These invasive, wasp-like insects are eating Pierce County pine trees
You may notice a pine sawfly on your pine trees this spring or summer. The pesky creatures are more disturbance than damage, but The News Tribune has gathered advice on what to do about them.
A common type of pine sawfly people are likely dealing with in Pierce County is the European sawfly, said entomologist and director of Washington State University's Puyallup Research and Extension Center Todd Murray.
He said he's seen pine hedges in the area being fed on by sawflies, which are a wasp-like insect. They are an invasive species from Europe, and were first documented in Washington state around 2008, Murray said. The sawflies feed on pine needles, sometimes causing bare spots on trees that can be striking, but do not cause critical tree damage, Murray added.
'They aren't really tree killers, they're not a species that's a major concern,' he said. 'They just take the needles away.'
He said pine sawflies also lay their eggs in pine needles, and these egg-positing wounds can be spotted on the foliage. As they get bigger, larvae begin to feed on the needles, making their presence more obvious. Since larvae typically live in big groups, the best way to rid a plant of them is to remove them physically, Murray said.
'They're aggregate feeders, they like to hang out together and eat,' he said. 'If you can reach into bushes within arm's length, you can knock the larvae right off the tree physically, into a bucket of soapy water.'
He said some people may also use insecticide to keep the insects away from their plants, but the bugs aren't deadly to pine trees. Birds are the main predator for pine sawflies, so people can also allow nature to take its course, he added.
For those who feel they have an annual issue with the insects, Murray suggested scouting recent pine needle growth for egg-positing wounds and using that information to see when larvae will eventually develop, to be prepared to remove them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ocean mud locks up much of the planet's carbon – we're digging deep to map these ancient stores
Mud is messy. For some, it's a plaything. To many, it can mean real hardship. Mud, though, is often overlooked, particularly when it lies out of sight. Deep down at the bottom of the sea, it is one of the most important natural archives of Earth's past – holding clues of shifting climates, coastlines, ocean conditions and carbon storage. Our research is the first to use computer models to trace how thick, carbon-rich mud patches on the seafloor have formed over thousands of years – helping to locate hidden carbon stores and understand the seafloor's long-term role in the climate system. This mud is a carbon time capsule. Vast amounts of organic carbon settle on the seafloor each year, coming from decaying marine life and from living (or once living) material washed in from land. When stored in the marine environment, this 'blue carbon' can stay locked away for centuries or millennia. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. Marine sediments are the planet's largest long-term reservoir of organic carbon, particularly in huge underwater mud patches, making them a vital component of the global carbon cycle. Mud makes an excellent carbon store because organic matter sticks to the tiny silt and clay particles and gets deposited in dense sediment, protecting it from oxygen – attributes that larger particles such as sand don't have. But no two mud patches are the same. Each holds a unique story about when it formed, how it got there, and how much carbon it stores. Across the world's continental shelf seas, scientists still don't know where all these muddy deposits are or how extensive they might be. Our research shows that computer modelling past ocean conditions can help predict the location and age of carbon-rich mud – all without getting our toes wet. This is a new way to bring old mud into the blue carbon conversation. We examined three mud‐rich areas in the shallow north-west European shelf seas: the Fladen Ground, Celtic Deep and western Irish Sea mud belts. Using computer models of ocean tides over the past 21,000 years – back to the peak of the last ice age – we found that each of these mud patches formed at different times. In the Celtic Deep and western Irish Sea mud belts, mud has accumulated over the past several thousands of years and continues to do so today, especially in the latter. In the Fladen Ground, deposits are ancient relics, preserved by calm tidal conditions since the muds were laid down between 17,000 and 5,000 years ago. The beauty of this modelling approach is that it can be applied to other shelf seas too. While direct scientific data (as opposed to computer models) is best, sampling the seabed is costly and time-consuming, especially in remote places. That's why the seafloor remains one of the least explored parts of our planet. Our work shows that models of past ocean conditions can help identify carbon-rich areas and guide more efficient sample collection. Mapping the size of muddy deposits and understanding the history of how and when they got there helps scientists to better consider how the seabed can store carbon and act as a buffer against climate change. Until now, assessments of blue carbon in offshore sediments have focused only on the surface of the seabed (typically the top 10cm). But that's literally just scratching the surface. A 2024 report estimated that 244 million tonnes of organic carbon are stored long-term in the surface of the UK's seabed, with over 98% of it in that thin upper layer of sediment (the rest in saltmarshes and seagrass meadows). However, carbon buried below 10cm is 'largely unquantified and relatively old', the report noted. Ignoring that buried carbon risks underestimating the seafloor as a long-term carbon 'sink' – an area that stores more carbon than it releases. The seafloor is a key player in climate regulation, as the carbon locked away in seabed sediments would otherwise contribute to atmospheric carbon dioxide. Disturbing the stored carbon – through offshore trawling, dredging or construction – risks mobilising carbon that has been locked away for centuries or millennia. When seafloor mud is disturbed, the organic carbon it holds can be exposed to oxygen-rich seawater where microbes may