Thousands gather to mark 30th anniversary of Srebrenica genocide
Seven newly identified victims of the 1995 massacre, including two 19-year-old men, were laid to rest in a collective funeral at a vast cemetery near Srebrenica on Friday, next to more than 6,000 victims already buried there.
Such funerals are held annually for the victims who are still being unearthed from dozens of mass graves around the town.
Relatives of the victims often can bury only partial remains of their loved ones as they are typically found in several different mass graves, sometimes kmiles apart. Such was the case of Mirzeta Karic, who was waiting to bury her father.
A flower is seen on a monument with the names of those killed in the Srebrenica genocide,(Armin Durgut/AP)
'Thirty years of search and we are burying a bone,' she said, crying by her father's coffin which was wrapped in green cloth in accordance with Islamic tradition.
'I think it would be easier if I could bury all of him. What can I tell you, my father is one of the 50 (killed) from my entire family,' she added.
July 11 1995 is the day when the killings started after Bosnian Serb fighters overran the eastern Bosnian enclave in the final months of the inter-ethnic war in the Balkan country.
After taking control of the town that was a protected UN safe zone during the war, Bosnian Serb fighters separated Bosniak Muslim men and boys from their families and brutally executed them in several days.
The bodies were then dumped in mass graves around Srebrenica which they later dug up with bulldozers, scattering the remains among other burial sites to hide the evidence of their war crimes.
The UN General Assembly last year adopted a resolution to commemorate the Srebrenica genocide on the July 11 anniversary.
Scores of international officials and dignitaries attended the commemoration ceremonies and the funeral.
Among them were European Council President Antonio Costa and Britain's Duchess of Edinburgh, Sophie, who said that 'our duty must be to remember all those lost so tragically and to never let these things happen again'.
Dutch foreign minister Caspar Veldkamp said he felt 'humbled' because UN troops from the Netherlands were based in Srebrenica when Bosnian Serbs stormed the town.
People mourn during the funerals in Srebrenica (Armin Durgut/AP)
'I see to what extent commemorating Srebrenica genocide is important,' he said.
In an emotional speech, Munira Subasic, who heads the Mothers of Srebrenica association, urged Europe and the world to 'help us fight against hatred, against injustice and against killings'.
Ms Subasic, who lost her husband and youngest son in Srebrenica along with more than 20 relatives, told Europe to 'wake up.'
'As I stand here many mothers in Ukraine and Palestine are going through what we went through in 1995,' Ms Subasic said, referring to ongoing conflicts. 'It's the 21st century but instead of justice, fascism has woken up.'
On the eve of the anniversary, an exhibition was inaugurated displaying personal items belonging to the victims that were found in the mass graves over the years.
The conflict in Bosnia erupted in 1992, when Bosnian Serbs took up arms in a rebellion against the country's independence from the former Yugoslavia and with an aim to create their own state and eventually unite with neighbouring Serbia.
More than 100,000 people were killed and millions displaced before a US-brokered peace agreement was reached in 1995.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
18 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
The cards are stacked against Ukraine — and against Europe
The most revealing moment in US president Donald Trump's White House meeting with European leaders came during a 'hot mic' moment when Trump was overheard discussing his relationship with Russian president Vladimir Putin. 'I think he [Putin] wants to make a deal for me, you understand that? As crazy as it sounds,' he whispered to French president Emmanuel Macron. The idea that Putin is beholden to Trump, that some sense of personal magnetism or obligation to the American president is pushing him towards a deal that will end the conflict in Ukraine is indeed crazy. Putin has earned his reputation as a cold and vicious thug, solely interested in his own goals and unmoved by sentiment. Yet Trump has often spoken of his admiration for Putin. The latter has repeatedly broken Trump's red lines on Ukraine, refusing to agree to a preliminary ceasefire before talks, and even escalating Russia's military offensive in the immediate aftermath of calls with the US president. Trump has threatened to impose more sanctions, but ultimately always backed down. Last week in Alaska, Trump described his relationship with Putin as 'fantastic'. Picture: AP /Julia Demaree Nikhinson Last week in Alaska, Trump described his relationship with Putin as "fantastic", even though he had threatened to impose sanctions if Putin did not offer concessions as a starting point to ending the war in Ukraine — none were forthcoming. The bromance is decidedly lopsided. Trump also has an outsized view of Russia's strength, telling journalists that only his intervention had prevented the Russian military from achieving victory in Ukraine. This overlooks Ukrainian successes in pushing back the Russian offensive in 2022 and the more than one million casualties, killed and wounded, inflicted on the Russian military since the start of the war. Russia, with an ageing population, a rusting and hydrocarbons-dependent economy, is not the Soviet Union of the Cold War. Despite his failed meeting with North Korea's president Kim Jong Un in Hanoi during his first term and the backlash following his fawning over Putin in Helsinki in 2018 when he accepted Putin's word over that of the FBI regarding interference in US elections, Trump still believes he can get a quick summit win on Ukraine. The search for moments of "great television" — as Trump's described his upbraiding of Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy during their meeting in February — is an important motivation. The vicious ambush of Zelenskky by both Trump and vice-president JD Vance in the Oval Office in February was shocking but it should not have been unexpected. Picture: AP /Mstyslav Chernov The problem for Europe and Ukraine is that there is a serious risk a trilateral summit between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy will descend into a two versus one pile-on. Trump's hostility towards Ukraine's president stretches back to his failed attempts to get the Ukrainian government to implicate the Biden family in a corruption scandal during Trump's first term in office. The vicious ambush of Zelenskky by both Trump and vice-president JD Vance in the Oval Office in February was shocking but it should not have been unexpected. On Monday, European leaders took their turns to praise Trump in Washington DC. This is viewed as a necessary tribute to keep the United States engaged on Ukraine's side of the war, supplying vital intelligence, communications and air defence systems. Europe can ramp up a lot of military assistance to Ukraine, but there are capability gaps that European militaries cannot hope to fill for some years yet. Paying homage to a capricious president may work in the short-term but if, as now seems likely, Trump turns on Zelenskyy and demands that he cede the remaining parts of the Donbas region controlled by Ukraine in the interests of "peace", then the inability of Europe to prevent such a stitch-up will call these tactics of obeisance into question. Allowing Washington, or Beijing, to believe Europe can be belittled, and then ignored with little consequence — whether on trade or Ukraine — could seriously backfire. Trump officials, like his envoy Steve Witkoff, say such concessions are a necessary precondition before putting in place "robust security guarantees" that will ensure a durable peace. Prior to the invasions of 2014 and 2022, Ukraine already had such assurances under the Budapest Memorandum of 1994; Russia as a signatory guaranteed Ukraine's independence and committed to never use military force against Kyiv. Ukraine, for its part, gave up all nuclear weapons systems which had previously been stationed in the country during the Cold War. It is still unclear what new guarantees the Trump administration believes would be sufficient to deter future Russian aggression. It is difficult to envisage a diplomatic breakthrough in the coming weeks. Putin's participation in talks are likely a gambit, a means for Moscow to try to shift blame to Ukraine as a spoiler of peace. Witkoff has shown his ineptitude and bias in recent months; he was unable to name the five Ukrainian regions — Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea — annexed or partly occupied by Russia. Witkoff also previously called Ukraine 'a false country'. Before any security guarantees are discussed, top of Trump's agenda will be transfers of land to satisfy Putin. President Zelenskyy cannot give up land which Russia does not occupy — even if he will be pressed to do so by Trump. Given the documented accounts of the mass abduction of children, rape, torture and murder in territories seized by the Russian military to date, the abandonment of more than 250,000 Ukrainians (more than the population of Cork City) living in unoccupied Donetsk to Russian control would be an unimaginable cruelty. Ukraine is struggling to get enough troops to the frontline. An angry Trump cajoling and then threatening Zelenskyy to give Putin what he cannot, will further demoralise Ukrainians — or so Putin hopes — at a time when Russia has gained considerable territory during its summer offensive in Donetsk. Trump has form, having presided over a disastrous deal with the Taliban in 2020, the Doha Agreement, that excluded the then Afghan government, and helped spur the Taliban to victory the following year. The best hope may be that Trump, notoriously inattentive, will simply move on and leave diplomacy on the Ukraine war to others. Dr Edward Burke is a lecturer in war studies at University College Dublin
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump offers assurances that US troops will not be sent to help defend Ukraine
President Donald Trump has offered his assurances that US troops would not be sent to help defend Ukraine against Russia after seeming to leave open the possibility the day before. Mr Trump also said in a morning TV interview that Ukraine's hopes of joining Nato and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are 'impossible'. The Republican president, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders held hours of talks at the White House on Monday aimed at bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. The White House meeting (Alex Brandon/AP) While answering questions from journalists, Mr Trump did not rule out sending US troops to participate in a European-led effort to defend Ukraine as part of security guarantees sought by Mr Zelensky. Mr Trump said after his meeting in Alaska last week with Vladimir Putin that the Russian leader was open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine. But asked on Fox News Channel's Fox & Friends what assurances he could provide going forward and beyond his term that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Mr Trump said: 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' Mr Trump would have no control over the US military after his terms ends in January 2029. The president also said in the interview that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but he underscored that Ukraine will have to set aside its hope of getting back Crimea, which was seized by Russian forces in 2014, and its long-held aspirations of joining the Nato military alliance. 'Both of those things are impossible,' Mr Trump said. Mr Putin, as part of any potential deal to pull his forces out of Ukraine, is looking for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory.
