
Student Loan Update: Lawmakers Issue Warning Over Change Impacting Millions
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Vermont Independent Senator Bernie Sanders and 10 Senate Democrats sent a letter to Education Secretary Linda McMahon on Tuesday, demanding explanations after the Trump administration paused student loan forgiveness under the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) plan.
This is a move the senators said would harm borrowers who had been in repayment for two decades or more.
Newsweek reached out to Sanders and the Department of Education for comment via email.
Why It Matters
The senators said the pause has created confusion for borrowers who have made payments for decades and could result in denials of legally mandated relief or unexpected tax bills.
Some 3 million borrowers are part of the IBR program, according to Sanders' press release.
More than 40 million Americans carry federal student loan debt, and the outstanding nationwide balance exceeds $1.7 trillion.
Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) questions Susan Monarez, President Donald Trump's nominee to be the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention...
Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) questions Susan Monarez, President Donald Trump's nominee to be the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), during her confirmation hearing before the Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on June 25, 2025 in Washington, D.C. MoreWhat To Know
Sanders led the group of senators in the letter to McMahon, who was nominated by President Donald Trump, that demanded clarity on the pause. The other senators were: Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Jack Reed (D-R.I.).
The lawmakers also criticized the lack of notice to borrowers and Congress and warned that affected borrowers could face tax liabilities if forgiveness did not proceed.
"At a time when Americans across the country are struggling to meet the costs of health care, food, housing, child care and other basic needs, it is unacceptable for the Trump administration to take any action that delays or denies legally mandated debt relief to borrowers that have been in repayment for two decades or more," says the letter.
"The department should not require borrowers who have fulfilled their legal repayment obligations to continue paying with no guarantee or timeline for relief," it adds.
The Trump administration has also reduced the number of income-driven plans and introduced rules that included a minimum monthly payment even for borrowers with no income. There will also be higher payment formulas tied to income bands, and a 30-year repayment term before eligibility for forgiveness.
These measures could increase costs for many borrowers compared with prior plans, experts say.
"Historically, any time there is a change in law or federal programs, it was on a going-forward basis, and those already in the system were 'grandfathered' in," Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "An indefinite pause for all borrowers is in stark contrast to how things are usually done."
The new transition rules require borrowers who consolidated through the federal direct loan program beginning July 1, 2026, to choose between Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) and the standard plan.
Under RAP, your monthly payments for each year are determined based on your income, and after a fixed term, you would qualify for student loan forgiveness.
However, it differs from other IDR plans because it has higher monthly payments and uses a different formula where the percentage of income that is counted toward your monthly payment increases for every $10,000 in additional income earned by the borrower with a cap of $100,000. Other IDR plans use a fixed repayment formula and factor in inflation.
Prior payment plans would be phased out through 2028, which could force difficult choices for borrowers.
"The administration says the pause is about ensuring accurate tracking of qualifying payments. The program hasn't ended. It's simply on hold. IBR is still safe for now, even as other plans like SAVE, PAYE, and ICR are phased out. Officials have assured borrowers that forgiveness will resume once the system issues are resolved," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek.
"For borrowers, though, it creates uncertainty. You're expected to keep making payments as scheduled, and while any overpayments should eventually be refunded, the reality is you're left in limbo."
What People Are Saying
Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The Trump Administration paused some of the income-based repayment options as it reassessed both the legality of some of them and how they align with the priorities of the administration. The problem, obviously, is for the many student borrowers who have previously qualified, it burdens them with potentially higher monthly payments and financial difficulties on a more than likely lower income."
Michele Zampini, associate vice president of federal policy and advocacy at The Institute for College Access & Success (TICAS), told Newsweek: "Borrowers have upheld their end of their bargain by making decades of payments and are legally entitled to have any remaining balance discharged under the IBR program. With little explanation, the Education Department is failing to uphold its responsibility to process these discharges, and has given borrowers no clarity as to when this will be resolved. This delay is especially concerning given that loans discharged after 2025 are subject to a heavy tax liability, even if they should have been discharged before the tax change goes into effect."
Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "These senators are outraged, and their constituents will soon follow, because this is essentially changing the rules halfway through the game. The affected Student loan borrowers chose Income-Based Repayment (IBR) with the obligation to pay a percentage of their income every single month for 20 to 25 years and the right to loan forgiveness of the remaining balance after that time. There are now borrowers who made this deal 24 years ago, and in July had the rug pulled out from under them. How is this okay?"
What Happens Next
Borrowers who relied on IBR or other legacy income-driven plans face deadlines to consolidate or select new repayment options as the administration phases prior plans out through 2028.
Experts warn those transitions could raise defaults and costs for some borrowers.
"In the end, this only hurts middle- and lower-income workers who have been paying back the government on a high interest loan for 20-25 years," Powers said. "They did what they were supposed to do, they have paid back what they borrowed and then some, they just don't make a lot of money. I don't see how these are the borrowers anyone is mad at."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Fed Governor Lisa Cook will not step down despite Trump call
Federal Reserve board of governors member Lisa Cook has said she will not step down despite President Trump calling for her to do so. Cook said she had 'learned from the media that [Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA)] Director William Pulte posted on social media that he was making a criminal referral based on a mortgage application from four years ago, before I joined the Federal Reserve,' according to a statement obtained by The Hill's sister network NewsNation 'I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet,' she added. 'I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts.' On Wednesday, Trump called for the resignation of Cook in the wake of allegations by FHFA's chief that she committed mortgage fraud. FHFA Director William Pulte said early Wednesday on the social platform X that Cook had designated two of her houses as her primary residences. 'Lisa D. Cook, committed mortgage fraud by designating her out-of-state condo as her primary residence, just two weeks after taking a loan on her Michigan home where she also declared it as her primary residence,' he said. Trump pushed for Cook to step down shortly after Pulte's post. 'Cook must resign, now!!!' the president said on his own Truth Social platform. Pulte also said his agency gave a criminal referral to the Justice Department on the allegations against Cook. In recent months, Trump has also directed his ire towards Fed Chair Jerome Powell and pushed for his exit as well.

