Dana White says UFC fight will ‘absolutely' take place on White House South Lawn, but awaits Trump's reply
In order to catch up and talk over the logistics of the proposed Fourth of July fight event at the White House next year, the UFC CEO was scheduled to visit Washington on August 28 with Trump and his daughter, Ivanka.
Trump declared last month that he would like to honor 250 years of American freedom by holding a UFC bout on the White House grounds with up to 20,000 fans.
Speaking to The Associated Press, White said: 'It's absolutely going to happen," adding that 'Think about that, the 250th birthday of the United States of America, the UFC will be on the White House south lawn live on CBS.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
11 minutes ago
- The Print
India, US troops to undertake joint military exercise next month, first after Op Sindoor
The joint exercise comes at a time when Pakistan and US have come closer than ever before under the Trump administration. The US President hosting Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House to undertaking joint anti-terror talks with Islamabad, both sides have a long way from 2018 when Trump had described Pakistan as a 'safe haven for terrorists'. Termed 'Yudh Abhyas', the annual exercise from 1 to 16 September in US' Alaska will see an all-arms contingent going from the Indian Army led by the Madras Regiment, ThePrint has learnt. New Delhi: Amid heightened tensions between New Delhi and Washington, and a growing synergy between the Pakistan government and US President Donald Trump, Indian and American troops will undertake a joint military exercise next month. 'The upcoming edition will see participation from both sides in high-altitude conditions in Alaska, a factor that adds operational complexity to the drills. Such settings will also allow troops to train in environments that mirror potential conflict zones,' said a source. Launched in 2004 under the framework of the Indo-US defence Cooperation Agreement, 'Yudh Abhyas' alternates annually between locations in India and the US, with the previous edition held in Rajasthan in 2024. In the exercise, the Indian Army and US Army typically take part in tactical field training which covers counter-insurgency, counter-terrorism and peacekeeping scenarios with command post drills that focus on mission planning, joint operations and coordination under United Nations mandates. Beyond such tactics, the exercise also serves as a platform for sharing military technology, operational best practices and disaster relief coordination methods. Separately, India and the US are also preparing to finalise the proposed 10-year framework for the US-India Major Defence Partnership, expected to be signed during the next meeting between Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth. The plan aims to expand cooperation beyond arms purchases to include co-production of systems such as the Javelin ATGMs (anti-tank guided missiles) and the Stryker combat vehicle. Furthermore, amidst tensions with the US, the Ministry of Defence had last week dismissed media reports claiming India had paused talks for major US defence purchases. Calling such reports 'false and fabricated', MoD officials had said procurement cases 'are being progressed as per the extant procedures'. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: India sees the value of US defence ties, but MAGA-style tariffs threaten long-term stability
Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
Daimler, Volvo, other truckmakers sue California to block emissions rules
Four major truckmakers, including Daimler and Volvo, sued California to block the state from enforcing strict emissions standards that U.S. President Donald Trump declared void in June. Daimler, Volvo, Paccar and International Motors , formerly Navistar, said they have been "caught in the crossfire" after Trump reversed waivers issued during the Biden administration that let California set its own standards. In a complaint filed on Monday, the truckmakers said Trump's rescinding U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approval of California's plan to boost zero-emission heavy-duty truck sales and reduce nitrogen oxide emissions preempted the state's enforcement. They said this included enforcing the Clean Truck Partnership , a 2023 program giving the truckmaking industry flexibility to meet emissions requirements while advancing California's goal of lowering emissions. The truckmakers said the regulatory uncertainty has caused irreparable harm because they cannot plan production in advance without knowing which vehicles they will be permitted to sell. Monday's complaint names the California Air Resources Board and Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom as defendants, and was filed in the federal court in Sacramento, the state's capital. Newsom's office and the board did not respond on Tuesday to requests for comment. On Tuesday evening, the Federal Trade Commission ended an antitrust probe into the Clean Truck Partnership, and said Daimler, Volvo, Paccar and International Motors agreed to avoid future anticompetitive agreements with state regulators. "CARB's regulatory overreach posed a major threat to American trucking," Taylor Hoogendoorn, deputy director of the FTC bureau of competition, said in a statement. Trump, a Republican, is trying to curb California's power under the federal Clean Air Act to set tighter pollution limits than federal law requires, and Newsom's ability to promote electric vehicles as the governor fights climate change. California has received more than 100 waivers under the Clean Air Act since 1970. During his June signing of joint congressional resolutions, Trump also blocked California's effort to end sales of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035. The state is also suing to undo Trump's actions. The case is Daimler Truck North America LLC et al v. California Air Resources Board et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, No. 25-02255.
