Jurassic tech: Company claims the dire wolf is ‘de-extinct', but is it ethical?
But, even if it's successful, is it right? And, have we learned anything from the happenings in Jurassic Park?
University of Otago department of zoology associate professor Nic Rawlence told The Front Page he challenges the term 'de-extinction'.
'The technology they've developed is stunning and will have very real-world conservation benefits, but it's not de-extinction. This is a genetically modified, designer grey wolf.
'If you think of all the individual DNA letters in a genome, which are millions and millions of them, they've only done 20 modifications to that genome. It's only a small number of modifications. But, if we think of functional de-extinction, all they've got is something that looks like a dire wolf,' he said.
SOUND ON. You're hearing the first howl of a dire wolf in over 10,000 years. Meet Romulus and Remus—the world's first de-extinct animals, born on October 1, 2024.
The dire wolf has been extinct for over 10,000 years. These two wolves were brought back from extinction using… pic.twitter.com/wY4rdOVFRH
— Colossal Biosciences® (@colossal) April 7, 2025
Even if it were possible to bring back a species, Rawlence said, the ecosystem it was part of no longer exists.
'If you try to de-extinct a moa, New Zealand's only got 25% forest cover. At the time of human arrival, it was 80% forest cover... Central Otago, for example, used to be covered in lancewood and kōwhai, which is weird to think of, but there's no analogue of that anywhere.
'So you haven't got the ecosystems for these animals to go back into. A lot of the ecosystems have been highly modified, they're full of predators. But, also, if you are gonna introduce animals into an ecosystem, you need them to be genetically healthy, not inbred. Think Tutankhamun married his sister, the Habsburgs out of Europe, or even Queen Victoria married her cousin.
'For a population to be genetically healthy, you need at least 500 individuals, which is a very tall order indeed,' he said.
The technology could instead be used in ongoing conservation efforts, Rawlence said.
'You could use it to reintroduce lost genetic variation back into kākāpō or takahē so that they have the evolutionary potential to respond to ongoing climate change or diseases. In kākāpō, you've got aspergillosis, lung fungus, or crusty bum.
'So we could use that technology to help what we've got rather than, in my view, assuaging human guilt for causing extinctions.'
In Colossal Bioscience's efforts to de-extinct the woolly mammoth, it has bred genetically modified mice with mammoth-inspired traits, such as woolly coats and cold tolerance.
The company says the loss of these large, cold-tolerant mammoths over the past 10,000 years has stripped the ecosystem of the Siberian tundra – a grassland that once efficiently absorbed carbon.
'If the mammoth steppe ecosystem could be revived, it could help in reversing the rapid warming of the climate and more pressingly, protect the Arctic's permafrost – one of the world's largest carbon reservoirs,' its website says.
'How many hundreds of millions of dollars are you going to have to spend to bring back enough mammoths to trample Siberia? It won't be 500 mammoths, it's probably gonna be thousands. I think the money's better spent elsewhere,' Rawlence said.
'Sometimes conservation can be sexy, kākāpō or takahē, but often the non-sexy species are the ones that are just as highly endangered, and trying to get money is a lot easier if people are investing in something akin to Jurassic Park.'
Listen to the full episode to hear more about whether we've learned anything from Jurassic Park and which 'un-sexy' species need the most help.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
7 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Association formed to boost connection in sciences
University of Otago students attending the new Otago Biochemistry and Genetics Student Association launch party had reason to pay special attention to the health and safety briefing from co-president Liam Young (right) after a tsunami alert rang out through their mobiles in the Terrace Lounge at the University of Otago on Wednesday evening. PHOTO: GERARD O'BRIEN A lack of tertiary science major social cohesion, and nobody being "mates" has inspired two University of Otago students to kick-start an association. Otago Biochemistry and Genetics Student Association (OBiGSA) co-presidents Liam Young and Cushla Bridges both came up with the idea after realising people studying the two "closely related" disciplines did not really know each other very well outside the lecture theatre. Miss Bridges said "basically none of us were mates outside of class". "We thought that we would make this club so that everyone could come together and have events like this, but also fun things. "We've had a quiz night, we're going to have like a movie night, a karaoke night, that sort of thing as well." The demand for a student association turned out to be very high and the room of their official launch on Wednesday was packed to the rafters and a sellout event. Miss Bridges said they had sold about 120 tickets. "We didn't expect it, but also we pushed quite hard for it, so I don't know what we were expecting." Mr Young said they celebrated the launch by getting to "pick the brains" of industry experts at a scientific panel. "We're basically asking them questions that you just can't find on Google ... Google and ChatGPT, they tell us everything and they seem to know everything — we're asking the humans something a bit more thought-provoking." He said they wanted some specialists to share their opinionated and controversial thoughts about various science topics. At the event yesterday were students from a range of majors, including anatomy, physiology, microbiology, immunology majors, biochemistry, genetics and zoology. Mr Young and Miss Bridges hoped the association lasted long after they left the university. "You've got to give the dream to someone else eventually," Mr Young said.
