logo
Largest German union drops four-day week demands amid economic slump

Largest German union drops four-day week demands amid economic slump

Yahoo27-05-2025

Germany's largest trade union is dropping demands for a four-day week due to the country's economic struggles.
"A four-day week with full wages is not currently on the union's list of demands," said Christiane Benner, chairwoman of IG Metall, on Tuesday.
Benner told the Bild tabloid that the policy remains sensible.
However, due to Germany's languishing economy, workers are currently facing a reduction in working hours due to employers' cost-cutting measures, she argued.
Many German businesses oppose proposals to introduce a four-day week with full pay.
In a March survey by the pro-business German Economic Institute, 94% of 823 companies survey said the move would hurt value creation.
In addition, almost 70% said they believed that work would go undone and that Germany would be left behind compared to international competitors.
IG Metall has emphasized that German companies must take responsibility to ensure their business models are viable in the future, to invest and to secure jobs.
"We recognize the seriousness of the situation. But we also see that many companies lack strategies for the future and are not making the necessary investments," Benner said.
Germany's economy - Europe's largest - has been in recession for two consecutive years, and experts expect the struggles to continue in 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

German minister notes 'harsh tone' in US ahead of Merz-Trump meeting
German minister notes 'harsh tone' in US ahead of Merz-Trump meeting

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

German minister notes 'harsh tone' in US ahead of Merz-Trump meeting

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul has called for the preservation of the well-established US-German relations ahead of Chancellor Friedrich Merz's meeting with US President Donald Trump. "Yes, the tone hasn't been as harsh as this for a long time," Wadephul said in the evening at a meeting of former Arthur F Burns Fellowship scholars in Berlin. He diagnosed "profound changes in the US itself with an unknown outcome" and a new style of interaction following the Trump administration's inauguration, "which is unsettling and also disconcerting." However, the conservative politician stressed that one must "not panic." "Instead, we must endure this storm phase by first focusing on our own interests." This also means that Germany must strengthen its defence capabilities, safeguard its trade interests, and "articulate [its] understanding of freedom of expression and academic freedom." Wadephul, who visited the US capital Washington last week, assessed the talks with his US counterpart Marco Rubio as a positive signal: "They have made me confident that we can reach agreements in mutual interest even on issues where we have differences of opinion." Difficult talks for Merz Merz is travelling to the United States on Wednesday and is due to speak with Trump at the White House on Thursday. During the election campaign, the chancellor sharply criticized the US government's interference in German domestic politics. Currently, Trump's threat of permanently high tariffs on EU goods is also straining the relationship. With regard to the Ukraine war, Merz, along with other European leaders, is striving for a common stance with the US towards Russia. There is anticipation as to whether Merz will have to contend with a similarly unfriendly reception at the White House as, for example, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Wadephul stresses US support Wadephul emphasized that the US had repeatedly supported Germany after liberation from Nazi rule during reconstruction and also during reunification. "We should and will never forget that." The Arthur F Burns Fellowship is a trans-Atlantic exchange programme for journalists, named after a former US Federal Reserve chairman and ambassador to Germany.

Madeleine McCann investigators remove ‘evidence' from abandoned houses
Madeleine McCann investigators remove ‘evidence' from abandoned houses

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Madeleine McCann investigators remove ‘evidence' from abandoned houses

