logo
Luxury-loving engineer, 31, who ran drug empire to fund lavish holidays & buy second home ordered to pay back just £96k

Luxury-loving engineer, 31, who ran drug empire to fund lavish holidays & buy second home ordered to pay back just £96k

The Sun07-06-2025
A LUXURY-loving woman ran a cannabis and cocaine empire to fund a lavish lifestyle of foreign holidays and expensive treats - before being rumbled after a costly mistake.
But Danielle Stafford has now been ordered to pay more than £96,000 back as the proceeds of crime, and she's got just 12 weeks to stump up the cash.
8
8
8
The 31-year-old made so much money by selling drugs that she bought a second house and lived without touching any of her job salary.
She pretended that most of the expensive items that were found were not designer goods but were fake or had merely been given to her by family members from their foreign holidays.
She was caught when police spotted her speeding.
A phone constantly rang with 30 calls or pinged with up to 20 drug messages after she was arrested and police later found £26,917 cash stashed around her home and drugs with a street value of £33,600.
She had luxuries including nine watches and three expensive Louis Vuitton handbags, Hull Crown Court heard.
Engineer and University of Hull graduate Stafford, 31, formerly of Hallgate, Cottingham, was jailed for seven-and-a-half years in April 2023 after she admitted three offences of being concerned in supplying heroin, crack cocaine and cannabis and another of possessing cash as criminal property, on dates spanning October 2017 and May 2020.
But the case resurfaced and was mentioned again so that the court could make a final decision on how much money Stafford was said to have made from her criminal activities.
Nadim Bashir, prosecuting, said that the criminal benefit figure had been agreed at £96,263.
She was ordered to pay it within three months – or face a default prison sentence of one year, to be served consecutively.
Stafford attended the hearing via a video link from prison.
Moment gutted lag is arrested at prison gates as he LEAVES jail after drug-dealing from his cell
The matter had originally been scheduled to be a contested full hearing but agreement was reached between the sides.
During the original court hearing in 2023, Mr Bashir said that police spotted a silver Audi heading along Priory Road towards Hull city centre at 7.30pm on May 12, 2020.
It was speeding and hastily turned onto Hotham Road South, cutting the corner and cutting up a vehicle heading in the opposite direction.
"It was then driven at speed along Hotham Road South," said Mr Bashir.
The car was followed and it was stopped in The Odd Bottle car park on Wold Road.
Police could smell cannabis coming from the inside of the car and this aroused their suspicions.
She "immediately lied" and told police: "I'll be honest, I've got this" and handed police a small silver wrap containing two buds of cannabis skunk.
Police found further bags of cannabis on her, including a food bag containing cannabis skunk and, from a pocket, another food bag containing cannabis skunk.
8
8
8
The car was searched and a carrier bag of cannabis skunk was found behind the driver's seat.
An empty tub containing drug residue was found. The total value of the cannabis was £1,308.
An iPhone was found, with drug messages on it.
"From the moment of seizure of the drugs to the arrival in the police station custody suite, the mobile iPhone was constantly ringing and receiving messages from different people," said Mr Bashir.
"Some 30 phone calls were received and 10 to 20 text messages."
On the way to the police station, Stafford was seen "fidgeting" with her jogging bottoms and she was asked if she had any more drugs hidden.
She said: "Yes, but it's not mine and I don't know what it is. I shoved it down my joggers when you pulled me."
Stafford pulled out a bag containing a large amount of small bags of cocaine.
There were 56 wraps of crack cocaine, valued at £2,800.
Her three-bedroom home in Cottingham was searched after police forced entry.
A glass jar with plastic bags inside was found hidden behind a bag of coal bricks in a coal bunker in the rear garden.
From the moment of seizure of the drugs to the arrival in the police station custody suite, the mobile iPhone was constantly ringing and receiving messages from different people
Nadim Bashirprosecuting
There were 270 wraps of crack cocaine, valued at £13,500, and 205 wraps of heroin, valued at £4,100, in the jar.
Stafford denied knowledge of them.
In the living room, herbal cannabis, valued at £2,500, was found in an open, empty banana box on a table.
She denied that it belonged to her.