Extra.ie
2 hours ago
- Extra.ie
'Shameful indictment' as record number of aid workers killed
The daily reports of people being killed in wars have often reduced hundreds of people into being a horrifying statistic. However, beyond the headlines, there are the unsung heroes who laid their lives on the line to provide aid to the civilians of the likes of Gaza and Sudan. Tragically, a record number of aid workers were killed in 2024, with the United Nations reporting 383 deaths across the year. Israel has blocked aid from coming into Gaza. Pic: Eyad BABA / AFP via Getty Images The UN branded the figures and lack of accountability a 'shameful indictment' of international apathy. They also warned that this year's toll is equally horrifying. The UN revealed the figures on World Humanitarian Day, revealing that the 2024 toll is 31% higher than the year before. These aid workers exhausted themselves trying to help the war-torn people of the world and were ultimately killed for standing up for civilians. This year's tragic death count was surged upwards by Israel's bombardment of Gaza. The UN stated that 181 humanitarian workers were killed in Gaza and a further 60 were killed in Sudan. A record amount of aid workers died in 2024. Pic: Saeed M. M. T. Jaras/Anadolu via Getty Images They added that most of those killed were local staff serving their communities, and were either attacked in the line of duty or in their homes. Aside from the killings, 308 aid workers were wounded, 125 were kidnapped and 45 were detained in 2024. This year is looking no better, mainly in Gaza as Israel continue to gun down civilians. The UN said: 'Worryingly, there is no sign that the trend is slowing this year, with 265 aid workers killed as of 14 August this year, according to provisional data from the Aid Worker Security Database.' From her base in Deir Al-Balah in central Gaza, Olga Cherevko from the UN aid coordination office, OCHA, said that exhausted aid workers continue to show up for work 'day in and day out'. Olga emphasized the commitment of her Palestinian colleagues over the last two years, mainly 'the doctors, the nurses, aid workers – many of whom have lost everything and several times over'. Other nations have attempted to drop aid into Gaza. Pic: Moiz Salhi/Anadolu via Getty Images She also highlighted the need for an immediate ceasefire and a permanent end to the attacks. UN aid chief Tom Fletcher said: 'Even one attack against a humanitarian colleague is an attack on all of us and on the people we serve. 'Attacks on this scale, with zero accountability, are a shameful indictment of international inaction and apathy. 'As the humanitarian community, we demand – again – that those with power and influence act for humanity, protect civilians and aid workers and hold perpetrators to account.' The UN reiterated that attacks on aid workers and operations violate international humanitarian law and damage the lifelines sustaining millions of people trapped in war and disaster zones. Tom Fletcher added: 'Violence against aid workers is not inevitable. It must end.' Israeli attack destroys UN-run School in Central Gaza. Pic: by Moiz Salhi/Anadolu via Getty Images Meanwhile, the UN's World Health Organization said it had verified more than 800 attacks on health care in 16 territories so far this year, with more than 1,110 health workers and patients killed, along with hundreds more injured. The WHO stated: 'Each attack inflicts lasting harm, deprives entire communities of life-saving care when they need it the most, endangers health care providers, and weakens already strained health systems.' The aid workers in Gaza have been feeling helpless as Israel blocked the passage of humanitarian aid into the territory, starving millions of people. Israel has been restricting food, fuel and medical supplies from coming into Gaza while Palestinians are being starved to death. Olga Cherevko reflected on the nature of humanitarian work and the feeling of helplessness in Gaza. The situation in Gaza is catastrophic. Pic: AFP via Getty Images She said: 'I think as a humanitarian, I feel powerless sometimes in Gaza because I know what it is that we can do as humanitarians when we're unable to do so, both here in Gaza and in any other humanitarian crisis. 'The fact that we continue to face massive impediments for delivering aid at scale, when our missions are delayed, when our missions lasted 12, 14, 18 hours; the routes that we're given are dangerous, impassible or inaccessible. 'Everyone's still showing up (to work), but courage alone and commitment alone isn't going to feed people, isn't going to save people. 'What we need is, again, a permanent ceasefire. We need political solutions to this conflict and a resolution to this crisis.' World Humanitarian Day marks the day in 2003 when UN rights chief Sergio Vieira de Mello and 21 other humanitarians were killed in the bombing of the UN headquarters in Baghdad.
