Taiwan's entrepreneurs in China feel heat from cross-strait tensions
Bustling Taipei-style shopping streets, majestic temples to the island's deities and thriving factories dot the eastern Chinese city of Kunshan, for years a hub for Taiwanese businesses.
But now those firms are feeling the strain from cross-strait tensions that have stoked safety fears among them.
Taiwanese entrepreneurs — known as Taishang in Mandarin — poured billions into mainland China since ties began improving in the 1990s, playing an important role in its rise to become the world's second-largest economy.
But their numbers have dwindled in recent years, with the number of Taiwanese working in China dropping from 409,000 in 2009 to 177,000 in 2022, according to estimates provided by the Straits Exchange Foundation, an unofficial intermediary between Taipei and Beijing.
China's economic slowdown and mounting trade tensions with Washington are partially responsible for the drop, the organization says.
But James Lee, a 78-year-old Taiwanese industrialist who was forced to close his cable and electrical outlet factory in southern Guangdong province in 2022, blames "politics."
"You have to be very careful when you speak," Lee said. "We Taiwanese businessmen are afraid."
Bolstered by their mastery of Mandarin and business acumen, Taishang have prospered as wily intermediaries between international markets and China's vast industrial manufacturing base.
Perhaps the most famous of them is Terry Gou, the founder of Foxconn whose vast factories in China churn out iPhones that have helped make it the world's biggest contract electronics manufacturer.
No guarantee of safety
An hour's drive from economic powerhouse Shanghai, Kunshan has been a key hub for Taiwanese-owned industry in China since the 1990s.
"Back then, it was a rice field," recalls Annie Wang, an industrialist from the island who arrived in Kunshan in 1996.
"Taiwanese companies were fortunate to coincide with the 30 most glorious years of Chinese manufacturing," she said.
Now, Wang heads an electronics subcontracting manufacturing plant, a small technology park and a coffee utensil brand.
At the height of the boom, Kunshan was home to more than 100,000 Taiwanese, according to unofficial figures from local associations.
But the number of Taiwanese companies in the city has shrunk from more than 10,000 a decade ago to fewer than 5,000 today, according to the data.
And the Taishang have felt the squeeze as relations between Taipei and Beijing plunge to their lowest depths in years.
The Chinese Communist Party — which claims Taiwan as its territory but has never controlled it — has hardened its stance against alleged "Taiwanese independence activists," even calling for the death penalty for alleged secessionism.
New rules, which also encourage citizens to report alleged pro-independence activities, have had a chilling effect on Taiwanese businesses in mainland China.
"We are not sending Taiwanese employees (to China) because we don't know how to guarantee their safety," said Lee.
"The initial favourable conditions have disappeared, and now there are many additional risks," Luo Wen-jia, vice chairman of the Straits Exchange Foundation, said.
China's economic woes and rising production costs are adding to the problems.
"When we first went there, we thought that China's economy would continue to improve because its market is so large and its population is so big," Leon Chen, a Taiwanese businessman who worked at a battery component factory in the southeastern province of Jiangxi, said.
"But we haven't seen this materialise because there are some issues — there is the U.S.-China trade war and there was the pandemic," he added.
Caught in crossfire
In response, Taiwanese manufacturers are turning to new, more profitable — and less politically sensitive — locales.
"Some went to Vietnam, and some went to Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines, and some returned to Taiwan," Luo said.
Between 2016 and 2024, Taiwanese investments in Vietnam approved by the Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taipei soared 129%, from $451 million to more than $1 billion.
Over the same period, those to mainland China fell 62%, according to the same source.
This decline could deal a blow to Beijing's "united front" strategy, which has seen it lean on Taishang communities to promote Taiwan's political integration and, ultimately, unification.
And as Beijing launches military drills practicing a blockade of Taiwan and Taipei cracks down on Chinese spies, Taishang risk being caught in the crossfire.
In October 2023, Foxconn was placed under investigation by Chinese authorities — a move widely seen as linked to a bid for the Taiwan presidency by its founder.
"There is no way to compare it with the heyday but we can still make ends meet," said Chen. "If the environment for doing business in China becomes worse and worse, we would have no choice but to leave."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
3 hours ago
- NHK
US pressure: Taiwan's high-stakes chips
Global semiconductor powerhouse Taiwan walks a fine line as it balances US tariff threats with its China chip export and plant interests.
