GLOBAL INDIGENOUS: Waorani people fight for their rights in Ecuador
Deusdedit RuhangariyoSpecial to ICT
Around the world: The Waorani people demand the right to decide their future in Ecuador, Indigenous communities in Taiwan battle a new digital threat, an Indigenous river defender in Peru wins the prestigious Goldman prize, Indigenous students in Australia get an inside look at the aviation industry, and a UNESCO report calls for support and funding for Indigenous media.ECUADOR: Waorani continue fight to stop oil extractionIn the heart of Ecuador's Amazon rainforest, the Waorani people are standing firm against a government-backed auction of oil rights on their ancestral lands in a fight that could change the way Indigenous people are consulted around the world, Inside Climate News reported on April 27.SUPPORT INDIGENOUS JOURNALISM..The Ecuadorian government opened the auction of oil rights worth an estimated $700 million after a brief meeting with members of the Indigenous Waorani village of Kiwaro. They arrived by helicopter, spoke in Spanish and not the Waotetero language, made no effort to work the Waorani's pikenani, or tribal leaders, and offered no real explanation of the impact or oil extraction on the land.+The Waorani fought back, however, and in 2019 16 communities and a provincial sued multiple federal ministries, arguing that their right to free, prior, and informed consultation (FPIC) had been violated.FPIC, rooted in international law and Ecuador's constitution, requires Indigenous communities be consulted before decisions affecting them are made. The underlying legal issue, however, is whether actual consent is required before the project can move forward, Inside Climate News reported.'If you don't have community support, you pay a price for it,' said Pierre Gratton of the Mining Association of Canada, citing conflicts that arise without proper engagement, according to Inside Climate News.The Waorani achieved a major legal victory in 2019, when a provincial court ruled their FPIC rights had been violated. The case is now under review by Ecuador's Constitutional Court, which aims to clarify national consultation laws. Meanwhile, new oil auctions threaten to impact many of the same communities again.'We do not want extractivism,' Waorani leader Luis Enqueri told Inside Climate News. 'We are fighting for the Constitutional Court to say that we alone have the right to decide what happens in our land.'
TAIWAN: Indigenous communities battle misinformationIn the age of artificial intelligence, Taiwan's Indigenous communities are facing an unsettling new threat, one that distorts, erases, and reimagines their cultures through the power of digital misinformation, East Asia Forum reported on April 25.While Indigenous peoples have long battled marginalization, AI-generated content is now amplifying old injustices in faster and more insidious ways to sow mistrust and deepen political divides, East Asia Forum reported.They include a viral post – since debunked by fact-checkers – claiming that Plains Indigenous soldiers had sided with Japan during Taiwan's 228 Incident in 1947. Or a video that appeared to show the Taiwanese government firebombing an Indigenous community but instead showed footage from the Solomon Islands riots of 2021.Even positive-sounding stories can be dangerous when misrepresented. One widely shared video celebrated a Taiwanese Indigenous tap dance troupe set for a global tour — but the troupe featured instead the Hani people of China's Yunnan province, blurring cultural boundaries and eroding the distinctiveness of Taiwan's Indigenous heritage.Around the world, Indigenous communities are raising similar alarms about algorithmic bias and digital colonialism. In Taiwan, speech recognition systems routinely misclassify Indigenous languages as errors, further silencing them online.But AI isn't only a threat — if handled differently, it could become a tool for revival, East Asia Forum reported. In New Zealand, Māori broadcasters teamed up with NVIDIA to build a speech model that accurately transcribes te reo Māori, showing what's possible when Indigenous groups lead the design process themselves.East Asia Forum concludes that with inclusive frameworks, ethical data practices, and Indigenous-led innovation, AI could become become a tool of cultural resurgence rather than erasure.
PERU: Indigenous river defender wins prestigious Goldman prizeAn Indigenous activist and women's leader from Peru's Amazon has won the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize after spearheading a legal battle that secured legal personhood for the river her Kukama people call home, The Guardian reported on April 21.Mari Luz Canaquiri Murayari, 57, an Indigenous leader from Shapajila village along the Marañón River, led a historic fight for her people and the environment. As head of the Huaynakana Kamatahuara Kana women's association and with support from Peru's Legal Defence Institute, Canaquiri spearheaded a legal campaign to protect the Marañon.After three years, judges in Loreto – Peru's largest Amazonian region – ruled in March 2024 that the river must be recognized as a living entity with the right to remain free-flowing and uncontaminated.The court in Iquitos found that the Peruvian government had violated the river's inherent rights and ordered immediate action to prevent future oil spills. It also mandated the creation of a protection plan for the river basin and formally recognized the Kukama community as the river's stewards. Although the government appealed, the ruling was upheld in October 2024 — a landmark victory not just for the Kukama, but for Indigenous rights across Peru.'She is the mother of rivers,' Canaquiri said of the Marañon, according to the Guardian. 'She is born in the Andes and becomes the Amazon River.'In Kukama belief, the river is sacred, home to spirits like Puragua, a giant boa that embodies its health and spirit. Yet for more than four decades, the Kukama have suffered the devastation of oil spills — killing fish, poisoning water, and damaging the ecosystem.Despite the legal victory, however, the river remains under threat, The Guardian reported. The fight is now complicated by a newly passed "anti-NGO" law, which prevents civil society organizations from taking legal action or offering legal counsel in cases against the state.For Canaquiri, the struggle is for future generations.'The government must stop killing nature and start protecting it,' she said. 'Otherwise, what hope will our children have?'
