Ukrainian army says it struck Russian gunpowder plant
The Ukrainian military says it has struck a major Russian gunpowder plant in the western Tambov region, causing a fire at the site.
The Ukrainian military characterised the plant as one of the main facilities in Russia's military industrial complex.
"It produces gunpowder for various types of small arms, artillery and rocket systems," it said in a statement on Telegram.
Tambov regional Governor Yevgeny Pervyshov said early on Wednesday that Russian defences had repelled a "massive attack" by Ukrainian drones on the town of Kotovsk, which independent Russian media identified as the site of a gunpowder plant.
He said one downed drone had caused a fire but no casualties, and the situation was under control.
Pervyshov also told people not to film and publish images of air defence operations and attempted attacks, as this would provide "direct assistance to the enemy".
The Tambov gunpowder plant produces propellant powders used in charges for ammunition for 122 mm and 152 mm howitzers, according to a report from the Royal United Services Institute and the Open Source Centre.
The Ukrainian military also said that it recorded explosions at an ammunition depot in Russia's Kursk region and an airfield depot in Russia's Voronezh region.
Reuters was not able to independently confirm the incidents.
Ukraine accepted the bodies of 1212 of its fallen soldiers from Russia after days of dispute, the Ukrainian agency dealing with prisoners of war said on Wednesday.
The soldiers died in battles in Russia's Kursk region and the Ukrainian regions of Kharkiv, Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, the agency said.
Russia received 27 killed soldiers in return, Russian chief negotiator Vladimir Medinsky said.
"Now they can be laid to rest in a Christian manner," he wrote on Telegram.
Russia has for days accused Ukraine of failing to accept the remains, and called on Ukrainian authorities to comply with agreements reached between the warring parties in talks in Istanbul at the beginning of the month.
Russia transported the bodies ready for handover over the weekend in what it termed a "humanitarian action" while Ukraine said that no agreement on a handover date had been reached.
The Istanbul talks provided for the return of the remains of more than 6000 fallen soldiers from Russia to Ukraine.
Work on implementing the Istanbul agreements will continue, Medinsky said, with an exchange of seriously wounded prisoners of war to take place on Thursday.
Ukraine and Russia had already exchanged an unspecified number of prisoners in recent days.
In Istanbul, it was agreed that each side would release in stages 1200 prisoners - those under 25, the seriously wounded and the seriously ill.
Ukraine has been defending itself against a Russian invasion for more than three years.
During the war, there have been repeated exchanges of prisoners and the return of bodies.
A Russian drone strike on the eastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv killed at least two people and injured dozens, local media reported early on Wednesday.
with DPA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
30 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Stars align for PLN in perfectly timed move into US uranium sector
Pioneer Lithium has diversified into uranium at just the right time Its Skull Creek project in the USA contains 17km of strike in north-western Colorado Uranium developments are high on the agenda of US President Donald Trump They say the best players make their own luck. That certainly applies to Pioneer Lithium (ASX:PLN), which has engineered an incredibly well-timed shift from its namesake commodity into a corner of the resources market with serious momentum behind it. With lithium prices dropping to four-year lows it made sense for the company from the stable of Robert Martin, a major early mover on the Canadian lithium, to diversify into a new commodity. Gold may be the obvious choice right now, with prices recently running to record highs. But there could be greater gains to make in markets yet to have their day in the sun. The move was to acquire two intriguing uranium projects at a time when spot prices suggested a market in a lull. Those assets – Skull Creek in Colorado and Warmbad in Namibia – came into the company with uranium at US$64/lb, down close to 40% from its January 2024 highs of US$107/lb. But prices of the nuclear fuel staged a rebound since then. And the decision to pick up Skull Creek could be the best timed move of the lot. Within four months, US President Donald Trump signed a wave of sweeping executive orders designed not only to dramatically increase the countries nuclear fleet – quadrupling its power supply by 2060. But the EOs also included calls to majorly expand the country's domestic uranium production and enrichment facilities. Facing declining capabilities in each, the US' ~100GW nuclear fleet is now reliant on Russian supplies to remain operational – a deeply tenuous position. "It gives you a lot of confidence to know that the Federal Government is 100% behind exploration and development of uranium projects," PLN CEO Michael Beven said. "In other jurisdictions, even in Australia, we see governments change their mind on their attitude towards uranium really quite regularly. "It's a real strong indicator the US has identified that uranium as an energy source and nuclear power as an energy source needs to be the primary focus in order to address climate change and provide green energy." Up Skull Creek Beven's ascension to the hot seat at PLN came after he consulted to the company, conducting due dilligence on the deals that saw Skull Creek and Warmbad picked up