Economic Times
11 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Forget Canada! D.C. mayor taunts Trump, says US capital should be America's 51st state instead
Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser criticized President Trump's decision to assume control of the city's police and deploy the National Guard, calling it political theater. Highlighting falling crime rates, used the occasion to push for D.C. statehood, arguing that only full autonomy can protect residents' rights. The federal oversight can last 30 days unless extended by Congress. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Federal takeover amid declining crime rates Bowser calls it a Political Theater Partisan divide deepens Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Guard's limited role Statehood debate reignited What's next? FAQs: Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser has fiercely delivered a sharp rebuke to President Trump's unprecedented decision to take control of the city's police department and deploy National Guard troops, calling it a direct threat to the city's democratic autonomy. Seizing the moment to amplify her long-standing campaign for the District to become the 51st state. Bowser mentioned that only full independence can protect the rights of more than 700,000 August 11, 2025, Trump invoked Section 740 of the Home Rule Act , giving him authority to assume command of the Metropolitan Police Department and authorize the deployment of 800 National Guard members under Title 32 status. At present, between 100 and 200 guardsmen remain active, managing support functions such as traffic management and crowd control. They have no arrest powers. As per the law, the federal control is restricted to 30 days unless Congress votes to extend justified the action by warning of the rise of violence in the city, but crime data presents a different angle. Washington, D.C., recorded a 35% drop in violent crime in 2024, and homicides have fallen by 26% in 2025. City officials credit targeted policing strategies and community programs for these declines, calling the president's move unnecessary and politically the takeover 'unsettling and unprecedented,' Bowser emphasized the intervention had little to do with public safety and more to do with political theater. She stressed that the city does not need federal oversight, but equal representation and control over its own governance. In a pointed jab, she quipped that the president 'doesn't have to look north to Canada for a fight — he's found one right here in the capital.'The move has deepened partisan rifts. Democrats say the federal intervention is proof of why D.C. should become the 51st state, noting residents pay federal taxes and serve in the military yet have no voting representation in Congress. Republicans, however, support Trump's decision, mentioning recent high-profile crimes and accusing local leaders of being soft on enforcement. Congress has scheduled hearings to examine the city's safety record and their visible presence of National Guard members across the city, their role is largely supportive. They are coordinating with logistics and crowd control but leaving law enforcement to the Metropolitan Police Department. Even during local coordination, the guardsmen have to finally answer the federal authority for the duration of the high-profile clash has reignited the debate for D.C. statehood . Past proposals, like the Washington, D.C. Admission Act has cleared the House but failed in the Senate. Advocates say statehood would end the capital's vulnerability to sudden federal control , while critics caution it could shift the political balance in Federal control will end in early September unless extended. Legal experts are already weighing whether Trump's actions could face constitutional challenges over executive authority in a jurisdiction that is not a state. Bowser says her administration will continue ensuring safety while protecting the city's autonomy. 'Our residents deserve the same rights as everyone else,' she stated, insisting that true security will come not from federal oversight, but in full statehood for the District of Columbia.Q1. Who is Muriel Bowser?A1. Muriel Bowser is the mayor of Washington, D.C.Q2. What is the Home Rule Act?A2. A law that grants D.C. a degree of self-governance but allows federal intervention in certain circumstances.
