SAAQclic scandal: Quebec ministers — and maybe Legault — may testify in pivotal month for CAQ
By
After months of bombshell revelations, the public inquiry into the $500-million SAAQclic scandal is entering a critical phase, with several ministers — and possibly Quebec Premier François Legault — among those who may be called to testify.
Legault, a trained accountant and former business executive, rose to power vowing to fight corruption and rein in Liberal-era excesses.
Now, as he readies a re-election bid in the face of dismal poll numbers, his government is mired in its most damaging scandal — a fiasco the opposition says reeks of corruption. The fallout has already led to the resignation of a key minister.
With the inquiry resuming Monday after a summer break, the next four weeks could prove pivotal for Legault's Coalition Avenir Québec.
What's SAAQclic, and what's the scandal?
SAAQclic is the glitch-plagued digital modernization of Quebec's auto-insurance board.
The Société de l'assurance automobile du Québec (SAAQ) upgraded its computer systems to enable online transactions and appointment bookings for driver's licences and vehicle registrations.
Not only was the project delayed and over-budget, but when it launched in February 2023, the system repeatedly crashed, causing long waits and widespread frustration at SAAQ offices.
The project is expected to cost $1.1 billion, $500 million more than the original price.
Quebec's auditor general was scathing in a report, citing poor planning, conflicts of interest and manipulated reports. The Unité permanente anticorruption (UPAC) raided SAAQ headquarters in June as part of its investigation.
Who knew what when?
We don't know yet.
A former head of the SAAQ has testified that he alerted Legault's onetime right-hand man, Yves Ouellet, of major cost overruns in September 2022, amid the last Quebec election campaign.
At the time, Ouellet was Quebec's highest-ranking public servant, reporting directly to Legault.
Liberal MNA Monsef Derraji has accused the SAAQ's board of withholding information about spiralling costs to shield the CAQ during the election.
Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon has called the affair 'one of the biggest political scandals in Quebec history.' He said there was 'clearly a corruption issue' in the SAAQclic debacle.
Who are the big names expected to testify?
Conflicting accounts have emerged about how much the government knew about the problems unfolding behind the scenes.
In a recent decree, the government officially lifted the confidentiality obligations of several top CAQ elected officials to allow them to testify and provide documents to the inquiry.
The decree covers the premier, ministers of transport, cybersecurity and digital affairs, as well as finance and the president of the Treasury Board. Also covered are former ministers and cabinet staff dating back to 2012.
Aside from Legault, other senior elected officials to watch for are Éric Caire, who resigned as cybersecurity minister due to the scandal, as well as Geneviève Guilbault and François Bonnardel (the current and former transport ministers, respectively). On Wednesday, Guilbault confirmed she was asked to testify next week, and Bonnardel is also expected to appear.
As president of the Treasury Board, Sonia LeBel oversees government spending and could be a crucial witness.
The Liberals have questioned LeBel's ties to Denis Gallant, the municipal court judge leading the inquiry. LeBel served as chief prosecutor at the Charbonneau corruption inquiry, where Gallant was a prosecutor.
The inquiry, which must submit findings by Dec. 15, says it will hold another seven to eight weeks of public hearings. Members of the National Assembly are to be called to testify between Aug. 18 and Sept. 12 — just ahead of the legislature's return on Sept. 16.
What has the inquiry heard so far?
Witnesses at the inquiry have painted a troubling picture — one of lax oversight, pushback against financial scrutiny, and indifference to soaring costs.
The consortium behind the project — LGS (an IBM subsidiary) and SAP — signed nearly 1,900 side contracts outside the main agreement. A former financial controller testified that the consortium failed to apply the required 10 per cent holdback on fees, a safeguard meant to protect the SAAQ in case of future problems with the work.
The consortium 'was hungry and wanted to be very well-fed from SAAQ funds,' he testified, with suppliers effectively allowed to bill the SAAQ a second time to fix their own mistakes.
An internal auditor told the inquiry that the hourly rate charged by external employees working on the project jumped from $82 to $350 per hour, apparently without justification.