for a collective $850,000 in cash and $850,000 worth of PLN shares. Along with small royalties, deferred consideration is also due of $1m should Pioneer outline a JORC resource of 30Mlb at 300ppm U3O8 or higher at Skull Creek and $1.5m if it outlines a JORC resource of 30Mlb at Warmbad of between 101-199ppm U3O8, and an additional $1m for a resource of 30Mlb at 200ppm or higher. That suggests the sellers of the assets had a degree of confidence something of substance will be found. The immediate focus is Skull Creek in north-western Colorado, where some 17km of strike has been identified based on historic rock chips containing anomalous uranium. They have peaked as high as 1240ppm U3O8 in the Sego Sandstone and Carbonaceous Shales that make up the project's prospective geology. Background uranium is just 2ppm U3O8, giving a glimpse of the promise at the project, which sits in a tier-1 province for in-situ recovery uranium production across Colorado and Wyoming. There were reports of a claimed "40Mlb resource" at the site dating back to 1956 in the early days of the US uranium industry. Beven says the definition of resource here is "very loose" compared to modern standards and certainly can't be relied on. But it does show strong ammunition the uranium mineralisation is widespread at the site. It's early days, but rock chip sampling is generating super results. "Rock chips have been really quite good. The highest grade we had there was 1240ppm," he said. "The lowest we had was 10ppm. Background uranium is about 2ppm. "So even the lowest rock chip that we got was 5x background radiation levels." That's especially since the program wasn't planned to target only where the company thought the highest grades would be found. "It was really just walk across the ground, map out where we find the Sego Sandstone outcropping, take samples of different types of rocks so that we can get the geochemistry of them so we can understand what the rocks are and where they're occurring, and get that very basis foundation," Beven said. "So for a programme like that, which isn't designed to try and find high-grade mineralisation, to come back with rock chips from 10ppm to 1240ppm across pretty much the entire strike of the project is more reinforcement that we have a very large uranium bearing system there with elevated uranium far beyond background." When to drill The sandstone hosted nature of the mineralisation at Skull Creek suggests it will be amenable to ISR mining, a cheap recovery method for shallow, low grade resources common across the United States and particularly operations in Wyoming and Colorado. In some ways it bears a resemblance to large deposits found in Western Australia, one of the world's best endowed uranium regions, with exploration geologist Mark Cousins remarking its similarities to the Bennet Well deposit in WA's north held by Cauldron Energy (ASX:CXU). The distinction between Colorado and WA, or course, is that unlike in WA uranium mining where PLN is exploring is supported by local regulators. Beven estimates it will take around two months to outline and prioritise targets for drilling with a two phase soil sampling program recently announced. The first phase will target four prospect areas: County Line, Blue Mountain, Skyline and Railroad, which have been previously identified in radiometric surveys and rock chipping. The second will see PLN collect samples along the project's 17km strike, with the goal of identifying uranium bearing Sego Sandstone and Carbonaceous Shales obscured by soils. With the US aiming to recover its domestic uranium output – currently equivalent to only around 2% of its annual reactor demand – there is serious steam from lawmakers to get moving on defining new deposits like, potentially, Skull Creek. But the jurisdiction is attractive for many other reasons, Beven added. Early analysis suggests style of mineralisation bears strong similarities to mines in Wyoming and Colorado, something that will be teased out in further testing, while the project has relatively simple permitting ahead of it given it sits entirely on ground managed by the Bureau of Land Management. A major highway runs just 400m from the edge of the project area, adding to its atractiveness. A Rossing lookalike Over at Warmbad in Namibia, some 30,000-odd metres of drilling have already been completed, outlining a deposit with similar characteristics to the world's longest continuously operating uranium mine, Rossing. "A company called Zemplar, which was a TSX listed company back in 2007 to 2009, did about 30,000m worth of drilling there and actually found uranium mineralisation in the ground, which is a sort of low grade Rossing style mineralisation," Beven said. " So it's hosted within Alaskalite granite. It's rare that you get to pick up an exploration project where you're able to look at the historic work and know you've got a deposit already sitting in the ground that you just need to build on. "Some of the work that they did between 2007 and 2009 just wasn't quite up to the standards of today to be able to makea JORC compliant resource out of it. But that's the exciting bit – we know there's mineralisation in there. and we only really need to do a small amount of work to upgrade it to where we can have a JORC compliant uranium resource." PLN is aiming to come out with an exploration target in the near future building off that historic drilling and run new geophysics to identify mineralised pods missed by previous explorers. At the same time, Beven says the company's flagship lithium project Root Lake in Ontario, which sits between known pegmatite-hosted resources, remains a terrific options for when the lithium price begins to recover.