NZ Herald
30-07-2025
- NZ Herald
Scientists say these waves were tame by comparison to tsunamis of the past
'It definitely created a Pacific-wide tsunami, which in the context of tsunamis is quite large,' said Tina Dura, a tsunami researcher at Virginia Tech in the US. 'But it's a little bit smaller than could be possible in that magnitude of earthquake.' The quake occurred near the Kamchatka Peninsula, where the Pacific tectonic plate is sliding underneath the North American plate. This seismically active 'subduction' zone has produced two of the world's top 10 earthquakes. In 1952, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake hit less than 32km away from the epicentre of yesterday's quake; that temblor also triggered a Pacific-wide tsunami. The two plates slipped past one another at the relatively shallow depth of 20km under the ocean, which caused part of the seafloor to thrust upward and displace the water - creating a tsunami. Wave heights reached much higher than normal near the Kamchatka Peninsula - more than 4.5m, said Alexander Rabinovich, a physical oceanographer and part of the IUGG International Tsunami Commission. He said local teams will be surveying damage to the low-population area along the southern coast of Kamchatka, where he said wave heights could have reached 15m. Around Hawaii, wave heights hit 1.5 to 1.8m. Most places around California saw just a foot (30cm) or so in increased wave height - though Crescent City, where tsunamis often get amplified because of the shape its shelf, saw wave heights of almost 1.2m. Why wave heights were relatively low farther away from the quake 'is the biggest question at the moment', said Viacheslav Gusiakov, a tsunami expert in the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. As the wave spreads out, it weakens. But the similarly powerful 1952 earthquake in the same region caused bigger waves and more damage in Hawaii than yesterday's quake so far. One possible explanation, Gusiakov said, is a potential absence of a large landslide in the ocean that could have exacerbated the tsunami. Underwater movements of sediments or rocks can add to the energy of a tsunami by up to 90%, although this specific case will need to be studied more. It's also possible that the earthquake itself, although powerful, may have contributed to a milder tsunami. US Geological Survey modelling suggests the land shifted by 6-9m along a roughly 480km stretch of fault, said Diego Melgar, director of the Cascadia Region Earthquake Science Centre at the University of Oregon. These sorts of variations in fault movement can be the difference between relatively small tsunamis and disastrous ones, he said. For instance, the 2011 earthquake that triggered a nuclear crisis in Japan shifted the land by as much as 45m across a similarly long stretch of fault line, creating tsunami waves that were as high as 30m locally. It also caused millions of dollars in damage in Crescent City and swept one person away. 'Earthquakes have a personality,' Melgar said. 'Those kinds of details really affect the tsunami.' Part of the answer is also better warnings, experts said. Tsunami warnings were issued in a timely manner by the Kamchatka and Sakhalin tsunami warning centres, Gusiakov said. So far, no tsunami fatalities have been reported. The surge of water did cause a deck to break off in Crescent City, but no injuries have been reported so far. Rabinovich said the tsunami warnings were quite effective this time around, allowing people time to evacuate from coastal areas, take boats out of harbours and prepare. 'When you're all the way across the Pacific Ocean, you do have a little bit more time to get everyone aware and prepared,' Dura said. That's not always the case. For example, she said an event could unfold in minutes to hours in the western United States from a rupture in the Cascadia subduction zone. It's too early to say that the earthquake did not cause any disastrous tsunami damage, Melgar said. People have become used to seeing disaster impacts broadcast live on social media, but it will take careful analysis of satellite data as well as boots-on-the-ground surveys to know the height of waves that hit the Russian coast, particularly in the sparsely populated Kamchatka Peninsula. Even though any tsunami impacts were minimal in Hawaii and on the US West Coast, Melgar called it 'a story of triumph' that those areas received warnings and acted quickly. Some warning systems have been implemented in response to deadlier and more damaging earthquakes. The 1952 earthquake near the Kamchatka Peninsula caused significant damage in Hawaii. In 1946, a 8.6-magnitude quake in Alaska's Aleutian Islands triggered a tsunami that killed 159 people in Hawaii. Those disasters were the driving force behind the creation of the US Tsunami Warning Centres, which are part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 'Any warning at all is a huge success,' Melgar said.
Otago Daily Times
26-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Plesiosaur has Waitaki link
New Zealand's largest fossil is gaining worldwide attention and it has its roots tied to the Waitaki district. Tūhura Otago Museum's dinosaur exhibit has been ranked the second-best in the world by TripAdvisor with a 96.5% approval rating from visitors, in large part due to its Matakaea Shag Point plesiosaur fossil. The fossil was found near Shag Point, which puts it within the Waitaki Whitestone Geopark, further enforcing the region's reputation of geological significance. Geopark volunteer Craig Jones worked on the plesiosaur when he was a research assistant for late University of Otago palaeontologist Emeritus Prof Ewan Fordyce. He described the fossil as "quite an impressive beast". It was discovered while Mr Jones was completing his undergraduate degree at the University of Otago. Due to its size, it had to be cut into blocks so it could be transported back to the university. That was where Mr Jones came in. "My job was to cut away as much of that excess rock as possible so they could be moved more easily into position. "What you see at Otago Museum is the thinned piece of block that I worked on." Even after he removed the excess rock, Mr Jones believed the fossil still weighed "three or four tonnes, at least". "I was quite fit after moving those rocks all day." Mr Jones also began reassembling the blocks. "It was quite a job to stick everything together because some bits were lost, because there was some crumbling at the edges. "While we didn't expect to get the whole thing assembled, we got a reasonable amount. "At least three-quarters of the body, I never got on to the tail, and I got most of the neck and I did some preparation on the skull." The skull was the most important part as there were barely any complete plesiosaur skulls in New Zealand, he said. "One of our great taonga is our marine fossils. It's almost as important as the marine mammals and marine birds." Mr Jones was proud of his role in such an impressive fossil. "Every day for a year, I worked intimately on that specimen. "There's still a lot of chips and bumps and probably annotations on the under sides of those blocks that I made. "It is always a joy to go back and look at it." After a long career with various scientific institutes, he is happy to have landed in Waitaki. "This is the centre of New Zealand's greatest fossil-collecting areas so it was great to come back." He has been volunteering with the geopark as a technical adviser. "Much of material that [the geopark] is based on is stuff I collected during those few years with Ewan. "I've worked at GNS Science for 16 years so I've got a pretty broad base of geoscience knowledge."
