the original DW script. It was edited by a journalist before publication.
Int'l Business Times
19 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Anna Forsythe Built Oncoscope to Give Doctors What They Actually Need: Usable Intelligence
In today's healthcare landscape, oncologists are drowning in data. Thousands of studies are published each month, new FDA approvals roll out regularly, and guidelines change constantly. Yet, despite this flood of information, many doctors still struggle to make the best treatment decisions for their patients. The problem is not a lack of data. The problem is a lack of usable insights. Nowhere is this more critical than in oncology, where every day and every decision can change the course of a patient's life. Anna Forsythe, founder of Oncoscope-AI, an AI-powered oncology intelligence platform, has spent her career at the intersection of science, economics, and clinical practice. She believes the answer is not to add more data to the pile but to transform it into clarity. "We do not need to give physicians more to read," Forsythe says. "We need to give them the right information, in real-time, that is relevant to the patient in front of them." It is a reasonable expectation, but one that the current system sometimes fails to meet. Oncology guidelines can span hundreds of pages, often outdated by the time they reach clinical use. "While there have been recent attempts to address this problem with a chatbot approach, it is the human/AI combination that is key in achieving usability and physicians' trust." Forsythe's platform, Oncoscope, solves this challenge by merging human expertise with trained artificial intelligence. It automatically reviews and organizes clinical trials, cross-referencing them with regulatory approvals and treatment guidelines. The result is a curated, reliable, and immediately usable knowledge base that oncologists can access in seconds. It works like this: a doctor inputs three basic clinical parameters—the stage of the disease, the genetic profile, and any prior treatments. In return, they receive a tailored, human-reviewed list of relevant studies, including survival outcomes and progression data, with immediate links to guidelines, approvals, and original publications. There is no need to scroll through irrelevant abstracts or search multiple databases. Everything is in one place, organized and actionable. This kind of tool is not just a convenience. It is a necessity. According to Forsythe, she was inspired to create Oncoscope after seeing people in her own life receive outdated or suboptimal cancer treatments. In one case, a friend with late-stage breast cancer was placed on chemotherapy despite the existence of a newer, more targeted therapy. The doctor had not yet seen the recent study supporting it. Forsythe found it in three clicks. "That story is not an exception," she says. "It is happening every day. And it is not because doctors are careless. It is because the information is not delivered in a way they can use quickly." This is a systemic flaw, and it has consequences. When oncologists default to older treatments because they cannot keep up with new evidence, patients can miss out on therapies that could extend or improve their lives. In a field where even a few months of added survival can mean everything, delays in information are delays in care. Forsythe and her team designed Oncoscope to cut out these delays. The system prioritizes the most rigorous research, flagged for relevance and clinical significance. Each entry is reviewed by experts to ensure it meets regulatory-grade standards. Doctors are not asked to interpret raw data—they are given the insights they need to make decisions now. Critically, Oncoscope is free for verified healthcare professionals. Forsythe calls it an altruistic venture, at least for now. Her goal is simple—to give doctors a tool they can trust and patients the care they deserve. "If we want better outcomes in cancer care," she says, "we do not need more information. We need smarter information. That is what changes lives."
