Latvian president believes NATO will overcome obstacles, meet 5% goal
RIGA, June 20 (Reuters) - Latvia's president expressed confidence NATO would agree to a new higher defence spending target demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump, despite Spanish objections, saying the alliance had little choice given the growing threat from Russia.
Spain on Thursday asked to opt out of the plan to increase members' defence spending to 5% of their gross domestic product, as requested by Trump, a move which could derail next week's NATO summit at the Hague.
Any agreement to raise defence spending needs unanimous approval by the 32 member states.
Latvian President Edgars Rinkevics told Reuters on Friday he understood why countries further from Russia might have difficulties convincing their voters to spend more on defence. But he said the need was pressing.
'I do hope there is the understanding in Madrid that this is a critical time for the Alliance, both when it comes to (increasing) its defence capabilities, but also to the Trans-Atlantic relationship,' he said in an interview in Riga.
'I think that they don't have much of a choice,' he added.
At an estimated 1.28% of GDP, Spain had the lowest proportion of expenditure on defence in the alliance last year, according to NATO estimates.
Latvia and fellow Baltic states Lithuania and Estonia are urgently ramping up their militaries, fearing that their neighbour and former overlord Russia could push on from its 2022 invasion of Ukraine to take more territory.
They spent more than 3% of GDP on defence this year, and have committed to top 5% for the next few years.
"We are saying that we need to spend as soon as possible now in order to avoid a worst-case scenario, spending much more later," Rinkevics said.
"While Russia is stuck in Ukraine, that possibility of a direct military attack is not very high," he said. "But it may change very, very quickly ... if a development in Ukraine leads Russian leadership to believe that NATO is weak, that Ukraine is defeated, that NATO is divided".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
19 minutes ago
- Metro
Trump shows he still isn't over 2020 election defeat as he demands investigation
President Donald Trump has called for a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election won by Joe Biden, claiming it was 'FRAUD'. 'Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD,' he wrote on social media today. 'The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin!' Trump's post comes amid an amped-up effort by him to undermine the legitimacy of Mr Biden's presidency. Earlier this month, Trump directed his administration to investigate Biden's actions as president, alleging aides masked his 'cognitive decline' – something which Biden slammed as a 'mere distraction'. The post also revives a long-running grievance by Trump that the election was stolen, even though courts around the country and a Trump attorney general from his first term found no evidence of fraud that could have affected the outcome. The Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity arm pronounced the election 'the most secure in American history'. The Justice Department has appointed a succession of special counsels in recent years – sometimes, though not always, plucked from outside the agency – to lead investigations into politically sensitive matters. In 2024, Trump's personal lawyers launched an aggressive and successful challenge to the appointment of Jack Smith, the special counsel assigned to investigate his efforts to undo the 2020 presidential election. Republicans have continually tried to deem the 2020 election, which Trump lost, as fraudulent, four years after it wrapped up. In the meantime, Trump has been sharing wildly outlandish theories about his predecessor online, amid accusations that Trump himself is suffering cognitive decline as well. More Trending Earlier this month, Trump shared a post on his TruthSocial site claiming the former US president was executed in 2020 and replaced by a 'clone'. Paul Quirk, a political science professor at the University of British Columbia in Canada, previously told Newsweek in early 2024: 'Biden's age should be less of an issue than Trump's more apparent cognitive decline – displayed in slurred speech and gross, repeated errors in one campaign rally after another.' An often tongue-twisted Trump has confused Biden with Barack Obama, his former Republican opponent Nikki Haley with Nancy Pelosi and the presidents of Hungary and Turkey. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Donald Trump's hand mark and 'cover up' raises concerns again MORE: Timothy Weah reveals Juventus stars were forced into 'weird' Donald Trump meeting MORE: Ellen DeGeneres shares rare look at sprawling UK home after leaving US over Trump
NBC News
22 minutes ago
- NBC News
Two weeks' notice: Trump's deadline on Iran is a familiar one
President Donald Trump's two-week timeline to decide on whether the U.S. will strike Iran's nuclear sites is a familiar one — it's one he's repeatedly used since his first term in office. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' he said in a statement issued through White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. In the last two months, Trump has promised action on questions or decisions in 'two weeks' over a dozen times — and he used the same timeline repeatedly during his first term in office. 'We're going to be announcing something, I would say over the next two or three weeks, that will be phenomenal in terms of tax and developing our aviation infrastructure,' Trump said of tax overhaul plans on Feb. 9, 2017. He released a one-page outline of the plan 11 weeks later, according to a Bloomberg review that year. He went on to repeatedly cite the time frame for impending actions on health care and infrastructure that never materialized during his first four years in office. Trump's use of the timing prediction has accelerated in recent weeks — and he's used it on items ranging from trade deals and tariffs to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Much of what he's predicted hasn't come to pass, with questions he's said he'd answer remaining unanswered. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Two weeks to set rates on tariffs Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on April 23, Trump said the country was going to have "great deals" on trade. "And by the way, if we don't have a deal with a company or a country, we're going to set the tariff. We just set the tariff. It's something that we think — that will happen, I say, over the next couple of weeks, wouldn't you say? I think so," Trump said. "Over the next two, three weeks. We'll be setting the number. And we're going to pick — could be for China too." Two weeks to decide on continued aid for Ukraine During an April 24 Oval Office meeting with Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, Trump was asked if he'd continued providing military intelligence and aid to Ukraine if there was no peace deal with Russia. "Let's see what happens. I think we're going to make a deal, and if we make a deal, it'll be wonderful. We won't have to worry about your question. You can ask that question in two weeks, and we'll see. But I think we're getting very close," Trump said. Two weeks to find out if Trump trusts Putin Asked by reporters on April 27 if he trusted Russian President Vladimir Putin, given the ramped-up attacks on Ukraine while Trump was calling for a ceasefire, the president said, 'We'll let you know in about two weeks.' Two weeks to determine Putin's path in Ukraine In an interview that aired May 4 on NBC's " Meet the Press," Trump was asked by moderator Kristen Welker if he'd misread Putin's position on Russia's war with Ukraine. "No, I'll tell you about in a month from now, or two weeks from now. I have no idea. I can tell you this, he's ... his ambition was stopped to a large extent when he saw that it was me that was now leading the charge," Trump said. Two weeks to set a trade deal with China Trump told reporters on May 4 on Air Force One that he'd be "setting" a trade deal with China. "At some point in the next two weeks or three weeks, I'm gonna be setting the deal. I'm gonna say that such and such a country has had a tremendous trade surplus, surplus their way, with us. They've taken advantage of us in various ways," Trump said. Two weeks to announce tariffs on pharmaceutical companies Asked on May 5 in the Oval Office if he'd made any determination on tariff rates and timing for pharmaceutical companies, Trump said, "I have. I'll announce it over the next two weeks." Asked about those same tariffs on Tuesday, Trump said, "We're going to be doing pharmaceuticals very soon." Two weeks to sign trade deals During a May 6 meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in the Oval Office, Trump suggested a number of trade deals were imminent. "We also have a situation, because everyone says, when, when? When are you going to sign deals? We don't have to sign deals. We could sign 25 deals right now, Howard [Lutnick, the commerce secretary], if we wanted. We don't have to sign deals. They have to sign deals with us. They want a piece of our market. We don't want a piece of their market," Trump said. "So we can just sit down, and I'll do this at some point over the next two weeks." Two weeks to meet Putin and end the war Trump was asked in Abu Dhabi on May 16 when he would meet with Putin to discuss ending the war. "As soon as we can set it up," Trump replied. "And I think in, uh, two or three weeks we could have it be a much, much safer place." Two weeks to set trade terms At a May 16 business roundtable in Abu Dhabi, Trump said he'd soon be setting the terms of the trade deals he wanted, and that Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent would be notifying trading partners. "So at a certain point over the next two to three weeks, I think Scott and Howard will be sending letters out, essentially telling people it won't be very fair. But we'll be telling people what they'll be paying to do business in the United States. They'll essentially be paying to be doing business in the United States," the president said. Two weeks to determine if Zelenskyy is doing a good job Asked on May 19 in the Oval Office if Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was doing enough to help end the war, Trump said, "I'd rather tell you in about two weeks from now because I can't say yes or no. "I think — look, he's a strong person, Zelenskyy, a strong guy and he's not the easiest person to deal with, but I think that he wants to stop. It's a very bad — it's a very bad thing that's happening over there. I think he wants to stop, but I could answer that question better in two weeks or four weeks from now." Two weeks to determine if Putin wants to end the war Trump was asked again if he believed Putin wanted to end the war while taking questions from reporters in the Oval Office on May 28. "I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks, within two weeks. We're going to find out very soon. We're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along or not. And if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently. But it will take about a week and a half, two weeks," Trump said. Two weeks to send out trade deal offers After touting a preliminary trade deal with China, Trump was asked at the Kennedy Center which country he expected to sign a deal with next. "Well, we're dealing with Japan. We're dealing with South Korea. We're dealing with a lot of them. We're dealing with about 15 countries. But as you know, we have about 150 plus and you can't do that. So we're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries and telling them what the deal is, like I did with E.U.," Trump responded. Two weeks to decide whether to attack Iran Press secretary Karoline Leavitt began her briefing on Thursday by discussing potential U.S. involvement in Israel's conflict with Iran. "Regarding the ongoing situation in Iran, I know there has been a lot of speculation amongst all of you in the media regarding the president's decision-making and whether or not the United States will be directly involved," she said. "In light of that news, I have a message directly from the president, and I quote, 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' That's a quote directly from the president for all of you today."
