
The History of Omega, the Beginning and the End of the Time Lords
The First History of Omega
A solar engineer and a prominent figure in early Gallifreyan society—and, as later audio stories would reveal, a close confidant and schoolfriend of Rassilon, another key player in the foundation of the Time Lords—Omega first appeared in Doctor Who's first anniversary special, 'The Three Doctors,' in late 1972. There it was revealed that it was Omega's research that unlocked the key to time travel that would radically overhaul Gallifreyan society and create the Time Lords as we'd come to know them. Deploying a powerful relic known as the Hand of Omega, Omega made a star go supernova before harnessing its energies to fuel the first acts of controlled temporal manipulation.
But while the Hand of Omega, and the research it bore, would be recovered by Gallifrey, Omega himself was seemingly lost in the destruction. Revered as a hero and made legend by his people as they used the Hand to become lords of Time, Omega had actually survived his experiment, flung into a black hole and deposited into a universe of pure antimatter. Not knowing that his people thought he was dead, Omega grew bitter as his acceptance at not being rescued turned to fury that he had been abandoned in his moment of triumph by the Gallifreyans. In time, Omega sought his own way out of the antimatter universe, experimenting on his power to manipulate it and even create his own life—at a cost that he failed to realize, as his own physical body broke down into nothingness.
By the time the Time Lords tasked the First, Second, and Third Doctors with attempting to stop Omega from destroying the universe in his attempts to acquire more energy to fuel his escape, all that sustained Omega's form was the original suit that he wore during his experiments with the Hand. After battling with the Third Doctor in an attempt to trade places in exile with him, Omega was left in the antimatter universe as it was seemingly destroyed. But his 'death' had not stopped diehard followers of his own arising on Gallifrey, creating a legion of cultists that swore to bring one of Time Lord society's foundational forces back to reality.
In the 1983 serial 'Arc of Infinity,' a member of Gallifrey's High Council, Hedin, secretly plotted to steal the Doctor's biological data to create a new physical form for Omega's will to inhabit. Although the plan was foiled, Omega managed to briefly escape his antimatter universe and emerge on Earth, only to find his form destabilizing until he was imprisoned in the antimatter universe for good… again.
Omega and the Timeless Child
It would take Omega almost 40 years to return to Doctor Who on-screen… technically speaking. Because while Omega's history as the creator of Gallifreyan time travel hasn't changed, his broader part in the creation of Time Lord society on a biological level did in Chris Chibnall's re-working of the Doctor's origins in the 2020 episode 'The Timeless Child', in which Omega makes a brief, uncredited appearance in flashbacks alongside Rassilon and Tecteun. Although the character is never explicitly named onscreen, the officially released production script for the episode names two Time Lord figures seen alongside Tecteun as to be assumed as Omega and Rassilon, making them aware of the true origins of Time Lord society as we come to know it in that story.
As established in 'The Timeless Child', Tecteun was the scientist who found, and then successfully exploited, the genetic material of the titular child—the mysterious being who would eventually become the Doctor—to give themselves the ability to regenerate their physical form upon mortal injury. In 'The Timeless Child''s brief explanation of Gallifrey's history, Omega's discovery of time travel occurs during a golden age of advancement for the Shobogans, the native peoples of Gallifrey, during the construction of the Citadel and even before Tecteun decides to offer up the genetic inheritance of regeneration to the Citadel's denizens, formally renaming their society as that of the Time Lords. But Omega is still considered a foundational member of this triumvirate that makes the Time Lords, even if, presumably, his loss in experimenting with the Hand of Omega now comes at a point separated from his discovery of time travel.
What Omega's Return Means for Doctor Who
Interestingly, what little we got to see—or rather hear about, Omega is namechecked but left pointedly offscreen—of Omega in 'Wish World' keeps vague about where exactly he has been kept since we last saw him. The Rani describes Omega has having been kept in an 'underverse,' access to which required a fracture in reality itself, rather than the black holes and matter/antimatter that were previously established in Omega's prior appearances. Whether or not the underverse is intended to be the same reality that Omega was trapped in in those original stories, or somewhere else he was potentially sent to after those events, remains to be seen.
But that detail aside, Omega's potential return to reality is largely irrelevant next to what the Rani intends to use him for: the resurrection of the Time Lords from their latest extinction. Again, just how remains to be seen, but if Doctor Who does once again bring the Time Lords back for a third time—after their apparent destruction during the Last Great Time War, undone during the events of 'The Day of the Doctor,' and then the Master's eradication of his own people a few years later. As far as we know, while Gallifrey the planet still exists in some form, unlike its prior fate in the Time War, the Time Lords themselves, save for the Rani, the Doctor, and the Master were seemingly all exterminated.
