Taupō clinicians plan for emergency hospital shutdown amid critical staff shortages
RNZ / Dan Cook
Contingency measures drawn up by concerned Taupō Hospital clinicians include plans to move patients to Rotorua Hospital if staff shortages forced Taupō's clinic to close.
The hospital, which serves a population of 40,000 people in the tourist region, has struggled to attract
enough senior doctors
to fill its roster, which forced workers to plan for the worst.
The hospital relies on locums to fill gaps, and permanent staff take on a high portion of night and weekend work.
There are 3.3 full-time-equivalent senior doctors working there permanently, out of nine funded positions to staff the emergency department and general ward.
Overnight, one senior doctor is on duty to take care of the department and ward.
RNZ has obtained a copy of the Escalation and Closure Plan for Taupō Hospital, which outlines what could happen if the hospital were forced to shut down due to not finding enough staff.
No closures have happened, and Health NZ's top manager for the area, regional deputy chief executive Cath Cronin, has told RNZ she wouldn't allow this and was instead focused on keeping the hospital open.
But closures aren't unprecedented. Last year,
Westport's hospital shut its doors
several times due to short staffing.
The plan's introduction outlines the gravity of a closure:
"Temporary closure of Taupō Hospital poses a potential risk to the population and, as such, Health NZ Lakes has a responsibility for managing the risk with a contingency plan, to safeguard the public to the best of its ability."
The document said its purpose was to set out an agreed process when there weren't enough senior doctors to staff the hospital's emergency department.
It said authority to consent to a closure sat with the regional deputy chief executive - Cronin - and "every possible option for covering vacant roster shifts must be exhausted" before the plan was put into action.
If closure were required, contingency measures would swing into action three days before the unstaffed shift, allowing time to tell the public and other affected parties.
If the emergency department were to close, but some services continue, security would be stationed at the hospital entrance with a list of patients allowed inside.
A February memo from senior clinical staff to management outlined further details.
The senior staff cited upcoming vacancies and difficulties in getting locums.
"Consequently, we are unable to guarantee that the Taupō Hospital will be able to cover every shift in the ED or the inpatient ward. Therefore, we thought it prudent to have contingency options documented and agreed in advance, which could be employed if and when this situation arose."
The memo described possible situations in which the plan would be enacted.
"Although none of these scenarios are considered acceptable under normal circumstances, we may be forced to implement one or more of them to ensure continuation of service provision," it said.
Two scenarios involved using doctors from Rotorua to keep open Taupō's general ward, or its ward and emergency department.
A third scenario suggested closing the Taupō general ward, which usually has about 15 patients.
"All inpatients requiring admission will be transferred to Rotorua, increasing the workload for Rotorua physicians and registrars/nurses."
Option four was to use telehealth for emergency department patients.
Option five tabled closing the department, which sees an average of 50 patients a day.
This would also potentially involve telehealth, but otherwise, emergency cases would have to travel to Rotorua.
The memo said risks for this were: "No access to emergency care for Taupō-Turangi communities. No onsite clinician for ward. No onsite support for birthing unit."
The sixth option was the status quo, with a reliance on locums (temporary staff). This was time-consuming to sort and expensive.
Emails released to RNZ show the hospital's battle to find staff.
On 15 May last year, then-clinical lead Jared Bayless said there were five emergency department shifts, including four overnight ones, unstaffed in the coming week.
Another email from Bayless, a month later, discussed juggling staff to cover vacancies during the week, which stretched the weekend roster thinly. There was concern that the hospital would have to operate at decreased capacity. Bayless subsequently informed emergency services about the possible staff shortfall.
In other messages, Bayless stated what would happen if staffing wasn't found to cover all shifts, options that the Escalation and Closure Plan covered.
A draft memo to Cronin in October from Health NZ's Lakes district group director of operations, Alan Wilson, again talked about the possibility of closure when staff couldn't be found, and outlined the risks of this, including having to rely on an already under-pressure Rotorua Hospital.
The memo said $1.29 million was spent on locums for Taupō Hospital in 2023-24.
It recommended changing the staffing structure away from senior doctors working 24/7, and employing more doctors to allow for round-the-clock coverage.
Cronin found out about the memo from doctor unions and emailed them to say she had concerns about the issues at Taupō Hospital's emergency department and how they'd been addressed.
"All discussions, planning or other communications regarding Taupō ED are now on hold."
Cronin also emailed Wilson expressing her disappointment about the memo's contents and that he let it happen.
"The proposed plan is not a direction I will endorse without further discussion, so don't progress any further planning or discussions with the team."
However, the Escalation and Closure Plan was circulated early this year in further emails.
Cronin told RNZ this week the Escalation and Closure Plan wasn't an "active plan".
"My approach is always to work on plans to keep hospitals open and EDs open," she said.
"This wasn't an approach that I endorsed. It got a life of its own, with the team wanting to do the right thing but not in quite the right way.
"When I found out about it, I did stop that approach to making a plan to close the ED, and instead we reconvened to work together on how we keep our ED open."
Cronin said she'd never been asked to consider closure, as outlined in the plan, although it was challenging to fill shifts.
