Holyoke mayor urges residents to voice support for downtown street upgrades
HOLYOKE — Holyoke Mayor Joshua A. Garcia is asking residents to support what's known as the High and Maple Streets Corridor Improvement Project by sending comments to the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission.
Garcia wants residents to share a sense of urgency to improve the busy corridor, which is contending for money in competition with other projects — even though possible construction remains years away.
A 21-day public review period ends May 23.
'This project is up for the resources needed for implementation in the year 2030,' he said.
The project is important because it will fix aging traffic signals, make pedestrian crossings safer and add bike lanes. These changes will help reduce accidents and make the streets better for all, Garcia said in a post on Facebook this week.
Intersections along High and Maple streets are heavily used and have been the subject of transportation audits, planning and evaluation since 2011.
The junctions are on the state's Department of Transportation's 200 worst intersections list and are in the top 5% of problematic intersections in the Pioneer Valley. Both lists are based on state crash data.
Gary Roux, principal planner and traffic manager at the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission, said transportation documents were recently released for public review and comment.
'There is a clear need for the project in the area, but we have limited funds and many worthy projects,' Roux said. 'We are always interested in hearing which projects are supported by the region's residents.'
According to Garcia, the corridor is home to obsolete traffic signals and non-compliant pedestrian crossings. The routes lack modern 'complete streets' features necessary for a vibrant and accessible downtown.
Upgrades would cut down on accidents between cars and people, make intersections safer and encourage walking and biking, which fits with Holyoke's plan, he said.
Part of the project area lies in the MassDevelopment Transformative Development Initiative District. This program helps neighborhoods grow by improving public spaces and working with local partners.
Garcia said that making the streets better and easier to use will help attract private investment, support new businesses and make High Street a lively and welcoming place.
'Although the project has faced challenges and delays, including removal from prior Transportation Improvement Programs, the city remains committed to its completion,' he said.
Garcia applauded the state DOT's recent decision to move the project forward to early design stages, aiming for construction in 2029-2030.
'It is essential that this momentum continue so that Holyoke can realize the full benefit of this critical investment,' he said.
The regional Transportation Improvement Program lists the High and Maple streets project for possible federal funding in the 2029 fiscal year, said Roux, of the PVPC.
The commission is required to provide a public comment period before the document can be finalized.
Every year, the commission releases a five-year project schedule. 'Based on the status of each project through the design process, we will update it and make recommendations,' Roux said.
Roux said many factors influence when a project can proceed. Funding is a key factor, as well as a project's readiness to be advertised for construction.
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
House witness flips script on Dem who ambushed him during hearing with unearthed tweet: 'Iceberg is ahead'
FIRST ON FOX: A House committee witness who was called out by Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia of California during a hearing this week is pushing back after the congressman unearthed a past social media post on Social Security in an attempt to discredit his testimony. During a House oversight DOGE subcommittee hearing on Wednesday, Garcia grilled Power the Future CEO Dan Turner while holding up a posterboard of a past tweet calling Social Security a "government-sponsored Ponzi scheme." "Madoff went to jail for it. Congress runs on it," the post said. "I should be able to keep 100% of my money and not watch government waste it with a paltry percentage return." Garcia then suggested that post was evidence that Turner lacks the credibility to be testifying about the billions of federal tax dollars directed to left-wing NGOs. Social Security Commissioner Breaks Down Plan To Save Agency From Insolvency "A Ponzi scheme and so I think it's interesting, of course, as one of our Republican witnesses is calling Social Security a Ponzi scheme, and that's the person that we should be taking advice from here today," Garcia said. Read On The Fox News App "Without Social Security, 22 million people would be pushed into poverty. That includes over 16 million seniors and nearly 1 million children. And in fact, Elon Musk has also said and agreed with you, sir, that this is a Ponzi scheme. I think it's ironic that you are one of our witnesses talking about efficiency when you want to attack the single best program that we have to support people not just out of poverty, but across this country to uplift them, to ensure they can afford a decent life." Fox News Digital spoke to Turner, who stood by his post and outlined his belief, echoed by many, that Social Security is structured like a Ponzi scheme by definition. Sen Elizabeth Warren: Social Security Is Under Attack. Gutting It Is A Broken Promise "Rep Garcia does not know the definition of Ponzi scheme," Turner said. "Social Security is the ultimate Ponzi, demanding more and more people at the bottom pay in to fund the people at the top, expect our demographics have this now reversed. The system will default. Mr. Garcia nor I will likely never see a dime. That should worry him more than my social media feed." Turner told Fox News Digital that if Garcia's staff were to spend as much time trying to save Social Security as it did "combing through my social media" then "perhaps the Ponzi scheme can survive long enough for me to get a small percentage of what the government confiscated during my lifetime." Turner explained that his father had received a "paltry percentage" of what he paid into the program and the the government "kept the rest" when his father died. "That's not just a Ponzi scheme, it's government greed and politicians running a money-laundering operation to get reelected. No one should be compelled to pay into a failed system, yet in a free America, you don't have that choice." In addition to Turner and Elon Musk suggesting that Social Security is by definition set up like a Ponzi scheme, Fox News Digital previously spoke to James Agresti, president of the nonprofit research institute Just Facts, who said the characterization has "validity." 