Detectives investigating the disappearance of Madeleine McCann have taken samples of potential evidence from abandoned houses near where she went missing 18 years ago. A squad of half a dozen German and Portuguese police officers and firefighters used chainsaws, hedge trimmers and pickaxes to clear thick foliage and access several crumbling ruins near Praia Da Luz in the Algarve on Tuesday morning. The officers removed mounds of earth and deposited them in plastic containers, which will be taken away for further examination. Close by, two blue supply tents had been set up to store equipment, including a ground-penetrating radar device. At one derelict sand-coloured house, approximately 300 metres from the coastline, a group of four firemen and one police officer pumped a disused well dry. The full crew of around two dozen police officers, firefighters and detectives undertook the eight-hour search from 9am. They were joined by a pair of plain-clothed detectives. The search is expected to last for three more days and will encompass more than 20 privately owned plots of land to the east of the coastal town where the three-year-old went missing while on holiday with her parents on May 3 2007. It covers a region of scrubland, dotted with disused wells, crumbling farmhouses and dirt tracks, that sits only a few miles from the Ocean Club resort where Madeleine vanished as her parents Kate and Gerry ate tapas nearby with their friends. The operation was launched at the behest of German authorities as part of their investigation into Christian Brueckner, a convicted paedophile and prime suspect in the case who rented two properties in Praia Da Luz around the time of her disappearance. The suspect has said he plans to disappear after his release from prison. Scotland Yard said it did not plan to send officers to help with the search but it was ready to assist if necessary. The BKA, Germany's equivalent of the FBI, hopes that any forensics salvaged from the dig sites may also yield the key piece of evidence needed to formally charge Brueckner. Brueckner, who is to due to be released after serving a seven-year-prison sentence for raping an American tourist in 2005, has always denied his involvement. During Tuesday's search, several officers wore face masks to protect themselves from the clouds of dust thrown up by the work in the 71F (22C) temperatures. Their efforts attracted the attention of passing cyclists who slowed down and stopped by the dig sites out of curiosity. Footage of the scene showed uniformed officers on a cordon on a dirt road in Atalaia – a neighbourhood of Lagos municipality – waving through unmarked vans and cars. The vehicles had German licence plates from the city of Wiesbaden, where the BKA has its headquarters. A van belonging to Portugal's Maritime Police, a force that has jurisdiction over coastal areas and took part in previous searches of beaches, wells and reservoirs using specialist divers, also arrived. A no-fly zone was enforced by police and dirt tracks leading into the scrubland from the coastal path were cordoned off with police tape. The search is expected to resume on Wednesday. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

JD Vance Is Being Proven Right About Europe's Free Speech Problem
JD Vance Is Being Proven Right About Europe's Free Speech Problem

