Brits are giving away up to £29 billion worth of work a year
For someone in full-time employment, who works an average of 233 days per year and based on the average full-time salary, this is effectively £1,012 worth of time annually they're forgoing.
Nearly half (46 per cent) say this is because they have 'too much work to do', with other reasons identified as feeling pressured to go back to work (23 per cent) and not seeing the point because they don't have enough time to go anywhere (21 per cent).
And more than a third (35 per cent) deemed their lunchbreaks 'too short' – with the average amount of time given to them during a workday only 39 minutes.
To give working Brits back their afternoon breaks, bakery brand, St Pierre, set up a 'respect zone' in Potter's Field Park – paying homage to the sacred lunchbreak and urging Londoners to 'eat avec respect'.
It has been designed to transport lunch-breakers to Paris, encouraging workers to 'do as les Français' – who are notorious for making the most of their slow-paced and leisurely lunches.
A spokesperson from the brand said: 'Lunchbreaks shouldn't be a luxury – and especially not something we feel pressured to forego.
'Even though life is busy and work is important, we need to remember to take time out for ourselves to really get that break we need – and go back to work energised, refreshed, and satisfied by a delicious meal we were able to properly savour.'
This is clearly needed, as 22 per cent believe we don't respect our midday meal enough in this country, especially compared to others in Europe – with Spain (33 per cent), Italy (28 per cent), and France (27 per cent) the most enviable.
Respect was also missing from their employers' attitudes towards this sacred time according to 23 per cent, with four in 10 declaring employers should encourage all staff to take their full lunchbreaks.
But even when those polled do manage to take time for a midday meal, over half (51 per cent) often do something work-related, such as checking emails or answering calls.
This may be because 52 per cent admitted they tend to stay at their desks during lunch, even if not doing work – with a popular alternative being mindlessly scrolling through social media (42 per cent).
And of those who do work through this period, over a fifth (22 per cent) admitted they would find it hard to break the unhealthy habit if they were given the chance.
This revelation comes despite 37 per cent agreeing regularly not taking a lunchbreak can lead to burnout and can negatively affect work performance (28 per cent).
As a result of these non-existent lunchbreaks, food choices also suffer – with 42 per cent rating them as 'average', or worse, according to OnePoll.com data.
The phenomenon also leads to lunchtime being a solitary affair in the UK, with 38 per cent revealing they typically spend this time alone, despite just under half (46 per cent) saying they would enjoy this time much more if they ate with others.
St. Pierre's spokesperson added: 'It's a sad state of affairs that our main break during a long day of work isn't really being treated as one – and that we can't seem to switch off even when given permission.
'There's something to be learned from the French here – taking that moment to really unwind and enjoy a delicious meal, without thinking about other things.
'We're also missing a prime opportunity in our everyday lives to connect with other people over good food and conversation.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
You've been using your oven wrong for years and it may be spoiling your food
If you have an oven in your property, you may want to pay attention, as you need to know what really important symbols mean. For anyone who cooks a lot, it's essential they learn what they're doing Brits do a lot of cooking, which means most people will have an oven at home, but not everyone knows how to work them properly. WhichUK has recently shared some advice to help people better their understanding of the essential daily appliance, and it's pretty important. An explainer video was recently shared on TikTok to detail what people need to get to grips with. It turns out, many people don't know what vital symbols actually mean, but you need to know how to work your appliances properly to ensure you stay safe and get the most out of your cooking experiences. In the clip, the presenter takes people through the different symbols and explains what they actually mean. When it comes to cooking appliances, it turns out you can learn something new every day. The presenter explains: "Are you using your oven wrong? You probably know the classic fan oven symbol. Good for most types of cooking, especially when you use more than one shelf." After showing an oven symbol featuring a simple line at the bottom, she added: "In this case, heat only comes from the bottom. Good for gently cooking stews and casseroles and crisping up the base of a pizza or pastry." In contrast, when there is a thin line at the top and the bottom of the symbol, this means heat comes from both sections, which she said is good for single-shelf cooking of pastries or scones or something substantial like a large cake. It also works well for roasting meat. After showing the grill symbol, she explained: "This is the grill. Some should be used with the door open, others closed, so always check your oven's manual. Place your food close to the grill, but with a little space in between, so it's not touching. "The grill is great for anything that sizzles, like sausages and bacon. [It's] also handy for browning off meat or the top of a lasagne. You can also grill with the fan on, which spreads the grill's heat - good for cooking through thicker pieces of meat or fish without heating the whole oven or burning the top." There's also a grill symbol that features a line at the bottom, and this is the grill with a lower heating element. This is considered a good setting to cook pies, tarts or pizzas that need a crispy base and a brown top. Not to mention, there's also a half-grill setting, which is displayed in the video. When this is turned on, only one part of the grill gets hot, so it's vital to ensure you place food near this area to ensure it cooks properly and doesn't spoil. The video has been viewed over 9,000 times since it was shared, so it's clear some people don't know what their oven symbols mean. The confusion was emphasised in the comment section too. One wrote: "I'm watching this in the knowledge that I only ever use one setting and I will never change." Another added: "My dad's oven broke and he called an electrician around. Turns out he's only used his grill and never used his oven function. How he's survived this long is beyond me." A third replied: "We just turn on the oven, press the go button and hope for the best." Meanwhile, a fourth also commented: "Thank you so much for this." Someone else also chimed in with: "Handy and informative. I use three of the settings mentioned. There are others. I'll have to experiment."
New Statesman
17 hours ago
- New Statesman
We should be eating oily fish – but what's the catch?