'Failure's Not An Option': Trump Budget Bill Will Be 'Big' Help For Seniors, Top House Tax-writer Says "A Ponzi scheme operates by taking money from new investors to pay current investors," Agresti said. "That's the definition given by the SEC, and contrary to popular belief, that's exactly how Social Security operates." Agresti explained to Fox News Digital that Social Security, a program mired for decades with concerns about waste, fraud, and improper payments, "doesn't take our money and save it for us, as many people believe, and then give it to us when we're older" like many Americans might believe. "What it does is, it transfers money when we are young and working and paying into Social Security taxes," Agresti said. "That money, the vast bulk of it, goes immediately out the door to people who are currently receiving benefits. Now, there is a trust fund, but in 90 years of operation, that trust fund currently has enough money to fund two years of program operations." The trust fund only being able to last for two years is not a result of the fund being "looted," Agresti explained, but rather it was put in place to "put surpluses in it" from money that Social Security collects in taxes that it doesn't pay out immediately and pays interest on. "The interest that's been paid on that has been higher than the rate of inflation," Agresti said. "So, the problem isn't that the trust fund has been looted. The problem is that Social Security operates like a Ponzi scheme." Democrats have vocally pushed back against efforts by Republicans and DOGE to reform Social Security or make cuts to what they say are examples of wasteful or improper spending from the department. "There's been a lot of misinformation about that as of late," Agresti told Fox News Digital. "You know, when DOGE came in and suggested that the Social Security Administration cut, I think it was about 10,000 workers, Democrats erupted that this is going to weaken Social Security. But the fact of the matter is that Social Security pays those workers who are for administrative overhead from the Social Security trust fund. So, by cutting out the money that they're paying them, you actually strengthen the program financially." Agresti told Fox News Digital that the current administrative overhead for Social Security is $6.7 billion per year, which is enough to pay more than 300,000 retirees the average old-age benefit. "Every single study shows social security going completely bankrupt in the next few years. Garcia and other democrats know the iceberg is ahead but rather than turn the ship, they are yelling at the iceberg about the senior citizens onboard," Turner said. "This Ponzi scheme is collapsing fast, and turning my tweets into posters is not going to stop it."Original article source: House witness flips script on Dem who ambushed him during hearing with unearthed tweet: 'Iceberg is ahead'
Gizmodo
11 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Trump's DOT Threatens to Pull Funding for California's High-Speed Rail
California's long-promised high-speed train project, first approved in 2008, has hit lots of roadblocks in its development process, and now it may be looking at the end of the road. The Trump administration's Department of Transportation released a report this week that does not paint a pretty picture of the project, and DOT head Sean Duffy has given California just over a month to respond to concerns or face having $4 billion in government funding rescinded, according to Reuters. The threat to cut off California follows a 315-page report published by the Federal Railroad Administration that claims California has missed several deadlines related to the high-speed rail and has failed to identify how it will secure $7 billion in funding to build a segment of rail between Merced and Bakersfield, California, which it needs to secure by next summer in order for the project to move forward. The report concludes, in quite Trumpian language, that California 'conned the taxpayer out of its $4 billion investment, with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time.' The Department of Transportation gave California until mid-July to respond to the report, threatening to terminate federal contracts if it fails to sufficiently address concerns raised in the report. The California High-Speed Rail Authority called the report 'misguided,' according to a report from the Los Angeles Times, and said it will issue a formal response soon. 'We remain firmly committed to completing the nation's first true high-speed rail system connecting the major population centers in the state,' a spokesperson for the agency said. Trump has been on California's ass about the rail project basically since he returned to office. His administration launched a yet-to-be-completed review of a $3.1 billion federal grant to help fund construction back in February, and last month he singled out the project during a joint appearance with Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada, stating, 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' and 'This government is not going to pay.' The scrutiny from Trump and company isn't exactly a surprise to officials involved in the high-speed rail's buildout, as officials signaled earlier this year that there may be funding shortfalls from the federal government on the horizon. And while plenty of people are frustrated by how long the California rail project has taken to come together and how much it costs, the federal government really is not on the hook for that much of it. Per the LA Times, California has paid for 82% of the project, relying on federal grants for just 18% of funding. While California's high-speed rail has had plenty of issues—mostly inflicted by politics—the 'train to nowhere' label that it often gets hit with no longer matches the picture on the ground. More than 119 miles of rail have been laid between Merced and Bakersfield, and the project is close enough to completion that abandoning it at this point would be more wasteful than finishing it, especially with communities along the route expecting a potential economic boom once it is up and running. But good luck telling that to Trump (and Elon Musk who has opposed it from the beginning).
