Parks are for all, not just paying festivalgoers
For centuries, local parks have preserved the sanity of parents with young children, allowed children to meet each other and create play with the simplest of means, and permitted elderly people a break from the loneliness of being stuck at home. Parks need preserving because they are egalitarian and provide a meeting space that helps build communities.
Very few object to short festivals that treat a park and the local community with respect. What we are seeing now is events companies preying on cash-strapped local authorities to get concert venues on the cheap, make a quick buck from large, prolonged events and move on, often leaving the park with extensive damage that takes months to repair. There is very little transparency as to what changes hands, how much money is actually made, what it is used for and how much the damage costs to fix. Years of savage local authority cutbacks have left parks with skeleton staffing, inadequate to produce the regeneration that these events necessitate. The effects can be cumulative and permanent.
The chief executive of the Association of Independent Festivals says the local authority is 'a representation of the local community'. Well, he would say that, wouldn't he? Not many local people feel so represented.Victor PaceForest Hill, London
The imposition of loud music on others is as unacceptable in public parks as it is from a phone on the bus or a speaker in the garden. The elementary social decency of not inflicting stressful noise on neighbours and fellow travellers is rapidly disintegrating. And public parks belong to all, not just the minority who want to attend pop concerts.Paul KeelingWelling, Kent
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
As Epping case could bring migrant hotel use to an end – where else can asylum seekers go?
A High Court Judge ruled that asylum seekers can no longer be housed at a hotel in Epping that has been the site of multiple protests in recent weeks. Epping Forest District Council won an interim injunction to stop asylum seekers being hosted at The Bell Hotel, saying it had become a 'feeding ground for unrest.' The judgement requires all migrants currently housed in the hotel – around 140 men as of last month – to leave by 4pm on 12 September. The Home Office is responsible for asylum and protection in the UK, and must now find somewhere else for these people to go. Reacting to the ruling, it warned it would 'substantially impact' its ability to house asylum seekers across the UK. Home secretary Yvette Cooper had unsuccessfully attempted to have the council's case dismissed shortly before the ruling. Other councils have also shown an interest in following suit in the wake of the ruling. However, none have initiated legal proceedings similar to Epping. Most experts agree that housing asylum seekers in hotels is not appropriate for a number of reasons. Cost, overcrowding and community tensions are amongst of the most commonly cited reasons. Border security minister Angela Eagle said the government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns', adding: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.' The case raises the question of where the asylum seekers currently in the Bell Hotel will need to go come September and, should the widespread use of migrant hotels come to an end, where all people currently housed in them can be placed instead. Hotels The latest Home Office figures show that there were 32,059 asylum seekers in UK hotels at the end of June, up eight per cent on the same point 12 months ago. This is down slightly on the previous quarter, however, and far lower than the peak of 56,000 in September 2023. There are also now fewer than 210 hotels in use, down from 400 in summer 2023. These hotels only make up around 35 per cent of all people in asylum accommodation, according to a report from the National Audit Office (NAO) in May. But their cost is disproportionately expensive, making up 76 per cent of total government spending on asylum accommodation. And, as has been seen in recent months, they are also a hot-bed for protests which have oftentimes turned violent. Imran Hussain, director of external affairs at Refugee Council said: 'Asylum hotels have become a flashpoint for tension in communities, cost billions to the taxpayer, and leave people trapped in limbo. Ending their use is in everyone's interest, but the Government's current plan to phase them out by 2029 is far too slow. We need to reform the accommodation system so that councils can house people in the community.' Housing Moving more asylum seekers into houses or flats is one possible alternative to the use of hotels. These could be provided by private landlords or social housing groups. Around 66,000 migrants were housed in these kind of properties by the end of December 2024, compared to 38,000 in hotels at the same time. The main criticism of this approach is that it will add more demand onto the UK's already stretched housing industry. In the private sector, rising rents are making living costs unaffordable for many households. Moving more asylum seekers into these properties – funded by the government – may push up rental prices further and create less availability for UK residents. However, housing more asylum seekers in social housing would possibly create issues for residents who are struggling most in that local authority. The waiting list for council housing reached over 300,000 in 2024 – if more migrants are moved into social housing, the already-long wait times may increase further. Mr Hussain said: 'Housing people in communities is cheaper and more effective than hotels or military sites. Local authorities already manage housing for other groups and know their local areas best, so they're well placed to provide accommodation.' 