break it down, converting it into carbon dioxide. Some of this carbon dioxide dissolved in the seawater may then find its way back into the atmosphere. Read more: That's why we are digging deeper in the Convex Seascape Survey, a five-year global research programme exploring blue carbon – asking questions like: where is it, how and when did it get there, and where did it come from? Alongside the computer modelling, we're studying the sediment record – using long tubes of mud extracted from the seafloor to measure how carbon storage has changed over time. With atmospheric carbon dioxide levels at a record high, it's vital to understand the risks of disturbing underwater carbon stores. Only then can we make smarter decisions about how to protect the ocean, and the carbon stored in its depths. We often think about protecting the ocean in terms of its marine life. But these muddy sediments, quietly building up on the seafloor, are vital in the fight against climate change. As David Attenborough says in his latest film, Ocean: 'The ocean is our planet's life-support system, and our greatest ally against climate catastrophe.' Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation's environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 45,000+ readers who've subscribed so far. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Sophie Ward receives funding from the Convex Seascape Survey. Zoe Roseby receives funding from the Convex Seascape Survey.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Virginia Mason Franciscan Health files notice of layoffs including in Tacoma
Virginia Mason Franciscan Health is eliminating more than 100 jobs systemwide, including in Tacoma, tied to virtual-care services. According to a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification filed Thursday, the layoffs will commence July 28, affecting 116 workers. A VMFH media representative told The News Tribune via email that the layoffs are across the health care system, and 'not limited to Tacoma.' Chad Melton is Interim president, Puget Sound Market, for VMFH. In a statement, Melton said the cuts were part of 'critical but necessary steps to remain financially sustainable so we can continue delivering high-quality care to the communities we serve.' 'This includes transitioning several virtual services and administrative functions, which will impact approximately 200 team members. Affected employees have been notified and are receiving personalized support, including placement assistance and access to open roles within our organization.' Melton noted that VMFH, 'like health care systems across the country,' is facing significant financial pressures 'including rising labor and supply costs, increasing claim denials and chronic underpayment from government programs.' 'These challenges have only intensified in Washington state, where a new budget introduces new taxes that directly affect hospitals and reduces reimbursement, most notably by capping payments for care provided to state and school employees. These changes are expected to cost VMFH an additional $30 million each year.' Melton said that the system as a result was 'realigning resources and improving operational efficiency.' 'These are difficult and necessary decisions to ensure we can continue meeting the needs of our patients — today and into the future,' he added. No further details were available Thursday night.
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
NASA's Arizona science spend
NASA spends hundreds of millions of dollars per state on average annually through its scientific missions, and Arizona is among the country's biggest recipients, a recent analysis shows. Why it matters: The space agency's science efforts bear the brunt of the cuts in the Trump administration's proposed budget, down nearly 50% to $3.9 billion. The big picture: Science represents about 30% of NASA's overall budget and includes missions like space telescopes, robotic probes and satellites that gather data about Earth's changing climate. While not always as headline-grabbing as human spaceflight, NASA's science activity has greatly enhanced our understanding of Earth and our celestial neighborhood. By the numbers: From 2022-2024, Arizona averaged the 10th most direct investment from NASA science spending in the country at $120 million per year, and had the ninth most overall spending last year with nearly $107 million, per data from The Planetary Society, a pro-space nonprofit. Nearly half the money in that three-year period ($58 million) went to Arizona's 7th Congressional District, home to the University of Arizona's main campus. Threat level: The Trump administration's proposed budget for the 2026 fiscal year would cut nearly $57 million in spending from the state. That would "severely curtail research" at University of Arizona and Arizona State University, The Planetary Society warns, putting 566 jobs at risk and jeopardizing $158 million in economic activity. Zoom out: California (About $3 billion), Maryland ($2 billion), Texas ($614 million), Virginia ($612 million) and Alabama ($586 million) saw the most NASA science spending on average annually across fiscal 2022-2024. Each is home to major NASA facilities. Those numbers represent obligations involving "research grants, contracts and cooperative agreements," the group says. Zoom in: Missions on the chopping block in Trump's NASA budget include the New Horizons spacecraft (first launched to study Pluto and now in the outer solar system) and Mars Sample Return, an ambitious joint American-European plan to collect Martian soil samples gathered by the Perseverance rover and bring them to Earth for further study. Nearly 20 active science missions would be canceled in total, the Planetary Society says, representing more than $12 billion in taxpayer investments. What they're saying: A chief concern, Planetary Society chief of space policy Casey Dreier tells Axios, is that already paid-for probes and telescopes would be deactivated even though they're still delivering valuable data, wasting taxpayer dollars already spent to launch and run them. "This is the part where you get pennies on the dollar return," Dreier says. "They keep returning great science for the very fractional cost to keep the lights on. And a lot of these will just be turned off and left to tumble in space."
