Tensions rise as Pakistan launches military campaign against India: What we know so far
Pakistan has announced the launch of a large-scale military operation against India – Bunyan Al Marsoos – in a new wave of escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbors. Islamabad has said the move is in retaliation for Indian strikes on its territory and Pakistani-controlled Kashmir.
India earlier launched Operation Sindoor, targeting what it described as 'terrorist infrastructure' in Pakistan. The strikes followed a deadly terrorist attack in Baisaran Valley that killed 26 civilians last month – which India holds Pakistan responsible for.
Islamabad – calling New Delhi's operation an act of 'unprovoked aggression' – has responded with shelling across the Line of Control, the de facto border in Kashmir.
Pakistan launched its operation overnight Friday into Saturday after reporting that Indian forces had struck three of its air bases, including Nur Khan near Rawalpindi, just 10km from Islamabad. Pakistan condemned the strikes as 'blatant aggression' but said its air defenses intercepted the attacks.
Pakistan's Operation Bunyan Al Marsoos (unbreakable wall) was announced on X. Islamabad said the operation aims to 'protect Pakistan's sovereignty, security, and oppressed citizens' and called it a 'befitting' response to Indian 'aggression.' The government claimed to have 'successfully targeted key Indian military installations,' destroyed a brigade headquarters at G Top, and hit a missile storage site in northern India.
Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said Pakistan had no choice but to retaliate to the Indian attacks, but later signaled willingness to deescalate if India halts further strikes.
India's Foreign Ministry accused Pakistan on Saturday of attacking military sites along its western border using drones, fighter jets, and loitering munitions. It said Pakistan attempted to infiltrate Indian airspace at more than 26 locations and carried out indiscriminate strikes on civilian targets, including health centers and schools.
Indian officials denied Islamabad's claims of critical infrastructure damage, calling them 'lies, misinformation, and propaganda.' The military released time-stamped images of intact air bases and confirmed only limited damage to personnel and infrastructure at Udhampur, Bhuj, Pathankot, and Bathinda. India also denied claims that its S-400 systems and BrahMos base were hit.
New Delhi confirmed that it conducted 'retaliatory' precision airstrikes early Saturday on Pakistani air bases at Nur Khan, Rahim Yar Khan, Rafiqui, Murid, Sialkot, and two radar sites, saying they were verified military targets.
Later, the Indian Army said it destroyed several terrorist launchpads near the Line of Control in response to Pakistani strikes, calling them 'hubs for planning and executing terror attacks against Indian civilians and security forces.' It later said that India does not seek escalation and will show restraint if Pakistan reciprocates.
India launched Operation Sindoor on Wednesday, claiming it targeted 'terrorist camps' rather than Pakistan's Armed Forces or civilians.
'Our actions have been focused, measured, and non-escalatory in nature,' the Indian government said, adding that it has shown 'considerable restraint in the selection of targets and method of execution.'
New Delhi said it struck nine suspected terrorist-linked sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. Islamabad, however, claimed that 31 civilians were killed in the initial strike and called the operation an act of 'unprovoked aggression,' vowing to respond accordingly.
India said the operation was launched in response to a terrorist attack in Pahalgam in India's Jammu and Kashmir federal territory in late April that killed 26 tourists. The Resistance Front, believed to be linked to the Pakistani-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed responsibility.
Indian investigators said they identified the attackers' planners and communication hubs connected to Pakistan. Islamabad denied having any involvement and called for an impartial probe.
The Group of Seven nations urged both sides to exercise maximum restraint and 'engage in direct dialogue towards a peaceful outcome.'
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke with Pakistan's army chief, General Asim Munir, and offered Washington's help in defusing the crisis. However, US Vice President J.D. Vance said Washington would not intervene. He told Fox News the situation is 'none of our business,' though he acknowledged concern over the risk of conflict between nuclear powers.
Iran and Bangladesh also urged restraint. The UK called for a 'swift, diplomatic path forward,' while Russia urged both nations to resolve the conflict 'through peaceful political and diplomatic means' and condemned terrorism in all forms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
India's defense trade with Russia ‘rubbed US wrong way'
India's long-established arms trade with Russia has become a bone of contention with Washington, US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said while addressing the eighth US-India Strategic Partnership Forum on Tuesday. The commerce secretary noted that US President Donald Trump had explicitly raised these issues with New Delhi and claimed that the Indian government was 'taking steps to address' them. Lutnick also suggested that India is 'starting to move towards buying military equipment from the US.' 'There were certain things that the Indian government did that generally rubbed the United States the wrong way. For instance, you generally buy your military gear from Russia. That's a way to kind of get under the skin of America if you're going to buy your armaments from Russia,' he said. He added that India's participation in the BRICS group, which challenges the hegemony of the US dollar, is 'not really the way to make friends and influence people in America.' #WATCH | Washington DC | US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick says, "...There were certain things that the Indian government did that generally rubbed the United States the wrong way. For instance, you generally buy your military gear from Russia. That's a way to kind of get… Currently, around 60% of the Indian military's equipment is of Russian origin. After the recent standoff with Pakistan, Modi praised the prowess of the country's air defense on Tuesday, particularly noting the performance of its Russian-made S-400 systems. 'Platforms like the S-400 have given unprecedented strength to the country,' Modi said in an address to the soldiers. The systems were acquired from Russia in 2016 at a cost of $5.4 billion, in defiance of a US threat to impose sanctions. Additionally, last month, India inaugurated a production unit for the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh. The new facility will help New Delhi increase its defense stockpiles in light of what is a volatile security environment. Lutnik made his remarks on India's trade with Russia in the context of negotiations about a trade deal with India. While he reiterated Trump's view of India as 'very protectionist,' with tariffs on certain items reaching 100%, he said the countries are close to finalizing a trade pact that would benefit both. Lutnik stressed he is 'very optimistic' about reaching a deal with India 'in a not too distant future.' The US is India's largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching $131 billion in the last fiscal year, according to government data. India exports more to the US than it imports, resulting in a trade surplus of over $41 billion. Meanwhile, New Delhi and Moscow have set a target of increasing bilateral trade to $100 billion over the next five years. Bilateral trade between the two nations skyrocketed since 2022 to cross the $60 billion mark despite immense pressure from the West on New Delhi to cut economic and political ties with Moscow.
Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
US launches new probe into India's Adani over Iran trade
The US Department of Justice has launched a new investigation into Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, alleging potential violations of US sanctions on Iran, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday. The probe focuses on alleged imports of Iranian liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) into India through Adani's Mundra port, located in the western state of Gujarat. An investigation by the WSJ found that tankers traveling between Mundra and the Persian Gulf often exhibited behavior commonly associated with ships attempting to evade sanctions, prompting further scrutiny into Adani's business dealings. Adani Group said it was not aware of any investigations conducted by the US, calling the report 'baseless and mischievous.' 'Adani categorically denies any deliberate engagement in sanctions evasion or trade involving Iranian-origin LPG. Further, we are not aware of any investigation by US authorities on this subject,' the company said. In May, US President Donald Trump announced that all purchases of Iranian oil and petrochemical products must cease, warning that any country or individual found to be buying these products would be immediately subject to secondary sanctions. The new US probe into one of India's largest conglomerates comes amid intense pressure which Adani has faced over the last two years. It began in 2023, when US investment firm Hindenburg Research released a report alleging that the Adani Group was involved in stock market manipulation. Later that year, similar allegations were raised by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, an international platform known for its work on the Panama Papers and Pandora Papers. Hindenburg's report led to a $150 billion loss in Adani's market value and sparked a political storm in India, with opposition parties calling for an investigation into Adani's alleged ties to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Last year, Hindenburg extended its criticism of the Adani Group to Indian officials, alleging that the head of the country's stock exchange regulator was involved in trading the group's shares, thereby preventing a proper investigation into supposed financial irregularities. Madhabi Puri Buch, chairperson of the Securities and Exchange Board of India, has denied the claims. In November 2024, US prosecutors indicted Gautam Adani and several top managers of his group for allegedly paying $250 million in bribes to Indian government officials to secure 'lucrative' solar power contracts. Adani Group has denied the allegations, calling them 'baseless.' The issue of US pressure on Adani was expected to feature in talks between Modi and Trump when the Indian leader visited Washington in February this year. Modi, however, denied that these discussions took place.
Russia Today
3 days ago
- Russia Today
India's top general responds to Pakistan's claim that it downed six jets
In his first interview with international media since the four-day military standoff with Islamabad last month, Chief of Defense Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan said on Saturday that India had changed its tactics after an initial "mistake" and established an advantage over Pakistan. 'What is important is not a jet being downed but why they were being downed. The good part is that we were able to understand the tactical mistakes that we've made, remediate, and rectify them, and implement them again — we flew all our jets, again targeting [sites in Pakistan] at long range,' General Chauhan told Bloomberg on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore, without providing any details regarding military losses. When asked to respond to the Pakistani military's claim that it had downed six Indian jets, he said it was 'absolutely incorrect.' India's military confirmed for the first time that it lost an unspecified number of fighter jets in clashes with Pakistan in Chauhan, chief of defense staff of the Indian Armed Forces, spoke to Bloomberg TV on Saturday, while attending the Shangri-La Dialogue in… In another interview with Reuters, General Chauhan reiterated that India had switched tactics after suffering losses on the first day of the conflict, when it launched strikes against what it called 'terrorist infrastructure' sites in Pakistan on May 7. 'What was important is, why did these losses occur, and what will we do after that?' he told Reuters. 'So we rectified tactics and then went back on the 7th, 8th, and 10th in large numbers to hit air bases deep inside Pakistan, penetrated all their air defenses with impunity, and carried out precision strikes,' he Delhi has previously rejected Islamabad's claims while refraining from commenting on alleged losses on its side. 'We are in a combat scenario; losses are a part of combat. The question you must ask us is... have we achieved our objective of decimating the terrorist camps? And the answer is a thumping yes. The results are for the whole world to see,' the Indian Air Force's Director General of Air Operations (DGAO) Air Marshal Bharti said, commenting on allegations that warplanes were lost during the media briefing on May 11, a day after New Delhi and Islamabad announced a ceasefire. India launched military action against targets in Pakistan on May 7 in response to the April 22 massacre of 26 people in Pahalgam, in India's Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, which New Delhi blamed on an Islamabad-sponsored terrorist organization. Islamabad denied any involvement in the attack, with top Pakistani officials claiming the country was itself a 'victim of terrorism.'
