In Absurd Act, Pakistan Brings Up Indus River Issue At UNSC Amid Maritime Security Debate
United Nations: While the Security Council was debating maritime security and expressing concern over terrorism on the seas, Pakistan tried to bring up a river issue, the Indus water.
That was in keeping with Islamabad's total obsession with matters relating to India, regardless of the topic of discussion, which often makes for a theatre of the absurd.
Without directly naming India but referring to it as 'one major country', Pakistan's Permanent Representative Asim Iftikhar Ahmad said it 'displayed a concerning propensity to usurp and weaponise shared natural resources -- including transboundary rivers -- in flagrant breach of treaty obligations and the principles of good neighbourliness'.
After the terrorist group, The Resistance Front, based in and backed by Pakistan, massacred 26 people in Pahalgam last month, India put the Indus Water Treaty in abeyance. Smarting under the action, Ahmad said India was 'leveraging geography' to "the detriment of the lower riparian state that is Pakistan'.
By avoiding mentioning by name, and using innuendos, he tried to avoid India using the right of reply to expose the assertions. India's Permanent Representative P. Harish, who spoke in the session, contemptuously ignored it.
Ahmad pouted over Pakistan's exclusion from the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA), a 23-member group of nations that, besides cooperating on a range of maritime issues, also take a strong stand against terrorism.
The 'coercive diplomacy' of 'the one major country' has led to 'the systematic exclusion of neighbouring states from regional maritime security frameworks, including the Indian Ocean Rim Association', he griped.
India took the initiative to found the IORA and objects to Pakistan's membership because of its terrorism links. As Pakistan is unable to afford an aircraft carrier and is dependent on the arms alms of China and Turkey, Ahmad also complained about what he called the 'aggressive naval expansion' by the 'one major country'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
News18 Poll: Indus Waters Treaty Signed By Nehru Surrender Of National Interest, Say 83% People
Last Updated: News18 conducted a public poll to gauge the mood of the nation on India's Operation Sindoor and associated responses to Pakistan's terror tactics Pakistan has written four letters requesting India to reconsider its decision to keep the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in suspension after the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22 that killed 26 tourists. But India has clearly said that, like terror and trade cannot go together, blood and water also can't flow together. The Narendra Modi government has underscored that the treaty will remain in abeyance until Islamabad 'credibly and irrevocably" ends its support for cross-border terrorism. News18 has conducted a public poll to gauge the mood of the nation on India's Operation Sindoor and associated responses to Pakistan's terror tactics. A key question was, 'The BJP says that the Indus Water Treaty signed by Jawaharlal Nehru and Ayub Khan is a surrender of national interest. Do you agree?" To this, 83.38% of the respondents said 'Yes" and only 16.62% chose 'No". The poll was conducted over two days, May 6 and May 7, 2025, using state-of-the-art software. It was held on News18's websites and social media platforms, and also via television channels using QR codes. A total of 14,671 responses were collected. Union minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan recently reignited the debate over the Indus Waters Treaty, criticising Jawaharlal Nehru for allocating 80% of the Indus basin water flow to Pakistan under the 1960 agreement. 'This is a historic decision; the Indus Waters Treaty has been cancelled. This is not an ordinary incident. When the Indus Waters Treaty was signed, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was the Prime Minister; he gave 80% of the water to Pakistan. Not only was water given, along with water, 83 crore rupees were also given, which is currently worth 5 thousand 500 crore rupees. By depriving our own farmers, we are giving water to those who are responsible for breeding terrorists," he added. Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has also criticised Nehru for signing the treaty and referred to it as the 'greatest strategic blunder in India's history". Taking to X, he wrote, 'Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru's signing of the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960 stands as one of the greatest strategic blunders in India's history. Despite India's natural upper riparian advantage, Nehru, under immense pressure from the then-American administration and the World Bank, handed away over 80% of the Indus basin waters to Pakistan—gifting full control over the mighty Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab rivers, while restricting India to the smaller eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej)." India and Pakistan signed the Indus Waters Treaty in 1960, with the World Bank as an additional signatory. The pact sought to divide the water of the Indus river and its tributaries equitably between the two countries. Under the treaty, water from three eastern rivers—Beas, Ravi, and Sutlej—was allocated to India, and that from the three western rivers—Chenab, Indus, and Jhelum—to Pakistan. The treaty also permitted both nations to use the other's rivers for certain purposes, such as small hydroelectric projects that require little or no water storage.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
These 5 countries are urging people to have more children due to..., countries are...
