logo
As SCO Condemns Israel for Attack on Iran, India Dissociates Itself from Statement

As SCO Condemns Israel for Attack on Iran, India Dissociates Itself from Statement

The Wire5 days ago

New Delhi: Underscoring its own unwillingness to criticise Israel, India today (June 14) distanced itself from a statement issued by the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which strongly condemned Tel Aviv's military strikes on Iran and characterised them as violations of international law and the UN Charter.The Israeli strikes on June 13 targeted Iranian military and nuclear sites, reportedly killing 78 people, including three senior security officials, the country's top nuclear negotiatior Ali Shamkhani, and causing damage to the Natanz nuclear facility. In response, Iran launched a barrage of ballistic missiles and drones early Saturday, resulting in at least three fatalities and injuring dozens more.In a strongly worded statement today, the SCO said member states had expressed concern and 'strongly condemn' the Israeli strikes.'Such aggressive actions against civilian targets, including energy and transport infrastructure, which have resulted in civilian casualties, are a gross violation of international law and the United Nations Charter. They constitute an infringement on Iran's sovereignty, cause damage to regional and international security, and pose serious risks to global peace and stability,' it said. Iran is also a member of the 10-member grouping. The SCO statement did not indicate that any member had dissociated from it. However, India issued a separate statement almost concurrently, clarifying that it was not part of the SCO's decision-making on this matter.India said that its position had been communicated to other SCO members. 'Keeping that in mind, India did not participate in the discussions on the above-mentioned SCO statement,' it said.It noted that India had already articulated in its position on Friday. 'We urge that channels of dialogue and diplomacy be utilised to work towards de-escalation and it is essential that the international community undertake endeavours in that direction,' said the statement.India has so far only said that it was 'deeply concerned' at the 'recent developments between Iran and Israel'.The latest MEA statement also noted that External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar had spoken to his Iranian counterpart on Friday, conveying what India described as the international community's 'deep concern' over the situation. He had also urged both sides to avoid further escalation and return to diplomatic channels at the earliest.A day earlier in New York, India abstained on a UN General Assembly resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, marking a reversal from its support for a similar resolution in the same body six months ago.While India limited itself to expressing concern, other Asian countries reacted more forcefully to the Israeli strikes.Japan's foreign minister Takeshi Iwaya issued a statement on Friday condemning Israel's actions in unequivocal terms. The use of military means amid ongoing diplomatic efforts, including US-Iran talks aimed at the peaceful resolution of Iran's nuclear issue, is completely unacceptable and deeply regrettable. The Government of Japan strongly condemns these actions,' he said. While Japan acknowledged Iran's retaliatory response, it did not condemn Tehran, instead expressing concern about the exchange of attacks and calling for restraint.China also denounced the Israeli strikes, describing them as violations of Iran's sovereignty. 'China is closely following Israel's attacks on Iran and is deeply concerned about the potential grave consequences of the operations,' said Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian. He said China opposed actions that 'violate Iran's sovereignty, security and territorial integrity' and called on all sides to avoid further escalation. Beijing currently holds the rotational chairmanship of the group.South Korea expressed 'deep concern over the sharp rise in tensions following Israel's attacks on Iran' and said it 'strongly condemns all actions that destabilize the region'. A foreign ministry spokesperson urged all parties to 'exercise maximum restraint to help de-escalate the situation'.Other Asian countries had more muted responses. Vietnam and the Philippines, both of which have diplomatic relations with Israel, did not issue any public statement. Singapore said it was 'deeply concerned' and urged 'all parties to exercise restraint and to de-escalate'The largest south-east Asian economy, Indonesia, and a country that does not have diplomatic ties with Israel, issued a strong condemnation. Its foreign ministry called Israel's attack on Iran an 'unlawful act' that 'undermines the very foundations of international law'.Malaysian prime minister Anwar Ibrahim posted on X that he condemned 'in the strongest possible terms, the Israeli military strikes in Iran, including targeted attacks that have killed senior Iranian leaders'.'Its clear aim is to sabotage the ongoing negotiations between the United States and Iran. It also comes amid renewed scrutiny of Israel's conduct in Gaza and mounting political pressure on [Israeli Prime Minister] Benjamin Netanyahu,' he wrote.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is a ‘regime change' in Iran possible? What happens if Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is killed?
Is a ‘regime change' in Iran possible? What happens if Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is killed?

Mint

time29 minutes ago

  • Mint

Is a ‘regime change' in Iran possible? What happens if Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is killed?