Politico
13 hours ago
- Politico
How Musk's ‘soap opera' with Trump could dent his businesses — and upend federal policy
Elon Musk's rift with President Donald Trump is exposing his companies to all the perilous downsides of going to war with his former First Buddy. From SpaceX's role as a defense and space contractor to Starlink's hopes for billions in federal broadband subsidies and air traffic control contracts, Musk's businesses stood to reap potentially limitless gains from his 130 days as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief. Even after the world's richest man left the White House a week ago, acolytes from his Department of Government Efficiency remained in key positions at agencies that make decisions about his companies — including weighing how to handle safety problems at Tesla, alleged security violations involving X, Musk's potential ventures in cryptocurrency, or air pollution generated by his artificial intelligence agent Grok. Now those same arms of government — the vast, powerful federal bureaucracy that Trump has openly portrayed as a weapon to be wielded against his enemies — are potential threats to Musk's business empire. Already, fallout from the Musk-Trump feud has wiped billions of dollars off Tesla's stock, although it recovered somewhat Friday after the White House sent signals of a possible rapprochement. The drama could reshape myriad policy outcomes, including the futures of brain-chip technology or America's hopes of reaching Mars. 'This is quite the soap opera,' said Steve Sosnick, a Wall Street veteran who works as chief strategist for Interactive Brokers. 'A lot of people saw this as a potentially combustible relationship, but the speed and ferocity at which it combusted is really astounding.' Here are some of the potential implications for Musk's businesses as a once-mighty alliance between the two men at the peaks of wealth and political power devolves into an ugly divorce: Tesla is arguably the cornerstone of Musk's business interests, the company that helped electric cars go mainstream in the U.S. and has visions of dominating the future of self-driving taxis. But much of its fate is in the hands of regulators at the Transportation, Treasury and Commerce departments. Before Trump's second term started, DOT's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration had opened probes targeting significant concerns with Tesla's design, mostly involving its suite of auto-throttle and lane-keeping technologies that the company erroneously names 'Autopilot' or 'Full Self Driving.' The agency investigates safety issues with automakers and can issue recalls for cars that suffer defects — and while Tesla had been poised for a potentially easier ride with Musk in Trump's good graces, that dynamic could now flip. Musk is also keenly interested in autonomous vehicle technology and has a significant stake in seeing it more widely adopted. Early moves by DOT had appeared aligned with Musk's interests, including requiring less self-reporting for some crashes involving driverless cars. He also wants national standards for autonomous vehicles, rather than the state-by-state patchwork that exists now — a wish that Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has supported. But Congress has failed in the past to enact legislation to create a national standard, and Musk's barrage of attacks on GOP congressional leaders could make that already heavy legislative lift even harder to reach. Tesla also benefits from a suite of federal clean energy policies left over from the Biden era, including a $7,500 tax break for electric vehicle purchases, that Republicans are now pushing to abolish in the 'big beautiful bill' that triggered the flameout between Musk and Trump. (Musk has denied that his attacks on the bill are an attempt to salvage the tax credits — saying his complaint is the trillions of dollars that the bill would add to the national debt.) Tesla faces an additional threat from a Commerce Department proposal earlier this year to impose tariffs of up to 721 percent on battery ingredients from China. The GOP megabill also threatens to deliver a quick death to tax incentives that are crucial for Tesla's solar energy generation and storage division, whose annual revenues recently jumped 67 percent year-over-year to $10 billion. Tesla Energy has instead urged the Senate to support a 'sensible wind down' of those tax credits, arguing that ending them abruptly 'would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid.' — Chris Marquette and Kelsey Tamborrino Trump's most direct threat to punish Musk came in a Truth Social post Thursday, in which he mused about cutting billions of dollars in the megabillionaire's companies' U.S. government contracts. Calling it 'the easiest way to save money in our Budget,' Trump added that he 'was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' That threat could cut both ways. SpaceX alone has received at least $20.9 billion in government contracts over the past 18 years, largely from NASA and the Defense