Japan Times
4 hours ago
- Japan Times
Taiwan's entrepreneurs in China feel heat from cross-strait tensions
Bustling Taipei-style shopping streets, majestic temples to the island's deities and thriving factories dot the eastern Chinese city of Kunshan, for years a hub for Taiwanese businesses. But now those firms are feeling the strain from cross-strait tensions that have stoked safety fears among them. Taiwanese entrepreneurs — known as Taishang in Mandarin — poured billions into mainland China since ties began improving in the 1990s, playing an important role in its rise to become the world's second-largest economy. But their numbers have dwindled in recent years, with the number of Taiwanese working in China dropping from 409,000 in 2009 to 177,000 in 2022, according to estimates provided by the Straits Exchange Foundation, an unofficial intermediary between Taipei and Beijing. China's economic slowdown and mounting trade tensions with Washington are partially responsible for the drop, the organization says. But James Lee, a 78-year-old Taiwanese industrialist who was forced to close his cable and electrical outlet factory in southern Guangdong province in 2022, blames "politics." "You have to be very careful when you speak," Lee said. "We Taiwanese businessmen are afraid." Bolstered by their mastery of Mandarin and business acumen, Taishang have prospered as wily intermediaries between international markets and China's vast industrial manufacturing base. Perhaps the most famous of them is Terry Gou, the founder of Foxconn whose vast factories in China churn out iPhones that have helped make it the world's biggest contract electronics manufacturer. No guarantee of safety An hour's drive from economic powerhouse Shanghai, Kunshan has been a key hub for Taiwanese-owned industry in China since the 1990s. "Back then, it was a rice field," recalls Annie Wang, an industrialist from the island who arrived in Kunshan in 1996. "Taiwanese companies were fortunate to coincide with the 30 most glorious years of Chinese manufacturing," she said. Now, Wang heads an electronics subcontracting manufacturing plant, a small technology park and a coffee utensil brand. At the height of the boom, Kunshan was home to more than 100,000 Taiwanese, according to unofficial figures from local associations. But the number of Taiwanese companies in the city has shrunk from more than 10,000 a decade ago to fewer than 5,000 today, according to the data. And the Taishang have felt the squeeze as relations between Taipei and Beijing plunge to their lowest depths in years. The Chinese Communist Party — which claims Taiwan as its territory but has never controlled it — has hardened its stance against alleged "Taiwanese independence activists," even calling for the death penalty for alleged secessionism. New rules, which also encourage citizens to report alleged pro-independence activities, have had a chilling effect on Taiwanese businesses in mainland China. "We are not sending Taiwanese employees (to China) because we don't know how to guarantee their safety," said Lee. "The initial favourable conditions have disappeared, and now there are many additional risks," Luo Wen-jia, vice chairman of the Straits Exchange Foundation, said. China's economic woes and rising production costs are adding to the problems. "When we first went there, we thought that China's economy would continue to improve because its market is so large and its population is so big," Leon Chen, a Taiwanese businessman who worked at a battery component factory in the southeastern province of Jiangxi, said. "But we haven't seen this materialise because there are some issues — there is the U.S.-China trade war and there was the pandemic," he added. Caught in crossfire In response, Taiwanese manufacturers are turning to new, more profitable — and less politically sensitive — locales. "Some went to Vietnam, and some went to Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines, and some returned to Taiwan," Luo said. Between 2016 and 2024, Taiwanese investments in Vietnam approved by the Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taipei soared 129%, from $451 million to more than $1 billion. Over the same period, those to mainland China fell 62%, according to the same source. This decline could deal a blow to Beijing's "united front" strategy, which has seen it lean on Taishang communities to promote Taiwan's political integration and, ultimately, unification. And as Beijing launches military drills practicing a blockade of Taiwan and Taipei cracks down on Chinese spies, Taishang risk being caught in the crossfire. In October 2023, Foxconn was placed under investigation by Chinese authorities — a move widely seen as linked to a bid for the Taiwan presidency by its founder. "There is no way to compare it with the heyday but we can still make ends meet," said Chen. "If the environment for doing business in China becomes worse and worse, we would have no choice but to leave."
