Then came Trump & his startling U-turns
US foreign policy under recent presidents has been marked by dramatic shifts, particularly concerning Iran, Pakistan, and India. Trump's approach has been especially unpredictable, reversing established positions and praising authoritarian leaders, contrasting sharply with his predecessors' strategies. This inconsistency raises concerns about the stability and reliability of US relationships on the global stage.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com .)
Almost a decade ago, the Barack Obama administration and Iran struck a nuclear pact, but it was overturned soon after Donald Trump became the US President. The fusion was brief. Joe Biden tried to revive it, but he didn't succeed. The US-Iran relationship went from bad to worse. Then came Trump, who was now eyeing nuclear harmony. But suddenly, Israel entered the scene, creating added fission and justifying that two's company, three's a crowd. With Pakistan, the Obama administration maintained strategic ties despite tensions over some terrorist groups and even pumped in billions of dollars in aid. Then came Trump, thundering that Pakistan was lying, deceiving and 'housing…the very terrorists that we are fighting'. The Biden-led US continued with the Trump-I line of thinking — of limited engagement with Pakistan. But, in an out-of-theblue U-turn, Trump started praising Pakistan and hunting for trade across the Radcliffe Line. In fact, a top US general declared that Pakistan was a 'phenomenal counterterrorism partner'.What an incredible change of heart! That too when Pakistani handlers executed the Pahalgam terrorist attack. Closer to home, Obama's tenure strengthened Indo-US relationship and the Trump administration gave it a strategic rotation. Biden's period saw steady progress in ties in spite of a few hiccups. Then Trump reappeared. To say the least, his or his administration's actions have been embarrassing India quite frequently. It appears as if Trump wants to build relationships on shifting sands. Surprisingly, Trump's approach towards not-so democratic landmasses — West Asia, Russia, China, Hungry, North Korea, etc — has been consistent. Just a few days ago, he was seen mollycoddling Syrian interim president, a former Islamist militant with ties to Al Qaeda. Trump's praise for authoritarian leaders and his absolutist ambitions are well-documented. In this context, former US President George W Bush's remark appears so apt: 'If this were a dictatorship it would be a heck of a lot easier... As long as I'm the dictator. Hehehe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's revival of an 85-year old immigration law creates new risks for undocumented migrants
The Trump administration has started enforcing an 85-year-old immigration law that requires non-citizens to register with the federal government and provide fingerprints. This law, originally passed in 1940 during World War II, had not been actively enforced for over seven decades, according to a report by Politico. Since April 2025, federal prosecutors have charged undocumented immigrants in several states, including Louisiana, Arizona, Montana, Alabama, Texas, and Washington, DC, with 'willful failure to register.' Most of the accused were already detained and facing deportation when the new charges were added. The registration law, part of the Alien Registration Act , classifies failure to register as a misdemeanor. Penalties include up to six months in jail or a $1,000 fine. The law applies to all non-citizens living in the US for over 30 days, regardless of their immigration status. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elegant New Scooters For Seniors In 2024: The Prices May Surprise You Mobility Scooter | Search Ads Learn More Legal experts say the law puts undocumented immigrants in a difficult position. If they comply, they risk exposing details about their illegal entry and stay. If they refuse, they face prosecution. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Jonathan Weinberg, a law professor at Wayne State University told Politico, 'The sort of obvious reason to bring back registration in the first place is the hope that people will register, and therefore give themselves up effectively to the government because they already confessed illegal entry.' Live Events You Might Also Like: Trump administration gives personal data of immigrant medicaid enrollees to deportation officials The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has also confirmed that the aim of the policy is to encourage undocumented immigrants to leave the country voluntarily. In February, DHS described this as 'mass self-deportation,' calling it a safer and more cost-effective method. A new seven-page registration form asks for detailed personal information, including how and when individuals entered the US. DHS estimates that around 3.2 million immigrants are currently unregistered. Since April, 47,000 people have reportedly completed the new form. As per the Politico report, a legal challenge is underway. The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights and other groups have filed a lawsuit. US District Judge Trevor McFadden declined to temporarily block the policy in April, saying the plaintiffs did not show direct harm. The case is now on appeal. In a separate development, a Louisiana judge recently dismissed five of the new criminal cases, stating that the defendants likely didn't know about the law and that the government had not provided a clear way to register since the 1950s. You Might Also Like: Trump directs ICE to expand deportations in Democratic-run cities, undeterred by protests However, the court also said future prosecutions may be more successful now that DHS has implemented a formal registration process. The Justice Department has appealed the dismissed cases and said it will continue pursuing immigration-related prosecutions. Michelle LaPointe, legal director at the American Immigration Council, said to Politico, 'I don't expect them to abate just because there were some dismissals.' She warned the government could still pursue many more cases under this law. You Might Also Like: Trump asks half a million people from THESE countries to 'self-deport' immediately amid immigration crackdown
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Has Iron Dome been breached? Iran claims using ‘new method' to hit Israel; watch missiles in action
