DBKL ticked off for being unreasonable over Dataran Merdeka events
PETALING JAYA : A requirement by Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) for all gatherings at Dataran Merdeka to
A requirement by Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) for all gatherings at Dataran Merdeka to
obtain official approval has been described as unreasonable and an example of selective enforcement.
A human rights activist, lawyer P Rajsurian, said a recent peaceful book-reading and discussion session which was disrupted by enforcement officers could have qualified as a social activity permitted under the bylaw cited by city hall.
He said DBKL's enforcement seemed selective as many other social activities were allowed to go on undisturbed.
'If you go to Dataran Merdeka, especially on weekends, you will see many people engaging in social events like picnicking without being disturbed,' he told FMT. 'Do those who picnic now need to obtain permits as well?'
Rajsurian also said the disruption raises serious concerns about how the authorities interpret the constitutional rights on freedom of movement, speech, and assembly.
On Tuesday, DBKL said that all events at Dataran Merdeka, regardless of nature, require the mayor's prior approval, citing a city by-law which prohibits speeches, demonstrations, campaigns, or political and social activities without a permit.
Events involving public assemblies must also obtain police approval.
DBKL's statement came after the National Youth Federation of Malaysia claimed that a peaceful book-reading and discussion event at Dataran Merdeka was disrupted last Saturday.
Nalini Elumalai, a senior programme officer with Article 19 Malaysia, said the latest incident showed a continuing intolerance toward freedom of expression. She called for open dialogue on the issue.
'The government should recognise and respect Dataran Merdeka as a legitimate venue for public gatherings and discussions, ensuring it is afforded the same level of access as any other public space in the country,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Malaysia hopes cross-border e-hailing with Singapore can be implemented, says Loke
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia is open to introducing cross-border e-hailing services with Singapore, but the initiative must be pursued jointly by both countries, said Transport Minister Anthony Loke. "In principle, we hope that cross-border e-hailing can be implemented," he told the Dewan Rakyat today. He was responding to Tebrau member of parliament Jimmy Puah's question on cross-border traffic congestion and e-hailing drivers. Loke said that the government was ready to discuss the matter further with Singapore, but cautioned that it could not be a unilateral decision. "As a matter of principle and policy, we are ready to discuss with Singapore to enhance cross-border connectivity, but this cannot be carried out unilaterally. Both parties must agree before it can be implemented," he added. The minister explained that any proposal to allow cross-border e-hailing required in-depth discussions at the government-to-government level. "We hope to continue these discussions and hope that Singapore will respond positively so that this idea can become a reality," he said. On Aug 3, it was reported by a news portal that cross-border e-hailing services were one of the matters discussed between Johor Menteri Besar Datuk Onn Hafiz Ghazi and Singapore Acting Transport Minister Jeffrey Siow on Aug 1. However, the island state's Land Transport Authority (LTA) clarified that no decision was made on the issue and that it has no plans to fully liberalise Singapore-Malaysia cross-border point-to-point transport via ride-hail services.
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ex-Hong Kong lawmaker says Australian asylum grant proves human rights infringed
Former Hong Kong lawmaker Ted Hui was concerned over Hong Kong's trial of his friend, pro-democracy businessman Jimmy Lai, on national security charges. (EPA Images pic) SYDNEY : Exiled former Hong Kong lawmaker Ted Hui hailed today Australia's grant of asylum status as a key acknowledgement of the territory's human rights infringements since its authorities quelled massive pro-democracy protests in 2019. Hui, who also urged support for businessman Jimmy Lai now being tried on national security charges, received asylum on Friday, more than four years after leaving Hong Kong, which has offered a bounty for him on criminal charges over the protests. 'It is recognition by the Australian government that human rights infringements and erosion of democracy and freedom actually happened and justified granting asylum to people like me … being persecuted because of the protests,' Hui said. 'I believe this is good for Australia to have that recognition and I am grateful for the country, which has given me so much,' he told Reuters in an interview. Australian visa data reviewed by Reuters showed it had approved no asylum claims by citizens of the Asian financial hub since January 2021, and rejected five in 2023. Hui, who is working as a lawyer in South Australia, said the good news for his family came in a week during which he was concerned over Hong Kong's trial of his friend, the pro-democracy businessman Lai, on national security charges. 'Jimmy Lai is very iconic of Hong Kong's resistance because he actually had the ability to leave Hong Kong but he decided to stay,' he said. 'That is very noble of him,' he added. Before his arrest, Lai had described himself to Hui as being 'like a captain of a ship' in support of democratic values and would 'sink with the ship'. 'He deserves democracy's help in rescuing him when he is in a deep plight and he is not well,' Hui added. Lai, 77, received medication and a heart monitor for the start of the trial's final submissions, prompted by health concerns aroused by heart palpitations. Australia's foreign minister Penny Wong raised concerns with her Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in a meeting last month about anonymous letters circulated in South Australia offering rewards for information about Hui and his family. 'The Australian Federal Police were investigating the matter,' Hui said. 'They call me to check on my safety and that of my family…,' he said. 'I can say the AFP is putting in a lot of effort,' he added. A police spokesman declined to comment. After Hui and his family arrived in 2021, 123 Hong Kong citizens have made asylum claims in Australia. Many more have taken up skilled visas under a programme launched in 2021 for Hong Kong citizens to stay permanently, data shows. The home affairs department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In a statement, the government of the former British colony said it was 'against the harbouring of criminals in any form by any country'.
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Court throws out Halim Saad's attempt to reinstate Renong takeover suit
(From left) Halim Saad claimed that Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Nor Mohamed Yakcop 'forced' him to relinquish his stake in Renong-UEM, together with all rights vested in him, without adequate compensation more than 23 years ago. PUTRAJAYA : Tycoon Halim Saad has failed to reinstate his lawsuit against former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad and two others over the government's takeover of his holdings in the Renong-UEM Group. The Court of Appeal dismissed Halim's appeal today on grounds that this lawsuit, filed in 2023, was time-barred. Justice Supang Lian, who led a three-member bench, said Halim's lawsuit was a plain and obvious case for striking out. Justices Lim Chong Fong and Alwi Wahab also heard the appeal. The court ordered Halim to pay RM20,000 in costs to the defendants, who included former second finance minister Nor Mohamed Yakcop and the government. In the suit, Halim claimed that Mahathir and Mohamed 'forced' him to relinquish his stake in Renong-UEM, together with all rights vested in him, without adequate compensation more than 23 years ago. Mahathir was prime minister from July 1981 to October 2003, and again from May 2018 to February 2020. Halim alleged that Mahathir and Mohamed were 'the prime movers in respect of the said compulsory acquisition and deprivation'. The stake was said to comprise 372 million shares, and represented 16% of Renong Bhd's entire share capital. Halim claimed that the shares, acquired by government investment arm Khazanah Nasional Bhd through its subsidiary in 2001, belonged to him personally and not to Umno, a fact acknowledged by Anwar Ibrahim in Parliament on Nov 24, 1997. Anwar was Mahathir's deputy and also the finance minister and Umno deputy president at the time. Halim claimed that UEM then held a 32.6% stake in Renong, while Renong held a 37.92% share in UEM. The suit sought an unspecified amount in compensation or, alternatively, general, aggravated and exemplary damages to be assessed by the court, together with interest and costs. The High Court struck out the lawsuit in May last year. Lawyer Malik Imtiaz Sarwar appeared for Halim while senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly and Imtiyaz Wizni Aufa Othman appeared for Mahathir, Mohamed and the government.
