Obama's former press secretary recalls ‘emotional' mood in White House after Trump win
Speaking at the 2025 National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ) conference in Chicago, Josh Earnest said it was grueling for the Obama administration to realize it would have to follow through on promises of a peaceful transfer of power despite spending the 2016 election cycle offering dire warnings 'about what could or would happen if Donald Trump were given the keys to the Oval Office'.
Those warnings stemmed in part from intelligence assessments that the US's longtime geopolitical adversary Russia had interfered in the race in which Trump defeated former secretary of state Hillary Clinton. Earnest said the Obama administration suddenly found itself needing to defend the validity of those assessments while saying it would peacefully transfer over the nuclear launch codes – and other levers of power – to Trump.
'Did [Obama] not mean how dangerous [Trump] could be?' Earnest asked rhetorically, referring to some of the questions he and fellow administration officials faced while briefing journalists at the time. 'It was a tough message.'
The remarks on Wednesday from Earnest – who was Obama's press secretary from 2014 to 2017 – also offered a first-hand peek into the somber mood at the White House after Trump defeated Clinton. Like many, Earnest 'was very surprised'. 'I did not think he was going to win,' he said.
Many Obama communications staffers were visibly demoralized, and Earnest said he and his aides decided to convene them, talk about Trump's victory and try to refocus them for the final two months in office.
During that conversation, Obama summoned Earnest to go over the logistics of a nationally televised speech he was planning to give in the White House's Rose Garden. Earnest recalled Obama asking how it was going with the staff that morning – to which he replied that they were 'emotional'.
Obama then asked an assistant to call the staff into the Oval Office. He stood in front of the Resolute Desk near his vice-president, Joe Biden, who would later succeed Trump in the White House – and gave them an early version of the speech he ultimately delivered that day.
'We have to remember that we're actually all on one team,' part of that speech read. 'We are Americans first. We're patriots first. We all want what's best for this country.'
As Earnest noted, Obama's official White House photographer, Pete Souza, captured the scene with his camera. He recalled how it was the first time many people in the room that day had been in the Oval Office.
'It was very poignant,' Earnest told the chat's host, the ABC7 Chicago news anchor Tanja Babich.
One of Earnest's most vocal critics in the aftermath of Trump's victory was the president-elect himself. Trump called Earnest a 'foolish guy' at a December 2016 rally.
'He is so bad – the way he delivers a message,' Trump said of Earnest after the latter defended the US intelligence community's assessment of Russia's interference.
Earnest has been a top spokesperson for United Airlines at the company's Chicago headquarters since 2018. He spent some time being a media pundit early during the first of Trump's two presidencies. But Earnest told Babich he did not find it 'particularly fulfilling' given the way Trump's unpredictable, chaotic style of governing can often disorient news outlets.
'The questions could all be boiled down to, 'Isn't this outrageous what Trump is doing?' Earnest said. 'And it became about finding different ways to say, 'Yes.'
'I wasn't doing journalism. I was doing commentary. And it was pretty close to entertainment.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump WON'T get honour of addressing Parliament during State Visit, Lord Mandelson suggests as he heaps praise on 'phenomenal' president
Donald Trump will not address both Houses of Parliament on his looming State Visit, Lord Mandelson has suggested. The UK ambassador to the US appeared to confirm speculation that the president's trip will happen in September when Westminster is not sitting. That would reduce the potential for protests, but also deprive Mr Trump of an honour that was granted to Emmanuel Macron last week. Keir Starmer dramatically extended the official invitation from the King as he wooed Mr Trump at the White House in February. It will be the first time a US President has been granted the honour of a second state visit. Mr Trump's first was in 2019. However, there has been a backlash from some left-wing MPs who launched a campaign to block him from addressing Parliament. In an interview with the Sunday Times, Lord Mandelson lavished praise on Mr Trump. The peer said Mr Trump was a 'phenomenon' who 'dominated' Washington and would be 'one of the most consequential presidents in American history'. Lord Mandelson said of the State Visit: 'He should expect a warm reception because he really does love Britain. He hugely admires it. 'He trusts Keir Starmer. It's not a question of expressing our gratitude. My lodestar here is to demonstrate respect, not sycophancy. I don't think the administration has any problem with that.' Reminded that Labour left-wingers have started a petition against Mr Trump addressing both Houses of Parliament, the peer said: 'Well there's a surprise... But I had assumed that at the time of the visit Parliament won't be sitting.' The Commons is due to sit at the beginning of September, but then break again from the 16th while party conferences are held. Mr Trump is expected to visit Scotland before then to tour golf courses, with rumours he will meet up with Sir Keir. Lord Mandelson said Mr Trump is a 'more nuanced figure than people appreciate'. 'Look, he's not only a unique politician - he's also going to be one of the most consequential presidents in American history,' the ambassador said. 'He has this sense of history, this grasp of power which I think perhaps recent inhabitants of the White House haven't quite seen. He is not a man for endless seminars and thinking. 'He's not a victim of analysis paralysis. He has a very quick, easy way of grasping the core points about an issue. And let's be honest: more often than not, there's a kernel of truth in everything he says.' Lord Mandelson joked that the MAGA crowd in Washington 'regard me as a slightly exotic target of their fascination'. He said a turning point in his job was when Mr Trump described him as 'handsome' during Sir Keir's visit to the White House. 