‘Stitch-up' or scandal? What triggered the downfall of Britain's Sea Lord

Telegraph

13-05-2025

Convened in a grand 19th-century mansion overlooking Buckingham Palace, the First Sea Lord's annual Sea Power Conference is a vivid reminder that Britannia did indeed once rule the waves. Within the imperial staterooms of Lancaster House, the Royal Navy's flagship conference attracts military VIPs from across the globe, discussing how Britain and her allies can steady an ever more unstable world. There is even a 'First Sea Lord's essay competition', offering a £1,000 prize for a well-argued strategy paper on how the Royal Navy might best deal with specific security threats.
This year, however, the august gathering – due to start on May 12 – was postponed at the last minute because of a keynote speaker dropping out. No, not a Ukrainian admiral sidetracked by urgent business in the Black Sea, or a tetchy Trump envoy throwing a hissy fit. Instead, it was the host himself, First Sea Lord Adml Sir Ben Key – whom, delegates were informed last week, had 'had to step back from all his duties for private reasons'.
The Ministry of Defence declined at first to elaborate, prompting speculation that Sir Ben was perhaps gravely ill. But on Friday, it confirmed he had stepped down while claims of an extramarital affair with a female subordinate are investigated.
It is the first time in the Navy's 500-year history that its First Sea Lord has faced a formal misconduct probe – which is perhaps surprising, given the reputation Royal Navy commanders had, in centuries past, for floggings, drunkenness and occasional acts of piracy.
Yet while it has been portrayed as a straightforward HR matter – the Navy forbids commanders having relationships with underlings – some suspect the reasons for his departure may have been rather murkier. A popular officer among the ranks, Sir Ben was said to be unhappy over planned cuts to the Navy, and was rumoured to have clashed with the Chief of the Defence Staff, Adml Sir Tony Radakin, over priorities. With Labour tipped to publish its long-awaited strategic defence review (SDR) in coming weeks – one that few expect to offer much new cash – there is speculation that the disciplinary proceedings might have been brought about, at least partly, to silence him.
'I think he has been stitched up to get him out of the picture,' one unnamed Naval source told the Mail on Sunday. 'He had constantly raised questions about the delays with new ships, funding for recruiting and the lack of frigates, and he was told to keep quiet. Now he can't say a thing.'
The MoD has declined to comment further, as has Sir Ben, 59, who has two sons and a daughter with his wife, Elly. But whether well-informed or not, the unproven speculation could barely have come at a worse time for the Government, as it tries to persuade both Britain and the world that the Navy will remain a serious global player.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has promised to increase defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP, amid growing threats from Russia and China, but many experts believe that figure should be twice that. With Donald Trump refusing to act as a Nato backstop, British Navy chiefs feel their own role in Europe's security architecture is now even more important. Their thinking is that Continental powers, particularly Poland and Germany, should focus on land forces, while Britain, as a longstanding naval force, counters Russian threats in the waters off north-west Europe.
The possible future combat scenarios were laid bare in the topics for this year's Sea Lord's essay competition, which included: 'What if China, Russia, Iran or North Korea cut data cables to the UK?' and 'What if the UK has to defend the North Atlantic alone?' Yet, after decades of peace-time cuts, some commanders doubt the Navy even has the capacity to defend Britain's own waters, let alone project power across the Baltics or protect Taiwan.
Last November, Defence Secretary John Healey said he would scrap two amphibious assault ships and a frigate as part of £500 million in short-term savings, while there is also talk of mothballing aircraft carriers amid fears they are too vulnerable to underwater drones.
The downsizing of the Navy is something that Sir Ben has witnessed first hand, having joined the force as a cadet in 1984, at the height of the Cold War. He went on to command a mine hunter, two frigates and the aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious. In 2019, he became the UK's Commander of Joint Operations, supervising British evacuation efforts from Afghanistan after the Taliban took power in 2021, before taking over as First Sea Lord from Sir Tony later that year. Until recently, he was considered a frontrunner to succeed Sir Tony as Chief of the Defence Staff, the Armed Forces' top job.
Officers who have served with Sir Ben speak well of him, although there is by no means consensus over whether he was the victim of a 'stitch-up'. They point out that the Navy, as with the rest of the Armed Forces, has a zero-tolerance stance on officers having affairs with subordinates, given the close-knit working environment on ships and submarines. For low-ranking officers, an illicit liaison could lead to allegations of favouritism. For top-ranking commanders, there could be a risk of blackmail. They also point out that Sir Ben himself had been vocal on sexual propriety.
Last October, he publicly apologised for 'intolerable' misogyny in the Submarine Service, after investigations exposed sexual harassment within its ranks. He returned to the theme in March, telling a Parliamentary defence committee that 'unwelcome sexual behaviours' were being stamped out.
'I don't think there is any stitch-up here – he had a sexual liaison with a subordinate in his chain of command, having dismissed others who did the same,' one former rear admiral says. 'First Sea Lords have more important things to do with their lives than have clandestine affairs.'
Others, though, are sad to see the back of a popular commander-in-chief, and do not rule out the possibility that the affair allegations have been used as an excuse to sideline him.
'There is literally nothing left to cut in the Navy without taking an axe to the body itself, and he may have been resistant to that,' says one source. 'It might have been that a colleague dobbed him in to bring about his downfall.'
In fact, uncertainty had been surrounding Sir Ben's future since well before last week. In January, The Times reported that he intended to retire this summer rather than apply to succeed Sir Tony, citing sources who said he no longer believed he could 'fix the Navy'. His office then contradicted this, briefing journalists that he was committed to managing whatever changes lay ahead.
There is, however, potential for disagreement over how those changes are implemented, particularly when tight budgets force a focus on certain priorities at the expense of others. Among the big expenditure programmes are the new Dreadnought submarines, which will replace the ageing Vanguard fleet as carriers of Britain's Trident nuclear deterrent, and Type 83 destroyers, which will have enhanced air defence capabilities, including against hypersonic missiles. But Sir Tony and Sir Ben may have differed over how much to invest in 'next generation' weapons, especially unmanned air and sea drones.
'Radakin had quite a radical agenda for rapid modernisation, pushing AI and unmanned systems, but you still need ocean-going ships, as drones can't just fly for thousands of miles, especially in extreme weather,' says one source. 'There is a balancing act between retaining the older systems and bringing in new tech – plus ships can take 10 years to build, so you have to plan ahead.'
'Sadly, successive governments have failed to invest properly in defence, and believed naively that the US was going to protect everyone for ever, ' adds ex-Royal Naval commander Ryan Ramsey, a former captain of the submarine HMS Turbulent. 'Radakin and Key are both good guys – maybe there is some politics at play here, but frankly, even if that turns out not to be true, the damage has already been done.'
The mood in the top ranks is unlikely to be improved by reports that the soon-to-be-published SDR contains no specific costings, potentially delaying key spending decisions in the autumn. Critics say Starmer's Government is needlessly prolonging the process, mindful that hiking defence spending is unpopular with Labour's Left.
'Ben Key probably wanted to retire because he was just tired,' added another former comrade. 'Running the Navy is OK when there's money around, but when you're firefighting against cuts all the time, it's just exhausting.'
Meanwhile, the search is now on for a replacement for Sir Ben, who may end up finishing an otherwise distinguished career in disgrace if this is indeed the end of his association with the Navy, as appears to be the case.
The current Second Sea Lord, Vice-Admiral Sir Martin Connell, has taken his place as Acting First Sea Lord, although there is as yet no new date for the Sea Power Conference at Lancaster House. It remains to be seen whether the essay contest will be revised to include the topic: 'What does a Navy do if it loses its top commander overnight?'