Japan Times
7 hours ago
- Japan Times
Asia overshadowed as G7 struggles with crises and lack of unity
Discussions about the Indo-Pacific — specifically China — were largely overshadowed at this year's two-day Group of Seven leaders' summit in Canada, with the focus squarely on the Israel-Iran conflict, adding to fears of disengagement from the region. While the meeting in the Canadian Rockies' resort area of Kananaskis in Alberta did offer the G7 a chance to further align on peripheral issues, the gathering yielded few concrete deliverables at a time of growing challenges to the rules-based order, raising doubts about the group's significance amid an increasingly cavernous divide between the U.S. and other members. U.S. President Donald Trump's hasty departure on the summit's first day not only left the grouping without its top leader, it also resulted in a number of missed opportunities to both display unity and engage with allies and partners on key global and bilateral issues. Meanwhile, mentions of China's growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific — a constant element of previous summits — were conspicuously absent from the statements that emerged from the meeting. Speaking at a news conference after the summit, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said that he had 'emphasized the importance of the G7's continued engagement in the region' and secured an agreement 'to work together on various issues related to China' and nuclear-armed North Korea. 'As the only G7 member in Asia, I shared Japan's position and efforts, including from the perspective of the Indo-Pacific region,' he said. 'Through two days of intensive discussions, we, the G7 leaders, were able to demonstrate our resolve to unite and work together to take the lead in addressing the various challenges facing the international community,' he added. But the visible lack of any focus on the Indo-Pacific was viewed by some as a loss for Ishiba, alongside the lack of a Japan-U.S. trade framework announcement and the missed chance for his first trilateral talks with Trump and South Korea's new president, Lee Jae-myung. 'I think this is a setback for Ishiba, who would clearly have preferred to reach an agreement with the U.S. on settling the trade dispute before the Upper House elections to emphasize his government's competency in handling Trump on the foreign policy front,' said Sebastian Maslow, an associate professor who specializes in Japanese politics at the University of Tokyo. 'Since this hasn't happened, the public and the opposition will have ample opportunity to question his U.S. policy.' An Upper House election is expected to be held July 20. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba speaks during a news conference at the conclusion of the Group of Seven summit, in Calgary on Tuesday. | AFP-JIJI At the same time, the gathering was a missed opportunity to unite behind new strategies intended to counter Chinese assertiveness in the region. 'Any loss in U.S. capacity to strengthen its alliance network is a general foreign policy win for Beijing, which views the United States as committed to cooperating with allies and partners to 'contain' China's growth,' said Chase Blazek, an Asia-Pacific analyst at U.S.-based geopolitics and intelligence firm RANE. It also became clear at the summit that other members of the group are struggling to fill the void left by Trump's absence, either individually or collectively. Ishiba was likely always going to struggle to secure a concerted focus on the Indo-Pacific. While the presence at the summit of Lee, as well as the prime ministers of India and Australia might have helped, Trump's early departure meant he wasn't able to meet any of them, thus removing any chance of presenting a united front alongside Japan. 'The larger image is hard to shake — America is walking away from global leadership at a time when it is badly needed,' said Nick Bisley, dean and professor of international relations at Australia's La Trobe University. 'The cooperative approach that lies at the heart of multilateralism is entirely at odds with Trump's instincts and political persona,' he added. To be fair, expectations for this G7 gathering were low to begin with. Relations between Washington and its closest allies have taken a hit ever since Trump decided to launch his global campaign of unilateral tariffs. Many countries had hoped to reach a deal with Washington at the summit, but the only agreement signed was with Britain — and that was seen as a mere formality. Further highlighting the low bar, Canada had announced prior to the summit that the grouping would not release a joint communique due to expected disagreements with the United States. The disagreements became clear from the outset, when the U.S. president mused that Russia should again be part of the bloc and raised the possibility of China — which his administration calls the United States' top security priority — also joining the grouping. Both suggestions are believed to have raised eyebrows among the G7's other members, especially after Moscow backed the remarks, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov telling reporters: "We agree with President Trump: It was a big mistake then to exclude Russia from the G8 format." Ultimately, as Washington refused to back a call for de-escalation, G7 leaders were only able to reach a bare-minimum agreement on the Israel-Iran conflict, issuing a tersely worded joint statement in which they expressed support for Israel's 'right to defend itself' while labeling Iran a 'principal source of regional instability.' Another pressing issue where Trump found himself at odds with other leaders was the conflict in Ukraine, with Canadian officials quoted as saying that plans to issue a strong statement on Russia's invasion were dropped after the U.S. sought to water down a draft document. U.S. President Donald Trump arrives for a family photo during the Group of Seven summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, on Monday. | POOL / VIA AFP-JIJI In Trump's absence, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met Tuesday with the remaining G7 leaders, who used the opportunity to double down on their support, including a promise by Canada of fresh financial sanctions and nearly $1.5 billion in new military assistance. Ishiba also held his first in-person meeting with Zelenskyy, discussing defense-industrial cooperation, including investments in Ukraine's drone production, as well as continued support for reconstruction efforts. The two sides also addressed Russia's collaboration with North Korea and Iran, including Moscow's upgrade of Iranian drones and the subsequent transfer of these enhanced models to Pyongyang. This comes as European countries are pushing for more coordinated sanctions against Russia. Washington, however, has refused to join the push, with Trump saying that Europeans should "do it first" and that "sanctions cost us a lot of money." 'The G7 has historically seen itself as a group of developed democracies,' said Ian Chong, an associate professor and expert on international relations at the National University of Singapore. 'Trump's position suggests that he prioritizes being a big power over common political values.' Meanwhile, conversations on the Indo-Pacific are likely to continue, Chong said, even if they do not have the higher profile of the crises that overshadowed the region at this meeting. But some say the latest summit ultimately highlighted how the Trump administration is squandering hard-earned U.S. leverage for short-term gains. 'What we need from President Trump are commonsense aims,' said Patrick Cronin, an Asia-Pacific security expert with the Hudson Institute think tank. Washington, he said, needs to be firmer with adversaries than allies, while also maintaining respect on the world stage and articulating what a 'credible' new international order looks like 'before dismantling the one that has served American interests for generations.' 'In the parlance of the current era, don't squander leverage without a clear strategy for achieving a better deal.'
