Oxford cardinal says next Pope 'should be a man of encounter'
An Oxford-based cardinal who will be casting a vote in the election of the next Pope has said the new pontiff needs to say "everybody is welcome".At the age of 79, Cardinal Timothy Radcliffe is one of the three Britons in the College of Cardinals young enough to vote for the next leader of the Catholic Church.Pope Francis was buried at Santa Maria Maggiore Basilica in the Vatican on Sunday and his funeral brought together politicians, royalty and 400,000 mourners.In an interview for BBC Radio 4, Cardinal Radcliffe said he was "confident that we will be given the person that we need at this moment".
Electing the next pope is the responsibility of any cardinal under the age of 80.The decision is made during a conclave - the gathering of all the cardinals - and the choice is announced by white smoke, which will billow above the Sistine Chapel.Cardinal Radcliffe, a theologian and former master of the worldwide Dominican Order, is one of only four Britons in The College of Cardinals, alongside Vincent Nichols, Michael Fitzgerald and Arthur Roche.He has lived most of his adult life at Blackfriars in Oxford, where he remains a member of the Dominican Community and is also an Honorary Fellow of University of Oxford St John's College, of which he is an alumnus.He only became a cardinal on 7 December due to his friendship with Pope Francis."The first impression you got was of meeting somebody who saw you, who enjoyed being in your presence," Cardinal Radcliffe said of the late pontiff."I had a very nasty operation for cancer and when I met him afterwards, I was in a crowd of people."He came over - absolutely typical - he knew I still had difficulty talking, and just laid his forehead on mine for twenty seconds and then went away."
How the next Pope is chosen?Why this Conclave means it's harder than ever to predict the next Pope
"We really need somebody like Francis who says 'everybody is welcome'," Cardinal Radcliffe said, referring to Pope Francis's legacy which includes a reformed approach to the Catholic Church's treatment of gay people. "He showed this welcome not just in words but by opening the doors of the Vatican, inviting people to lunch - transgender people, gay people, people of all sorts."So we really need somebody who, like Francis, will be a man of encounter."Cardinal Radcliffe said he was "not daunted" by the upcoming choice and said a lot of progressives expressed scepticism upon the election of Pope Francis."But they were surprised to discover how he's opened the doors to so many people," he said."I am confident that we'll be given the person that we need at this moment."
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
35 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Politics LIVE: Starmer to unveil Strategic Defence Review in Scotland while Farage visits Hamilton
It's been far from an easy morning round for the Prime Minister, who was quite defensive when being asked when defence spending might hit three per cent. Sir Keir Starmer told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'We had a commitment for 2.5 per cent by the end of this Parliament. We pulled that right forward to 2027. 'We showed that when we say there's a new era of the defence and security of our country, is our first priority – as it is – that we meant it. We take the same approach to 3 per cent.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Oxfam HQ could be turned into lab space and office
Plans have been submitted to turn Oxfam's headquarters into an office and lab Investments Limited have applied to Oxford City Council for planning permission to turn the building on John Smith Drive, Oxford Business Park, Cowley into a life science or office facility and "create a significant number of job opportunities".The charity said it had signed the lease for a new workplace within the ground floor of a smaller building on the same site, to help reduce Saj Malik, who represents Temple Cowley on the city council, has raised concerns about the knock-on effect of creating new science and tech jobs on the city's housing shortage. Oxfam's HQ moved to Oxford Business Park from Summertown in July 2005, and the building was sold to Sutton Council in was put on the market for £60m in 2023 and sold to a private investor for £37.1m in April lease on the building ran out in for the move include adding an extra floor to the building, as well as a gym and café area on the ground floor and a row of columns outside the comes after the charity announced it was trying to save £10.2m in wages, and that 265 jobs were at risk of to the planning statement the proposal will "create a significant number of new job opportunities" and the plans would "positively contribute to Oxford's role as a leading hub for research and development and life sciences within the UK".It adds the building could be used by multiple tenants and connectivity to the business park would be improved by upcoming plans for the Cowley Branch Mr Malik said many Cowley residents felt "it's too much, too quickly and gentrification is being imposed on communities without thought of the impact"."While I fully encourage investment into Cowley, this kind of development often doesn't benefit the people who live here in terms of job opportunities," he said."Already we have a shortage of housing in Oxford meaning teachers and nurses have to live elsewhere causing recruitment and retention difficulties."A spokesperson for Oxfam said they hope to move in July. "The new office space is smaller and will support us to reduce our costs," they added. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