Two glass jars contained cannabis valued at £370. Police also found weighing scales, a large amount of cash and more food bags. She admitted that this belonged to her.
In Stafford's bedroom, £430 cash and £25.36 in coins were found.
Herbal cannabis and Ecstasy tablets were found. Bank notes totalling £670 were found as well as £2,350 and £1,480 cash.
More cash, totalling £7,580, was found in a safe but she denied that it was hers.
Three Louis Vuitton handbags and nine watches were found. She admitted that these were hers.
8
8
In an upstairs box room, cash bundles of £9,100, £1,668, £550, £700, £1,110, £165, £190 and £91 were found.
Examination of Stafford's bank accounts revealed that "she clearly had an additional stream of cash income" apart from her monthly wages from working for Swift Group.
Holidays had been taken but there was no trace from her bank account of her buying foreign currency or making purchases overseas.
"Again, evidence of an additional cash stream income," said Mr Bashir.
Stafford had bought her Cottingham home in March 2016 for £124,999 in her sole name with a mortgage and a property in Hotham Road South in July 2018 without a mortgage for £68,500 in equal shares with her aunt.
Stafford paid the "lion's share" of £64,927 from cashing in premium bonds and she told police that she bought it to rent out.
"Even with rental or lodgings allowances, neither property was able to provide any significant source of income to justify the cash found in the house," said Mr Bashir.
During police interview, Stafford claimed that a Liverpool lad had been staying with her on and off and that he had telephoned her to say that he had left something at her home.
She had somehow managed to avoid her drug dealing activities coming to the attention of the police for a substantial period of time.
Nadim BashirProsecuting
When she got home, there was a large amount of cannabis and, when he asked her to take it to him, she said that she did not feel comfortable doing so.
She claimed that he asked her just to bring a bag which was there and, in a panic, she grabbed a bag and was driving to meet him.
Stafford denied that she or the lad were dealing drugs but later admitted that she would drive to Liverpool and bring him back to Hull.
She denied knowledge of any of the large amounts of cash found around her home, claiming that she looked after it for the lad, including keeping it for him in her own bedroom, apart from £2,350 which belonged to her.
"She said that the money in the safe had nothing to do with her and all the other cash belonged to the lad," said Mr Bashir.
He told the court that Stafford was an "enthusiastic" cannabis dealer and progressed to becoming a Class A cocaine dealer.
"She had somehow managed to avoid her drug dealing activities coming to the attention of the police for a substantial period of time," said Mr Bashir.
"The natural result of this was that she was able to accumulate a substantial amount of wealth, including purchasing an investment property, a house to rent.
"Cash found in her home address amounted to £26,917.
"The contents of her home address in Hallgate, Cottingham, is strong evidence of the nature of her drugs business.
"The amount, type and value of drugs found at her home were substantial. The drugs alone were street valued at £33,600. This is sustained drug dealing."
During the 2023 hearing, Saleema Mahmood, mitigating, said that Stafford was street dealing cannabis and regularly and frequently took part in this.
She claimed that her involvement in Class A dealing arose through a person from Liverpool.
Evidence of any Class A dealing was extremely limited and came from two sets of messages.
This came much later than the cannabis enterprise.
There was an element of naivety and exploitation in her involvement and she had little influence on those above her in the chain.
Stafford claimed that she had only the "odd piece" of designer item and that so-called expensive watches and other items bought were counterfeit or had been bought as presents for her by her family on holidays to places like Turkey and Spain.
She also claimed that the family was in the habit of keeping large amounts of cash at home, rather than in a bank, and that she was entrusted to look after them for family members because she was seen as being a "responsible" person who could be "trusted" with money.
She had shown remorse for what she had done.
There were references from previous employers and others. She had tried to get work and had done voluntary work.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row
Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Rayner claims Reform will ‘fail women' as she weighs in on online safety row

