logo
The first undersea voyage to the North Pole

The first undersea voyage to the North Pole

The Hindu4 days ago
Search for power
The concept of underwater transport is deeply embedded in human history. It wasn't until the 17th Century, however, that the first practical submarine was built. And it was only during World War I that submarines became a huge factor in naval warfare.
Even in the decades after World War I, the submarines could last underwater for only about 12-48 hours. This practical limitation was due to their power source, something that the U.S. Navy were trying to overcome for years by pursuing alternate sources of energy for their vessels.
The news of the atom having been split in 1939 didn't immediately lead to the beginning of the Manhattan Project. The potential of nuclear energy for power generation and explosives, however, didn't go unnoticed and the U.S. Navy began experimenting nuclear-powered propulsion.
This was under the aegis of Ross Gunn, a physicist heading the Mechanics and Electricity Division at the Naval Research Lab (NRL). Submarines of the time relied on electric batteries that were charged by diesel-powered generators, thereby requiring resurfacing, fuel, and oxygen. Even if the submarines used fuel cells for propulsion, oxygen remained a limiting factor. Gunn dreamt of a new power source with a uranium core that would heat water to run a steam power plant onboard.
Once Gunn's team secured funding, work began to explore ways to separate uranium isotopes. Their work got a fillip once Philip Abelson, a physicist at the Carnegie Institute of Washington, got on board. Abelson pioneered a method of liquid thermal diffusion to separate the isotopes and in his own words 'the facility at the Naval Research Laboratory was the world's most successful separator of uranium isotopes' for a time.
Seeing the success that Abelson's method was able to produce, the Manhattan Project – operating in secrecy – were quick to replicate it, building a liquid thermal diffusion plant with 2,142 columns, each 15 m tall, at Oak Ridge National Laboratory – the S-50. The S-50 turned out to be the first feeder plant in a trio of plants that enriched uranium in series for the first atomic bomb that was dropped on August 6, 1945 on Hiroshima, Japan.
Gunn's contribution was recognised and he urged the Navy in 1946 to send people to learn about nuclear energy from scientists who were involved with the Manhattan Project. With Abelson returning to Carnegie Institution the same year and Gunn switching NRL for the U.S. Weather Bureau, the onus of building the nuclear-powered submarine fell on Russian-born engineer Captain Hyman G. Rickover.
Building the Nautilus
Rickover was one of the five people who went to learn about nuclear energy from Manhattan Project scientists following Gunn's recommendation. Quick to see the benefits of nuclear power in their realm, Rickover led the effort to design a power plant for a submarine that would be both safe and compact.
With Rickover at the helm, a group of engineers began experimenting on reactor designs. They came up with a pressurised water reactor, which continues to be a model for a common type of nuclear reactor even today.
According to this design, water in a coolant loop is kept under high pressure. Pumped near a core of uranium that is slightly enriched, the water heats up but is prevented from boiling by the high pressure. Once the heated water moves into a steam generator, it vaporises water in a secondary loop. The steam that results from this process turns a turbine generator and electricity is produced.
Rickover contracted with Westinghouse, a manufacturing company, to build the reactor in the early 1950s. In order to build SSN-571 – the submarine that this reactor would power – he brought in the Electric Boat Division of General Dynamics.
The resulting submarine was tested time and time again, both before and after the reactor was installed by the Navy. Rickover, meanwhile, took it upon himself to personally interview and approve every single Navy officer involved in the programme, not just in the beginning, but for decades thereafter.
His methods might have been very different, and even earned him the reputation of being a fanatic among his detractors, but Rickover did succeed in building the world's first nuclear submarine. What's more, he managed it years ahead of schedule as the USS Nautilus was launched on January 21, 1954. With more than 1,200 people gathered, the submarine was commissioned on September 30, officially entering the Navy service. On the morning of January 17, 1955, the Nautilus ran on nuclear power for the very first time.
Travelling under the North Pole
Stretching nearly 320 feet and displacing over 3,000 tons, the Nautilus was much larger than the diesel-electric submarines that came before it. In addition to being able to travel underwater at speeds in excess of 20 knots, the submarine was also capable of being submerged for almost unlimited time periods. This was a direct result of the method of propulsion as the atomic engine had no need for air and only used up a small amount of nuclear fuel.
In 25 years of operation, Nautilus smashed speed and distance records, remained capable of avoiding detection by even the best such systems, and remained continuously underwater for more than two weeks in one shot. Among its many firsts and successes, its journey under the North Pole in 1958 is rather special.
Nautilus became the first craft to cross under the North Pole thanks to Operation Sunshine. For this historic voyage, 116 men were on board – a party that included Commander William R. Anderson, 111 officers and crew members, and four scientists, who were civilians.
Having departed from Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on July 23, 1958, it passed north through Bering Strait and surfaced only at Point Barrow, Alaska. On August 1, Nautilus went under the Arctic ice cap as it left the north coast of Alaska.
With the submarine diving to a depth of nearly 500 feet, the ice cap above it varied from anywhere between 10 to 50 feet. Around 11:15 p.m. EDT (Eastern Daylight Time in the U.S.) on August 3, Commander Anderson made the following announcement: 'For the world, our country, and the Navy — the North Pole.'
The historic moment passed as the Nautilus carried on without stopping under the geographic North Pole. It surfaced next only on August 5, in the Greenland Sea between Spitsbergen and Greenland. It ended its historic journey at Iceland two days later.
In a career spanning a quarter of a century, the Nautilus travelled about half a million miles. It was decommissioned on March 3, 1980 and designated a National Historic Landmark in 1982. Having first gone on exhibit in 1986, it is now a permanent exhibit open to the public at the Submarine Force Museum in Groton, Connecticut, U.S.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