Department, according to public federal spending records. The majority of that funding was awarded within the last five years. But the government depends on Musk's companies as well, with the Pentagon relying on his rocket company, SpaceX, for rapid and low-cost launches. It is unlikely that its biggest competitors, including the joint Boeing and Lockheed Martin-backed venture ULA or the Jeff Bezos-led BlueOrigin, could make up the difference. NASA relies on SpaceX as the only American company able to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station, at least until Boeing works out problems with its Starliner. Musk, aware of that fact, greeted Trump's announcement with a counterpunch — tweeting that SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft 'immediately.' Musk later walked back that comment upon the advice of an account on X named 'Alaska.' If SpaceX did decommission Dragon, the U.S. would have to go back to hitching rides aboard Russian spacecraft — a potentially awkward arrangement as Trump pushes Russian President Vladimir Putin to resolve his war in Ukraine. The move would also imperil plans to launch commercial space stations under a NASA-funded program. In addition, SpaceX is key to NASA plans to return to the moon, with the company slated to provide a landing system for astronauts for a planned 2027 mission. SpaceX was also seen as a top contender to win contracts for Trump's proposed 'Golden Dome' defense system, which would rely on a constellation of satellites to track missile threats against the U.S. homeland. Musk's SpaceX has already landed federal contracts for seven upcoming space launches worth $845.8 million out of nine that the U.S. is set to conduct. Payload, a media outlet covering the space industry, estimated that SpaceX's revenue shot up by more than 50 percent to over $13 billion in 2024, with U.S. government launches and Starlink purchases helping to drive the increase. DOT could also create significant headaches for SpaceX, whose launches are licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration. SpaceX can't launch without an FAA permit, and under the Biden administration several of its launches were delayed or prohibited until the company fixed problems or passed environmental reviews. The FAA also slapped SpaceX with a $633,009 fine last year for separate launch violations, triggering Musk to call for its then-administrator Mike Whitaker to resign. Whitaker subsequently stepped down, effective the day Trump took office — years ahead of the end of his five-year term. — Jack Detsch, Joe Gould, Sam Skove, Oriana Pawlyk and Jessie Blaeser Starlink, SpaceX's satellite subsidiary, has been angling for a role in the FAA's promise to upgrade its beleaguered air traffic control system — one of the most criticized potential conflicts of interest between Musk's businesses and his former leading role in the Trump administration. And it's seeking billions of dollars in Biden-era broadband subsidies, a decision in the hands of the Commerce Department. Now all that is at risk. Musk has publicly promoted Starlink's satellite communications terminals as a solution for the FAA's communications technology problems, while criticizing Verizon's work on a $2.4 billion contract meant to upgrade the agency's telecom infrastructure from copper wires to fiber optics. (He later conceded that he had meant to criticize a different contractor.) Duffy more recently urged Congress to approve a massive improvement plan for the FAA that could, among other fixes, allow either fiber or satellite technology to replace the agency's telecommunications equipment. He said he was 'agnostic' about whether Musk's companies should be involved. Duffy also allowed SpaceX employees to visit an FAA air traffic control center in Virginia in February, and some SpaceX engineers took temporary jobs at the agency under an ethics arrangement that allowed them to take part in matters that could affect the company's financial interests. To date, however, the FAA has not disclosed any information about whether it intends to modify the Verizon contract or award any business to Starlink, beyond a handful of test sites that have been in progress since before Trump took office. At the same time, Starlink could reap enormous taxpayer subsidies from the federal buildout of fast internet access across the country as the Commerce Department overhauls its funding rules to allow a larger role for satellite companies. The changes in the $42.45 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program were expected to hand a bigger role — and much more money — to new technologies like satellite broadband. Musk's Starlink would likely be the big winner from that overhaul. Musk was also looking to Trump-appointed officials in Commerce and the Federal Communications Commission to make smaller rule changes that could have helped expand Starlink's business, such as freeing up wireless bandwidth for satellite service providers. — Oriana Pawlyk and John Hendel The Federal Trade Commission is in