(Image: New Delhi: Many big powers of the world are now worried not due to population growth, but due to population decline. Where once population explosion was considered a crisis, now many countries are facing serious crises like aging population and lack of manpower due to low fertility rate. Here we are sharing with you the names of world's top 5 countries that are going through population crisis. Turkey: Turkey's birth rate in 2001 was 2.38 which has fallen to 1.48 in 2025. This figure is even lower than France, Britain and America. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has called it a 'bigger threat than war' and has declared 2025 as the year of family and announced to start the decade of family from 2026. Efforts are being made to give economic incentives to new couples. Vietnam: Vietnam has ended the decades-old two-child policy. Now people can have as many children as they want. From 1999 to 2022, the average birth rate was 2.1, but in 2024 it fell to 1.91. The same trend is seen in other Asian countries like Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore, but their economies are much stronger than Vietnam hence, Vietnam is trying to create a balance. China: China's population has been declining for three consecutive years. According to the United Nations' estimates, it can decrease from 1.4 billion to 800 million by the end of the century. This is directly affecting the economy due to the low working-age population and increasing pension and healthcare needs. New Zealand: The birth rate in New Zealand reached a record low of 1.56 in 2023. The special thing is that the number of women aged 15 to 49 increased in the country, but the number of children still decreased. In 2022, this rate was 1.66, which is already well below the required rate of 2.1 to maintain the population. These figures clearly show that having children is no longer a priority in the country. North Korea: Even though North Korea does not reveal its population figures, according to the United Nations' estimates, its birth rate is 1.78. This rate is higher than South Korea, Japan and China, but still below the required 2.1. If this trend continues, then there is a danger of a huge shortage of workers and collapse of social structure in the coming years.
Deccan Herald
12 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Pahalgam attacks: Patrons punished, perpetrators still at large
Even as six weeks have passed after 25 tourists and a local resident were brutally killed at a scenic meadow near Pahalgam in south Kashmir, the terrorists, who carried out the attack, remain at large. India responded to the carnage by launching 'Operation Sindoor' on May 7, targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan and areas under illegal occupation of Pakistan, and sending out a strong message to the 'deep state' of the neighbouring country. A four-day-long cross-border military flare-up followed, which came to its end on May 10. New Delhi also put in abeyance its Indus Water Treaty with Islamabad, apart from other measures. But, despite a massive manhunt by the J&K police and Indian Army, the five terrorists, who went on a killing spree on the meadow that day, appear to have vanished like ghosts into the forests and mountains of south Kashmir. The April 22 massacre, claimed by The Resistance Front (TRF), a shadowy proxy of Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, marked one of the deadliest attacks on civilians in Kashmir in recent years. It also triggered one of the most intense security operations in the Valley since the abrogation of Article 370 in time for political consolidation in J& April 27, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) formally took over the probe. Its teams have been stationed in Srinagar and south Kashmir, working closely with J&K police and military intelligence units, combing through call records, travel data, and seized digital devices. Yet, there has been no arrest or clue leading to the terrorists, who turned the scenic tourist destination into a killing field. This is in sharp contrast to the terrorist attack at Pulwama on February 14, 2019, when, within 10 days after 40 CRPF personnel were killed in a suicide bombing, the security forces tracked down and eliminated the main perpetrators in a village just 12 km from the scene. 'The Pulwama operation showed the strength of the intelligence and response apparatus,' a retired senior police officer told DH. 'This time, the same ecosystem seems slower, fragmented – or perhaps outsmarted.' 'They (terrorists who carried out the April 22 attacks) have either exfiltrated through deep forest or are hiding in plain sight with local support,' he said. 'When we eliminated the terrorists responsible for the Pulwama attack, it restored some public faith. Today, that faith is shaken.' Intelligence agencies suggest that Pahalgam attackers – three Pakistanis and two local residents - were well-trained to operate without digital trails, making them hard to track. 'The terrain is their ally,' another former security official said. 'They can live off the grid for weeks. They're using our mountains and forests the way guerrilla fighters do. That's the real challenge.' In mid-May, six local militants were killed in two operations in Tral and Shopian. But as officials later clarified, none of them were directly linked to the April 22 massacre. The prolonged failure to trace the attackers is raising difficult questions. The public is anxious, especially in tourism-dependent areas. 'It's not just the killings — it's the silence since. That's what's most terrifying,' said a hotelier in Pahalgam. More worryingly, experts believe this could signal a new phase in Kashmir's militancy — one where handlers across the border are deploying mercenaries physically and mentally well-trained and capable of evading security dragnets for a long period. And, as long as the 'Butchers of Baisaran' remain free, the horror they unleashed will loom large over the fragile calm of Kashmir.