A project manager admitted to manipulating a call for tenders to avoid scrutiny by the Autorité des marchés financiers, which is responsible for ensuring transparency and integrity in public contracting.
The inquiry heard that three SAAQ auditors quit in 2024 due to the lack of interest in their work by then-CEO Éric Ducharme. One auditor testified that Ducharme wanted the auditors to stop making waves.
In the wake of that testimony, the CAQ government removed Ducharme as CEO. He was the second CEO to have been appointed and then dismissed by the Legault government.
Some senior officials at the SAAQ have downplayed the runaway costs in their testimony.
'Quebecers won't be penalized that much' by the fiasco, a former SAAQ board member testified, suggesting a small increase in fees for driver's licenses could compensate for the escalating price.
Later, a former SAAQ president said the SAAQ is so large it can absorb extra costs 'without stopping the Earth from spinning.' He said cost overruns are 'inevitable — you have to live with it.'
Announced in March, the inquiry has heard from 45 witnesses. It has also met with more than 100 others and gathered more than 100,000 documents from the SAAQ and five ministries.
The ministries are: Finance; Treasury Board; Cybersecurity and Digital Technology; Transport; the Executive Council. The latter is the ministry that supports the premier and his cabinet.
Is the scandal hurting the CAQ politically?
A May Léger poll found that most Quebecers want ministers responsible for SAAQclic held more accountable and say the fiasco has shaken their confidence in the government's ability to manage projects.
With the next election scheduled for October 2026, surveys place the CAQ in third, behind the Parti Québécois and the Liberals. A recent projection by poll aggregator QC125.com suggests the CAQ would not win a single seat if the vote were held today.
The political fallout remains evident as new controversies emerge.
Critics were quick to draw comparisons after the Legault government announced $570 million in school funding cuts in June — an amount comparable to SAAQclic budget excesses.
The CAQ government has stressed that the project began under former Liberal premier Philippe Couillard. The SAAQ announced its plan in 2015 and signed the contract in March 2017, under the Liberals.
However, most of the work — and the resulting excess spending — occurred after the CAQ took office in October 2018.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
EDITORIAL: Stick a fork in ‘Elbows Up'
Prime Minister Mark Carney has promised about $1.2 billion in loan guarantees, grants and contributions for Canadian sawmills. Photo by Darren Makowichuk / DARREN MAKOWICHUK/Postmedia 'Elbows Up' hasn't been Prime Minister Mark Carney's approach to dealing with U.S. President Donald Trump on tariffs ever since he won the April election and it's time to consign the phrase to the dustbin of history. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account While Carney advocated dollar-for-dollar tariffs against the U.S. during the Liberal leadership race, he quickly jettisoned the idea on becoming prime minister. That was logical given that Canada would lose a dollar-for-dollar trade war because the U.S. economy is ten times the size of ours. A Leger/Postmedia poll released last week found public support for the 'Elbows Up' approach to trade relations with the U.S. — that the Liberals originally promoted — has plummeted. Six months ago, it was at 73%. Now it's down to 45%, close to a statistical tie with 41% who say Canadian negotiators should take a more measured approach and focus on getting a deal with Trump, even if it means some tariffs on Canadian goods remain. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That's similar to Carney's path on the issue — posing initially as a trade warrior who would meet Trump dollar-for-dollar on the field of battle and get a deal eliminating all the Trump tariffs. That was always a double-edged sword because Canadian counter-tariffs on imported U.S. goods are paid by Canadians in higher consumer prices. Carney's position has changed significantly since then. First, his government removed counter-tariffs it had initially imposed on many imported American goods that Canadian companies needed to continue operating. He scrapped the Liberals' digital services tax within days of Trump demanding it. Then he lowered expectations, saying a deal with Trump could include some U.S. tariffs. Carney also put out the word that Canada's position was that no deal with the U.S. was better than a bad deal. What it all means is that some of the tariffs Trump has already imposed on us could become permanent, leading up to renegotiating the entire Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade that comes up for renewal next year. Trump agreed to that deal during his first term, praising it at the time as 'the fairest, most balanced, and beneficial trade agreement we have ever signed into law … the best agreement we've ever made.' Crime Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Canada Sunshine Girls