Israel-Iran tensions Iranian forces unleashed barrage of missiles on Israel early Monday, targeting major cities including Tel Aviv and Haifa, marking a dramatic escalation in tensions between the two regional powers. The assault damaged residential areas and raised global concerns about the potential for a wider Middle Eastern conflict. Powerful explosions shook Tel Aviv as Israel's defence systems intercepted Iranian missiles. Plumes of black smoke billowed into the sky over the coastal city. Iran says 'new method' made attack more effective Iran's Revolutionary Guards claimed to have employed a novel attack method that allegedly caused Israel's multi-layered defence systems to target each other. "The initiatives and capabilities used in this operation, despite the comprehensive support of the United States and Western powers and the possession of the most up-to-date and newest defence technology, led to the successful and maximum hitting of the missiles on the targets in the occupied territories," it said. They warned that future operations would be "more devastating, tougher, more precise, and more destructive." "The arrogant dictator of Tehran has become a cowardly murderer who targets the civilian home front in Israel to deter the IDF from continuing the attack that is collapsing his capabilities," Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a statement. "The residents of Tehran will pay the price, and soon." Israel's Iron Dome Israel's primary defence mechanism, the Iron Dome, along with other air defence systems, intercepted many of the incoming Iranian missiles. Military officials reported an "80 to 90% success rate" in intercepting these threats, though they acknowledged that no defence system is completely impenetrable. The Iron Dome is Israel's sophisticated air defence system, primarily designed to intercept and destroy short-range rockets, mortars, and drones. Developed by Rafael Advanced Defence Systems with American support, this defensive shield became operational in 2011 and has proven highly effective, with Israeli military officials reporting an impressive 80-90% success rate. The system employs truck-mounted units that fire radar-guided missiles to neutralise incoming threats in mid-air. One of its notable features is its intelligent threat assessment capability - it can determine whether a rocket is headed toward a populated area and only intercepts those that pose a genuine threat, allowing others to land in unpopulated areas.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's US travel ban 2.0: 36 more countries face potential entry restrictions; here's the list
Trump's US travel ban 2.0: 36 more countries face potential entry restrictions; here's the list In a dramatic escalation of its immigration and national security agenda, the administration of the US President Donald Trump is weighing an expansion of travel restrictions that could affect citizens from 36 additional countries, according to an internal State Department cable obtained by Reuters. This move follows Trump's recent executive proclamation earlier this month, which barred nationals from 12 countries from entering the United States. The proposed expansion would mark one of the most sweeping visa policy overhauls in recent US history and has triggered global diplomatic ripples. The internal cable, signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, outlines a stringent 60-day compliance window for the targeted nations to meet US security and identity-verification benchmarks. Failure to do so, the cable warns, could result in a partial or full suspension of entry into the United States for their citizens. Donald Trump escalates immigration crackdown in second term President Trump's return to the White House has been accompanied by an aggressive renewal of his controversial immigration policies. His second term began with deportations of Venezuelan nationals with suspected gang affiliations and efforts to limit enrollment of foreign students in US institutions. On the travel front, as per Reuters report, the administration's recent ban on 12 countries was touted as necessary to protect the United States from "foreign terrorists and other national security threats." These latest measures, however, raise the stakes further and reflect the administration's push for more robust border control and internal vetting mechanisms. US issues warning to 36 nations over security concerns According to the cable, which was first reported by The Washington Post, the State Department has identified numerous security and administrative shortcomings in the 36 countries currently under review. The issues raised include: Lack of cooperation in identity verification or the issuance of forged or insecure passports Failure to facilitate deportation of nationals ordered removed from the US High overstay rates of US visa holders Historical ties to terrorism or antisemitic and anti-American activities The memo emphasized that not all concerns apply to every country on the list, but each is being asked to take corrective action to avoid punitive measures. 'We are constantly reevaluating policies to ensure the safety of Americans and that foreign nationals follow our laws,' a senior State Department official said in background, declining to elaborate on individual countries. US travel ban : List of 36 countries for possible entry restrictions If the proposed expansion proceeds, the following countries may face either full or partial entry restrictions: Africa & Middle East Angola Benin Burkina Faso Cameroon Cote D'Ivoire Democratic Republic of Congo Djibouti Egypt Ethiopia Gabon The Gambia Ghana Liberia Malawi Mauritania Niger Nigeria Senegal South Sudan Sudan Syria Tanzania Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Asia & Pacific Bhutan Cambodia Kyrgyzstan Tonga Tuvalu Vanuatu Caribbean & Americas Antigua and Barbuda Cabo Verde Dominica Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Sao Tome and Principe The countries are being evaluated based on metrics such as passport security, deportation cooperation, and terrorism-related risks. Countries already affected by travel restrictions The administration's latest actions build upon existing travel restrictions. Earlier this month, a presidential proclamation barred entry from: Afghanistan Myanmar Chad Congo Republic Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Somalia Sudan Yemen In addition, partial restrictions are currently in place for: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela These restrictions vary from limitations on certain visa classes to outright bans on all forms of travel. Legal, diplomatic, and global ramifications The proposed expansion is expected to reignite legal and diplomatic tensions. During his first term, Trump's 2017 travel ban targeting Muslim-majority countries sparked widespread protests and lawsuits. Though challenged multiple times, the Supreme Court upheld a revised version in 2018. Critics say these bans disproportionately affect developing nations and vulnerable populations, and that national security justifications often lack transparency. Several nations already impacted by existing bans have expressed frustration, with diplomatic channels flooded with requests for clarification and protest notes. Human rights organizations have condemned the new move, calling it a form of 'geopolitical discrimination.' The 60-day countdown: What happens next? As per the cable, nations identified must take corrective steps within 60 days to avoid travel restrictions. These steps could include: Issuing machine-readable and tamper-proof passports Signing repatriation agreements to facilitate removal of deported citizens Sharing biometric data with US law enforcement and immigration authorities Demonstrating cooperation in counterterrorism intelligence Failure to comply could result in entry bans for visa applicants, revocation of existing visas, or even restrictions on diplomatic staff and government officials. White House defends the move In a statement issued late Sunday, the White House defended the travel policy expansion: 'The Trump administration will always prioritize the safety of Americans. Nations unwilling or unable to meet global identity and security standards will face consequences. We seek cooperation, not confrontation—but compliance is non-negotiable.' Despite mounting criticism, the administration remains firm in its stance, citing national security, sovereignty, and public order as non-negotiable pillars of US immigration policy. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