'Ultimately, the only way to end hotel use for good is to resolve asylum applications quickly and accurately so people can either rebuild their lives here or return home with dignity. This will cut costs and allow refugees to integrate into their new communities, contribute, and play their part in Britain.' Military bases and boats Military bases have been used to accommodate asylum seekers in the past, but their use attracted widespread criticism. In 2022, the Conservative government said it would use 'large sites' like ex-military facilities, as well as barges and ferries to reduce demand on asylum hotels. The only two sites still in use are Wethersfield Airfield in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent. As of December 2024, there were only 735 migrants living between them. The government said in March that Napier Barracks would be closing after multiple allegations of poor conditions and criticism from MPs. It was also found that former home secretary Suella Braverman acted unlawfully in accommodating three asylum seekers at Wethersfield who argued they were living in 'prison-like' conditions. However, despite pledging to close Wethersfield in opposition, Labour is set to continue and even expand its use, increasing its capacity from 800 to 1,225 in July. Most agree that the use of boats is not a tenable or humane solution. The last people left the Dorset-moored Bibby Stockholm in November after fierce criticism against the 'migrant barge'. Student accommodation The government purchased former student accommodation in Huddersfield in 2023 with the purpose of housing asylum seekers. As of February 2025, the property was under development, according to the NAO. The 405-bed block of flats will hold a maximum of 670 people, the Home Office has said. There were reports that 168 students had planned to live in the building and were told they had to make alternative arrangements, although the government denied this. Using this kind of accommodation – already built for temporary use – may be a strong option to replace the use of hotels in the coming years. However, Kirklees Council said in March that there were issues it would like to see addressed before the plans go ahead. Council leader Cathy Scott said: "The Home Office needs to commit to engaging properly with the Huddersfield community on its plans as well as addressing the many important issues the council and its partners have put forward before the site becomes operational. She added: "In Kirklees, we have a strong record of supporting people who are fleeing persecution. But the system relies on trust and confidence. We do not believe the Home Office has done enough to build trust over the past six months. That's why we will continue to raise our concerns on behalf of local residents and communities."
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government's GCSE English and maths resits policy ‘not fit for purpose'
The Government's policy of making students resit maths and English GCSEs is 'not fit for purpose' and it can undermine young people's 'confidence and motivation', education leaders have warned. Politicians have been urged to 'rethink' how young people are encouraged to gain English and maths skills after the number of post-16 students taking GCSE resits in the two subjects increased this year. The rise in young people resitting their exams is partly down to a growing number of teenagers in the population, as well as the return to pre-pandemic grading standards in England in 2023, the Ofqual chief has suggested. In England, many students who do not secure at least a grade 4 – which is considered a 'standard pass' – in English and/or maths GCSE are required to retake the subjects during post-16 education. The proportion of 16-year-old entries in England securing at least a grade 4 in English language has dropped from 71.2% last year to 70.6% this year – although it is above the pre-pandemic year of 2019, when the figure was 70.5%. In maths, the proportion of 16-year-old entries in England securing at least a grade 4 has fallen from 72.0% in 2024 to 71.9% this year, though this is higher than 71.5% in 2019. Students in England are funded to retake maths and/or English until they achieve a GCSE grade 9 to 4. For students with a grade 2 or below, they can either study towards a pass in functional skills level 2 or towards a GCSE grade 9 to 4. PA news agency analysis of figures by Ofqual suggests that 183,450 16-year-olds in England did not achieve a grade 4 or above in English language this year, 1,770 more than in 2024. In maths, it is likely that 174,930 16-year-olds did not achieve a grade 4 or above, 970 fewer than last year. The Government launched a curriculum and assessment review last summer. Ahead of the review's final report, which is due in the autumn, education leaders have called on policymakers to look again at the GCSE resits policy. The Education Secretary has said the review will look at how to support young people who do not achieve the 'right level' in maths and English at GCSE. Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'Once again we see that the majority of students who retake GCSE English and maths in post-16 education under a Government policy of mandatory resits continue to fall short of a grade 4 standard pass. 'It is utterly demoralising for these young people and there has to be a better way of supporting literacy and numeracy. 'We urge the curriculum and assessment review to grasp this nettle.' Catherine Sezen, director of education policy at the Association of Colleges (AoC), said: 'Across the country, educators are working hard to improve outcomes, yet many are left asking what more can be done. 'After a decade of the condition of funding policy, it is time to rethink how we support young people to build essential English and maths skills.' She added that the AoC is calling for 'a more flexible, evidence-based approach' which empowers colleges to meet learners' needs 'without relying on repeated resits that can undermine confidence and motivation'. Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the NAHT school leaders' union, said the current GCSE resit policy was 'not fit for purpose'. He said: 'NAHT has long called for reform of the current policy that forces students into repeated resits, which is demotivating and ineffective. 'What is needed are more appropriate and engaging alternatives to GCSEs in English and maths at KS4. 'Post-16 students who need to continue the subjects must be allowed to study for qualifications that suit their needs and ambitions, rather than defaulting to GCSE resits.' Jill Duffy, chief executive of the OCR exam board, added that Thursday's figures showed a 'resit crisis. She said: 'Tinkering at the edges of policy won't fix this. We need fundamental reform to maths and English secondary education – especially at Key Stage 3 – to support those who fall behind in these crucial subjects.' UK GCSE entries for students aged 17 and over has risen by 12.1% compared with last year. On the rise in the number of post-16 students taking resits, Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator at England's exams regulator Ofqual, said it was linked with the 'rising demographic trend'. He told PA: 'If you've got a larger cohort – and proportions getting a grade four are broadly stable – you're going to see more people coming through to resit. 'But the reset of normal grading standards in 2023 probably also plays into it as well.' Sir Ian said: 'My view is that the Government's policy that students continue to study English and maths post-16 if they haven't reached that critical grade four threshold is the right thing to do. 'The policy is not that students do multiple resets. The policy is that they continue to study English and maths and sit, when appropriate, either for GCSE or for a functional skills qualification.' Speaking to PA earlier this month, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'The curriculum and assessment review is looking at how best we can support 16 to 19-year-olds who don't achieve the right level in maths and English. 'Of course I do want more students – particularly from less well-off backgrounds – to get a good pass at GCSE in English and maths because that's the gateway to so much more. 'But the curriculum and assessment review is going to look at the approach we will take in the years to come.'
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Teenager who planned mosque attack in Scotland detained for 10 years
A teenager who listed Hitler, Mussolini and the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik as his inspirations and who planned a terrorist attack on a mosque has been sentenced to 10 years in custody. The 17-year-old, who cannot be named because of his age, had intended to set fire to an Islamic centre in Greenock, Inverclyde, after befriending the imam and mapping out the building's interior on his phone. The teenager was arrested at the door of the centre in January this year. He was carrying a military-style rucksack that contained a German-manufactured Glock-type air pistol, ammunition, ball bearings, gas cartridges and aerosol cans, according to prosecutors. He was sentenced at the high court in Glasgow on Thursday after pleading guilty to two terrorism charges, with a further eight years of supervision on licence upon release. In his sentencing statement, Lord Arthurson said: 'What you had in mind was what can properly be characterised as a quite diabolical atrocity involving extreme violence and multiple deaths. You even requested that your attack be livestreamed. Your conduct was only stopped by your arrest, when you were quite literally at the very door of the centre.' Prosecutors said the teenager, who became radicalised online, began plotting the attack in December 2024 and joined the mosque's WhatsApp group saying he was 'looking for guidance', later winning the trust of the imam during several visits. Meanwhile he was boasting of his plans to set the centre on fire on the social media platform Telegram and later filmed himself wandering the corridors, including footage showing him superimposing a hand carrying a semi-automatic pistol. Sineidin Corrins, deputy procurator fiscal for specialist casework at the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, said: 'This heinous plan to attack those within his own local community was prepared and driven by racial and religiously motivated hatred, and showed that he not only held neo-Nazi beliefs but was about to act on them to cause pain and suffering'.