AUSTRALIA: Indigenous students get inside look at aviation industryIndigenous students interested in careers in aviation were given a special firsthand look inside an operational aviation facility when they visited the Royal Flying Doctor Service base in Townsville, Australia, National Indigenous Times reported on April 24.As part of the Raising Horizons pilot program, an initiative led by Gunggandji Aerospace, students from NRL Cowboys House were given rare access to one of Australia's most critical aviation services.Daniel Joinbee, director of Gunggandji Aerospace, said the goal of Raising Horizons is simple but powerful: to show First Nations youth that "aviation is within their reach.""Through Raising Horizons, we're giving First Nations youth real exposure to the industry, connecting them with role models, and showing them the pathways to get there," he said, according to National Indigenous Times.For many students, it was their first time inside an operational facility, given them a chance to see the range of roles that keep the RFDS running — from piloting and nursing to engineering and maintenance. They toured a modified RFDS aircraft used for emergency and remote operations and explored the hangar's cutting-edge technology.Daniel Joinbee, director of Gunggandji Aerospace, said the goal of Raising Horizons is simple but powerful: to show First Nations youth that "aviation is within their reach.""Through Raising Horizons, we're giving First Nations youth real exposure to the industry, connecting them with role models, and showing them the pathways to get there," he said, according to National Indigenous Times.Gunggandji Aerospace is Australia's first and only 100 percent Aboriginal-owned aviation company. Joinbee emphasized that the students represent the future of aviation."These students are our future pilots, engineers, and aviation leaders," he said, according to National Indigenous Times. "This pilot program is just the beginning."
UNITED NATIONS: Report calls for support, funding for Indigenous mediaShane Taurima – Kaihautū of Whakaata Māori and chair of the World Indigenous Broadcasting Network – returned to the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues as UNESCO unveiled a landmark global report calling for support and resources for Indigenous media, Te Ao Maori News reported on April 26.+Taurima last participated at UNPFII two years ago, when the forum officially recognized the vital role Indigenous media play in upholding Indigenous rights and called for a comprehensive global study.That study has now been completed and was formally released, concluding that Indigenous media face severe underfunding and limited access to essential resources.Taurima reflected on the findings by speaking from New York with Whakaata Māori journalist Te Aniwaniwa Paterson, who joined a collective of Indigenous reporters covering the forum. ICT was part of the collaboration, organized by Grist.The UNESCO report found that 73 percent of Indigenous media organizations cite lack of funding as a major hurdle, while 51 percent struggle with the high costs of media equipment. Even more troubling, 19 percent report having no internet access at all.'[Indigenous media] is essential and it's impactful, but it's unfortunately under-resourced, under-funded and often overlooked from a policy perspective and excluded structurally,' Taurima said, according to Te Ao Māori News.The report's findings hit close to home. Last year, it was announced that Whakaata Māori would see a $9.5 million funding cut over three years, a 20 percent reduction in its operating budget.Taurima welcomed the report's recommendations, however, which include strengthening legal and institutional protections for Indigenous media, revising outdated media laws to be more inclusive, and upholding Indigenous peoples' rights to freedom of expression and access to communication platforms.