Toronto Sun
3 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
GOLDSTEIN: Canada's targets for cutting greenhouse gases fit the definition of insanity
Liberal and Conservative governments have been setting and failing to meet emission reduction targets since 1988. Photo by iStock / GETTY IMAGES After almost four decades of Canadian governments setting and failing to hit eight consecutive targets for reducing Canada's industrial greenhouse gas emissions, surely it's time to admit the targets are meaningless. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Far from being 'aspirational' as supporters claim, they in fact deceive Canadians about the effectiveness of federal spending of more than $200 billion of taxpayers' money on climate change (as of 2023) on 149 federal programs administered by 13 government departments, since the Liberal government came to power in 2015. In fact, Liberal and Conservative governments have been setting and failing to meet emission reduction targets since 1988. Given 37 years of ongoing failures, these targets now fit the definition of insanity — doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results. Here's where things stand given the latest available federal government emissions data that comes from 2023. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Canada's current emission reduction target was set by then prime minister Justin Trudeau in 2021 — a goal of reducing Canada's emissions to at least 40% (and, ideally, up to 45%) below 2005 levels in 2030. According to the federal government, which retroactively changes the historical data every year based, it says, on improved data-gathering methods, Canada emitted 759 million tonnes of these gases in 2005. That means the government's target is to cut Canada's emissions to 455 million tonnes (40% below 2005 levels) and, ideally, to 417 million tonnes (45% below 2005 levels) in 2030. Canada's emissions in 2023 were 694 million tonnes which is 8.5% below 2005 levels. To meet the minimum federal target of reducing emissions to 455 million tonnes in 2030 would require cutting 2023 emissions by 239 million tonnes. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That would mean the equivalent of shutting down Canada's entire old and gas sector (208 million tonnes of annual emissions in 2023) in 2030 and still coming up short. To reach the government's interim target of reducing emissions to 20% below 2005 levels in 2026 (meaning 607 million tonnes) would require a cut of 87 million tonnes of emissions by next year, more than all emissions from Canada's buildings sector in 2023 (82.7 million tonnes). Earlier this year, the government announced another unrealistic target of reducing emissions to 45%-50% of 2005 levels by 2035. A report by federal environment commissioner Jerry DeMarco following an audit of the Liberals' Net Zero Emissions Accountability Act last year said it was still possible for the government to achieve its 2030 target, 'but now the task is much harder because there are only six years left to do essentially 20 or 30 years worth of reductions.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. His findings, however, provided few grounds for optimism. DeMarco said the government's lack of transparency made it impossible for the average citizen to understand, much less believe, its emission reduction targets. It claims current policies will achieve a 36.2% reduction in emissions compared to 2005 in 2030, close to its minimum target of 40%. But when DeMarco's auditors examined a sampling of 20 of the government's 149 measures to cut emissions, they found only nine were on track to achieve their goals. Of 32 additional measures the government claimed would help boost reductions from 36.2% to at least 40% in 2030, only seven were new. The audit found cases where two different programs were funding the same projects and reporting the same expected emission reductions, raising the possibility of double-counting. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It also reported the computer modelling used to estimate the emission cuts of various government programs wasn't updated in 2023 compared to 2022 and that some of the initial calculations were overly optimistic. In addition, 'recent decreases to projected 2030 emissions were not due to climate action taken by governments, but were instead because of revisions to the data used in modelling.' Given all this, if the Liberals under Prime Minister Mark Carney won't abandon unrealistic climate targets then they should at least come clean with Canadians about where things really stand. Read More This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. This as opposed to their current practice of insisting they're on track to meet their targets when the federal government's own data tell a very different story. It's the same problem with the Liberals' policy to mandate that 20% of all new car sales must be battery-electric, plug-in hybrid or hydrogen fuel cell starting next year, rising to 60% in 2030 and 100% in 2035. The auto sector has warned that given lagging EV sales in Canada, the only way to achieve the 2026 target would be to pull a million new gas-powered vehicles off the market, limiting consumer choice, increasing delivery times and driving up costs for consumers at a time when our auto sector is under siege from Donald Trump's tariffs. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Canada Crime Toronto & GTA Toronto Blue Jays Toronto Blue Jays


