
India Is Testing New Defense Technologies That Mirror Russia And Ukraine
Over the past three years, the Russia-Ukraine War has transformed modern warfare, as new technologies are being rapidly developed and fielded to provide enhanced capabilities to the warfighters. Both countries are heavily leveraging commercial technology, especially in the drone and counter-drone space, to defeat traditional military systems, such as tanks and artillery. This shift has allowed different countries, including India, to become larger players in the defense technology domain. In particular, India's Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO) has conducted a number of tests in the last few months on cutting-edge drone and counter-drone systems.
Founded in 1958, the DRDO's mission is to reduce India's dependence on foreign defense systems by creating indigenous technologies. The organization currently employs more than 5,000 scientists in a broad network of laboratories and research centers. Despite Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's emphasis on military modernization and domestic production, the DRDO still operates on a fairly limited budget compared to the defense budgets of other countries. As such, they appear to be prioritizing their research efforts, especially in the drone and counter-drone space, to align with technologies that are finding success on the Russia-Ukraine battlefield.
The DRDO has a long history of drone development efforts, having built a diverse fleet of autonomous vehicles that leverage domestic, commercial technology. The drones range from the Trinetra, a small quadcopter with advanced sensing and autonomy, to the Rustom, a larger fixed-wing aircraft capable of carrying various payloads. The DRDO is transitioning these drones into products for the Indian military, while further developing them to have new capabilities. In the past year, the Indian army placed an order for 700 Trinetra drones. Meanwhile, the DRDO is continuing the development of the Archer-NG, the newest variant of the Rustom, which has reported range of 1,000 km with a payload capacity of 300 kg.
More recently, the DRDO has been testing glide bombs, a variant of drone technology that has been used extensively by Russia in their missile strike campaigns. In early April, the DRDO successfully tested two glide bombs. The first, the Gaurav, which was developed with industry partners, is reported to have a range of 100 km and a weight of 1,000 kg. The second glide bomb, the Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon, has a similar range, but is smaller, only weighing 125 kg. However, it uses advanced optics for increased accuracy with a focus on striking airfields. According to both reports, the glide bombs successfully hit their targets.
While air-based drones have shaped much of the current conflict, Ukraine has also demonstrated the strategic value of water-based drones, which have limited Russian operations in the Black Sea. The DRDO has followed suit, with its Naval Science and Technology Laboratory testing the High Endurance Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (HEAUV) in a lake in late March. The HEAUV is 10 meters long, weighs six tons, and carries a payload of advanced sensors. It is designed for 15 days of endurance at a cruising speed of 3 knots. The tests showed that the HEAUV could successfully navigate both underwater and on the surface. Once further testing is complete, the HEAUV will likely be used by the Indian Navy to monitor their maritime borders.
With the rise of drone technology, there has been a corresponding push in counter-drone technology. Both Russia and Ukraine have deployed a mix of kinetic and non-kinetic solutions to neutralize aerial threats. Similarly, the DRDO maintains a broad portfolio of counter-drone efforts, encompassing both types of systems. These technologies are at varying stages of technical maturity, with two recently reaching the testing phase.
In February, the Research Centre Imarat, a DRDO laboratory, tested the Very Short-Range Air Defense (VSHORAD), a comparable system to the Igla-S, which the Russian military uses extensively to counter low-flying aerial threats. The VSHORAD is a man-portable system intended to engage drones, helicopters, and low-flying aircraft at a range up to 6 km using an infrared-homing missile. In the test, the VSHORAD successfully intercepted multiple small, low-signature drones.
While conventional systems remain effective, both Russia and Ukraine are advancing new counter-drone technologies as well. One of Ukraine's most recent innovations is the Tryzub, a laser weapon designed to shoot down aerial threats. India has taken a similar approach. In mid-April, the DRDO tested the Mk-II(A) Laser Directed Energy Weapon system, which uses radar and electro-optical sensors to track low-flying targets, including quadcopters and helicopters. Once a target is identified, a 30-kilowatt laser delivers structural damage to disable the aircraft. The system was developed by the DRDO's Centre for High Energy Systems and Sciences, with support from Indian industry and academic institutions. It was successfully tested earlier this month, shooting down a small Chinese-manufactured drone.