My final thoughtsMy final thoughts are in Ecuador, where the story of the Waorani people is one that grabs me deep in the chest. It's not just another land dispute or a courtroom battle, it's a fight for dignity, for life itself. When the Waorani say, 'We do not want extractivism,' they're speaking not just for themselves, but for all of us who depend on forests, clean water, and a livable planet.They aren't resisting progress; they are protecting something far more precious: a way of life rooted in respect for the Earth. Their courage, standing up to powerful forces with truth and unity, is nothing short of heroic.I can't help but feel a surge of hope when I think about the Waorani's 2019 victory. Against all odds, they won, a testament to what persistence and collective strength can achieve. It's inspiring to see the Constitutional Court take their case seriously now, knowing that a strong ruling could set a new standard for Indigenous rights across Ecuador.They fought not just for land, but for their right to be heard, to decide, to thrive. Their fight reminds us that real change often begins with the voices that are hardest to silence.But it's painful and frankly infuriating to see how the government continues to push ahead with new oil auctions. It's as if court rulings, Indigenous rights, and international law mean nothing when weighed against short-term profit.When officials offer promises of development while communities still lack clean water and basic services, that's not negotiation, it's coercion. It's colonialism, repackaged for the 21st century. And unless something shifts, we are repeating the same brutal patterns that have devastated Indigenous communities for generations.The only way forward is real respect, not just in words, but in action. Ecuador must finally recognize the right of Indigenous peoples to say "no," without fear or manipulation. Land titles must be secured, services provided, and consultations done in ways that honor Indigenous ways of decision-making, not undermine them.The world should be watching, because what happens to the Waorani is a mirror of what's happening everywhere. Their stand is not just for their river, their forest, their future, it's for the future of all of us who believe the Earth is not for sale.The Waorani are not just protecting a forest, they are protecting the heartbeat of life itself.
Our stories are worth telling. Our stories are worth sharing. Our stories are worth your support. Contribute $5 or $10 today to help ICT carry out its critical mission. Sign up for ICT's free newsletter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
To Protect Amazon from Drug Traffickers, Title Indigenous Lands, Report Says
Drug traffickers are violently seizing Indigenous lands in the Peruvian Amazon to clear rainforest and grow coca. To combat the drug trade, a new report calls for titling Indigenous territories along major trafficking routes. Since 2020, 27 Indigenous leaders in Peru have been assassinated, it is believed, for defending their land, including more than a dozen who were murdered in connection to drug trafficking, according to a new report published by Amazon Watch. 'We, the Indigenous defenders, face threats from drug traffickers when we speak out,' said Marcelo Odicio, an Indigenous Kakataibo leader. 'We are calling for real change in how this crisis is addressed.' Drug traffickers are able to seize land through organized invasions and cement their holdings with fraudulent contracts. More than 270 Indigenous communities in the Peruvian Amazon are at risk of being attacked and uprooted by drug traffickers, the report said. To protect native lands and stem the loss of forest, it called for titling Indigenous territories. Until recently, the U.S. Agency for International Development had been supporting Indigenous groups in Peru in combating deforestation related to the production of cocaine. But the recent dismantling of the agency, under President Donald Trump, has threatened to reinvigorate the drug trade, the Associated Press reports. U.S. Aid Cuts Are Hitting Global Conservation Projects Hard
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oklahoma lawmakers didn't think we deserved to know their plans as session ended, and they did a lot
Representatives Josh West, R-Grove, left, Steve Bashore, R-Miami, and John Pfeiffer, R-Orlando, watch the vote returns on a veto override vote during the House session on May 29. (Photo by Janelle Stecklein/Oklahoma Voice) Oklahoma's lawmakers are supposed to be accountable to the people who elected them, but our legislators conveniently forgot that last month in their frenetic scramble to reach the finish line. Lawmakers spent the final night of the annual legislative session chugging cups of coffee and scarfing down pizza as they cast dozens upon dozens of consequential votes while most of their constituents slept. When Oklahomans awoke the morning of May 30, they suddenly found themselves with nearly four dozen new laws ramrodded through the Legislature in the dead of night. Meanwhile, the head of a state agency woke up unemployed after legislators suddenly decided to fire her just before the stroke of midnight. It's not necessarily problematic that lawmakers cast votes at night: That happens many years because they procrastinate or are otherwise disorganized. What was extremely concerning this time was that they entered — and exited — the penultimate day without a full public agenda posted. If their sparse public agenda was to be believed, the state House of Representatives and Senate had no plans to take up any veto overrides or even the state's mental health commissioner. The reality was starkly different. It turns out our elected officials, who we pay to operate in the public, strode into session, secretly planning to override Gov. Kevin Sittt's vetoes on a wide range of topics ranging from mammogram screenings to food truck fire safety to investigations of missing and murdered Indigenous women. But they apparently didn't think the public was entitled to know those plans. It wasn't until they actually started voting that the public got an inkling that something was afoot. How is that good governing? Do our lawmakers think they know so much better than their constituents that they don't believe the people they represent should be able to weigh in on significant issues? Or is it just that they think the only voices that matter are the lobbyists gathered around the chamber television screens watching the shenanigans play out in real time? Is it any wonder that Stitt posted a video on