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: How Netanyahu exploited Trump's biggest weakness
Let us now praise famous men — and the famously transactional friendships they foster. Benjamin 'Bibi' Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel and amongst the world's longest-running acts in the global political circus, has always possessed a singular talent: the ability to both infuriate and seduce American presidents, often simultaneously. From Bush the Patriarch to Clinton the Slick, from W. the Phlegmatic to Obama the Aloof to Biden the Irascible, each occupant of the Oval Office has taken his turn being charmed, used, and ultimately exasperated by Israel's master tactician. Bibi is as fluent in American politics and raw ambition as he is in English. But after 30 years of Netanyahu's tangos, rumbas, and lambadas, perhaps no dance has been more compelling — or more co-dependent — than Bibi's political hora with Donald J. Trump. For all their resemblance and blunt camaraderie, Bibi has irritated Trump plenty over the years. In 2020, with a camera trained on him and a calculating gleam in his eye, Bibi dispassionately acknowledged that Joe Biden had indeed won the presidential election, sending Trump into apoplexy. The maven of Mar-a-Lago didn't forget. He fumed, he stewed, and for a while, Bibi was persona non grata in Trump World, exiled from the court of MAGA. But Bibi, always catlike in his ability to adapt, beguile, and stick the landing, is fully aware of Trump's elemental weakness: his ego. With well-chosen words of flattery, Netanyahu effortlessly wooed The Donald back onto Team Bibi, singing songs of Trump's 'courage' and acumen, his 'historic decisions' and 'unmatched friendship' with Israel. Bibi, with combat training, and M.I.T. and Harvard pedigree, knows how to hit his marks. Trump, in return, twirls his tail like a proud Jack Russell terrier, honored that the Israelis — those legendarily brilliant, gadget-slinging, hardcore, tech-wielding warriors of modernity — are in awe of his genius. Bibi's people have encouraged this perceived tribute, inviting Trumpworld into classified briefings, offering demonstrations of drone warfare, and engaging in plenty of ceremonial back-patting. For a president who prefers a concise PowerPoint from Mossad to a protracted, yawn-fest NATO summit, such homage is irresistible. But Bibi goes deeper still. He understands MAGA in ways that would make a CPAC planner proud. He talks about 'America First' not with trepidation or cynicism but with admiration, positioning Israel as a scrappy partner rather than a needy dependent, in a shared civilizational struggle. What we do here, he tells American conservatives, is what you believe in over there. It's Steve Bannon-speak, and it works. So here we are: Bibi and Trump, reunited in the crucible of war. Trump, for his part, is leaning into it, framing the Middle East as a place that was 'quiet' and 'stable' when he was first in charge and devolved into chaos under 'Sleepy Joe' Biden. The two machers now share a cause, a villain (Iran) and a buzzy streaming series. It's an extended wartime honeymoon — a second act in the Bibi-Donnie bromance. It will be curtains for that second act, however, if Trump doesn't get a deal. And quickly. Trump wants deals. Trump understands deals. Trump lives for deals. If he senses that cutting a bargain with Tehran will get him a fine trophy — a Nobel, perhaps, or merely a flattering New York Post cover, he'll do it. And that's no deal for Netanyahu, who has staked his legacy on being the man who stops Iran from getting the bomb. If Trump even flirts with Khamenei's intermediaries, Bibi will likely race over to Fox News and remind the American right why some red lines aren't meant to be crossed. And therein remains the pattern: Embrace, exploit, betray, reconcile. Bibi and Trump, both transactional to a fault, are not ride-or-die allies but co-stars in a drama where the plot twists and applause lines are always telegraphed but never boring. As with all aging performers, they scramble for the stage, the spotlight, and the standing ovation— even if it means stepping on each other's lines and cues. In the end, their relationship isn't about ideology or diplomacy. It's about mutual usefulness. Trump gets to boast of Jewish love and Israeli loyalty. Bibi gets a powerful American booster with a multi-million-strong base. But when the cameras are off and the deals get twisty, don't be surprised if these two divas once again go their separate ways, for at least a time — and then reunite for the next act. After all, in politics as in love, as in showbiz, timing is everything. And Bibi Netanyahu never strays too far from center stage. Mark Halperin is editor-in-chief and host at the live video platform 2WAY and the host of 'Next Up' on the Megyn Kelly network.