80 years after Hiroshima: Nuclear threat still looms over global security
80 years after Hiroshima: Nuclear threat still looms over global security

First Post

time2 days ago

  • First Post

80 years after Hiroshima: Nuclear threat still looms over global security

History, with its grim cycles and painful lessons, has every reason to indict humanity. In the week marking the 80th anniversary of the US atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Russia announced it no longer considers itself bound by the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, blaming 'the actions of Western countries' for creating a 'direct threat' to its security. Last Friday, US President Donald Trump said he had ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines 'in appropriate regions' following what he described as 'highly provocative comments' by former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is ironic that nuclear weapons still exist, despite the well-known devastation they cause to the planet—and the threat of nuclear sabre-rattling remains as constant as the air we breathe. Aside from white lilies and sombre memorial services for the dead, and sympathy for those emotionally and physically maimed by the two blasts in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, little has moved forward in practical terms. In the prologue of her book Nuclear War: A Scenario, Annie Jacobsen describes a frightening vision of what the next nuclear bomb explosion might look like. For now, it is only imagination—but reality would unfold within minutes if the bombs were ever detonated, for whatever reason. She writes: 'A 1-megaton thermonuclear weapon detonation begins with a flash of light and heat so tremendous it is impossible for the human mind to comprehend. One hundred and Eighty million degrees Fahrenheit is four or five times hotter than the temperature that occurs at the center of the Earth's sun. In the first fraction of a second this thermonuclear bomb strikes… there is light…. Soft X-ray light with a very short wavelength. The light superheats the surrounding air to a millions of degrees, creating a massive fireball that expands at millions of miles per hour. Within a few seconds, this fireball increases to a diameter of a little more than a mile (5,700 feet across), its light and heat so intense that concrete surfaces explode, metal objects melt or evaporate, stone shatters, humans instantaneously convert into combusting carbon.' This, of course, is Jacobsen's speculative scenario of what might happen if a nuclear bomb were to strike the Pentagon outside Washington. But if such an event were to occur, her imagined horror would become exact, unbearable reality. In the 653-page book The Effects of Nuclear War, authored along with Philip J Dolan, Samuel Galsstone writes, 'There are inherent difficulties in making exact measurements of weapons effects. The results are often dependent upon circumstances, which are difficult, and sometimes impossible, to control even in tests and would certainly be unpredictable in the event of an attack.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Then, after the immediate destruction there is the curse of a nuclear winter which is inevitable. A legacy of devastation, a present of peril Eighty years after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed more than 200,000 people and left haunting reminders of nuclear warfare, the world remains on edge. Far from fading into the pages of history, nuclear weapons continue to cast a long, ominous shadow over global peace and security. While the world has avoided another nuclear strike since 1945, today's risks may be even more acute driven by geopolitical volatility, advancing technologies and the slow unravelling of disarmament frameworks. A world still armed to the teeth As of early 2025, the global stockpile of nuclear warheads stands at approximately 12,241, with the vast majority—over 90 per cent—held by United States and Russia. This massive arsenal is not just a relic of the Cold War but a continually modernised force, featuring increasingly sophisticated delivery systems and warhead designs, Andrew Hammond writes in The Business Times. While global treaties have aimed to curb proliferation, they have done little to dismantle the core of existing nuclear forces. Slowing clock of disarmament The post-Cold War era witnessed a surge of hope for nuclear disarmament. Treaties such as the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (Start) and initiatives like the Nuclear Security Summits led to tangible reductions and enhanced controls over nuclear materials. However, this progress has since slowed, if not reversed. Today, the momentum has shifted towards rearmament. The United States is developing a new generation of nuclear weapons and has indicated an openness to resuming nuclear testing. Meanwhile, China has more than tripled its arsenal, reaching around 600 warheads. These developments have reignited fears of a new arms race, especially as Russia also pursues advanced systems like hypersonic missiles and underwater nuclear drones. Submarines are indeed deadly platforms for nuclear launches. Efforts such as the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), which came into force in 2021, have garnered support from many non-nuclear states. Yet, they have been largely dismissed by nuclear-armed nations. The global appetite for disarmament, once buoyed by the horrors of Hiroshima, is faltering in the face of renewed strategic competition. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Tensions in a fragile world Geopolitical fault lines are increasingly volatile, exacerbating the risk of nuclear conflict. Recent exchanges between Medvedev and Trump over nuclear threats serve as stark reminders of how easily diplomatic tensions can veer into dangerous territory. Medvedev's reference to Russia's 'Dead Hand' nuclear retaliation system and Trump's counter by repositioning submarines closer to Russia are not just posturing, they reflect the peril of miscalculation in today's hyper-charged political climate. Other hotspots, including the enduring India-Pakistan conflict and North Korea's relentless nuclear testing, add layers of complexity. These regions combine deep-seated historical animosities with nuclear capabilities, making them particularly susceptible to escalation. Iran, for its part, remains a significant concern. Reeling from attacks on its nuclear facilities, Tehran may further accelerate its nuclear programme, potentially pushing other regional powers like Saudi Arabia and Turkey toward similar ambitions. Technology: The new wildcard While nuclear weapons have always embodied existential danger, emerging technologies are making the nuclear scenario even more unpredictable. Artificial intelligence, cyber warfare and advanced missile defence systems are disrupting the traditional logic of nuclear deterrence. According to Hammond, AI-driven systems, if poorly managed, could make decisions faster than human operators can verify, increasing the likelihood of misjudgements. Meanwhile, cyberattacks on nuclear command and control systems could trigger false alarms or disable safeguards. The potential for accidental launches or misinterpreted threats has grown significantly in an era of digital warfare and machine decision-making. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD During the Cold War and into the 1990s, several false alarms nearly triggered nuclear war due to technical errors and misinterpretations. In the 1950s, a flock of Canadian geese was mistaken for a Soviet bomber attack by radar systems. The 1960s saw meteor showers and radar reflections from the moon falsely indicating a missile strike, while in 1979, a human error led to a false nuclear alert, causing Norad (North American Aerospace Defense Command) to scramble fighter jets. A year later, a faulty computer chip triggered a similar scare, prompting the preparation of B-52 bombers and the President's emergency aircraft. The most serious incident occurred in 1995 when a Norwegian research rocket was misidentified by Russian systems as a US nuclear missile, prompting president Boris Yeltsin to consider a retaliatory strike, an act he ultimately resisted, narrowly avoiding catastrophe. Terrorism threat Beyond state actors, the threat of nuclear terrorism has not disappeared. While acquiring a functional nuclear weapon remains a high barrier for non-state groups, the possibility of a radiological dispersal device (dirty bomb) is far more feasible. Such a weapon would use conventional explosives to spread radioactive material, potentially causing mass panic, economic chaos and long-term contamination of urban centres.. Hammond mentions former US defence secretary Robert Gates who once remarked that the thought of a terrorist obtaining a nuclear weapon was what kept him awake at night. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Treaties undermined, norms at risk International treaties and arms control frameworks that once served as guardrails are now fraying. The Doomsday Clock, maintained by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, was set just one second from midnight earlier this year, the closest it has ever been to global catastrophe. Eighty years after Hiroshima, the world faces a dual nuclear threat: that of state-led warfare and non-state terrorism. While the horrors of 1945 forged a powerful global aversion to nuclear war, that consensus is under threat. The only way to ensure nuclear weapons are never used again is to eliminate them altogether. Eight decades on, the urgency of that mission has never been clearer.

