
Firms led by US military veterans deliver aid in Africa and Gaza, alarming humanitarian groups
ON A PLANE OVER UPPER NILE STATE, South Sudan — Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict.
Last week's air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former U.S. intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world's deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts.
The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend that could allow governments or combatants to use life-saving aid to control hungry civilian populations and advance war aims.
In South Sudan and Gaza, two for-profit U.S. companies led by American national security veterans are delivering aid in operations backed by the South Sudanese and Israeli governments.
The American contractors say they're putting their security, logistics and intelligence skills to work in relief operations. Fogbow, the U.S. company that carried out last week's air drops over South Sudan, says it aims to be a 'humanitarian' force.
'We've worked for careers, collectively, in conflict zones. And we know how to essentially make very difficult situations work,' said Fogbow President Michael Mulroy, a retired CIA officer and former senior defense official in the first Trump administration, speaking on the airport tarmac in Juba, South Sudan's capital.
But the U.N. and many leading non-profit groups say U.S. contracting firms are stepping into aid distribution with little transparency or humanitarian experience, and, crucially, without commitment to humanitarian principles of neutrality and operational independence in war zones.
'What we've learned over the years of successes and failures is there's a difference between a logistics operation and a security operation, and a humanitarian operation,' said Scott Paul, a director at Oxfam America.
''Truck and chuck' doesn't help people,' Paul said. 'It puts people at risk.'
Fogbow took journalists up in a cargo plane to watch their team drop 16 tons of beans, corn and salt for South Sudan's Upper Nile state town of Nasir.
Residents fled homes there after fighting erupted in March between the government and opposition groups.
Mulroy acknowledged the controversy over Fogbow's aid drops, which he said were paid for by the South Sudanese government.
But, he maintained: 'We don't want to replace any entity' in aid work.
Fogbow was in the spotlight last year for its proposal to use barges to bring aid to Gaza, where Israeli restrictions were blocking overland deliveries. The United States focused instead on a U.S. military effort to land aid via a temporary pier.
Since then, Fogbow has carried out aid drops in Sudan and South Sudan, east African nations where wars have created some of the world's gravest humanitarian crises.
Fogbow says ex-humanitarian officials are also involved, including former U.N. World Food Program head David Beasley, who is a senior adviser.
Operating in Gaza, meanwhile, Safe Reach Solutions, led by a former CIA officer and other retired U.S. security officers, has partnered with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a U.S.-backed nonprofit that Israel says is the linchpin of a new aid system to wrest control from the U.N., which Israel says has been infiltrated by Hamas, and other humanitarian groups.
Starting in late May, the American-led operation in Gaza has distributed food at fixed sites in southern Gaza, in line with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's stated plan to use aid to concentrate the territory's more than 2 million people in the south, freeing Israel to fight Hamas elsewhere. Aid workers fear it's a step toward another of Netanyahu's public goals, removing Palestinians from Gaza in 'voluntary' migrations.
Since then, several hundred Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded in near daily shootings as they tried to reach aid sites, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Witnesses say Israeli troops regularly fire heavy barrages toward the crowds in an attempt to control them.
The Israeli military has denied firing on civilians. It says it fired warning shots in several instances, and fired directly at a few 'suspects' who ignored warnings and approached its forces.
It's unclear who is funding the new operation in Gaza. No donor has come forward, and the U.S. says it's not funding it.
In response to criticism over its Gaza aid deliveries, Safe Reach Solutions said it has former aid workers on its team with 'decades of experience in the world's most complex environments' who bring "expertise to the table, along with logisticians and other experts.'
Last week's air drop over South Sudan went without incident, despite fighting nearby. A white cross marked the drop zone. Only a few people could be seen. Fogbow contractors said there were more newly returned townspeople on previous drops.
Fogbow acknowledges glitches in mastering aid drops, including one last year in Sudan's South Kordofan region that ended up with too-thinly-wrapped grain sacks split open on the ground.
After gaining independence from Sudan in 2011, South Sudan has struggled to emerge from a civil war that killed nearly 400,000 people. Rights groups say its government is one of the world's most corrupt, and until now has invested little in quelling the dire humanitarian crisis.
South Sudan said it engaged Fogbow for air drops partly because of the Trump administration's deep cuts in U.S. Agency for International Development funding. Humanitarian Minister Albino Akol Atak said the drops will expand to help people in need throughout the country.
But two South Sudanese groups question the government's motives.
'We don't want to see a humanitarian space being abused by military actors ... under the cover of a food drop," said Edmund Yakani, head of the Community Empowerment for Progress Organization, a local civil society group.
Asked about suspicions the aid drops were helping South Sudan's military aims, Fogbow's Mulroy said the group has worked with the U.N. World Food Program to make sure 'this aid is going to civilians.'
'If it wasn't going to civilians, we would hope that we would get that feedback, and we would cease and desist,' Mulroy said.
In a statement, WFP country director Mary-Ellen McGroarty said: 'WFP is not involved in the planning, targeting or distribution of food air-dropped' by Fogbow on behalf of South Sudan's government, citing humanitarian principles.
Longtime humanitarian leaders and analysts are troubled by what they see as a teaming up of warring governments and for-profit contractors in aid distribution.
When one side in a conflict decides where and how aid is handed out, and who gets it, 'it will always result in some communities getting preferential treatment,' said Jan Egeland, executive director of the Norwegian Refugee Council.
Sometimes, that set-up will advance strategic aims, as with Netanyahu's plans to move Gaza's civilians south, Egeland said.
The involvement of soldiers and security workers, he added, can make it too 'intimidating' for some in need to even try to get aid.
Until now, Western donors always understood those risks, Egeland said. But pointing to the Trump administration's backing of the new aid system in Gaza, he asked: 'Why does the U.S. ... want to support what they have resisted with every other war zone for two generations?'