"But we always get there, one way or another," she said.
"We always manage to cover that. We haven't had to close.
"We've got a particularly tough time in the next couple of months, not only in Taupō but across the whole country.
"We're getting right into the middle of winter, with lots of sick leave, but everyone's endeavouring to do what they can to maintain that access for patients."
There were plenty of other mitigations before closure would even be considered.
"We take that week by week when we plan, then day by day, or shift by shift if we need to."
Cronin said this year she met with Taupō's medical staff weekly and would regularly check in with the lead clinician.
Asked about shifting patients to Rotorua if required, Cronin said moving patients to ensure they received the proper standard of care was something that happened nationwide.
This week, there were 4.7 full-time-equivalent senior doctor vacancies in Taupō, which would drop to 2.7 in October when two staff members joined.
Two extra junior doctors had recently joined, and one would soon start.
By January, another two were due, which left two vacancies.
She said recruitment would focus on how Taupō was a great place to live and the quality of the clinical team at the hospital.
Rural hospital medicine specialist Ralston D'Souza has just taken over as Taupō Hospital's clinical lead.
He said the lack of permanent staffing at Taupō wasn't new, and he and the other clinicians developed plans in response.
"It's probably been known about for a couple of years," he said.
"With that short staffing, there's going to be gaps in the normal, everyday roster. So, as a group, we were trying to [say] to management: Look, this is a risk to the organisation.
"If permanent staff are unable to fill these gaps, if locums are unable to fill these shifts, we have to have a contingency plan on what we need to do.
"There's a huge amount of people affected in the hospital and in the community if there's no doctor in the hospital, so we wanted to get something on paper or get protocols in place if that were to occur because of the vulnerability of our workforce."
He said additional junior doctors were welcome, although it would take some time until they were trained to fill overnight shifts, with their varied responsibilities.
But he was more hopeful than previously, and he said Cronin was working closely with the hospital on staffing issues.
Clinicians, management and the community were working together to find solutions, D'Souza said.
Sarah Dalton, the executive director of the senior doctors' union, the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, said clinicians drawing up the Escalation and Closure Plan showed there weren't enough doctors to staff the hospital.
"Between 40 to 50 percent of their roster at any given time is filled either by locums or their employed staff being prevailed upon to do extra shifts, so do extra work for extra pay to keep the place open."
She said the arrangements to fill the roster were "hand to mouth, subsistence stuff".
Dalton criticised Health NZ for paying little attention to the well-being of permanent staff, while
spending plenty on locums.
Patient Voice Aotearoa's Malcolm Mulholland said the Escalation and Closure Plan showed how concerned clinicians were.
"It's pretty confronting seeing that plans have been drafted to actually shut down one of our hospitals in New Zealand, and to know that it serves a community of 40,000 people or more.
"It's extremely concerning."
Mulholland said the advocacy group held a public meeting in Taupō earlier this year, where he heard from clinicians' concerns about staff shortages and the prospect of patients transferring to Rotorua.
It was planning to hold a further public meeting in the town on 30 July at 6pm, at Taupō's Hilltop School.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Spinoff
27 minutes ago
- The Spinoff
It's time to shut the alcohol industry out of health policy in Aotearoa
Alcohol is our most harmful drug, yet industry groups have inside access during the development of alcohol harm reduction strategy, where they can put pressure on officials to water down policy advice. It has to stop, argues Steve Randerson. Most New Zealanders would be shocked to learn the alcohol industry is regularly invited to help shape our national health policies on alcohol. But that's exactly what's happening. Recent information uncovered by RNZ through the Official Information Act shows senior health officials in the Public Health Agency are 'expected' to work directly with alcohol industry representatives. Who set this expectation or what the expectations entail is unclear, but the information reveals the agency's diligent response. Regular interactions occurred between four separate industry associations representing spirits, wine, beer and hospitality and the Public Health Agency, part of the Ministry of Health. A group manager with responsibilities for alcohol harm reduction, Ross Bell, emerged as the main conduit for contact. The interactions included regular meetings, ongoing email contact and consultation on alcohol harm reduction plans. The alcohol industry had been involved in the development of an action plan for foetal alcohol spectrum disorder. All four industry groups were invited to give input to a new guiding framework for spending the $16 million alcohol levy, a public fund meant to reduce harm; in contrast, to our knowledge, there was no opportunity for most of Aotearoa's major public health organisations that work on alcohol to contribute to the framework. One industry representative questioned a government refresh of New Zealand's outdated guidance on lower-risk drinking levels, which some other countries now set considerably lower to reflect current evidence of the health risks of alcohol. The partially completed project was subsequently put on hold. While the pause was described as an internal ministry decision, current systems leave ministry staff exposed to potential industry pressure and there is a concerning lack of transparency around possible industry influence. For instance, alcohol industry feedback on the alcohol levy framework was redacted from the OIA documents supplied to RNZ. There's a reason this matters. Alcohol is our most harmful drug. It causes cancer and foetal alcohol spectrum disorder, and costs our country more than $9 billion a year in health and social harm. The damage is sustained by our lack of effective safeguards around the supply and promotion of alcohol, such as online marketing and the higher numbers of outlets in communities at greater risk of harm. Communities around the country have long fought to have more