Nigel Farage and Reform UK risk 'failing a generation of young women' if they scrap online safety laws aimed at preventing revenge porn, Angela Rayner has said. The Deputy Prime Minister demanded Mr Farage explain how his party would keep young women safe when they use the internet, after Reform vowed to repeal the Online Safety Act. Her warning is the latest intervention in a row between senior Labour figures and Mr Farage's party over the Act. Under new rules introduced through the legislation at the end of July, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children from accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Reform has vowed to repeal the law and replace it with a different means of protecting children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Among their criticisms of the Act, Mr Farage and his colleagues have cited freedom of speech concerns and claimed the Act is an example of overreach by the Government. This prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the Act – like Mr Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the Act. Now, the Deputy Prime Minister has questioned how Mr Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse, also known as 'revenge porn', without the Online Safety Act's protections. Ms Rayner claimed: 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also said. Ministers have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free speech. In a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Mr Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the Government have outlined one. He also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and location. When Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. 'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. 'Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'

Rayner claims Farage's Reform will ‘fail women' in online safety act row
Rayner claims Farage's Reform will ‘fail women' in online safety act row

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Rayner claims Farage's Reform will ‘fail women' in online safety act row

Angela Rayner has warned Nigel Farage and Reform UK that their plan to scrap online safety laws could "fail a generation of young women" by removing protections against issues such as revenge porn. The Deputy Prime Minister demanded Mr Farage explain how his party would ensure young women's online safety, given Reform's vow to repeal the Online Safety Act. Her warning is the latest in a series of interventions by senior Labour figures regarding the Act. Under rules introduced in late July, the legislation requires online platforms, including social media and search engines, to prevent children from accessing harmful content like pornography or material encouraging suicide. Reform has vowed to repeal the law and replace it with a different means of protecting children online, though the party has not said how it would do this. Among their criticisms of the Act, Mr Farage and his colleagues have cited freedom of speech concerns and claimed the Act is an example of overreach by the Government. This prompted backlash from Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who claimed people like Jimmy Savile would use the internet to exploit children if he was still alive, and insisted anyone against the Act – like Mr Farage – was 'on their side'. The Reform leader demanded an apology, but ministers have been trenchant in their defence of the Act. Now, the Deputy Prime Minister has questioned how Mr Farage would seek to prevent the 'devastating crime' of intimate image abuse, also known as 'revenge porn', without the Online Safety Act's protections. Ms Rayner claimed: 'Nigel Farage risks failing a generation of young women with his dangerous and irresponsible plans to scrap online safety laws. 'Scrapping safeguards and having no viable alternative plan in place to halt the floodgates of abuse that could open is an appalling dereliction of duty. It's time for Farage to tell women and girls across Britain how he would keep them safe online.' Under the Online Safety Act, revenge porn is classified among the 'most severe online offences', the Deputy PM added. Citing figures from the charity Refuge, the Labour Party claimed a million young women had been subject to revenge porn: either intimate images being shared, or the threat of this. Some 3.4 million adults in total, both men and women, have been affected, Labour also said. Ministers have previously had to defend the Online Safety Act against accusations from Elon Musk's X social media site that it is threatening free speech. In a post at the start of August titled 'What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach', the platform formerly known as Twitter outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Mr Farage has meanwhile suggested there is a 'tech answer' for protecting children online, but neither he nor the Government have outlined one. He also suggested children are too easily able to avoid new online age verification rules by using VPNs (virtual private networks), which allow them to circumvent the rules by masking their identity and location. When Reform UK was approached for comment, its Westminster councillor Laila Cunningham said: 'Women are more unsafe than ever before thanks to Labour. Starmer has released thousands of criminals back onto the streets early with no regard for women's safety. 'I am calling on Jess Phillips to debate me on women's safety – she ignored the grooming gangs scandal and now she's wilfully deceiving voters on this issue. 'Reform will always prioritise prosecuting abuse but will never let women's safety be hijacked to justify censorship. 'You don't protect women by silencing speech. You protect them by securing borders, enforcing the law, and locking up actual criminals, and that is exactly what a Reform government would do.'

Tech Secretary Peter Kyle reignites war with Nigel Farage by accusing him of putting women at risk
Tech Secretary Peter Kyle reignites war with Nigel Farage by accusing him of putting women at risk

The Sun

time8 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Tech Secretary Peter Kyle reignites war with Nigel Farage by accusing him of putting women at risk

TECH Secretary Peter Kyle has reignited his war with Nigel Farage by accusing him of putting women at risk. He claims the Reform leader's vow to repeal online safety laws would 'rip up' protections against violent misogyny and revenge porn. 2 Mr Kyle sparked a row last month when he alleged Nigel was 'on the side' of paedos like Jimmy Savile. Furious Mr Farage branded the comments 'disgusting' and demanded an apology. But Labour has launched a fresh assault on Mr Farage as he soars in the polls. Both Deputy PM Angela Rayner and safeguarding minister Jess Phillips are attacking him over women's safety. Writing in today's Sun on Sunday, Mr Kyle says: 'When Nigel Farage boasts that he would scrap the Online Safety Act, he's admitting he's happy to leave the internet as a wild west and put women and girls at risk. 'He'd rip up protections that crack down on revenge porn, violent misogynistic content, and posts encouraging self-harm or suicide. 'He would tear down the defences we've built to hold back dangerous content and that would make the police's job much harder.' Zia Yusuf, head of the party's Department of Government Efficiency, said: 'This law is the biggest assault on freedom of expression in this country in our lifetimes. Since the Act came into force what has been censored? "Footage of a protest in Leeds, comments demanding the end of illegal migration, and even biographies of Richard the Lionheart have been removed from social media. Reform party leader Nigel Farage discusses immigration at Westminster press conference 'If this was really about protecting children from predators, why did this law result in the censorship of a speech in Parliament on the grooming gangs?' Mr Yusuf said Reform would pass a law 'fit for purpose'. It comes after Donald Trump's US administration attacked Britain for 'serious restrictions' on free speech. 2 Strangle porn 'rife for kids' By Sophia Sleigh MORE than half of kids have seen strangling in online porn, a shock poll will show this week. Some 58 per cent of 16 to 21-year-olds said they witnessed it when they were younger. Most had it served up to them on their feeds without looking for it. Stronger protections were introduced by Ofcom in July as part of the Online Safety Act. The Government aims to ban strangling porn through its Crime and Policing Bill. Children's Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza, who ordered the research, said: 'Pornography is warping children's views of themselves, of each other and of their expectations of sex. 'They are seeing, often by accident, things which are illegal in real life.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store