Just how Omega's power could restore the Time Lords, again, remains to be seen. But with the revelation of the Timeless Child, and the Doctor's understanding of their connection to Gallifrey, Omega is now even more important to the foundations of the Time Lords than he already was with the invention of time travel—'Wish World' even describes him as the first Time Lord, and creator of their society. If he really is the key to their return–or a continuation of their absence from Doctor Who's current mythology—we'll find out once and for all as the current season of Who comes to its end in 'The Reality War' this weekend, on May 31.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russell T Davies warns ‘fight is coming' with gay rights ‘rapidly getting worse'
Doctor Who showrunner Russell T Davies has warned that a 'fight is coming' because gay rights are 'rapidly and urgently getting worse'. The award-winning screenwriter, 62, best known for reviving BBC sci-fi series Doctor Who in 2005, gained prominence in 1999 for writing Queer As Folk, a programme about the lives of three men living in Manchester's gay village. Davies is urging young people to use the 'anger of the past' to protect gay rights amid growing support for Reform UK which has pledged to 'ban transgender ideology' in schools. Speaking to the Big Issue, Davies said: 'When Queer As Folk came out in 1999, if you'd said: 'What will gay rights be like in 2025?', we'd have said, 'oh, it will all be marvellous – it'll be sunshine and skipping down the street, hand in hand – gays, queers, lesbians, everyone'. 'And look at where we are. Things got better but now things are rapidly and urgently getting worse. 'What happens in America always happens here (the UK) – and as we look down the barrel of a Reform government, we, the gay community, queer community, should be revolting in terror and anger and action. 'They're out to get us. The President of America is literally out to get us, is discounting us. 'He would be happier with us invisible and gone, defunded, completely invisible if not biologically altered to become as straight as him. 'I hope they're prepared to fight, that younger generation that has no idea how they got there. And neither should they – they're busy living their lives. 'I didn't spend my youth looking back at World War Two, but I do think: 'are you prepared to fight, because a fight is coming?'' Davies' next Channel 4 series, Tip Toe, deals with the culture war that has radicalised some people into homophobia, transphobia and prejudice. Davies said: 'I'm very proud of it. 'It's radical, it's savage, and it's hilarious. 'It is the strongest thing I've written – I do believe Queer As Folk, Cucumber, It's A Sin and Tip Toe are the ones that will be on my gravestone.' Reform UK has been contacted for comment. The full interview with Davies can be read in this week's Big Issue.


Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Are Women's Ideas Missing From The Future Of Innovation?
By Isabel Fernandez Mateo, Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, London Business School In the world of science and technology, we like to believe that the best ideas rise to the top. That innovation is a meritocracy. That inventors, driven by the promise of progress and profit, will naturally seek out the most promising research, regardless of who wrote it. But what if that is not the case? New research suggests that gender bias may be quietly shaping the future of innovation. A study I co-authored with Michaël Bikard and Ronak Mogra – Standing on the Shoulders of (Male) Giants: Gender Inequality and the Technological Impact of Scientific Ideas - recently published in Administrative Science Quarterly, found that scientific papers authored by women are significantly less likely to be cited in patents than those authored by men. In other words, when inventors look for ideas to build on, they are more likely to pick ones that come from men . This is not just an academic issue. Patent citations are a key sign that a scientific idea is being used to develop new technologies. If women's work is being overlooked, it means their ideas are less likely to shape the tools, treatments, and technologies of tomorrow. We started by analysing more than 10 million scientific papers published between 1980 and 2020. Across fields and decades, the pattern was clear: women's research was cited less often in patents. Even after accounting for things like the prestige of the journal, the author's experience, and the commercial relevance of the work, the gap remained. To dig deeper, we looked at what we call 'paper twins', cases where different teams of scientists independently published essentially the same discovery around the same time. These rare instances gave us a unique opportunity to compare how inventors responded to nearly identical ideas. The result? The papers led by men were cited more often in patents than their female-led counterparts. We also ran an experiment. We showed 400 doctorial degree holders a scientific abstract and randomly assigned either a male or female name to the author. Participants spent more time reading the abstract when they thought it was written by a man. They also rated it as more important. This suggests that the problem goes beyond visibility or access. It is also about perception. Even among highly educated readers, there seems to be an implicit bias that leads them to value men's ideas more. That has serious consequences, not just for the careers of individual scientists, but for the direction of innovation itself. If inventors are less likely to engage with research authored by women, valuable ideas may be missed. And because women scientists are more likely