BRIAN READE: 'Welcome to Bonkers Britain, a joke of a country where I feel beaten and ungoverned'
Rarely has a quote from a High Court judge chimed so perfectly with the instincts of the masses. 'Am I going bonkers?' was the cracker uttered by Judge Mr Justice Chamberlain last November after he was told there had been a catastrophic leak by the MoD, which had put thousands of lives at risk, cost taxpayers potentially £7billion, and forced the UK to secretly fly 19,000 Afghans here to live permanently.
And the government's response to that was to beg the judiciary to hide any knowledge of it from the British people by imposing the kind of court order favoured by footballers who don't want the world to know they're having sex with their brother's wife. To add unfathomable insult to life-threatening injury, the soldier who caused the calamity went unnamed, unpunished, and was moved sideways, and his boss, General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, was promoted to First Sea Lord.
To answer your question, m'lud, no you're not going bonkers. It just feels that way living in a joke of a country where nothing seems to work any more, where everything that can go wrong goes wrong, and when it does, the self-serving cowards who run the show hide the truth from view, shift the blame and punish no one. Welcome to Omnishambles Britain.
A country where every big construction project, like HS2, gets bogged down with red tape and skilled worker shortages, takes years longer than comparable countries and if finished, comes in billions over budget. A country where young people struggle to get on the housing ladder because we've built fewer houses in the past decade than the average Lego enthusiast, making rents eye-wateringly expensive and forcing many to live in their parents' spare room into their mid-30s.
A country where you have to take out a second mortgage to get a peak-time train ticket to its capital and which empties its jails of criminals because it did nothing about them getting full. A country which sees itself as a world-leading economy yet has to crawl to the American president with a letter from a man with a crown on his head, pleading with him to visit his palace in the hope he doesn't hit us with tariffs. We are a nation that can't control our borders even though vowing to do so was the main reason voters allowed politicians to cause economic carnage by divorcing our European neighbours.
A country that allows scandals like the Post Office, infected blood and Grenfell to happen, then tries to wheedle out of giving the victims recompense and justice. A nation that gets more angry about rappers supporting besieged Palestinians than the besiegers who are slaughtering them. A country where you wait 12 hours in NHS A&E corridors to get seen, the roads are riddled with potholes, local councils are going bankrupt, the welfare and care systems are broken, and the only thing that's growing is the national debt.
I don't know about you but I've almost reached the point where I'm finding it hard to get angry any more. The daily revelations of systemic incompetence, embarrassing U-turns and grovelling apologies just leaves me feeling beaten and ungoverned. I'm now resigned to the fact that this country is well and truly up sh** creek without a paddle. And thanks to the profit-sucking, sewage-dumping charlatans who run our privatised water industries, a creek that is very shi**y indeed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
29 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
High Court to hear bid to challenge Palestine Action ban
Huda Ammori is seeking to challenge Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe Palestine Action under anti-terror laws, after the group claimed an action which saw two Voyager planes damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. On July 4, Ms Ammori failed in a High Court bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, with the Court of Appeal dismissing a challenge to that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. The Government is opposing the bid for the legal challenge to be allowed to proceed, with the hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain due to begin at 10.30am on Monday at the Royal Courts of Justice. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident, and are due to face trial in early 2027. Protesters outside the Royal Courts of Justice on The Strand, central London, earlier in July (Lucy North/PA) Since the ban came into force, dozens of people have been arrested at protests in cities including London, Manchester and Cardiff, including an 83-year-old reverend. At the hearing earlier this month, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, said the proscription was an 'ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power'. He also said that the Home Office 'has still not sufficiently articulated or evidenced a national security reason that proscription should be brought into effect now'. Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that the harm caused by the ban would be 'far-reaching' and could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Dismissing the bid for a temporary block, the judge said that the 'harm which would ensue' if a block was not ordered was 'insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'. He added that some of the 'consequences feared by the claimant' were 'overstated'. At a late-night Court of Appeal hearing, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis threw out a bid to challenge the High Court's decision, finding that there was 'no real prospect of a successful appeal'.
Western Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
High Court to hear bid to challenge Palestine Action ban
Huda Ammori is seeking to challenge Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe Palestine Action under anti-terror laws, after the group claimed an action which saw two Voyager planes damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20. On July 4, Ms Ammori failed in a High Court bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, with the Court of Appeal dismissing a challenge to that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5. The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. The Government is opposing the bid for the legal challenge to be allowed to proceed, with the hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain due to begin at 10.30am on Monday at the Royal Courts of Justice. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was 'disgraceful'. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident, and are due to face trial in early 2027. Protesters outside the Royal Courts of Justice on The Strand, central London, earlier in July (Lucy North/PA) Since the ban came into force, dozens of people have been arrested at protests in cities including London, Manchester and Cardiff, including an 83-year-old reverend. At the hearing earlier this month, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, said the proscription was an 'ill-considered, discriminatory and authoritarian abuse of statutory power'. He also said that the Home Office 'has still not sufficiently articulated or evidenced a national security reason that proscription should be brought into effect now'. Blinne Ni Ghralaigh KC, also representing Ms Ammori, told the court that the harm caused by the ban would be 'far-reaching' and could cause 'irreparable harm to large numbers of members of the public', including causing some to 'self-censor'. Ben Watson KC, for the Home Office, said Palestine Action could challenge the Home Secretary's decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Mr Justice Chamberlain said that an assessment on whether to ban the group had been made as early as March, and 'preceded' the incident at RAF Brize Norton. Dismissing the bid for a temporary block, the judge said that the 'harm which would ensue' if a block was not ordered was 'insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'. He added that some of the 'consequences feared by the claimant' were 'overstated'. At a late-night Court of Appeal hearing, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Lord Justice Lewis and Lord Justice Edis threw out a bid to challenge the High Court's decision, finding that there was 'no real prospect of a successful appeal'.
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Reform will be ‘toughest' party on crime ever, Farage to say
Nigel Farage is set to announce a series of tough-on-crime measures on Monday as he seeks to set out more of Reform UK's policies, it has been reported. The Reform leader is expected to use a speech in London to vow to cut crime in half, declaring his party to be 'the toughest party on law and order this country has ever seen', according to The Daily Telegraph. Among his promises will be a pledge to recruit 30,000 new police officers; end early release for prisoners convicted of serious violent, sexual or knife offences; and deport 10,400 foreign offenders currently in British jails. He will also propose a major prison-building programme aiming to provide an extra 30,000 places to alleviate the prison overcrowding that prompted the Government to expand early release schemes. Mr Farage will say: 'We will cut crime in half. We will take back control of our streets, we will take back control of our courts and prisons.' But he will face questions over how he will achieve this, given his already significant spending promises and the need to negotiate returns agreements for foreign offenders. His speech comes amid rising concern about crime in Britain, with The Sun On Sunday reporting that a recent Survation poll found 49% of people thought the UK was 'becoming a lawless country'. Overall, crime has generally fallen over the past decade, but rose last year driven mainly by sharp increases in fraud and theft. Dame Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said: 'If Nigel Farage was serious about making our streets safer, he should have backed the tough new laws we introduced earlier this year. 'It's shameful that Reform constantly seeks to undermine confidence in our police and criminal justice system and voted to try to block measures to crack down on knife crime, anti-social behaviour, shop theft, child sexual abuse, and long overdue action to tackle the scourge of violence against women and girls. 'They should focus more on practical solutions to support our police, combat crime, deliver justice for victims of crime, rather than chasing headlines, spouting slogans and trying to divide communities.'