US President Donald Trump hinted at a "regime change" in Iran just hours after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Sunday, 'This mission [US attacking Iran's nuclear sites] was not and has not been about regime change.' The idea of killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei also surfaced during the Iran-Israel conflict. It was said that Trump had vetoed an Israeli plan to kill the Iranian Supreme Leader, but the US President later claimed Khamenei was an "easy target" but would not be killed, "at least for now". This left the door open for a discussion of what exactly President Trump meant by "regime change." Meanwhile, Israel, which is in conflict with Iran, has not ruled out killing Khamenei. Last week, Israel Defense Minister Israel Katz said of Khamenei: 'This man absolutely should not continue to exist.' Cambridge dictionary defines a 'regime change' as a complete change of government, especially one brought about by force. Meanwhile, Britannica says a regime change refers to the overthrow of a government considered illegitimate by an external force and its replacement with a new government according to the ideas or interests promoted by that force. Simply put, a change of regime means forming a new government. In case of Iran, a regime change would require Israel or the US having a figure in mind to replace Khamenei and send troops to the country, Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute in Washington, DC, told CNN. A delay in choosing the new Supreme Leader could fuel another possibility for a regime change in Iran. Iran's government is a unique hybrid system which has elements of a theocracy and a republic. The Supreme Leader is at the top of Iran's power structure. He is "the guardian jurist who is effectively Iran's leader for life," the CRF explained. The president is the second-highest-ranking official in Iran. Particularly, Khamenei, the 86-year-old cleric, has ruled Iran for more than 35 years as its highest authority, rising to power a decade after the 1979 Islamic Revolution overthrew a US-backed monarch. So, what will happen if Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dies? Will his death lead to a regime change? Khamenei can be replaced by a new leader, but changing the regime itself is likely to trigger unrest in the Islamic Republic. Choosing a leader on time may not necessarily lead to a "regime change" in Iran. After US strikes in Iran, The New York Times, citing sources, reported that Khamenei has chosen three successors as his replacement in case military commanders die in Israeli strikes. However, the US reportedly fears that Iran could get "somebody worse than Khamenei," a source told the New York Post. Experts reportedly said that if the Supreme Leader is killed and the Guardian Council delays naming a successor, the risk of instability could grow. Parsi from Quincy Institute in Washington also warned that "a possible outcome of Khamenei's potential killing is total regime collapse." One possible scenario is Iran's various ethnic groups vying for power after Khamenei's death. Experts say that any attempt at regime change in Iran risks collapsing the state altogether – "a scenario that could splinter Iran and send shockwaves across the Middle East," CNN reported. Earlier, The Telegraph reported that Khamenei's death could create a vacuum at the heart of the government that might trigger internal strife and civil unrest. This is because Khamenei's death is likely to create opportunities for Iran's ethnic minority groups to rise up. Reports suggest that separatist groups who have long opposed the Islamic Republic may seek to take advantage of what they may see as an opportunity. This could "potentially ignite local conflicts that could spiral into a broader civil war." If Iran's regime falls, 'there would be support for ethnic separatist groups by the Israelis, and perhaps the US,' Parsi said. This would lead to a situation where remnants of the state are going to be consumed with fighting separatists. Another possibility is "military intervention", which "rarely leads to democratisation," Hamed Mousavi, associate professor of International Relations at the University of Tehran, told CNN. "Military factions that could take over are 'not going to be the type of regime that the US may have had in mind,' Parsi said. "They are unlikely to seek diplomatic routes with Israel or the US, but could take a more hawkish approach that sees possession of a nuclear bomb as the only deterrent to more attacks," Parsi said.

'No CEASEFIRE, But...': Iran's Big Message To Trump As Israel Accepts Truce Deal
'No CEASEFIRE, But...': Iran's Big Message To Trump As Israel Accepts Truce Deal

Time of India

time30 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'No CEASEFIRE, But...': Iran's Big Message To Trump As Israel Accepts Truce Deal

/ Jun 24, 2025, 01:27PM IST Iran and Israel have finally agreed for ceasefire implementation hours after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire on Truth Social. Iran's top diplomat Abbas Araghchi praised armed forces for relentless strikes against Israel until the ceasefire deadline. He denied any ceasefire agreement exists, warning Israel to halt aggression by 4 a.m. Tehran time to avoid further retaliation. Iran launched six waves of ballistic missiles targeting central and southern Israel, killing four civilians in Beersheba when a missile hit an apartment building. Israeli forces intercepted most missiles but one made impact. The intense missile barrage occurred minutes before the proposed ceasefire phase began, reflecting high regional tensions. Araghchi stressed the final decision on ending military operations is pending, signaling uncertainty in the fragile conflict's future.#IsraelIranCeasefire #MiddleEastTensions #TrumpNews #TehranStrikes #BreakingNews #QatarMediation #IDFUpdates #IranCrisis #Geopolitics #Ceasefire2025 #WorldAtWar #PeaceOrWar #GlobalAlert #USForeignPolicy #MideastConflict

Iran denies ceasefire violation as Israel warns of ‘forceful' response
Iran denies ceasefire violation as Israel warns of ‘forceful' response

Mint

time30 minutes ago

  • Mint

Iran denies ceasefire violation as Israel warns of ‘forceful' response

News about a missile attack by Iran on Israel after the ceasefire between the two countries took effect is "denied", Iranian media reported, quoting state TV. "Victory has forced Israel to unilaterally accept defeat and stop its aggression" said Iran, as quoted by Fars News. Israeli military said earlier it detected missile launches from Iran to which Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said Israel would respond 'forcefully'. Katz said the military had now been instructed to carry out high-intensity operations against targets in Tehran. The Israeli military reported two missiles fired from Iran mid-morning on Tuesday, leading sirens to blare in the north several hours after US president Trump announced a ceasefire plan, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reports. The army initially said it had identified missiles launched from Iran 2.5 hours after the start of the ceasefire. 'Two missiles were launched from Iran and they were intercepted,' a military official told AFP on condition of anonymity, with the army saying people could leave shelters about 15 minuutes after the first alert. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday he has ordered the country's military to respond forcefully to what he said was Iran's violation of a ceasefire with Israel, Reuters reports. The directive followed an announcement by the military that it had detected missile launches from Iran towards Israel. The Israeli military said it was working to shoot down Iranian missiles after detecting the launch. Earlier, US president Donald Trump had said that the ceasefire was now in effect. Katz said the military had now been instructed to carry out high-intensity operations against targets in Tehran. He said, "In light of Iran's blatant violation of the ceasefire declared by the President of the United States – through the launch of missiles toward Israel – and in accordance with the Israeli government's policy to respond forcefully to any breach, I have instructed the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) … to continue high-intensity operations targeting regime assets and terror infrastructure in Tehran.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store