It's time to put renewed emphasis on life skills for our young people
Worse, the same report suggests that the prospect of securing a good job is just as dependent now as it was 20 years ago on who you know, rather than what you know. Perhaps most worrying, the report suggests that in a world where the nature of work is changing very rapidly, young people are being prepared by the education system for a career in traditional professions which might not even exist in the very near future, so significant is going to be the impact of AI. You could dismiss the report, except for the fact that it comes from a source as authoritative as the OECD. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is a Paris-based think tank that is, admittedly, dominated by the world's richest countries, but it is also noted for producing the best comparison statistics on education in the world. READ MORE: Scottish independence support at 58 per cent if Nigel Farage becomes PM – poll In fact, the report is so persuasive because what the researchers did was compare current world data with data from 20 years ago, when they first undertook work of this sort, and they would appear to be shocked to find that so little has changed. I am not surprised by this. If anyone had told me when I was at university, in the 1970s, that I would be making most of my income as a social media content creator, I would have been bemused by the suggestion. No-one had heard of the internet, or YouTube, or electronic recording data of the type we now use. Nor did any of the technology we use to consume social media exist back then. I make the point for a good reason. If my own career has changed this radically, and the rate of change in the nature of work is increasing and things are changing more often, what is it that we should now be training young people so that they have skills that may support them for decades, rather than a year or two at most after they leave either school or university? I have had six university appointments over the past 28 years and I appreciate the value of an academic education. But what I also realise is that this type of education, which dominates Highers and university courses, does not suit most people. In fact, in many disciplines, unless you want to be an academic, it is not much use at all. That is most especially true as far too many courses do not encourage much critical thinking at undergraduate level. All that means I am not surprised by what the OECD has found. I know that there might be exceptions to my comments in the case of some applied disciplines, such as medicine or veterinary science, and some engineering courses, but even then, these subjects exist in a real-world context once the person studying them has left university. To ignore this fact when they are training is quite ridiculous. So, what do I suggest we should do? I think the time has come for the unnecessary focus on academic disciplines in education to go. If the tiny minority who want to pursue a career in that area need concentrated training, that is for postgraduate education, above all else. At the level of Highers, in particular, the focus has to be very heavily on life skills. Of course, two or three more specialist subjects should be taken, but as important as these might be, so are essential and transferable life skills to ensure that people have the opportunity to change careers as time develops, as will inevitably happen to almost everyone now. So, what skills do I think are required? Try this list, which are things that matter to me now as an employer (which I am): Effective written communication Effective verbal communication Applied numeracy, including how to construct business-oriented spreadsheets Basic bookkeeping, accounting and budgeting An outline of the tax system Website creation and management The essentials of marketing Time management Basic employment law and contract law There is no job that exists for anyone over the age of 21 that does not require most skills, and most young people arrive in employment missing many of them. If, however, young people arrived with them, it would then be relatively easy for employers to provide more vocational training after the age of 21, using apprenticeship schemes if appropriate. Even those schemes are, however, at present, being hindered by a lack of these basic essentials, even among graduates. My suggestion is that at least 40% of the required undergraduate courses should also be cut on these issues. The result would be degrees that might be useful, and more fun to study, which is an issue that really matters to me when I know that so many students do not get very excited by their undergraduate university courses at present. Scotland could make these changes. Everyone would be a winner.
