Giant US-UK armada takes to water in ‘Talisman Sabre' show of force with aircraft carriers shrouded by fighter jet fleet
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
AN IMPOSING US-UK armada has taken to the water as part of the allied Exercise Talisman Sabre war drills.
The impervious aircraft carriers and fighter jet fleets are taking part in live-fire exercises in Australia which include 35,000 military personnel from 19 different nations.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
9
An imposing US-UK armada has taken to the water as part of the allied Exercise Talisman Sabre war drills
Credit: SWNS
9
Aircraft carriers USS George Washington (top) and HMS Prince of Wales (bottom) sail in formation with US and UK warships
Credit: SWNS
9
35,000 military personnel from 19 different nations took part in the Australian drills
Credit: SWNS
Australia marked the historic event, the largest war drills in their history, by firing missiles from its M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).
The HIMARS launchers were recently bought from the US and were unleashed today at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland.
Elsewhere, a striking display of allied naval might saw the UK and US deploy their USS George Washington and the HMS Prince of Wales aircraft carriers.
The UK - who sent over 3,000 troops - also used vessels such as HMS Richmond, HMS Dauntless, RFA Fort Victoria, and RFA Argus for the exercise.
read more in war drills
SEA OF STEEL Watch as huge fleet of terrifying new Chinese 'tank boats' takes to water
The expansive multinational flotilla was shadowed by warships from Canada, Norway, and Australia as well.
The huge fleet were paired up with air operations and joint ground manoeuvres which took place across Australia's Northern Territory and Queensland.
Brigadier Nick Wilson told reporters after the drills: "Today was the first time the Australian Army has live-fired our long-range, multi-domain platforms being the HIMARS, so it is a remarkable day."
British Defence Secretary John Healey added: "The historic bonds between Britain and Australia run deep, and through AUKUS and exercises like Talisman Sabre we are strengthening these ties for the challenges of tomorrow.
"Our commitment to the Indo-Pacific is unwavering, as this huge military exercise demonstrates.
"We will continue to work alongside our closest allies to maintain the security and stability that underpins global prosperity."
Britain pledges more support to Ukraine as NATO warships prepare for largest drills since Cold War
Talisman Sabre has been a major biennial joint exercise ever since it was first announced in 2005 between the US and Australia.
This year saw dozens of other countries take part such as Canada, Fiji, France, Germany, India, Japan, the Netherlands and South Korea among others.
The drills stretched all the way from Darwin to Brisbane as the allies imposed themselves across the Indo-Pacific.
The waters are often closely monitored by Chinese surveillance ships.
Beijing has kept a watchful eye over any naval exercises off the Australian coast during the last four Talisman Sabre exercises dating back to 2017.
Defense Industry Minister Pat Conroy said he expects China to monitor them again this time around.
Conroy said: "We'll adjust accordingly. We'll obviously observe their activities and monitor their presence around Australia.
"But we'll also adjust how we conduct those exercises."
9
U.S. Navy aircraft and the George Washington Carrier participate in the dual carrier operations
Credit: SWNS
9
A US F18 launches from US Aircraft Carrier, USS George Washington
Credit: SWNS
9
An Australian soldier from the 1st Military Police Battalion is seen participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025
Credit: Getty
It all comes as Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese began a six-day visit to China of his own.
He is expected to hold a fourth face-to-face meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Tuesday.
Albanese said despite Chinese surveillance being a concern, he would not raise it as an issue amid the Talisman Sabre operations.
China has been routinely trying to scare the West through their own military drills in recent weeks.
Earlier this month, dramatic footage captured a fleet of Chinese tank boats charging through the sea in tight formation near Taiwan.
And China's new giant "sea monster" warplane was spotted for the first time in the Bohai Sea.
These developments have raised fears that a Chinese invasion on Taiwan could be imminent.
Bringing the self-governed province back in line with mainland China has been a goal of president Xi Jinping's for a long time and recent military activity has shown that China is ready to take it back by force.
The self-governing nation has been protected by the firepower of ally America for decades.
The latest Talisman Sabre drills will give Taiwan further hope of protection from not only the US but also the entire allied fleet.
The exercises are also aimed towards striking fear into other Western allies such as North Korea and Russia.
Russia's relationship with Europe has drastically worsened as Vladimir Putin continues to defy all warnings and continue with his deadly invasion of Ukraine.
But even Vlad, with all his firepower and huge army, faces a serious battle against a unified West due to his lack of aircraft carriers.
Russia only boasts a single rustbucket carrier - but even that is poised to be scrapped after seven years of failed repairs.