The Russia-Ukraine War is highlighting the fast-paced future of defense technology, particularly in the drone and counter-drone sectors. While the United States, Russia, and China have long dominated many military systems, this field has seen a broader range of countries rapidly developing new capabilities. India is emerging as a key player. Recent testing by the DRDO shows India's ability to quickly develop critical drone and counter-drone technologies that have found success on the modern battlefield. As these systems mature, they will equip Indian forces and potentially support foreign military sales, boosting India's presence in the global arms market. More broadly, these efforts will strengthen India's defense industrial base, allowing India to position itself to be a more self-reliant and agile force in the evolving global defense landscape.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NATO, European Defense ETFs: 2025 Market Leaders
In a year marked by escalating geopolitical tensions and shifting global alliances, the Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) has surged 35% while U.S. stocks, as measured by the S&P 500, have gained roughly 2%. The fund's performance comes amid renewed hostilities in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and fresh uncertainty about the future of NATO itself following President Donald Trump's sharp criticisms of the alliance. These dynamics have triggered a wave of increased defense spending across Europe, fueling investor demand for companies tied to military production, surveillance systems and advanced weaponry. The most recent catalyst: a memorandum from Russia laying out aggressive conditions for ending the war, further rattling markets and boosting defense-focused equities. The Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF is designed to give investors targeted exposure to defense and aerospace companies headquartered in countries that are members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). To achieve its objective, the fund tracks the Themes NATO Defense Index, which includes firms involved in weapons manufacturing, military communications, cybersecurity, aerospace systems and battlefield logistics across both the U.S. and Europe. Since NATO tracks a market cap-weighted index, the top holdings include major U.S. names like GE Aerospace (GE) and Boeing (BA), alongside European giants like Airbus AE. The ETF's strategy reflects a transatlantic alignment, making it unique compared to more U.S.-centric or Europe-only defense ETFs. With rising defense budgets, particularly among Germany, Poland and the Nordic countries, the fund has benefited from strong investor interest and real-world increases in defense contracts. But will global and European defense ETFs keep climbing? Beyond NATO, other ETFs focused on European defense stocks have also attracted attention in 2025. The iShares European Defense ETF (EUAD) provides exposure to pure-play European defense firms and excludes U.S. companies. It targets manufacturers and suppliers within the EU and U.K. that derive significant revenue from defense activities. EUAD offers a tighter regional focus than NATO, making it more sensitive to European policy changes and spending trends. EUAD leads all ETFs in this group, as it's up nearly 70% year to date. The SPDR European Shield ETF (SHLD) blends defense and homeland security exposure, including worldwide companies that work in border protection, drone surveillance and cyber-defense. Its portfolio tilts slightly more toward tech-enabled security and infrastructure resilience, making it a broader play on European and global national security than strictly military hardware. SHLD also has an impressive year-to-date gain of nearly 55%. As the Russia-Ukraine war drags on and tensions rise with Russia's latest hardline peace proposal, defense stocks may continue to benefit from political pressure and policy changes. NATO, EUAD and SHLD all stand to gain if European nations follow through on their pledges to increase military readiness and spending—regardless of the tone coming out of Washington. While a potential diplomatic breakthrough could cool some of the momentum, the long-term trend of rising defense investment in Europe appears firmly in place. For investors looking to tap into this macro shift, the NATO and its peers offer a focused way to participate in the evolving security landscape. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investing in ETFs involves risks, and investors should carefully consider their investment objectives and risk tolerance before making any investment decisions. At the time of publication, Kent Thune did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned | © Copyright 2025 All rights reserved Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
As Harvard fights Trump admin in court, professors are quietly dropping courses
Jules Riegel, a lecturer in History and Literature, planned to teach a course in the fall at Harvard University on global transgender history. Now they are opting out of teaching the course due to fears of content-based retaliation and fears for their students' safety and as an openly transgender individual, according to a Monday court filing. 'I have had to reevaluate how I can safely teach courses on topics including global transgender history, World War II and the Holocaust,' Riegel said. Riegels' decision comes at a time when Harvard University says it is fighting in federal court to protect its academic freedom, aiming to push back billions of dollars in funding cuts executed by the federal government. The Harvard faculty chapter of the American Association of University Professors is also suing the federal government in a separate lawsuit. Riegel's commentary is included in court documents on the case. Both Harvard and the association submitted motions for summary judgment on Monday. As a non-tenure-track faculty member, Riegel said they are worried the Trump administration's goal of 'reducing the power held by students and untenured faculty,' as stated in an April 11 letter. They are concerned about having 'even less control around my curriculum, such as hindering my ability to determine my own course content, or being forced to teach content with which I disagree,' they said. 'I am fearful for the safety of my students, especially international students or students with immigrant backgrounds, including their ability to engage with critical scholarship around the Holocaust and transgender history,' Riegel said. 'Because of the administration's actions, I could not in good conscience recommend that doctoral applicants attend Harvard right now,' they said. Riegel isn't alone in altering course plans. Read more: Harvard foreign students feel like 'poker chips,' consider transfer after Trump attacks An anonymous faculty member in the court filing also changed their teaching plans for next semester due to fears of harassment. The professor, a member of the faculty of arts and sciences, planned to teach a course addressing the lead-up to the U.S. Civil War, according to a court filing from Harvard professor Kirsten Weld. However, they felt like the topic would be considered a part of diversity, equity and inclusion programing due to its focus on slavery, settler colonialism, Indian removal and the U.S.-Mexico War. The professor was concerned that they would face false accusations under Title VI — which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin — since the course would explore white supremacy in American history. They were also nervous that, because they had already experienced public targeting and harassment at Harvard due to being in support of pro-Palestine student protesters, greater emphasis could fall on them. For other Harvard professors, canceling courses isn't an option. One anonymous faculty member, who has been working at the medical school and has decades of clinical expertise, said they will be working outside of the U.S. next year and plan to eventually leave the country 'because they do not feel comfortable being at Harvard anymore.' The faculty member said their pro-Palestine advocacy and opinions make them a target at Harvard, according to the court filing. Harvard researchers are also being discouraged from publishing in scholarly and public-facing materials on topics opposed by the federal government, according to Weld's court filing. Since the attacks against Harvard, the American Association of University Professors has had to prioritize training on digital surveillance and information security and a Know Your Rights workshop, using up valuable resources for the organization. They also have had to hold twice as many meetings with members as they typically do to help navigate the Trump administration's actions, according to the court filing. Clark University to lay off up to 30% of faculty amid enrollment woes 'Incredibly ironic': Trump antisemitism effort may force out Harvard's Israeli Jews MIT bans class president who gave pro-Palestine speech from commencement Why the fight over foreign students at Harvard has some US students leaving, too Harvard affinity group graduations held off campus amid 'capitulation' to Trump Read the original article on MassLive.


Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Gen. Clark on European Union Push for Air Defenses
Retired General Wesley Clark, Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe, discusses NATO pushing the European Union to boost air defenses and how quickly this could happen. He also shares his reaction to the notion that warfare is changing, reflecting on the Ukraine drone strike on Russia. Retired General Wesley Clark speaks with Kailey Leinz and Joe Mathieu on the late edition of Bloomberg's 'Balance of Power.' (Source: Bloomberg)