‘No Chicks With D**ks For Me': Right-Wing Comedian Goes Off The Rails In Texas Senate Rant
‘No Chicks With D**ks For Me': Right-Wing Comedian Goes Off The Rails In Texas Senate Rant

Time of India

time2 days ago

  • Time of India

‘No Chicks With D**ks For Me': Right-Wing Comedian Goes Off The Rails In Texas Senate Rant

On Cam: Russian Volcano SPITS Out Lava Bombs In Rare Footage After 600 Years Of Silence | Watch For the first time in over 600 years, Russia's Krasheninnikov volcano has erupted — and it's all caught on camera. Local guide Artyom Sheldovitski filmed rare footage showing massive lava bursts and ash plumes on Day 2 of the eruption in the remote Kronotsky Nature Reserve in Kamchatka. The volcano's awakening comes days after a powerful 8.8-magnitude earthquake rocked the region. Experts believe the quake may have reactivated not just Krasheninnikov, but five other volcanoes now showing signs of eruption — including Klyuchevskoy, Bezymianny, Kambalny, and Karymsky. Scientists are calling it a "parade of eruptions" not seen since the year 1737. 2.2K views | 9 hours ago

Ring of Fire awakens: 600-year-quiet volcano erupts after massive quake shakes Pacific
Ring of Fire awakens: 600-year-quiet volcano erupts after massive quake shakes Pacific

Time of India

time2 days ago

  • Time of India

Ring of Fire awakens: 600-year-quiet volcano erupts after massive quake shakes Pacific

Krasheninnikov volcano's massive ash blast Live Events Scientists confirm earthquake link More eruptions could be coming FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A massive 8.8 magnitude earthquake shook the Pacific last Wednesday. This was the 6th strongest quake ever recorded, according to the US Geological Survey. The quake's epicenter was 84 miles southeast of Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula, triggering tsunami warnings across the Pacific, USGS said according to media no major tsunami waves hit, eyewitness footage showed tragic videos of whales washed ashore, likely killed by the quake. Scientists say this quake has now triggered volcanic eruptions along the Pacific Ring of Fire, a huge horseshoe-shaped area filled with hundreds of volcanoes, Dr. Alexey Ozerov of Russian Institute of Volcanic and Seismic Sciences said as per Sopka, the largest volcano in the region, erupted just hours after the earthquake according to Russian geological sources quoted by reports. This was its first eruption in 600 years, as hot lava burst out violently, according to KVERT, according to the report by The Sunday evening, the Krasheninnikov volcano erupted, sending a giant ash cloud nearly 4 miles high into the sky as per Kamchatka Volcanic Eruption Response Team (KVERT). This eruption is considered "historic" by Local Russian media and geologists. The volcano last erupted between 1423 and 1503, making this its first known eruption in centuries, historical volcanic quickly issued a red aviation alert, warning aircraft of heavy ash in the sky , according to the KVERT official alert. As of Monday night, the eruption was still going on, with possible ash explosions reaching up to 10 km high according to emergency services update, as per the report by The Sun.A third volcano, Mutnovsky, started rumbling on Monday evening. A 'thermal anomaly' was spotted by scientists, which is often a sign of coming eruptions according to the Kamchatka Volcanic Eruption Response Team. People were strongly warned to stay away from the site, KVERT public warning Alexey Ozerov said there is a direct connection between the earthquake and the volcanic eruptions. He explained the quake "activated magmatic centers" and gave them extra energy, causing eruptions according to Dr. Ozerov's official statement, as per the report by The Jonathan Paul from Royal Holloway University, UK, said the quake likely opened cracks in the earth, which allowed magma to rise and build pressure — Interview with Daily Mail. He said the delay between the quake and eruptions like Krasheninnikov's happens because cracks take time to form — Dr. fear this could be just the beginning of more volcanic activity along the Ring of Fire — Volcanologists' assessments. Kamchatka alone has 160 volcanoes, many of them still active — Russian geological records, as mentioned by The Sun Michael Manga from UC Berkeley warned that volcanoes in Chile, US Cascades, Japan, Indonesia and Kamchatka are all prone to erupt after big quakes as per previous scientific findings, reports scientist Alexey Ozerov said a crack opened on Krasheninnikov's crater, releasing steam, ash, and gas. He said the ash spread to the Valley of Geysers, and there's a gas smell in the air, as per reports.. Ozerov warned tourists may need to be evacuated from the Valley of Geysers due to possible health and safety, as stated by The Sopka in Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula erupted for the first time in 600 years after a massive Pacific scientists confirmed the 8.8 magnitude Pacific quake caused multiple volcanoes to erupt along the Ring of Fire.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store