logo
Households to receive up to £2,000 in compensation for water failures

Households to receive up to £2,000 in compensation for water failures

Independent11 hours ago
Households in England will be paid up to £2,000 in compensation for water service failures as part of new efforts to reform the sector.
The government announced that compensation payments from water firms, for problems such as low pressure, disruptions to supply or sewer flooding, will increase tenfold from July 2.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said the move was the first increase in compensation rates in 25 years in recognition of the 'urgent need' to bring payments in line with inflation and properly compensate households for poor service.
Severe issues such as flooding will see customer compensation double from £1,000 to up to £2,000, while households suffering consistent low water pressure will be automatically eligible to receive up to £250, up from the previous compensation rate of £25.
Payments will automatically be credited to the accounts of eligible customers with immediate effect.
The announcement comes as the government attempts to grapple with the problems engulfing the water sector in the face of high public anger over the degraded and polluted state of rivers, lakes and coasts, rising bills, bosses' bonuses and shareholder payouts.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed said that 'too many water companies are letting down their customers – with leaking pipes, poor water supply and low water pressure'.
'The Government is holding water companies to account by making them put money back into people's pockets when they fail their customers.'
Defra said it was working with water companies to expand the list of circumstances that would trigger compensation payments.
Compensation for when customers are asked to boil their water due to a contaminated supply will come into force later this year, it said.
The standards, outlined in the Guaranteed Standards Scheme, set out a baseline for customer service in the water sector and include providing timely restoration of the water supply following an interruption, responding to written complaints and managing the risk of sewer flooding.
Action already announced to cut sewage spills and attract investment in the sector includes: strengthening regulation to ensure polluting water bosses who cover up their crimes now face two-year prison sentences; the banning of 'unfair' bonuses for bosses of six polluting water companies; and 81 criminal investigations into sewage pollution.
Mike Keil, the chief executive of the Consumer Council for Water (CCW), said: 'Customers expect to be treated fairly when their water company lets them down, so we're delighted the Government has moved at pace to strengthen service standards.
'This should give people peace of mind, they now have far stronger protection from a much broader range of water company service failures – from the slow installation of water meters to the mishandling of debt recovery.
'As well as bolstering payments for thousands of customers, these changes mark an important step towards restoring trust in the water sector, which is at an all-time low.'
Ofwat chief executive David Black said it welcomed 'these improvements to guaranteed standards and payments for customers.
'When customers suffer from problems like low pressure, disruptions to supply or sewer flooding, they can experience major stress and inconvenience, and payment amounts must recognise the disruption to their lives when standards are not met.
'These new changes are another way to make sure customers are protected when companies get it wrong.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More than a third of homeowners ‘have regrets about their property'
More than a third of homeowners ‘have regrets about their property'

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

More than a third of homeowners ‘have regrets about their property'

More than a third (37%) of homeowners regret aspects of the home they bought, or would make different decisions if buying again, a survey indicates. Among younger adults, nearly two-thirds (63%) of homeowners aged 34 and under expressed regrets about their property purchase. This compared with just under half (48%) of those aged 35 to 54 and just over a fifth (22%) of homeowners aged 55-plus. Regrets included underestimating the full costs of buying or renovating, dissatisfaction with the location, and having to make compromises on indoor or outdoor space. London homeowners were particularly likely to have regrets about their property purchase, with just over half (51%) saying they would now make different choices. Paula Higgins, chief executive of HomeOwners Alliance, which commissioned the research, said: 'Buying a home is one of the most significant and emotional decisions people make, and our research shows many are left feeling they got it wrong. 'Younger buyers, in particular, are being hit hardest by the realities of the market: high prices, hidden costs, and the pressure to compromise. 'In London, these challenges are even more acute. Sky-high property prices mean buyers are often stretching their budgets to the limit and compromising to get on the ladder.' Ms Higgins added: 'It's worth remembering that even with these regrets, owning a home brings long-term stability and financial security. 'You're building equity, not paying someone else's mortgage, and you have a roof over your head that you can call your own. 'Most homeowners adapt and grow into their homes – they decorate, renovate, build equity, and make the space work for them. 'With time, a house becomes more than a transaction; it becomes a home.' The research was carried out for HomeOwners Alliance in April by Opinium, surveying more than 1,200 homeowners across the UK.

Fears over £160bn blow to London's stock market as AstraZeneca considers listing move to US
Fears over £160bn blow to London's stock market as AstraZeneca considers listing move to US

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Fears over £160bn blow to London's stock market as AstraZeneca considers listing move to US

The boss of AstraZeneca, the biggest company on the London Stock Exchange, has discussed shifting the pharmaceutical firm's stock market listing to the US. Such a move would be the biggest hit to the stock market yet, following some huge departures such as £10bn financials firm Wise and £40bn mining business Glencore, among others. The pharmaceutical firm however is far bigger by market capitalisation, currently worth just over £161bn – more than BP, National Grid and Lloyds Bank combined. Pascal Soriot is the chief executive who has held private conversations over moving the listing, first reported the Times, citing frustrations with restrictions around new medicines and pricing structures. The Independent understands the company acknowledges the CEO's concerns as being longstanding, especially regarding new products, while conversations are ongoing with the UK government over support for the wider pharmaceutical industry, particularly when it comes to supporting the commercial environment to become a global superpower in the sector. While the stock market listing would naturally be a huge blow for the UK markets, Mr Soriot could seek to re-domicile the company in the US too. That would bring political pressure too amid a potential huge blow for the government as they both chase economic growth and also get ready to back life sciences as one of the pillars mentioned in the recent industrial strategy. Earlier this year, AstraZeneca ditched plans for a £450m vaccine hub near Liverpool, with 'timing' cited as a reason at the time, while a £12m funding gap was also apparent. While the Conservatives had initially agreed the deal including a £90m pledge, Labour found no record of it after taking power and eventually only committed to £78m. 'Reports that AstraZeneca wants to move its stock listing to the US looks to be driven by business needs rather than chasing a higher valuation,' commented Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell. 'America is important to its growth strategy and it could become an even bigger cog in the wheel. 'The CEO seems frustrated at the lack of financial support to open new laboratories and manufacturing facilities in Europe and might see a full US stock listing as a stepping stone to receiving better treatment Stateside. 'It won't be an easy move to pull off as unlike many other UK market 'defectors' with a dominant US shareholder base like CRH and Flutter, AstraZeneca has a more geographically diverse pool of investors.' Meanwhile, one key focus of President Trump's tariff plans have been to encourage - or demand - more pharmaceutical companies ply their trade in the US. The EU are trying to arrange in a trade deal for pharmaceuticals to be one of the industries which get a lower than 10 per cent base tariff for exports. A total of 40.4 per cent of AstraZeneca's total $54bn (£39bn) revenue for 2024 came from the US alone: $21.8bn (£159bn), compared to $11.7bn from Europe and $12.6bn from Asia, Africa and Australasia combined. AstraZeneca does already have American depositary receipts trading in the US, which allows investors to locally trade in their shares. At the close of Monday's market, their share price on the LSE had risen more than 2 per cent to above £104, before falling back 0.5 per cent lower in Tuesday morning trading. When contacted, the company did not directly comment on any listing speculation. Board approval would be required to move the shares overseas. Mr Soriot earned £16.85m in 2023 as the highest-paid CEO among any FTSE 100 firm.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store