to focus on issues that disproportionately affect women, such as certain health conditions, this disparity could mean fewer innovations in areas that urgently need attention. Yet, despite these barriers, many women have made extraordinary contributions to science and technology, proving that when their ideas are recognized and taken seriously, they can change the world. Katalin Karikó, a Hungarian-born biochemist, played a central role in the development of mRNA vaccine technology. Her pioneering work laid the foundation for the COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. For years, her research was overlooked and underfunded. Today, it is credited with helping to save millions of lives. Her story is a powerful reminder that transformative scientific ideas can be undervalued until circumstances demand their recognition. Frances Arnold, a Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry, pioneered the use of directed evolution to engineer enzymes with new and improved functions. Her work has had wide-ranging applications, from biofuels to pharmaceuticals, and has helped bridge the gap between academic discovery and industrial innovation. Jennifer Doudna, another Nobel laureate in Chemistry, co-discovered CRISPR Cas9, a gene editing technology that has revolutionised biotechnology. Her research has not only transformed basic science but is now being used in drug development and holds promise for treating genetic diseases. Tu Youyou, a Chinese pharmaceutical chemist, discovered artemisinin, a powerful anti-malarial drug that has saved millions of lives. Her work, which earned her the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, is a reminder that scientific brilliance can emerge from outside the outside the dominant institutions of science.. And Grace Hopper, a pioneer in computer science, is credited with inventing the first compiler and played a key role in developing COBOL, a programming language still used in business and government systems today. Her legacy continues to shape the digital infrastructure we rely on. These women are proof that when their ideas are recognised and built upon, the impact can be profound. But they are also exceptions in a system that too often overlooks the contributions of women in science. So what can be done? For starters, inventors and research and development teams need to take a hard look at how they search for and evaluate scientific research. Are they relying too heavily on familiar names and networks? Are they unintentionally filtering out work from underrepresented groups? Academic institutions also have a role to play. They should consider how norms around authorship and communication may affect whose work gets noticed. And funding agencies and policymakers should support efforts to make the innovation pipeline more inclusive, from lab bench to patent office. The idea that innovation is a level playing field is a powerful one. But it is not always true. If we want to build a future that reflects the full range of human insight and creativity, we need to make sure we are not overlooking half the ideas on the table. Because the next big breakthrough might already be out there, just waiting for someone to take it seriously. Isabel Fernandez-Mateo, Adecco Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship; Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, London Business School Isabel Fernandez-Mateo holds the Adecco Chair at London Business School. As Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship, she has taught in various degree programmes at London Business School, including the required core Strategic Management course for the full time MBA and Executive MBAs, as well as two electives: 'Building your Career Strategy' and 'People Analytics.' She also teaches in the PhD programme. An expert on how relationships influence career outcomes – particularly in hiring, job transitions, and career advancement, Professor Fernandez-Mateo also studies gender diversity in the executive labor market. In her recent work, she examines the organizational and social barriers that prevent women's access to positions of leadership. Her work has been published in leading academic journals such as Administrative Science Quarterly, American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology, Management Science, and Organization Science. She is currently Department Editor of Management Science (Organizations Section).
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
New Heroes And Icons In NHL 26
New Heroes, Icons, and HUT information have been released for NHL 26. Heroes and Icons will be new additions to Hockey Ultimate Team, Heroes being fan-favorites and Icons being soem of the top players of all time. The announced Heroes are 84 overall Ales Hemsky, Jeremy Roenick, Keith Tkachuk, Markus Naslund, Rob Blake, and Zdeno Chara. The announced Icons are 86 overall Chris Chelios, Chris Pronger, Henrik Lundqvist, Joe Thornton, Teemu Selanne, and Sergei Fedorov. Along with these players a revamp of HUT has been announced. New line combinations that add bonuses based on nationalities and skillsets will be available. This will benefit those building theme teams. Based on the image below it appears that building a high chemistry team will boost your team's overall, AP, and salary cap. This should allow users to build teams with all kinds of players and put less value on using meta cards. There will also be a salary cap that will encourage players to build teams in different ways. NHL 26 is set to release Sept. 12, those who pre-order the deluxe edition get access Sept. 5. For more NHL Gaming news make sure you bookmark The Hockey News Gaming Site or follow our Google News Feed.