With Rs 33.68 Lakh Crore Fortune, Gopichand Hinduja Is UK's Richest Again; Know The Tycoon
Last Updated:
Under his leadership, the Group acquired Gulf Oil in 1984 and three years later took over Ashok Leyland.
Gopi Hinduja and his family topped the Sunday Times Rich List 2025 with a net worth of 35.304 billion British pounds (Rs 33,67,948.64 crore), beating the second holder, David and Simon Reuben and family, with a margin of 8.42 billion British pounds (Rs 8,042 crore). Gopi Hinduja and his family hold the crown of Britain's wealthiest despite a drop in net worth by 1.89 British pounds.
Gopichand Hinduja is a key figure in the influential Hinduja family, which manages the multinational conglomerate, the Hinduja Group. This diverse enterprise spans industries such as trucks, lubricants, banking, and cable television.
Who Is Gopichand Hinduja?
Gopichand ascended to the role of chairman in May 2023 following the death of his older brother, Srichand Hinduja. The family has significant real estate holdings in London, including the Raffles London hotel, situated in the historic Old War Office building in Whitehall.
A 1959 graduate of Jai Hind College, Mumbai, he received an honorary Doctorate of Law from the University of Westminster and an Honorary Doctorate of Economics from Richmond College, London, according to the group's website.
Gopichand resides in London, while his younger brother Prakash lives in Monaco, and their youngest sibling, Ashok, manages their interests in India from Mumbai.
First Published:
May 18, 2025, 15:21 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What Trump America needs to understand: A country is not a corporation
Several years ago, Nobel-Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman wrote an insightful article, 'A Country is not a Company', in which he argued that business leaders need to understand the difference between economic policy on the national and international scale and business strategy on the organisational scale. In other words, and to put it bluntly, CEOs who do not understand economic policy are ill-suited for the role. Little did many realise, including perhaps Krugman himself, that an article written in 1996 would command such resonance almost three decades on. After all, CEOs of firms that have enjoyed unbridled monopoly power — especially after the emergence of the modern corporation around the turn of the last century — have shown more than a passing tendency to use that market power to their advantage. Examples abound from Standard Oil, Exxon Corporation, IBM, Microsoft, and, more recently, big-tech companies to name a few. Firms engaged in market-based competition play a 'zero-sum game' — one gains at the expense of the other. Disciplining errant firms has been accomplished by a combination of market creativity and intervention of anti-trust authorities, but it has been a hard task. Do nations jostle for competitive advantage on the global stage the same way that firms do locally? Krugman thinks not. International trade, significantly, is not a zero-sum game. According to him, 'If the European economy does well, it need not be at US expense; indeed, if anything a successful European economy is likely to help the US economy by providing it with larger markets and selling it goods of superior quality at lower prices.' Historically, that has been the case for all economic development, and most recently in East Asia. Global interdependence and the emergence of deeply integrated value chains are proof that trade increases the size of the global economic pie. The whole point of modern trade is not to impoverish either partner(s), it is to enrich both; or else why trade at all? Colonists engaged in coercive trade; today's trade is entirely voluntary. A popular phrase attributed to George Mallory, a British mountaineer of the 1920s, captures the core motivation behind mountaineering. Why do people climb mountains? 'Because they are there,' he is famously believed to have retorted. Monopolies exploit their power because it's there; CEOs have the clout along with the capacity to get away with it. Doing the same as a country — that is, flexing muscles on the global economic stage because you have power — is entirely different. Because modern trade is a matter of choice, no one holds a gun to and forces nations to trade. Blaming 'unfair' foreign competition, therefore, for trade deficits as Donald Trump has been relentlessly doing, is politically expedient but economically disingenuous. Are trade deficits the right measure of a country's competitiveness? Krugman ponders that competitiveness cannot simply be measured by staring at trade balances and their changes. If you do that, the implications are quite