Vancouver Sun
7 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
This Day in History, 1947: 'Bellicose and irrepressible' mayor Gerry McGeer dies in office
At about 10:15 p.m. on Aug. 10, 1947 Vancouver Mayor Gerry McGeer finished up some work in his study and laid down on a couch. At 10 a.m. the following morning, his driver came to pick up McGeer to go to city hall, but he was dead. McGeer had had a fatal heart attack in his sleep. He was 59. McGeer had previously had some health problems — he was bedridden with appendicitis and peritonitis (inflammation of the belly) during the 1946 campaign for mayor. 'He underwent an emergency operation Dec. 2 and spent the rest of the campaign period in hospital,' the Province noted on Aug. 11. Discover the best of B.C.'s recipes, restaurants and wine. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of West Coast Table will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'He fought the same hard campaign he always fought, in spite of his illness, fighting for votes in radio speeches from his hospital bed.' He won in a landslide. The city was shocked at his sudden death eight months later — there had been speculation he was going to make a run for prime minister if Mackenzie King stepped down. Gerald Gratton McGeer was born in Winnipeg on Jan. 6, 1888, one of 13 children. The family moved to Vancouver two years later, where his Irish father Jim McGeer became well-known for his eloquence and political bent. He passed both traits on to his son. Gerry McGeer was an impatient youth: the Province said he quit high school at 14 because he thought the education system 'medieval.' So his father got him as job as an iron moulder. 'He was a cocky little squirt, but the hardest working little guy you ever saw,' one of his co-workers said years later. 'The description was prophetic of McGeer the politician and reformer,' said the Province. 'Bellicose and irrepressible, fond of his own eloquence, at times showy and bombastic, but with a fact-filled memory and a cool, calculating brain underlying all his fireworks.' In his political career he was a fierce opponent of the left. But the Province said in his iron moulder days he became a union official, and 'took a leading role in organizing several Vancouver strikes.' He attended Dalhousie Law School in Halifax and was admitted to the B.C. bar in 1915. A year later he successfully ran for the B.C. legislature in Richmond as a Liberal. After a stint in the army in the First World War, he ran for the federal Liberals in Vancouver Centre in 1920, but lost. He then thrived as a lawyer, being named a King's Counsel in 1921. But politics was his true calling. He became a Liberal MLA again in 1933 and in 1934 entered the civic arena, winning a landslide victory over Vancouver's longest-serving mayor L.D. Taylor. People had been arguing over whether to build a new city hall for decades but McGeer finally got it done, opening the city's current art deco city hall in 1935. But his term as mayor was stormy: he read the riot act at Victory Square after unemployed men occupied the Hudson's Bay store on April 23, 1935. He then moved the proposed city hall out of downtown to 12th and Cambie, which was heavily criticized. He was elected as a reformer, and in his first week in office fired the police chief and two magistrates. He declared war on vice and had the cops confiscate 1,000 slot machines. He was so ubiquitous in Vancouver, newspaper headlines often referred to him as simply 'Gerry.' He left both civic and provincial politics after he won Vancouver Burrard in the federal election in 1935. But he became obsessed with currency reform and what the Sun called 'monetary theories of his own devising,' and was never named to a federal cabinet. Still he was well-known across Canada because of his speeches. A wag once said McGeer suffered from 'inflammation of the vowels.' 'Ebullient, controversial, hard-hitting, voluble, and at times flamboyant, he never failed to capture the imagination of a public, which time after time gave him resounding, record-smashing majorities at the polls,' said the Sun after his death. He was re-elected as MP in 1940 and was named to the Senate in 1945. But he called it 'a mausoleum' and successfully ran for Vancouver mayor again in 1946. His nephew Pat McGeer kept the family name alive in the provincial legislature as a Liberal and Social Credit MLA and cabinet minister from 1962 to 1996. jmackie@