say on where and how alcohol is sold, while well-funded alcohol industry groups have doggedly opposed such changes in our courts, media and parliament. In this context the inside access alcohol industry representatives are enjoying during the development of alcohol harm reduction strategy is disheartening. Industry involvement in public health policy isn't just bad practice. It's a major conflict of interest. This is why Health Coalition Aotearoa . Almost half the alcohol sold in Aotearoa is consumed in heavy drinking sessions, while lighter alcohol consumption also increases the risk of cancer and other diseases. Any steps that broadly reduce these harms will impact alcohol industry profits, creating an inescapable incentive to undermine or block effective change. A senior health official put it bluntly: 'In my experience… these alcohol interests have zero interest in reducing harm (or sales of booze) and a huge purse to fund their lawyers.' Despite this, the government continues to expect the alcohol industry to have a seat at the table, where they can put pressure on officials to water down policy advice to ministers well before the public has a say. In contrast, New Zealand is required to protect our tobacco control public health policies from the commercial interests of the tobacco industry – since 2005 we have been party to the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. This agreement recognises the 'irreconcilable conflict' between tobacco industry profits and public health. The same logic applies to alcohol – yet no such protections exist. The Ministry of Health and Customs have continued to interact with tobacco industry representatives for tobacco regulation purposes, but one improvement of Aotearoa signing the framework convention is they now both maintain a public register of these interactions, which should only occur where strictly necessary. Other parts of the government may not have been so scrupulous, however. NZ First politicians have been reported to be closely affiliated with industry executives, and several coalition government ministers have appeared to use similar arguments as tobacco industry representatives to defend their repeal of the tobacco endgame measures in the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products Act 1990, suggesting a common script. While the New Zealand government is yet to fully implement its responsibilities under the framework convention, it is a strong step in the right direction, and Labour health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall has proposed legislation to promote stronger compliance. We urgently need a similarly stringent approach for alcohol and await new rules for engagement with the alcohol lobby being considered by the Ministry of Health. The World Health Organization's Global Alcohol Action Plan 2022-2030 is clear: governments should protect public policy to reduce alcohol harms from commercial and other vested interests that undermine health. Most New Zealanders agree – a recent poll found 71% believe the alcohol industry should have no role in alcohol policy development. This strong public support should give politicians the courage to draw clear boundaries around industry involvement in policy intended to reduce alcohol harm.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Is there confusion over the role of 'physician associates'?
An investigation ordered by the UK government into physician associates there has found they shouldn't diagnose and treat untriaged patients. It also recommends changing their name to "assistant" rather than associate to stop them being confused with doctors. Four months ago the Health Minister, Simeon Brown, gave the go ahead for Physician Associates to become part of the regulated health workforce here. At the moment the PA's working here are trained in the UK or the US and work under the licence of a supervising doctor. The New Zealand Resident Doctors' Association has backed the two main findings of the UK report, but the New Zealand Physicians Associate Society says the situation in the UK isn't applicable here. Kathryn is joined by Deborah Powell the National Secretary of the Resident Doctors Association and Lisa deWolfe the regulation chair of the New Zealand Physician Associate Society. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
The famous Dunedin Study gets world-wide attention
The Dunedin Study. Photo: Dunedin Study/University of Otago The landmark Dunedin Study of babies born in the early 1970s has caught the eye of the OECD. The study followed the lives of 1037 babies babies born at Queen Mary Maternity Hospital, Dunedin, in 1972. The participants were assessed every two years, then as adults every five to seven years. Using over 52 years of data, the Dunedin researchers identified eight different pathways strongly linked to early factors like mental health, childhood trauma, and cognitive skills. The OECD plans to use these findings to help policymakers around the world understand how early life experiences shape futures that thrive or struggle. Dorothy Adams, an independent adviser who worked at the OECD on secondment from the NZ Ministry of Social Development, told Morning Report the collaboration was "incredibly valuable". While there are other overseas longitude study, with a couple done over a similar timeframe, the Dunedin Study is unique, partly due to its very high retention rate of about 90 percent. "The OECD, in their view, it [the Dunedin Study] is world leading in many regards," Adams said. She said a particularly interesting finding from the study was the role IQ plays throughout an individual's life. "Young ones found to have good, or high IQ were more likely to do better in life then those with low IQ," she said. She said IQ is amenable to intervention, and research findings are starting to be implemented in programmes. For example, the study found ages three to four were critical for development of self regulation - how you think, behave and feel. "The Dunedin Study didn't necessarily give the answer about what to do, but it really narrowed down the search," Adams said. In response, a programme called Engage was developed, a game that helps develop cognitive skills in children, and was implemented in about half of New Zealand's Early Childhood Education (ECE). "It's being measured, it's being monitored and we are seeing results," Adams said. "I think that is a really lovely example of how these research findings are starting to be used in intervention." She said researchers are starting to look at how the Dunedin Study could be used more for contemporary challenges and to guide intervention development.