
A Calculated Conversation: When Entrepreneurs Meet Opportunity
Getty Images
Jeff, the founder of J-Rock Company, had always known his firm was building something special. In the quiet blue ocean of specialized manufacturing consulting, his company stood tall—disciplined, trusted, and uniquely positioned. But even visionaries need a sounding board. That's why he called me.
"Hey, Lewis," Jeff said. "I need some help. Have you ever heard of a private equity guy named John Byron or a private equity firm called AER? They joined forces with Gold Capital to buy out our main competitor, and now they're coming after us."
I leaned in. "I don't know them personally, but tread carefully. Conversations like this—where someone says, 'We just bought your competitor and now we're calling you'—that's the beginning of a script I've seen too many times. And it doesn't always end well."
'Conversations like this—where someone says, 'We just bought your competitor and now we're calling you'—that's the beginning of a script I've seen too many times. And it doesn't always end well."
Jeff nodded. He knew I wasn't just playing devil's advocate—I was issuing a caution born of experience. I explained that the capital markets were overflowing—$2.5 trillion globally, all in search of returns. "Firms are constantly reaching out to companies like yours. The danger is that confidence, which you've earned by building something great, can also cloud your judgment. It's easy to get caught up in visions of exits and retirements without realizing you're underprepared."
Jeff smiled. 'I appreciate the timing, Lewis—really. We've got our first sit-down tomorrow night.'
J-Rock, Jeff explained, had always kept a tight focus—serving manufacturing companies with revenues from $2 to $50 million. Their closest competitor, Three Bridges, had always been a respectful rival. But when Gold and AER bought Three Bridges, installed their own CEO, and retained the founder as president, Jeff realized something bigger was in motion. Now the same firm wanted J-Rock, and they weren't being subtle. Patty Grant, the new CEO of the conglomerate, was flying in to make the pitch personally.
"They want us because of our licensing, team experience, and credibility. They even want me to take over consulting across the ecosystem—replacing John, who's retiring. I'm planning to go in and listen, not talk. No valuation numbers, no expectations. Just ears open."
"Smart,' I said. 'But how much do you know about the firm? How have their previous funds fared? What's the schedule of the current fund? Do you know people who have sold to them or partnered with them?'
Jeff didn't have any answers. 'I guess I'm not so prepared for this conversation.'
'Business owners rarely fully understand the game that is being played by private equity. These firms approach business owners knowing that a big number will do two things: get their attention and make them drop your skepticism, stop asking the hard questions.'
I explained that business owners rarely fully understand the game that is being played by private equity. These firms approach business owners knowing that a big number will do two things: get their attention and make them drop your skepticism, stop asking the hard questions.
As a first step, Jeff and I went over the questions Jeff could ask about the firm and their past performance. Afterwards, Jeff would have to check what they said about their performance against publicly available data. This was a good early test to see if they were honest or if they played games.
But most of all, I cautioned Jeff to listen ten times more than talk. Don't offer up information, ask questions. Act like a buyer, more than a seller, since, as I explained, if a deal were to be struck, Jeff was buying into this firm's guidance and capabilities.
Above all else, I told Jeff to go into this conversation assuming there would be no deal to be struck. Most of the time, I explained, when you are approached by a single suitor rather than running a formal company transaction process with years to prepare before going to market, the buyer was in a more advantageous position than the seller. But, I reminded, Jeff, the seller always has the power to walk away.
I explained the following to Jeff: 'Just because you built a great company doesn't mean you know how to sell it. They buy 10 companies a year, you sell one company in your life. You are outmatched by a mile.'
'Just because you built a great company doesn't mean you know how to sell it. They buy 10 companies a year, you sell one company in your life. You are outmatched by a mile.'
The next day, the meeting took place. Jeff followed up with me soon after.
"The meeting went great," he reported. "Very high level, no deep numbers yet, but the intent was clear—they want us in the fold. And they want me at the helm of their consulting arm. Our research on their past deals checks out, and we're heading into NDA territory now."
Jeff was optimistic. I was measured—this wasn't the finish line—it was the starting pistol.
'Next, they'll start asking for certain rights. You'll see a letter of intent from them soon. Have someone else who knows about these things read it alongside you. Because you're about to give them something —an exclusivity period—but they aren't giving you much back.'
Jeff had never thought of it that way. Once again, he realized he was getting excited while I was telling him about dangerous pitfalls he was about to drop into.
I reminded him. 'Jeff, this will work out fine if we just make sure we play our game, not theirs.'
'This will work out fine if we just make sure we play our game, not theirs.'
The mentorship was clear: Listen more than you speak. Own your role in the process. And above all, don't let momentum become a substitute for strategy. Jeff had a big decision ahead—but thanks to his preparation, and a timely conversation with me, he wasn't going in blind.
COOL TECH NOTE: I put this entire conversation into Google's NotebookLM and then asked NotebookLM to use the conversation to create a podcast between two commentators. I posted the entire conversation on Youtube. Check it out here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
21 minutes ago
- News24
Renewables revamp: Govt wants to halve timelines for power projects
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Stocks futures drop as Trump claims China has ‘violated' trade agreement
Stock futures fell Friday after President Donald Trump said China has 'totally violated' its trade agreement with the United States, sending another jolt to markets after a whiplash week of tariff developments. Dow futures were down 100 points, or 0.3%. S&P 500 futures and those tied to the Nasdaq 100 both slid 0.3%. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' the president posted on social media. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Wall Street has been cautious about the next steps in Trump's trade war. Stocks had received a boost this week after the Court of International Trade late Wednesday blocked most of Trump's tariffs on legal grounds, but that rally lost steam as traders bet the White House would aggressively appeal and pursue another legal strategy. A federal appeals court on Thursday paused the CIT's ruling to block Trump's tariffs, leaving the president's massive tariff agenda in limbo as the courts deliberate its legality. 'The stunning, head-spinning, mind-boggling trade fiasco will not be resolved quickly,' said Greg Valiere, chief US policy strategist at AGF Investments, in a note. 'It probably will land in the Supreme Court — and even that may not settle the issue.' Investors on Friday also digested fresh data that showed the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation gauge cooled in April slightly more economists had expected, but also revealed a significant drop in consumer spending. Trump has reignited his trade war in the past week, which has stirred up uncertainty in markets after Wall Street had begun to turn the page on tariff concerns. The S&P 500 has been steadily climbing out of an early April slump instigated by the president's back-and-forth on his 'reciprocal' tariffs. Despite the recent fluctuations, investors who sold at the start of May missed out on a historically strong month for markets. The benchmark index is up more than 6% this month and is on track for its best month since 2023 and its best performance in May since 1990. 'Even though the stock market has staged a decisive rebound since the April lows, there is still plenty of uncertainty on tariffs, especially given the legal battle that is brewing over the 'Liberation Day' tariffs,' said Clark Bellin, president and chief investment officer at Bellwether Wealth. The dollar slightly gained on Friday. Yet the US dollar index, which measures the dollar's strength against six major foreign currencies, is on track to end the month in the red. It would be the dollar's fifth month of decline in a row. 'We expect bouts of market volatility ahead as investors continue to navigate a range of market, economic and geopolitical risks,' said Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, CIO of global equities at UBS Global Wealth Management, in a Thursday note. The benchmark S&P 500 is up about 0.5% this year. This is a developing story and will be updated.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs?
On this week's Everybody's Business, we analyze recent developments in the US trade war, as well Donald Trump's tumultuous relationship with crypto.