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

JD Vance Is Being Proven Right About Europe's Free Speech Problem

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. When JD Vance stood before European leaders in Munich this past February, warning that free speech was "in retreat" across the West, his remarks were met with audible discomfort in the room. The gravest threat to democracy in Europe, he argued, wasn't external—it was the internal erosion of liberal principles like free expression. "If you are running in fear of your own voters, there is nothing America can do for you," the U.S. vice president told a visibly stunned room of diplomats. At the time, his comments were widely dismissed in both U.S. and European policy circles as either populist pablum or unnecessarily provocative. German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius called them "not acceptable." Vance had cited arrests in the UK and restrictions under the European Union's Digital Services Act as examples. Months later, however, his warnings seem less abstract. In England this week, Hamit Coskun was convicted and given a $325 fine for burning a copy of the Quran in public—a case that sparked debate not only for the act itself but for its broader implications. Former immigration minister Robert Jenrick accused the UK of enforcing "a two-tier justice system," suggesting similar punishment would be unlikely had the burned text been a Bible. "Would I have been prosecuted if I'd set fire to a copy of the Bible outside Westminster Abbey? I doubt it," Jenrick said. The National Secular Society, which supported Coskun on his case, also condemned the ruling, calling it "a significant blow to freedom of expression" and "a concerning capitulation to Islamic blasphemy codes." Hamit Coskun arrives at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London, Monday June 2, 2025. Hamit Coskun arrives at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London, Monday June 2, 2025. Aaron Chown/PA via AP The case echoed examples Vance had raised in Munich, including the case of a Swedish man prosecuted for burning a Quran during a protest — in a ruling handed down five days after another man also being prosecuted over the incident was shot dead. In both cases, Judge Göran Lundahl ruled that "freedom of expression does not constitute a free pass to do or say anything"—a line Vance saw as emblematic of a retreat from Enlightenment values. In the UK, debates over religious speech have reignited calls for and against blasphemy-style protections. Jenrick wrote on X that the ruling "revives a blasphemy law" repealed by Parliament in 2008 after a secularist campaign. Writing in The Spectator, conservative commentator Douglas Murray warned that the Labour government was "reconsidering the introduction of a blasphemy law"—an idea the previous Conservative administration had rejected outright. He argued that efforts to define and police "Islamophobia" were increasingly blurring into efforts to criminalize offensive speech. "You may march through the centre of London or Stockholm week after week supporting groups that want to annihilate the Jewish race—but don't get caught upsetting Muslims," Murray wrote. "These are the rules of the game and everyone knows it." Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokesman, Dave Pares, responded Tuesday: "We have no blasphemy laws in England and there are no plans to introduce any." Diverging Philosophies Vance's speech in Munich drew a stark contrast between U.S. and European views on free speech. In the U.S., the First Amendment prohibits government restrictions on speech in most cases, even when it's offensive, hateful or inflammatory. The legal default is to protect speech unless it causes direct harm or incites violence—a principle that has been fiercely defended across party lines for generations. US Vice President JD Vance gestures as he speaks with NATO Secretary General during a meeting on the sidelines of the 61st Munich Security Conference (MSC) in Munich, southern Germany on February 14, 2025. US Vice President JD Vance gestures as he speaks with NATO Secretary General during a meeting on the sidelines of the 61st Munich Security Conference (MSC) in Munich, southern Germany on February 14, 2025. Photo by Tobias SCHWARZ / AFP) (Photo by TOBIAS SCHWARZ/AFP via Getty Images European nations, by contrast, typically criminalize "hate speech," broadly defined as language that insults or incites hatred against protected groups. Supporters argue such laws maintain social harmony and prevent violence. But as Vance warned, these protections can suppress dissent, satire and religious or political expression. Resistance to European speech laws is increasingly reflected at the ballot box. Populist and nationalist parties—often critical of immigration and political censorship—are gaining traction, mirroring trends seen in the U.S. over the last decade. In Poland, Trump-backed conservative Karol Nawrocki narrowly won the presidency last weekend. In Germany, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) is polling at record highs. Vance's remarks weren't merely a defense of American legal norms—they were a direct challenge to a Western consensus that increasingly treats "hate speech" as a criminal offense, even when no violence is incited. Ideology and Influence Back in February, many in Munich dismissed Vance's speech as alarmist or extreme. But the controversies that followed—over blasphemy, protest, and political expression—have sharpened the very divide he described. To critics, Vance misunderstood Europe's emphasis on social cohesion. To supporters, he said what others wouldn't: that a democracy afraid of free speech is a democracy in retreat. U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and U.S. Vice President JD Vance greet visitors during the Memorial Day wreath-laying ceremony at the Memorial Amphitheater in Arlington National Cemetery on May 26, 2025 in Arlington, Virginia. U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and U.S. Vice President JD Vance greet visitors during the Memorial Day wreath-laying ceremony at the Memorial Amphitheater in Arlington National Cemetery on May 26, 2025 in Arlington, Virginia."His critiques of Europe derive at least in part from his ideological convictions," John Fousek, a professor in international relations at New York University, told Newsweek. Fousek explained that while Vance's views are grounded in constitutional arguments, they also reflect a broader worldview. "At the core of those convictions is American nationalism, and more specifically, Christian nationalism. These beliefs likely shape his views on the U.S. relationship with the 'outside' world more generally." Responding to Vance's criticism, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz emphasized the historical roots of Europe's approach: "Today's democracies in Germany and Europe are founded on the historic awareness that democracies can be destroyed by radical anti-democrats. That's why we've built institutions to defend them—and rules that protect, not limit, our freedoms." French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot also weighed in. "No one is required to adopt our model," he posted on X. "But no one can impose theirs on us. Freedom of speech is guaranteed in Europe."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store