Los Angeles Times
13 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Fox News hosts were determined to help Trump stay in office after 2020 election, legal filing says
The 2020 presidential election is history, but a legal dispute over Fox News' reporting on President Trump's false claims of voter fraud is heating up. A motion for summary judgment by voting equipment company Smartmatic filed Tuesday in New York Supreme Court laid out in detail how phony allegations that it manipulated votes to swing the election to Joe Biden were amplified on Fox News. The motion also described how the Fox News Media hosts who are defendants in the suit — the late Lou Dobbs, Jeanine Pirro and Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business — were allegedly committed to helping Trump prove his fraud theories so he could remain in office. 'I work so hard for the President and the party,' Pirro wrote in a text to Ronna McDaniel, then chair of the Republican National Committee. Pirro left Fox News in May to become U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. Smartmatic is suing Fox News for $2.7 billion in damages, claiming that the network's airing of the false statements hurt the London-based company's ability to expand its business in the U.S. Fox News settled a similar suit from Dominion Voting Systems for $787.5 million in 2023. The motion alleged that on-air hosts repeated the fraud claims even though executives and producers were told they were false. The Fox News research department, known as the 'Brainroom,' allegedly informed network producers that Smartmatic's role in the 2020 election was limited to Los Angeles County and that the company's software was not used in Dominion voting machines, another false claim made on the air. Fox News maintains the network's reporting on President Trump's false claims were newsworthy and protected by the 1st Amendment. But part of the company's legal strategy has been focused on minimizing the damage claims. Fox News has asserted that any problems Smartmatic has experienced in attracting new business are rooted not in its reporting but in the federal investigation into the company's activities with overseas governments. Last year, Smartmatic's founder, Roger Alejandro Piñate Martinez, and two other company officials were indicted by the U.S. attorney's office and charged with bribing Philippine officials in order to get voting machine contracts in the country in 2016. While the Trump camp's assertions that the election was fixed were not believed throughout Fox News and parent company Fox Corp., the conservative-leaning network gave continued to give them oxygen to keep its audience tuned in, the motion alleged. The motion described a 'pivot' that occurred on Nov. 8, 2020, when then-Fox News Executive Chairman Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan asked Fox News Media Chief Executive Suzanne Scott to address the decline in the network's ratings after Biden was declared the winner of the election. The network also looked at research to evaluate why viewers were leaving. 'The conclusion reached based on performance analytics: give the audience more election fraud,' the court document stated. Such thinking, the filing said, permeated the company, already in a panic over losing viewers to right-leaning network Newsmax. The upstart outlet saw a ratings surge after Biden's win due to its unwavering support of Trump's claims. 'Think about how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL,' Fox News host Jesse Watters said in a text to his colleague Greg Gutfeld. Throughout November and December 2020, the three hosts named in the suit, Dobbs, Pirro and Bartiromo, repeatedly featured Trump's attorneys Rudolph Giuliani and Sidney Powell as guests. They spread the falsehoods that Smartmatic software was used in Dominion voting machines and altered millions of votes. Smartmatic's work in Los Angeles during the 2020 election was meant to be an entry point for the company to expand its domestic business. The company's defamation suit claims that Fox News obliterated those efforts by presenting the false fraud claims. But Fox News believes that issues with Smartmatic's $282-million contract with Los Angeles County could help advance its case. On Aug. 1, federal prosecutors filing a legal brief alleging that taxpayer funds from the county went into a slush fund held by a shell company to help pay for its illegal activities. Federal prosecutors handling the case involving Smartmatic's business in the Philippines said they plan to detail similar alleged schemes out of L.A. County and Venezuela to show that the bribery fits a larger pattern. Fox News attorneys have filed a brief asking for county records that they believe will help bolster their case. The network is also expected to try to get the Smartmatic indictments in front of the court to raise doubts about the company's reputation. A Smartmatic representative said Fox News' records request is a diversion tactic. 'Fox lies and when caught they lie again to distract,' a Smartmatic representative said in a statement. 'Fox's latest filing is just another attempt to divert attention from its long-standing campaign of falsehoods and defamation against Smartmatic.' The company added that it abided with the law in Los Angeles County and 'every jurisdiction where we operate.' Smartmatic's Tuesday court filing also included information that contradicted public statements Fox News made at the time. The document alleged that Fox News fired political analyst Chris Stirewalt and longtime Washington bureau executives Bill Sammon for their involvement in calling the state of Arizona for Biden on election night. The early call of the close result in the state upset the Trump camp and alienated his supporters. At the time, Fox News said Stirewalt departed as part of a reorganization and Sammon retired. But the motion said Rupert Murdoch himself signed off on the decision to sever Stirewalt and Sammon from the company in an effort to assuage angry viewers who defected. The motion cited a communication from Dana Perino, co-host of Fox News show 'The Five,' describing a phone call with Stirewalt after his dismissal. 'I explained to him — you were right, you didn't cave, and you got fired for doing the right thing,' Perino said. Both Sammon and Stirewalt now work in the Washington bureau of NewsNation, the cable news network owned by Nexstar Media Group.

14 minutes ago
Sen. Amy Klobuchar calls for new AI laws amid rise in deepfakes
Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar is calling for stricter laws when it comes to deepfakes, saying Americans need more control over their own images.