social media frustrated with all the last-minute maneuvering and telling voters to watch closely? Because make no mistake, these were consequential votes. A successful override of the governor's veto meant these measures became law. And there were some great veto overrides like increasing women's access to mammogram screenings and focusing resources to help tackle the state's Missing Murdered and Indigenous People crisis. But there were some headscratchers. One such veto override saw lawmakers waste nearly five hours deadlocked on a strange bill that changed the leadership requirements to become the Oklahoma National Guard's top leader. Stitt said later it creates a new pension system, will cost taxpayers' a lot of money and that lawmakers didn't know what they were voting on. I'm still not 100% certain what exactly the bill does, but critics of the measure grumbled under their breath that the changes would benefit a seated lawmaker, and that the House leaders wouldn't allow any more critical veto overrides — like mammogram screenings — to move forward until that one happened. The Legislature decided Allie Friesen, the mental health commissioner, needed to go with all the chaos surrounding her agency's budgetary disarray, cut and canceled contracts and the need for tens of millions of dollars just to make payroll. Lawmakers were so disillusioned with her leadership in the final days that they essentially stripped her of her power to directly implement a landmark mental health settlement that involves providing competency restoration services for indigent defendants. Stitt, who opposed the firing, said Friesen disturbed 'the status quo and questioned long held practices at the agency.' He also criticized Sen. Paul Rosino, R-Oklahoma City, and Rep. Josh West, R-Grove, who ran the measure, questioning what they stand to gain, what they were trying to keep covered up, if they have conflicts of interest, and if Rosino was 'trying to help his wife avoid responsibility for her role in the finance department there.' Rosino admitted during questioning on the Senate floor that his wife works as a part-time employee at the agency. She was apparently working there even while her husband was helping lead investigatory hearings into the agency's operations and sought Friesen's firing. Stitt later apologized for bringing Rosino's wife into the conversation. We've entrusted our lawmakers with an enormous amount of power. They're pretty much the only governmental entity in the entire state that is not subject to the Open Meeting and Open Records Act. They have internal rules that govern their behavior, but it's not uncommon to watch them waive those at a moment's notice when they deem it convenient. That means legislators basically do whatever they want, when they want and how they want. The public can't look at their correspondence to determine what's happening behind the scenes that could influence their decision-making. Even the Governor's Office has to comply with both laws. Given lawmakers' secretive behavior, I think it begs the question, do they continue to deserve this level of trust? Lawmakers, how would you answer this question? SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
L'nuey and Parks Canada seek board members to co-manage protected lands, historic sites
The First Nations group L'nuey and Parks Canada are looking for board members to help co-manage P.E.I.'s protected lands and historic sites, taking the next step on an agreement they have spent years crafting. "The agreements were signed and negotiated over many years. I believe the negotiations started even way back in the early 2000s," said Geraldine Arsenault, the field unit superintendant for Parks Canada on Prince Edward Island. "These agreements for both the new national park reserve and for the Toquktmekl agreement, these agreements were both signed at different moments in 2024." The new boards will consist of five members, including two selected by L'nuey and two chosen by Parks Canada. The fifth, who will chair, will be appointed by the board members. "Now we're at the phase of implementation of these agreements, and the first part of that implementation is to form the boards themselves, so that they can advise on the governance of these places," said Arsenault. The boards will oversee places like Pituamkek National Park Reserve off P.E.I.'s North Shore and national historic sites such as Province House in Charlottetown, Cavendish-North Rustico and the working inn at Dalvay-by-the-Sea. Jenene Wooldridge is the executive director of L'nuey, an organization focused on Indigenous rights for the Mi'kmaq community on P.E.I. "We advance and protect Mi'kmaq rights, and we focus on the areas of governance development, all negotiations and consultations for the Mi'kmaq," she said. "L'nuey is proud to be able to support the Mi'kmaq leadership over the past number of years. They have been steadfast in making sure that these agreements come to fruition and that we are able to now get into the implementation phase." Bringing Indigenous perspectives Arsenault said reconciliation has been very important for Parks Canada. "We've been working for a very long time with the Mi'kmaq of Prince Edward Island to really bring in the Mi'kmaw perspective to how we manage our national historic sites and our national park," she said. "And now with the new national park reserve Pituamkek, it really brings a piece of Mi'kmaw traditional lands into the family, if you will, of protected sites." Wooldridge said the boards will have different priorities. "Pituamkek is a brand-new national park reserve, so it's really building it from the ground up. It's going to be looking at what the potential visitor experience could look like, where are their protected sites, that wouldn't be so good for visitors or lots of people being around," she said. "Also access will be a discussion, I'm sure, for those co-management boards, so it's really more of the operational discussions that will be happening, building from the ground up for Pituamkek." Wooldridge said that the other board will look at existing national historic sites and the national park. She said they hope to have these board positions filled by the fall. "The recruitment is open now, and we encourage Mi'kmaw community members who have interest or expertise in culture, governance, environment, you know, community engagement, to put their names forward because all of those perspectives matter." She said non-Indigenouse Islanders are also welcome to put their name forward if they have experience in those areas.