UAE president, Pakistani prime minister discuss cooperation, regional developments
LONDON: UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan met with Pakistan Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif at Qasr Al-Shati in Abu Dhabi to discuss ways to strengthen cooperation between the two countries.
The leaders exchanged Eid Al-Adha greetings on Thursday and focused their meeting on cooperation in the economic, investment, and development sectors. They reaffirmed their commitment to deepening ties and broadening the partnership between their countries.
They discussed various regional and international issues and highlighted the necessity of supporting global initiatives to promote regional and global peace, the Emirates News Agency reported.
Sharif commended Abu Dhabi for promoting dialogue and seeking common ground in diplomatic conflict resolution, along with its continuous support for Pakistan's development initiatives, the WAM added.
The meeting was attended by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al-Nahyan, the deputy ruler of Abu Dhabi and national security adviser, as well as Sheikh Hamdan bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan, the deputy chairman of the Presidential Court for Special Affairs. They were joined by other senior Emirati and Pakistani officials.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
IFC to provide $400 million loan for Pakistan's copper-gold Reko Diq mine
ISLAMABAD: The International Finance Corporation will provide a $400 million subordinated loan for Pakistan's Reko Diq copper-gold mine, according to an IFC disclosure on Friday. The loan adds to a $300 million commitment announced in April, bringing IFC's total financing for the project to $700 million. The estimated cost of the mine is $6.6 billion, to be funded through a mix of debt and equity from a consortium of lenders. 'The estimated total Project cost is $6.6bn, and it will be financed using a combination of debt and equity,' the disclosure said, adding that other parallel lenders will provide the remaining debt financing. This type of loan, known as subordinated debt, is typically repaid after other senior loans and helps absorb more risk, making it easier for other lenders to invest. Other financiers, including the US EXIM Bank, Asian Development Bank, Export Development Canada, and Japan's JBIC, are also expected to join the financing package, project director Tim Cribb told Reuters in April. Term sheets are expected to close by early in the third quarter. IFC chief Makhtar Diop said earlier this year that the institution was 'doubling down' on Pakistan, with a focus on infrastructure, energy and natural resources. Reko Diq, located in Balochistan, is one of the world's largest undeveloped copper-gold deposits. It is being developed by Barrick Gold, which holds 50 percent, with the remainder split between Pakistan's federal and provincial governments. Production is expected to begin in 2028. Barrick has projected the mine will generate up to $74 billion in free cash flow over its estimated 37-year life.
Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Do You Support the State or Hezbollah?
In South Lebanon, the faces of the massacre's survivors were terrifying and harrowing. Amid the rubble of what used to be homes, the people are visibly apprehensive, in pain, and broken. No one was celebrating Eid-Al-Adha, not even the children. Both north and south of the Litani River, everyone in the South is deeply apprehensive about the future. This anxious anticipation- before or after defeat- has manifested itself in many forms, reflecting its causes and implications in various ways. Everything in the south feels unsettling, as though the ground were shaking. On the second day of the holidays, my daughter Nadia returned to our home after visiting our relatives in Nabatiyeh, and she told me about a conversation she had had with one of her young cousins. No older than eleven, this cousin asked: 'Do you support the state or Hezbollah?' My daughter's full account is not for publication, but it was alarming. The joint efforts of physicians, sociologists, and educators would be required to explain how a child could understand how to distinguish between a state and a militia, prefer the latter, and try to convince another child that 'Nawaf Salam is a bad guy, while 'The Sayyed' (Nasrallah) is a hero who died for us.' Before I continue, I should point out that I have not chosen to share the children's conversation because I believe that 'Truth comes out from the children's mouth,' and to expose the community's secrets through their words. My daughter defended Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, saying that he is a good man, while the other child firmly affirmed that Nasrallah is the one true leader. In an era of hyper-sectarianism, the words or behavior of children cannot be understood with the social virus of their environment- children are always innocent at heart. Sheikh Yasser Aoudeh was assaulted due to his enlightened ideas and audacity. We all know who had been behind this