The government has, for some time, been trying to get a reluctant population to eat fish – preferably oily fish such as mackerel, herring or salmon – at least twice a week. It began campaigning around 1563, urging people to add Wednesday as a 'fissh daye' to Friday, still observed as a fast day even in newly Protestant England. It was for the national health: not the well-being of individuals, but the country's economic and military might. Elizabeth I's government, flinching at the threat from Spain, aimed to boost 'the nursery of the navy', the fishing fleet. Fish would eke out the nation's limited beef supplies, in demand from a growing and increasingly wealthy population. But neither fasting nor fish were popular and the policy was dropped. In the 18th century there was another attempt. Humiliated by defeat in the American War of Independence, parliament looked instead to develop north and west coastal Scotland, which had no large-scale fishing industry. Inconveniently located Highlanders were cleared from their villages in favour of sheep and packed off to the maritime margins to become crofters and fishing folk. The expanding herring industry attracted the attention of Adam Smith. To relieve poverty, he argued, subsidise the small and local. Bounties (subsidies) on huge fishing vessels simply ended up in the pockets of wealthy Londoners. Those small boats hardly made a dent in Scotland's vast shoals. Daniel Defoe described the Pentland Firth as 'one-third water and two-thirds fish' in the 1720s. Donald Murray's Herring Tales (2022) describes how young Highlanders and Islanders followed the 'numberless armies' throughout the season from Orkney to Lowestoft. For much of the 19th century, netting, gutting, barrelling, curing and selling fish provided jobs (demanding, cold and smelly, as they were) and food through small, usually family-owned boats. The breakfast kipper became part of the much-admired Scottish breakfast (particularly plump, rubicund fish became known as 'Glasgow Magistrates'). Smoked fish gave factory workers something 'tasty' for their tea, and extra-salted fish were given to enslaved workers in the Caribbean. Today, we take a 'healthy diet' to be a personal matter. But the old sense of the health of the economy is indissoluble from bodily health, thanks to the cost of the NHS. Oily fish – salmon, herrings, sardines, sprats, mackerel – have found themselves recommended anew by government for cardiovascular health, thanks to their micronutrients and Omega-3 – essential fatty acids that our bodies cannot make themselves. Critics and conservationists say that humans should simply eat the source of Omega-3 directly, by eating as far up the food chain as possible. Ditch lice-infested fish-farm salmon; instead eat the tiny silver anchovies, sardines, herring – the small fry that are turned into fishmeal. This is cheap, healthy fast food (though, admittedly, they can be whiffy in the kitchen). Traditional recipes tend to be quick and uncomplicated: a flash under the grill, some bread, butter and something sharp like lemon, dill pickle, capers, gooseberries or rhubarb. Potatoes often feature. Smoked mackerel flaked into mashed potato make quick fishcakes, without the smell lingering. Both herring and mackerel take kindly to a devil of mustard and cayenne. The Sicilian pasta con le sarde, an ancient, pre-tomato pasta sauce of sardines, fennel, pine nuts and raisins, takes as long to make as pasta takes to boil. A few anchovies, cooked with onions, give an umami boost to a tomato-based sauce. If there is a lesson in these contrasting stories – the Elizabethan proclamation vs the Adam Smith subsidies – it is that if the legislature wants to change the way the population eats, it must put some money into it; proclamations or their modern equivalent, 'guidelines', don't work by themselves. So much for our economic and personal health – what about the oceans? Smith was right for a reason he couldn't have foreseen: small boats don't wreck the marine ecosystem as huge trawlers do. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe If there are to be plenty more fish in the sea – enough for us to eat our two portions a week – small might be the way to go in the kitchen, as it is in water. [See also: 150 years of the bizarre Hans Christian Andersen] Related
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Look out for 'one of the rarest' UK coins ever struck worth £1,000
This coin must feature a specific error to make it especially valuable An expert has urged Brits to keep an eye out for 'one of the rarest' UK coins ever produced. This highly-sought after two pence piece could be worth as much as £1,000 to collectors. The coin is still legal tender as it was minted in 1983. However, it must bear a specific error to be especially valuable. The minting error can be found on the coin's reverse side (tail side) if it has the inscription "new pence" instead of the standard "two pence". This phrasing was typical post-decimalisation but should have been changed in 1982. In a video uploaded to social media platform TikTok, an expert known as the Coin Collecting Wizard, explained more. He said: 'The 1983 'new pence' 2p coin is one of the rarest decimal coins ever struck, worth over £1,000 to collectors. In 1983 the Royal Mint had already changed the reverse legend [words written on a coin] from 'new pence' to 'two pence' back in 1982. "However, a small number of 2p coins dated 1983 were accidentally struck with the old 'new pence' inscription.' But he warned that these coins will only be in circulation if someone opened a special collector set. He continued: 'These coins were not issued for general circulation and are believed to have been included only in a few special collector set making them extremely scarce. 'If you find one with the date 1983 and the words 'new pence' rather than 'two pence' you may be holding a coin worth a four figure sum. Just don't forget that it is only the year 1983 and it must say' new pence' instead of 'two pence'. 'If you follow these simple rules it will help. Good luck you're going to need it.' As stated on the Royal Mint's website: "In 1983 a small number of 2p coins were mistakenly struck with the wording 'new pence' on the reverse. These coins were produced to brilliant uncirculated quality - a standard higher than ordinary circulating coins - and were included in special sets intended for collectors. "Since there are relatively few coins with the date 1983 and the inscription 'new pence' in circulation, they may well have a value higher than face value to a collector. "The Royal Mint is, however, unable to comment on the value of any individual coin and we would recommend that you should consult a coin dealer." At the time of reporting, an example of the 1983 new pence coin could be found on eBay for £998.58, and another for £2,499.