Putin's 'Ship of Shame' has played no role in the war against Ukraine and has instead been languishing in the grim Arctic port of Murmansk, in northwestern Russia.
9
A terrifying fleet of Chinese tank boats seen charging through the sea near to Taiwan earlier this month
Credit: X
9
Vladimir Putin's only rustbucket aircraft carrier is poised to be scrapped after seven years of failed repairs - leaving the despot vulnerable
Credit: EPA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The situation in Gaza is dire – but Starmer should be clear about who is to blame
SIR – The situation in Gaza is awful and has been for some time. However, there are two sides in this war – Israel and the terrorist group Hamas, which, let's not forget, started this conflict with its brutal attack on Israel and the taking of 251 hostages. The Israeli response to Hamas has been devastating and the innocent people of Gaza are suffering. However, if Hamas truly cares about those in Gaza and wants to end this suffering, it should release all the remaining hostages and stop using hospitals, public buildings and aid centres for military purposes, thus risking them being hit as military targets. Rather than unilaterally recognising a Palestinian state (report, July 29), if Western leaders want an end to this conflict, they must make demands of Hamas, along with Israel – or else it won't happen. Alan Carter Newcastle upon Tyne SIR – Why is it that not one country that wants to recognise a Palestinian state has made it a precondition that the Palestinian Authority drop its 'pay to slay' policy? The so-called Martyrs Fund means that, every month, the Palestinian Authority gives money to Palestinian terrorists who are in Israeli prisons, for attacking Israelis. It also gives money to the families of Palestinians killed or injured during the course of attacking Israel – money which for decades was paid on the basis that, the more serious the attack or the longer the prison sentence, the higher the payment would be. Lynton Stock London NW7 SIR – We have two very different ongoing situations in the region. One is in Gaza and one is in the West Bank. While most are concentrating on Gaza, Israeli settlers are illegally taking over land in the West Bank and building settlements there. This crime gets very little coverage, but it matters: where else could a Palestinian state be set up but on the West Bank? Before that is possible, Israel has to stop the settler activities there. This is what our Prime Minister should be concentrating his efforts on. Herbert Chappell Woking, Surrey SIR – Puntland in north-east Somalia has a government, a constitution, established borders and effective state institutions. Despite years of wrangling, it is still not recognised internationally as a state. Yet the British Government is planning to recognise a state called 'Palestine', which has none of these things except a name. For an administration full of international lawyers, this is strange indeed. Jolyon Grey Cheltenham, Gloucestershire SIR – As countries seem to be queuing up to recognise a Palestinian state (report, August 1) it might be timely to remind certain politicians that some 25 countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Lebanon, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Algeria, Iran, and Venezuela, do not actually recognise the state of Israel. Strange, that, since Israel does exist and, as it stands, Palestine's claim to statehood is ephemeral. Dr Gerald Edwards Glasgow
BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Jeremy Corbyn's new party needs a name and it's trickier than you might think
The first thing anybody wants to know when a new political party is launched is what it's going to be Jeremy Corbyn has decided to do things differently. The former Labour leader claims more than 600,000 people have registered as supporters for the new left-wing party he is setting up with fellow independent and ex-Labour MP Zarah is, so far, a party without a reports that it was going to be called Your Party - because that's what the sign-up website is called - were quickly shot down by has said she thinks The Left or the Left Party would be a good title for the new the pair have said they want supporters to come up with a name, as part of their debate on what the new party will stand for. They will not be able to put forward candidates for election until they have registered a name with the Electoral Commission, which has strict rules about not copying other parties' names or sounding too much like apart from that, supporters have a blank canvas."The name should sum up in one simple phrase the pure essence of what the party is all about," says Sheffield University's Prof Matthew time is also ripe for a political party named for the modern world, he Flinders argues the mainstream parties' brands were forged in different times and "most young people don't really understand what Labour means, or Conservative". "The especially don't know what Liberal Democrat means."Whereas parties were once sustained by local branch or social meetings that has "eroded in a digital age, making the relationships thinner and putting more pressure on name and brand recognition to resonate with voters", Prof Flinders the commercial world, brand names are everything."There's a lot of power in a name and if you can clearly convey your point of view and use those words effectively it does a lot of work," says Laura Rogers, an executive creative director at advertising agency AMV BBDO, which counts retailer Currys and charity the RSPCA among its sweet spot, she argues, is something that works well for sharing online and sells well as "merch". Get the wrong name and you risk ridicule. Just