dangerous — they lead to harmful steps like trade wars to promote so-called competitiveness. Trade wars often make the situation worse. Evidence of the recent madness emanating from the US in the form of tariff impositions on countries that it runs a deficit with shows that contrary to expectations, the tariffs actually weakened the US dollar. It lost nearly 10 per cent of its value since January, with over half the decline in April. The tariffs also disrupted the bond market by triggering a sell-off in the US treasuries, spiking yields and challenging its safe-haven status. This volatility forced a temporary tariff pause, highlighting the bond market's power. Interestingly, on May 28, the US Court of International Trade struck down Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, ruling that they exceeded presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. According to the verdict, these tariffs involved significant economic and political issues, requiring explicit congressional authorisation, which was absent. Poignantly, on the same day, Elon Musk officially quit his advisory role in the US administration, concluding his tenure at the Department of Government Efficiency. Even so, looming on the US horizon are inflation, recession and policy unpredictability. The Trump administration has already appealed the decision (it has been stayed by the appellate court) and the case may progress to the US Supreme Court, by which time data on the impact on the US trade deficit will be available. Economists refer to this lag as 'the J-curve effect', reflecting a nuance where financial markets adjust almost instantaneously to shocks, while goods markets adjust with a lag. In all likelihood, with the tariff retaliations we have witnessed from China, Canada, and Mexico among others, the US trade deficit could become worse. Own goal, anyone? Besides, the Triffin thesis suggests that the US must run trade deficits to provide the necessary dollars for global liquidity. So, if the US wishes to remain the hegemon and continue to enjoy the exorbitant privilege of printing dollars and importing goods and services for a song, it will need to run deficits. In fact, since 1971 when the US dollar was brusquely decoupled from gold by President Richard Nixon (the so-called 'Nixon shock'), effectively ending the gold standard and the Bretton Woods system, the US dollar has continued to meet the bulk of the global demand for liquidity. In only two years since 1973 has the US trade balance been positive. In this half-century, the US has been a most productive nation, innovation-intensive, 'competitive' and creative, enterprising and illustrious, all achieved in the presence of growing trade deficits. Blaming trade deficits for unemployment and low wages is therefore ineffective and, in many cases, unequivocally wrong, especially when they are caused by domestic factors. The US is a services-based economy — education, insurance, healthcare, banking, real estate, information technology, among other sectors contributing almost 80 per cent of GDP. Getting manufacturing back by erecting tariff walls is a futile scheme, destined to fail. The CEO of a country running economic policy must, therefore, distinguish between politically expedient rhetoric and the harms of making policy decisions based on careless arithmetic. The existence of trade deficits (or surpluses) reflects a complex interaction of many factors, especially for a country that provides global liquidity. These need to be understood clearly. Krugman's warning and the embedded advice, therefore, must be taken seriously, above all by the country that nurtured his clarity of thought. (The writer is dean, School of Humanities and Social Sciences at Shiv Nadar University, and professor of Economics. Views are personal)
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Stocks in news: Tata Technologies, Ola Electric, Nestle, HDFC Bank, Wipro
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel Markets edged lower in a volatile trading session, losing over half a percent amid weak cues. In today's trade, shares of Tata Technologies Wipro among others will be in focus due to various news private equity firm TPG is likely to sell 2.1% stake in Tata Technologies via block deal according to a media report. The total block size is estimated at Rs 634 crore with floor price for the deal likely to be set at Rs 744.5 per bought over 8.61 crore shares worth Rs 435 crore in Ola Electric Mobility on Tuesday via a block deal in which Hyundai Motor Company and KIA Corporation were logistics tech company Zinka Logistics Solutions, popularly known as BlackBuck, witnessed a block deal on Tuesday. A group of marquee institutional investors