crime which exposes just how indoctrinated the community has been, as well as a state of lawlessness. This assault might not have come from the top, and Hezbollah's apology to Sheikh Aoudeh could be sincere. Still, it bears full ideological, social, and moral responsibility for the assault, exactly the same way that it is to blame for the child's words. Had it not been for years of indoctrination and incitement against difference- if it were for the demonization of other political and cultural views as a threat to the faith- this brazen attack against a religious figure in broad daylight, in front of many witnesses, would never have happened. The same applies to the assaults on the UNIFIL forces operating in the south. They are not simply spontaneous reactions of locals, as Hezbollah always claims. They were likely deliberate acts. Worse still, they may be the result of a power struggle within Hezbollah, and they could be linked to regional escalation. The important question is: how can we explain, from a sociological perspective, Hezbollah's success in pushing "locals" to carry out this assault and others like it? How could its support base aggravate the distortion of South Lebanon's relationship with the world? How could they fall into the trap of reinforcing its image as a lawless community that is hostile to outsiders? How can it be so vicious with anyone who criticizes or opposes the party? To analyze the direct and indirect causes of the three events, we need to deconstruct Hezbollah's social and cultural discourse- not just to understand its so-called ideological base but the Shiite community as a whole, both before and after the massacre of the "support war." That is, we must compare and contrast the two different phases in which displays of dominance, strength, and chauvinism accumulated over more than three decades. How can Hezbollah come to terms with the fact that its power had been an illusion? It suffered a crushing defeat within a week, forcing a retreat to its rhetoric of victimhood and existential fear to defend its weapons. Arms are now treated as part of the doctrine, and whoever objects (be they from the sect, the state, or the international community) is deemed an enemy of the faith. Between the rise and fall of ideological groups- throughout the years in which they strive to maintain their hegemony over sectarian their community- they have consistently stubbornly insisted on clinging to the same rhetoric of the massacre. They insist on shunning any effort to go over their mistakes and a reckless escalation, eventually reaching a point where they lose control over their reactions or emotions. At one stage, Hezbollah may indeed have succeeded in undermining the concept of statehood among Shiites, simultaneously consolidating a narrow and exclusive identity. It justified its monopoly over power under the pretext of 'empowering the sect' and 'protecting the faith,' tying both its arsenal. It then turned those arms into a tool needed to maintain a powerful 'parallel statelet' built over the ruins of a weakened state. This is the narrative it pushes on the young and the old, and it is now seeking to reimpose this narrative by force, attacking anyone who dares try to repudiate it.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Pakistan stocks drop over 1,900 points amid Israel-Iran tensions
KARACHI: The Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) plunged more than 1,900 points on Friday, as investor sentiment soured following Israel's strikes on Iran, triggering fears of wider regional escalation. The benchmark KSE-100 index fell 1,949.56 points, or 1.57 percent, closing at 122,143.56, down from the previous close of 124,093.12. Shares traded largely in the red, mirroring losses across regional and global markets after the Israeli attacks shook investor confidence, according to a market review by Pakistani brokerage Topline Securities. 'Geopolitical tensions after Israel's attack in Iran weighed down on world equities, including the KSE100,' Raza Jafri, Head of Intermarket Securities, told Arab News. 'In particular, if a geopolitical risk premium gets added to international oil prices on a prolonged basis, it could negatively affect the outlook for the current account deficit and inflation, given more than 25 percent of Pakistan's import bill comprises of petroleum products.' He noted that Pakistan was now 'much more disciplined' economically, having avoided fuel subsidies and refrained from using foreign exchange reserves to support the currency. This, he said, would help the country better withstand a potential oil price shock than in the past. Ahsan Mehanti, Chief Executive of Arif Habib Commodities Ltd, said stocks declined across the board in response to the strikes. 'Slump in global equities on geopolitical risks and weakening rupee played catalyst role in panic selling at PSX,' he said. Israel launched strikes on Iran earlier on Friday, claiming Tehran was 'very close' to developing a nuclear weapon. The attacks reportedly targeted nuclear facilities, scientists, and senior military commanders.