'I've never been in a town or a political system that is so dominated by one individual,' he said. 'Usually, you're entering an ecosystem rather than the world of one personality. But he is a phenomenon. A unique politician.' Lord Mandelson suggested he does not believe Nigel Farage will become PM as he recounted a recent conversation with US vice president JD Vance. 'I explained to the vice-president that, yes, highly effective populists and political actors like Farage can take advantage,' the New Labour architect said. 'At the end of the day, at the election people will be choosing their future government - not having a fling, expressing a protest or demonstrating their impatience. 'And in that sense, I said, perhaps Nigel is peaking too soon.' Lord Mandelson compared the political situations in the UK and US as he tried to explain why the Labour government has been struggling to make headway. He said: 'The mandates that both President Trump and Keir Starmer won at their elections last year came from the same sense of anger that many voters have. 'That they've been overlooked: the system was not delivering for them, that they were being taken for granted. 'But what's different about Britain is that we seem to have been travelling through a long, dark tunnel for ten years, with no signs of light or hope. 'It has seemed one thing after another. And I feel people are emerging from that tunnel, almost blinking into the daylight.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Kash Patel denies rumors he's quitting the FBI over DoJ ruling on Epstein files
FBI director Kash Patel has denied swirling resignation rumors over reported unhappiness at a justice department decision to close the book on Jeffrey Epstein after administration officials teased a big reveal earlier in the year. In a Saturday social media post, the agency director said: 'the conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been. It's an honor to serve the President of the United States – and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me.' Over the past week, Maga hardliners, including Georgia representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, former White House adviser Steve Bannon and – reportedly – FBI deputy director Dan Bongino, have been strongly critical of a joint decision by US attorney general Pam Bondi and the FBI to not release further information about Epstein held in government files, including a so-called client list. Critics have slammed the FBI-justice department conclusion about Epstein's official autopsy that the disgraced financier had hung himself in his cell. Many have refused to accept that, repeating a conspiracy theory that Epstein, who died in August 2019 while awaiting trial, was in fact murdered to silence him. 'This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list',' the memo stated. 'There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.' Rumors of a rift between the FBI and the justice department over the memo have been denied by deputy attorney general Todd Blanche, who wrote on social media that there is 'no daylight' between the FBI and the Department of Justice leadership on the issue. 'I worked closely with [Kash and Bongino] on the joint FBI and DOJ memo regarding the Epstein Files. All of us signed off on the contents of the memo and the conclusions stated in the memo. The suggestion by anyone that there was any daylight between the FBI and DOJ leadership on this memo's composition and release is patently false,' Blanche said. But on Friday, NBC News reported that Bongino is considering stepping down from his post at the FBI after a 'heated confrontation' with Bondi over the issue. 'Bongino is out-of-control furious,' the person who has spoken with the deputy FBI director said. 'This destroyed his career. He's threatening to quit and torch Pam unless she's fired.' Donald Trump has also grown testy with repeated questions about Epstein, who was once a neighbor in Palm Beach. He erupted on Tuesday when he was pressed on an apparent one-minute gap in a 10-hour video recorded outside of Epstein's cell. 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?' he said. 'This guy's been talked about for years … Are people still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable.' Bondi has since explained that the missing minute of surveillance film was simply the recording equipment resetting itself, as it does every night. Still, it is not clear that Maga hardliners are willing to let the Epstein conspiracy theories go – they have provided a constant stream of material that supposedly supports their theories of a deep state. But no evidence has emerged that Epstein was engaged in a conspiracy to blackmail high-profile visitors, including Britain's Prince Andrew, to his homes in New York, Florida, New Mexico and the US Virgin Islands. The FBI-DoJ memo stated that it had uncovered 'a significant amount of material', including more than 300GB of data and physical evidence that included 'a large volume of images of Epstein, images and videos of victims who are either minors or appear to be minors, and over ten thousand downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography'. 'Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials and will not permit the release of child pornography,' the memo said.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
One in four Trump supporters has concerns about tariff policy
A recent poll reveals that many of Donald Trump 's voters have reservations about his tariff policies, especially those targeting China. Only half of Trump voters surveyed believe that his tariffs on China will ultimately benefit US companies. Roughly one in four Trump voters expressed concerns that the tariffs are damaging the US's ability to negotiate trade agreements with other nations. Trump's supporters are nearly evenly split on whether he should require Congressional approval to impose tariffs or if he should possess the sole authority. While 46 per cent of Trump voters support tariffs on China even if they lead to higher domestic prices, a quarter of them also think these tariffs are detrimental to US companies.