picked up stakes, while existing investor Peak XV Partners pared down its number of permanent employees in Nestle India fell 3.8% in FY25, though the maker of Maggi and KitKat increased its capex and is investing in new capabilities and Motor announced significant enhancements to its premium SUV, Hyundai Alcazar, with a panoramic sunroof and DTC option on markets regulator Sebi has recently granted approval to six companies for their initial public offerings (IPOs) including that of HDB Financial services, a subsidiary of HDFC Bank.R Systems partnered with Mavvrik to enable proactive financial governance for AI and Hybrid Life arm Zynext Ventures acquires stake in Agenus, expands its Immuno-oncology pipeline and global secured a multiyear deal with entrust to drive growth through scalable, AI-Powered tech services.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
IndiaAI empanelment drives down prices of GPUs in second round
ETtech Live Events An analysis of the lowest (L1) prices released by the IndiaAI Mission for the second round of the tender for graphics processing units (GPU) shows an up to 10% fall in prices compared with the first first-round bidders will be asked to match these prices, resulting in substantial savings for the users. The GPUs are sourced under a government scheme to provide subsidised compute power to local artificial intelligence decline in the price of the same GPU model from the first round to the second round ranged from just Rs 4 an hour to as high as Rs 1,234 per some companies told ET that the reduced L1 rates will help kickstart artificial intelligence pilot projects in various domains, which previously may have been cost-prohibitive, others warned of a price bloodbath for GPU capacity prices are possibly the lowest in the world for GPU services, helped by the 40% government startups, developers, researchers and corporations exploring and implementing AI would be able to afford GPU capacity by leasing from the identified providers.'All existing empanelled players will be asked to match new L1 prices,' IndiaAI Mission chief executive Abhishek Singh told ET. 'From what we hear from companies, they will mostly match, to retain their priority of allocation of AI workloads.'As many as 53 categories of GPUs have been offered in the second round of the tender, out of which some are new (like Nvidia's B200 GPUs). In 16 categories, prices have reduced compared with the first said assigning AI workloads is an ongoing process and companies have six months to provision the per the IndiaAI website, 4,423 GPUs with a total subsidy of Rs 111.86 crore have been allocated so far. Compute has been allocated to 21 applicants from academia, government entities, early-stage startups, MSMEs and the student startup Sarvam AI , the first startup selected to build an indigenous foundational model under the IndiaAI Mission, has already been allocated 4,000 GPUs, Singh said. Others like Soket, Gnani and Gan are expected to give their estimate on the compute they need.'Allocation is dynamic. Companies have invested heavily in bidding for GPUs. Commitments require significant money and those in the business have done so after their assessments,' he has received the highest subsidy allocated under the programme at Rs 98.68 crore, out of a bill of Rs 246.71 crore for 4,096 Nvidia H100 GPUs, as per the IndiaAI minister Ashwini Vaishnaw on Friday announced the addition of 15,916 GPUs to the existing cluster of 18,417 GPUs under the programme, taking the total to 34,333 include GPUs of Nvidia, AMD, AWS and Intel. The offering comprises 15,100 H100 Nvidia GPUs , 8,192 Nvidia B200 GPUs, 4,812 Nvidia H200 GPUs, and 1,973 Nvidia L40S GPUs.'The combination of reduced L1 rates and government support will help kickstart pilot projects in various domains, enabling more organisations to experiment with and scale AI use cases that previously may have been cost-prohibitive,' said Rishikesh Kamat, senior director, Cloud services division, at NTT Data India , one of the seven empanelled bidders in round Bairathi, chief executive of Cyfuture India, another empanelled bidder in round two, warned of lower prices creating problems for the nascent industry.'It's advantageous for users but is concerning for service providers, as a price bloodbath is on," he said. Moreover, it would be even more fatal for companies if workloads as envisaged by the IndiaAI Mission don't come through, he average L1 hourly GPU price was Rs 612.85 in the first round of empanelment against an average Rs 655.90 in the second round of empanelment. While there has been a decline in price for the same GPUs between the two rounds, the average is higher in the second round because of newer categories of GPUs.