ask the Post Office, which in 2001 wasted £2m to rebrand as Consignia, only to reverse course after the baffling name became a laughing stock. A new political party must also be alive to the risks of social media that loves to turn everything into punchlines."Make sure the first three letters don't spell a bad word," warns journalist Ash Sarkar of the left-wing media site Novara Media. "Like the word assembly can very easily be changed to 'ass'."While this may seem flippant ,"People experience and understand politics through the content they share online", Sarkar the general public to name a party would have been a disaster, leading to "Party McPartyface" says Sarkar - referencing the time Boaty McBoatface won a public poll to name a £200m polar research Bailey, co-founder of branding and design agency Baxter and Bailey, thinks Corbyn's decision to ask supporters for names is a clever stunt that has created buzz and a sense of ownership for those signing up. "It also really fits with his brand to be social and democratic with the choice of name," Bailey says."But being democratic in naming and design doesn't make a whole lot of sense," he warns. Political history is littered with cautionary tales for new parties trying to make a name for themselves. The Electoral Commission website shows a new party is registered almost every week in the UK, and most fade without making an impact at a national when a party launches with 11 MPs and a national profile they can collapse without ever really defining themselves - like The Independent Group (TIG), which launched at the height of the Brexit deadlock in 2019 as an avowedly centrist, pro–European Union political party only lasted ten months but changed its name twice, first to Change UK and then to The Independent Group for Change after petitions website threatened to sue over the Allen, the ex-Tory MP who was the first leader of Change UK, recalls her party became "lost in admin", sapping the fledgling movement of a name that speaks to your message and is not already taken by another political group of business is "trickier than you think", says Allen. Pamela Fitzpatrick, who runs the Peace and Justice Project with Corbyn, registered a party last month named "Arise" - a name drawn from one of Corbyn's favourite political strategist and pollster Chris Bruni‑Lowe, who has written a book on the history of politic slogans, would advise against using Arise as the new party's name. "Vague or overly poetic names will underperform, especially if the party is meant to be a corrective force," he his book, Bruni-Lowe says he found "voters don't reward wordplay - they reward clarity and conviction".A name must also be "clear" rather than "clever", he the most effective political brands "offer a vision or mission, not just an organisational label" and use "the electorate's own language and frustrations". Corbyn has insisted the final decision will only come after "all the responses" are in. The plan is to settle on a name at the party's founding conference, in the the discussions around the name are just a distraction, says tends to "hyper-fixate on things that don't really matter", she argues."It's not going to live or die based on a name," insists Sarkar. "It will live or die based on its political strategy.""The fact that 600,000 people have signed up to the new Corbyn project with no name is an answer to the question on how much the name matters," she a message to supporters on Friday, the party with no name said: "Make no mistake: whatever the name, it is always going to be your party." Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Angela Rayner's department spends thousands in taxpayers' cash on woke diversity training
ANGELA Rayner's department has spent thousands of pounds of taxpayers' cash on woke diversity training. Her housing department splashed £47,272 on the coaching — including nearly £5,000 to a firm that advises on the dangers of banter at work. Inclusive Employers Ltd teaches how to 'decolonise the workplace' and offers 'inclusion allies' training. The Deputy PM's department refused to give full details of what this training involved when quizzed in parliamentary questions. But the company provides courses on unconscious bias and micro aggressions, according to its website. It warns workplace 'banter, when unchecked, can escalate into harmful behaviour including bullying, harassment and discrimination'. The website also provides tips on how to 'navigate the anti-woke backlash' and suggests many Baby Boomers are anti-woke. It states boomers 'may be uncomfortable with the rapid shifts and evolving language associated with being woke' and have a 'nostalgia for the values and beliefs' of the past. The Tories, who helped to uncover the near £50,000 spend, bashed it as a waste of taxpayers' cash. Shadow cabinet office minister Mike Wood said: 'Angela Rayner seems determined to push through her divisive Equality, Diversity and Inclusion agenda by any means necessary — even though it's clearly not in the national interest. 'This is part of a wider pattern of taxpayers' money wasted across Whitehall under Labour on woke virtue-signalling. It must be stopped.' Ms Rayner is in charge of steering the new Employment Rights Bill, which massively beefs up the powers of trade unions, through parliament. Angela Rayner says lifting 2-child benefit cap not 'silver bullet' for ending poverty after demanding cuts for millions It will force businesses to recognise union 'equality representatives' and let them have paid time off for their trade union work. A government spokesman said: 'The vast majority of this spend went on accredited, practical training to help managers better support disabled colleagues.' 1