AU Financial Review
40 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
US senator pushed to ground, handcuffed at LA briefing
Lawyers for Harvard University urged a federal judge to reinforce her block on the Trump administration's effort to bar the college from enrolling foreign students. In a filing in federal court in Boston on Thursday (Friday AEST), the university said the judge should do more to ensure the administrating is complying with her previous order. Harvard cited concerns that the administration would impose alternative restrictions on its ability to enroll foreign students. The filing is the latest salvo in the high-stakes battle between President Donald Trump and the US's oldest and richest university. Earlier, a Russian scientist at Harvard was freed on bail by a federal judge after spending four months in detention for failing to declare biological material she brought into the US for research. After winning release on Thursday, Kseniia Petrova is scheduled to reappear in court on June 18 for a hearing over whether the government will proceed with a criminal charge for smuggling, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and a $US250,000 fine. In February, US customs agents detained the Russia-born researcher and revoked her visa because she didn't declare frog embryos that she brought on a flight into Boston's Logan Airport. After the Trump administration called Petrova a threat to national security, and she challenged efforts to deport her, she was charged in May with illegal smuggling.
The Advertiser
15 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Israeli minister sanctions dubbed too little, too late
The sanctioning of two Israeli ministers by Australia has been labelled a "slap on the wrist" by a prominent pro-Palestine advocate. The federal government has imposed sanctions on Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich in a co-ordinated move with Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom. The sanctions were applied for "extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights", with the pair barred from travelling to Australia and any assets in the country being frozen. The measures prompted condemnation from the US, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying it would do little to achieve a ceasefire in the conflict. Australian Palestine Advocacy Network president Nasser Mashni welcomed the move but said it was too little, too late. "These sanctions are crumbs, tossed by the Australian government 613 days too late," he said. "This is a small step, but Australia must stop pretending that a slap on the wrist for two fascist ministers is justice." Mr Mashni said further sanctions, similar to measures imposed against Russian officials for the country's invasion of Ukraine, need to be applied. "Australians of good conscience demand real action. That means a full array of sanctions," he said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has doubled down on the need for the sanctions, despite blowback from Israel and the US. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley says the government has overstepped its bounds. "It is unprecedented to, as a government, take actions, sanctions on members of a democratically elected government," she told Sky News on Thursday. "The US has explained that these actions are actually counterproductive to securing that ceasefire and that peace, and the government should be paying attention to that." Shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser, who is Jewish, says the style of sanctions imposed by the government was normally reserved for human rights abusers and terrorists. "The big question here is whether this is a new standard that will be applied to the public comments of officials from other countries," he told ABC Radio. "If this is the new standard, it will have serious implications for our international relations.". Middle East politics professor at Deakin University Shahram Akbarzadeh said the sanctions were a consequential step. "It is significant and it sends a signal that Australia is becoming more resolute in pursuing its foreign policy agenda of a two-state solution," he told AAP. "Australia would not have done this on its own, but when Australia sees other allied countries taking this move, that allows Australia to feel comfortable in numbers." Israel's ambassador to Australia Amir Maimon said the sanctions were concerning and unacceptable. "These ministers are part of a government that operates under the principle of collective responsibility, making such measures unreasonable," he said in a statement. "The Israeli government will convene early next week to consider and determine our official response to these actions." Prof Akbarzadeh said the sanctions imposed by the Western allies would not alter how Israel would conduct itself in the conflict. "Israel has shown it does not take international opinion seriously, and this move is unlikely to deter the Israeli government in the way they're prosecuting the war in Gaza," he said. The latest eruption of war in Gaza was sparked by militant group Hamas killing about 1200 people and abducting 250 others in Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel's military response has since killed almost 55,000 mostly civilian Palestinians in Gaza, local health authorities say. Australia in July also sanctioned Israelis involved in attacking and killing Palestinians in the West Bank. Australia has listed Hamas as a terrorist entity since 2001, according to the federal government's national security website. The sanctioning of two Israeli ministers by Australia has been labelled a "slap on the wrist" by a prominent pro-Palestine advocate. The federal government has imposed sanctions on Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich in a co-ordinated move with Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom. The sanctions were applied for "extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights", with the pair barred from travelling to Australia and any assets in the country being frozen. The measures prompted condemnation from the US, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying it would do little to achieve a ceasefire in the conflict. Australian Palestine Advocacy Network president Nasser Mashni welcomed the move but said it was too little, too late. "These sanctions are crumbs, tossed by the Australian government 613 days too late," he said. "This is a small step, but Australia must stop pretending that a slap on the wrist for two fascist ministers is justice." Mr Mashni said further sanctions, similar to measures imposed against Russian officials for the country's invasion of Ukraine, need to be applied. "Australians of good conscience demand real action. That means a full array of sanctions," he said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has doubled down on the need for the sanctions, despite blowback from Israel and the US. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley says the government has overstepped its bounds. "It is unprecedented to, as a government, take actions, sanctions on members of a democratically elected government," she told Sky News on Thursday. "The US has explained that these actions are actually counterproductive to securing that ceasefire and that peace, and the government should be paying attention to that." Shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser, who is Jewish, says the style of sanctions imposed by the government was normally reserved for human rights abusers and terrorists. "The big question here is whether this is a new standard that will be applied to the public comments of officials from other countries," he told ABC Radio. "If this is the new standard, it will have serious implications for our international relations.". Middle East politics professor at Deakin University Shahram Akbarzadeh said the sanctions were a consequential step. "It is significant and it sends a signal that Australia is becoming more resolute in pursuing its foreign policy agenda of a two-state solution," he told AAP. "Australia would not have done this on its own, but when Australia sees other allied countries taking this move, that allows Australia to feel comfortable in numbers." Israel's ambassador to Australia Amir Maimon said the sanctions were concerning and unacceptable. "These ministers are part of a government that operates under the principle of collective responsibility, making such measures unreasonable," he said in a statement. "The Israeli government will convene early next week to consider and determine our official response to these actions." Prof Akbarzadeh said the sanctions imposed by the Western allies would not alter how Israel would conduct itself in the conflict. "Israel has shown it does not take international opinion seriously, and this move is unlikely to deter the Israeli government in the way they're prosecuting the war in Gaza," he said. The latest eruption of war in Gaza was sparked by militant group Hamas killing about 1200 people and abducting 250 others in Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel's military response has since killed almost 55,000 mostly civilian Palestinians in Gaza, local health authorities say. Australia in July also sanctioned Israelis involved in attacking and killing Palestinians in the West Bank. Australia has listed Hamas as a terrorist entity since 2001, according to the federal government's national security website. The sanctioning of two Israeli ministers by Australia has been labelled a "slap on the wrist" by a prominent pro-Palestine advocate. The federal government has imposed sanctions on Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich in a co-ordinated move with Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom. The sanctions were applied for "extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights", with the pair barred from travelling to Australia and any assets in the country being frozen. The measures prompted condemnation from the US, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying it would do little to achieve a ceasefire in the conflict. Australian Palestine Advocacy Network president Nasser Mashni welcomed the move but said it was too little, too late. "These sanctions are crumbs, tossed by the Australian government 613 days too late," he said. "This is a small step, but Australia must stop pretending that a slap on the wrist for two fascist ministers is justice." Mr Mashni said further sanctions, similar to measures imposed against Russian officials for the country's invasion of Ukraine, need to be applied. "Australians of good conscience demand real action. That means a full array of sanctions," he said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has doubled down on the need for the sanctions, despite blowback from Israel and the US. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley says the government has overstepped its bounds. "It is unprecedented to, as a government, take actions, sanctions on members of a democratically elected government," she told Sky News on Thursday. "The US has explained that these actions are actually counterproductive to securing that ceasefire and that peace, and the government should be paying attention to that." Shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser, who is Jewish, says the style of sanctions imposed by the government was normally reserved for human rights abusers and terrorists. "The big question here is whether this is a new standard that will be applied to the public comments of officials from other countries," he told ABC Radio. "If this is the new standard, it will have serious implications for our international relations.". Middle East politics professor at Deakin University Shahram Akbarzadeh said the sanctions were a consequential step. "It is significant and it sends a signal that Australia is becoming more resolute in pursuing its foreign policy agenda of a two-state solution," he told AAP. "Australia would not have done this on its own, but when Australia sees other allied countries taking this move, that allows Australia to feel comfortable in numbers." Israel's ambassador to Australia Amir Maimon said the sanctions were concerning and unacceptable. "These ministers are part of a government that operates under the principle of collective responsibility, making such measures unreasonable," he said in a statement. "The Israeli government will convene early next week to consider and determine our official response to these actions." Prof Akbarzadeh said the sanctions imposed by the Western allies would not alter how Israel would conduct itself in the conflict. "Israel has shown it does not take international opinion seriously, and this move is unlikely to deter the Israeli government in the way they're prosecuting the war in Gaza," he said. The latest eruption of war in Gaza was sparked by militant group Hamas killing about 1200 people and abducting 250 others in Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel's military response has since killed almost 55,000 mostly civilian Palestinians in Gaza, local health authorities say. Australia in July also sanctioned Israelis involved in attacking and killing Palestinians in the West Bank. Australia has listed Hamas as a terrorist entity since 2001, according to the federal government's national security website. The sanctioning of two Israeli ministers by Australia has been labelled a "slap on the wrist" by a prominent pro-Palestine advocate. The federal government has imposed sanctions on Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich in a co-ordinated move with Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom. The sanctions were applied for "extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights", with the pair barred from travelling to Australia and any assets in the country being frozen. The measures prompted condemnation from the US, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying it would do little to achieve a ceasefire in the conflict. Australian Palestine Advocacy Network president Nasser Mashni welcomed the move but said it was too little, too late. "These sanctions are crumbs, tossed by the Australian government 613 days too late," he said. "This is a small step, but Australia must stop pretending that a slap on the wrist for two fascist ministers is justice." Mr Mashni said further sanctions, similar to measures imposed against Russian officials for the country's invasion of Ukraine, need to be applied. "Australians of good conscience demand real action. That means a full array of sanctions," he said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has doubled down on the need for the sanctions, despite blowback from Israel and the US. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley says the government has overstepped its bounds. "It is unprecedented to, as a government, take actions, sanctions on members of a democratically elected government," she told Sky News on Thursday. "The US has explained that these actions are actually counterproductive to securing that ceasefire and that peace, and the government should be paying attention to that." Shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser, who is Jewish, says the style of sanctions imposed by the government was normally reserved for human rights abusers and terrorists. "The big question here is whether this is a new standard that will be applied to the public comments of officials from other countries," he told ABC Radio. "If this is the new standard, it will have serious implications for our international relations.". Middle East politics professor at Deakin University Shahram Akbarzadeh said the sanctions were a consequential step. "It is significant and it sends a signal that Australia is becoming more resolute in pursuing its foreign policy agenda of a two-state solution," he told AAP. "Australia would not have done this on its own, but when Australia sees other allied countries taking this move, that allows Australia to feel comfortable in numbers." Israel's ambassador to Australia Amir Maimon said the sanctions were concerning and unacceptable. "These ministers are part of a government that operates under the principle of collective responsibility, making such measures unreasonable," he said in a statement. "The Israeli government will convene early next week to consider and determine our official response to these actions." Prof Akbarzadeh said the sanctions imposed by the Western allies would not alter how Israel would conduct itself in the conflict. "Israel has shown it does not take international opinion seriously, and this move is unlikely to deter the Israeli government in the way they're prosecuting the war in Gaza," he said. The latest eruption of war in Gaza was sparked by militant group Hamas killing about 1200 people and abducting 250 others in Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel's military response has since killed almost 55,000 mostly civilian Palestinians in Gaza, local health authorities say. Australia in July also sanctioned Israelis involved in attacking and killing Palestinians in the West Bank. Australia has listed Hamas as a terrorist entity since 2001, according to the federal government's national security website.
