
Prithviraj snubbed at National Awards: Jury chairperson Ashutosh Gowariker felt performance was ‘inauthentic'
Despite this, Nair himself was a vocal critic of the film's inclusion. 'As a Malayali on the panel, I raised serious objections. I questioned how a film that defames a state like Kerala and serves as propaganda could be considered for a national honour. I even conveyed my concerns directly to the jury chairperson,' he said. He noted, however, that his dissenting voice was isolated: 'I was the only one who labelled it as propaganda. Others argued that even if it was controversial, it tackled a relevant social issue.'
Also Read | 71st National Film Awards: Shah Rukh Khan and Rani Mukerji receive their first ever National Award after over 3 decades in the industry
Meanwhile, another notable contender, Blessy's Aadujeevitham (The Goat Life), starring Prithviraj Sukumaran, was submitted for multiple awards but failed to secure any wins. Its absence from the winner's list has left a bitter taste among fans and cinephiles alike. When asked about this, Nair revealed that Jury Chairperson Ashutosh Gowariker wasn't entirely convinced.
'He had seen the movie at a previous film festival in Goa and had serious concerns about the film's adaptation and execution. Gowariker and others also felt the adaptation lacked naturality and the performances didn't feel authentic.' The film was also nominated for Best Male Playback Singer and Best Lyrics (for Rafeeq Ahammed's 'Periyone Rahmane'), but lost out partly because the producers did not submit a proper English translation of the lyrics. Among standout performances, KR Gokul's character received praise for its freshness and impact. Yet, despite appreciation from the jury, the award eluded him as the overall quality of the films was also a significant factor in final decisions.
In contrast, Ullozhukku was lauded for its consistent excellence across all departments, which earned it the Best Malayalam Film award. Nair commented, 'Every element of it, from writing to direction and technical execution, was appreciated, which is why it won Best Malayalam Film.' The film was also considered for Best Debut Director, Best Actress (Parvathy Thiruvothu), and its cinematography by Shehnad Jalal was in contention but ultimately lost out to The Kerala Story in the latter category.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Imtiaz Ali defends Shah Rukh Khan's National Award win for Jawan: 'If the country has honoured him...'
In response to the controversy surrounding Shah Rukh Khan's recent National Award win for the movie "Jawan," filmmaker Imtiaz Ali has publicly defended the actor, telling IANS that it was a proud moment while speaking on the sidelines of an event in Mumbai. 'No, no. If the country has honoured him, it's obviously a big thing. I would like to congratulate Shah Rukh Khan and all the people who got this big award. Thank you," he stated, sending his best wishes to each and every recipient. Shah Rukh Khan's performance in the movie "Jawan" earned him his first National Award for Best Actor on August 1. Urvashi, a South actress, started the controversy by quietly casting doubt on SRK's National Award victory. Urvashi pointed to the jury's unfair decisions while accepting the Best Supporting Actress award for "Ullozhukku." She allegedly questioned what made Jawan deserving of Best Actor honors, without specifically mentioning Shah Rukh, while veteran Malayalam actor Vijayaraghavan's stirring performance wasn't even taken into consideration for the lead category. Online discussion was sparked by her comments. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like They were so beautiful before; look at them now; number 10 will Surprise you Undo However, some internet users were shocked to understand that Shah Rukh Khan had won the National Award for "Jawan," wondering why it had taken him 33 years to receive this honor. Many noted that he was not given credit for some of his most famous roles in movies like "Devdas," "Swades," "Veer Zaara," and "Chak De! India." The actor's victory generated discussion regarding the jury's selection criteria and timing. Veteran actor Mukesh Khanna defended Shah Rukh Khan in the face of increasing criticism over the actor's National Award victory. "People who are saying that Shah Rukh Khan should not have received the award for this film (Jawan) but for Swades—remember A. R. Rahman received the Oscar for 'Jai Ho' and not for the various beautiful songs he created in the past," he informed IANS. "Shah Rukh has been working hard for the past 40 years now—so what is wrong if he has received a National Award?"


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Lilliput compares SRK's acting in Zero to Kamal Haasan: Not even the dust on his feet
Actor Liliput recently shared his views on Anand L Rai's 'Zero' (2018), which depicted a protagonist with dwarfism. He criticised actor Shah Rukh Khan's portrayal in the film, while comparing his performance to actor Kamal Haasan's acting prowess in 'Appu Raja (1989).In an interview with Red FM Podcasts, Lilliput said, "Someone who is not blind will act like they are blind but for a person who is not a dwarf, how will you act like a dwarf? Because dwarfs are normal, their hand movements are normal, they laugh and think like anyone else, they only look a different way. So how will you act that out? You will make him look smaller technically."advertisement"We know you are good looking and cute so our impression of what you are ends there. We are not looking at a dwarf, we are looking at a hero who has been made to look like a dwarf via visual effects,' he said and asked, 'And what is your script trying to say," the actor went on. While drawing parallels between Khan and Haasan's performances in 'Zero' and 'Appu Raja' respectively, the 'Mirzapur 3' actor said, "You look at Appu Raja's intelligence. Kamal Haasan picked out the details of the physicality of a dwarf person. Dwarfs are a little distorted, their fingers are smaller, a little thicker, arms, face and feet are different so when you are not able to leave an impact, then why are you making it? And how could you think that you would leave an impact?""Kamal ji ki aap copy kar rahe ho, unki acting ki. Charno ki dhool bhi nahi ho aap (You are copying Kamal ji. You imitate his him. And you are not even equal to the dirt on his feet)," he Rukh recently won a National Award for Best Actor for Atlee's 'Jawan'. He shared the award with actor Vikrant Massey for Vidhu Vinod Chopra's '12th Fail'.Shah Rukh will next be seen in Siddharth Anand's 'King', featuring his actor-daughter Suhana Khan, Abhay Verma, Abhishek Bachchan, Jaideep Ahlawat, Jackie Shroff and others in key roles.- EndsTrending Reel


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Bigg Boss Malayalam 7: Shanavas advises Gizele to dress modestly, says 'It's needed to earn love and votes from the Malayali audience'
In a recent episode of Bigg Boss Malayalam Season 7, contestant stirred yet another controversy by advising fellow housemate Gizele Thakral to dress more modestly to align with Malayali cultural expectations. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The conversation has since sparked a heated debate among fans and viewers of the show. During a casual chat inside the house, Shanavas approached Gizele with what he described as 'well-meaning advice,' urging her to reconsider her wardrobe choices. 'The way you are brought up, your profession, everything might be different. I suggest you be a bit more well-dressed. No matter what you are outside, this is a show watched by Malayalis. Freedom of choice of dress is for all, you can wear what you wish. But to earn their love, impression, and votes, you need to do it. ' However, Gizele appeared to take the feedback in a positive spirit and acknowledged Shanavas' point of view. This comment followed his earlier nomination of Gizele, where he expressed concerns that her dressing style might not sit well with the Kerala audience, calling it potentially "nasty" in the context of local culture. His statement during the nomination round had already attracted criticism on social media, with many calling it regressive and judgmental. While some viewers supported Shanavas for being 'honest' and looking out for his co-contestant, a large section of the audience criticized the comment as a form of moral policing.