charge of enforcing a consent decree stemming from a 2011 settlement with Musk's social media company — then called Twitter and under different ownership — over data security violations. The order was updated in 2022 when the company had to pay a $150 million fine for violating the original deal, and it's set to keep X under FTC scrutiny until 2042. The order requires periodic audits of X's privacy and security practices, and violations could result in extending the consent decree order, as well as additional fines. It's been a thorn in Musk's side since he acquired the company. The FTC is also investigating whether advertising groups violated antitrust laws through coordinating boycotts against X — an investigation that could help Musk, if it turns up illegal collusion. Or regulators could drop or stall the probe amid the Musk-Trump feud. Meanwhile, the clash between Musk and Trump blew up just as the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday was granting Musk, a longtime critic of the agency, another six weeks to respond to a January lawsuit over his purchases of Twitter stock in 2022. The agency has alleged that Musk was 11 days late to publicly disclose he had acquired a major stake in the company — a gap that allowed him to buy up shares cheaply while investors lost out on more than $150 million. How Trump's SEC handles the case has already been a question mark to many former Wall Street regulators. — Alfred Ng and Declan Harty Musk's brain-implant company Neuralink has won some key federal approvals allowing it to test its technology, but it will ultimately need Food and Drug Administration clearance for its chip to reach the market. Neuralink said in May that the company had received a breakthrough designation from the FDA for its device, which aims to restore the ability to communicate in people with severe speech impediments caused by a variety of neurological conditions or paralysis. The designation gives the company quicker access to agency feedback while trying to expedite the review process. While FDA commissioners have historically shied away from interfering in product reviews, the agency head could call for conditions to be placed on any Neuralink clearance, such as postmarketing study requirements. Commissioner Marty Makary recently unveiled a framework for approving updated Covid vaccines that sets study expectations for manufacturers who want to get their shots approved for young, healthy people. The agency green-lit the company's first clinical trial in humans in 2023. — Lauren Gardner The Trump-Musk breakup comes as Congress is considering legislation that would regulate cryptocurrencies. Musk — a longtime fan of the industry and particularly the token Dogecoin — isn't explicitly in the crypto business. But his social media company's plan to launch an 'X money' platform with Visa has sparked concerns among some lawmakers that he or another big technology firm could seek to issue a digital currency known as a stablecoin that is pegged to the value of the dollar. Lawmakers could include language in crypto legislation that would limit tech firms' ability to use stablecoins to get into financial services. That would allay fears from Democrats about digital currencies breaking down historic barriers between banking and commerce firms — but it would deliver a blow to Musk. What's more, X's payments company is poised to operate as a money transmitter business that is regulated by the Treasury Department. The company has already obtained licenses in several dozen states and has registered with Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. — Jasper Goodman and Michael Stratford Trump's environmental regulators also have the power to obstruct one of Musk's highest-profile initiatives — his artificial intelligence company, xAI. The Memphis, Tennessee-based supercomputer behind Musk's chatbot, Grok, has a voracious appetite for electricity, and has been powered in part by natural gas turbines operating without Clean Air Act permits since June 2024. The Environmental Protection Agency has so far declined to take any action against the sprawling supercomputer facility for the huge amounts of smog-forming air pollution it's releasing. Theoretically, though, it could order xAI to shut the unpermitted turbines down. If that happens, Grok would be forced to operate on just 150 megawatts of power that xAI receives from the local electric grid — a fraction of what it needs. Musk has underscored the importance of the turbines to his operations, saying at the launch of Grok3 in February that the bot was powered by 'trailer after trailer of generators.' xAI was valued at $80 billion in March when it bought Musk's social media site X. xAI is now seeking a Clean Air Act permit for 15 of the turbines. The decision technically lies with the Shelby County Health Department, but the department has requested assistance from EPA, which is reviewing the issue. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin met with xAI representatives at the end of May. — Ariel Wittenberg