Mark Millar, who has advised the U.N. and Britain on humanitarian matters in South Sudan and elsewhere, said involving private military contractors risks undermining the distinction between humanitarian assistance and armed conflict.
Private military contractors 'have even less sympathy for a humanitarian perspective that complicates their business-driven model," he said. 'And once let loose, they seem to be even less accountable.'
Knickmeyer reported from Washington. Mednick reported from Tel Aviv, Israel.
The Associated Press receives financial support for global health and development coverage in Africa from the Gates Foundation. The is solely responsible for all content. Find 's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at .org.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
33 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump to host Pak's Asim Munir after he backed Nobel Peace Prize bid: White House
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday hosted Pakistan's military chief, General Asim Munir, at the White House in a rare meeting that followed Munir's call for Trump to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. Munir credited Trump with preventing what could have become a nuclear war between India and Pakistan during their brief military standoff in May, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly White House confirmed that the meeting was held in recognition of Munir's remarks lauding Trump's role in halting a potential escalation between the two nuclear-armed hours before the meeting, Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a 35-minute phone call with Trump to firmly clarify that the ceasefire following the May 7-10 military standoff had been achieved through direct communication between the Indian and Pakistani militaries - not through any external mediation. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said PM Modi reiterated that New Delhi has never accepted third-party involvement in its bilateral issues with Islamabad and never India's assertion, Trump insisted his intervention was decisive. Speaking to reporters ahead of Munir's visit, Trump said both countries were "going at it" and credited his outreach with defusing the crisis. He praised both Prime Minister Modi and General Munir for their roles, calling it a collaborative success, but one shaped significantly by US stopped a war between Pakistan and India. I love Pakistan," Trump said. "Modi is a fantastic man. I spoke to him last night. We are going to make a trade deal with Modi of India."He added, "This man [Munir] was extremely influential in stopping the war from the Pakistani side, and Modi from the Indian side. They were going at it-and they're both nuclear countries. I stopped a war between two major nuclear nations, but I don't think I've seen a single story written about it."The four-day conflict between India and Pakistan in early May was sparked by the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, in which 26 people - most of them tourists - were response, India launched retaliatory strikes on nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) as part of Operation Sindoor. Pakistan countered with unprovoked attacks targeting civilian areas and military infrastructure, all of which were thwarted by India's air defence has maintained that the de-escalation was the result of existing backchannel military communications. Foreign Secretary Misri also dismissed suggestions of a US-India trade dialogue or any request for mediation during the confirmed that while Trump and PM Modi had planned to meet in person on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, the meeting was called off due to Trump's early departure amid the escalating Middle East reportedly invited the PM to visit the US en route back from Canada, but PM Modi declined due to prior commitments, and instead extended an invitation to Trump to attend the Quad leaders' summit in India later this year - an offer the US President InMust Watch


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Asim Munir to meet Donald Trump at the White House: Lunch date sparks memes, mystery, and a whole lot of buzz
US President Donald Trump met Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir in Washington amid the ongoing Iran-Israel war. The rare closed-door meeting sparked speculation over Pakistan's mediation ambitions, counterterrorism ties, and its support for Iran. India, facing fallout from a Kashmir terror attack, remains wary. Trump claimed Munir helped prevent conflict with India, a statement New Delhi disputes. Meanwhile, social media users mocked the high-stakes summit with Bollywood memes, highlighting the online reaction to serious geopolitical moves. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Pakistan signals mediation role in Iran conflict Counterterrorism and controversy Strategic interests and broader agendas Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Fallout in India Internet reaction: Bollywood memes and cringe In a rare high-level engagement, US President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan 's Chief of Army Staff, Field Marshal Asim Munir , at the White House on Wednesday. The meeting took place in the Cabinet Room and was confirmed in the president's daily schedule. This is the first time since 2001, when General Pervez Musharraf met a US president, that a Pakistani military chief has held such talks with an American backdrop is tense. The Middle East is ablaze with conflict between Iran and Israel, and Washington is weighing its military options. Trump's discussion with Munir came as part of efforts to manage escalating regional tensions—and perhaps explore Pakistan's role in told reporters at the White House, 'I love Pakistan,' adding that Munir was 'extremely influential' in stopping recent fighting between India and Pakistan. However, he did not clarify what he hoped to achieve from their to some media reports, Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir was seen as he arrived at the the White House in Washington, DC to meet the US President Donald has positioned itself as a potential mediator in the Israel-Iran war. Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, speaking in parliament earlier this week, said: 'Our intention was always to see successful negotiations between the United States and Iran.' He added that Iran was open to talks, provided Israel stopped its his Washington visit, Munir reaffirmed Pakistan's support for Iran. At a public event, he stated Pakistan's 'clear and strong' backing for Tehran in the war, while also voicing support for American efforts to de-escalate the Minister Shehbaz Sharif echoed this sentiment in a post on social media, saying he had called the Iranian president 'to express Pakistan's unwavering solidarity with the brotherly people of Iran in the face of Israel's unprovoked aggression.'Pakistan's history with Iran is long and complex. The late Abdul Qadeer Khan, widely considered the father of Pakistan's nuclear programme, was accused of sharing nuclear designs with Iran. These atomic ties have drawn global scrutiny for geopolitics, Munir's US trip included a focus on counterterrorism. According to Dawn, the most concrete outcome of the visit may be a strengthened counterterrorism partnership with the US, especially in combatting Islamic State Khorasan (IS-K), which poses threats across South not everyone welcomed Munir in Washington. Outside a hotel event where he was speaking, overseas Pakistanis protested loudly, chanting slogans like 'Pakistanio ke Qatil,' 'Mass Murderer Asim Munir,' and 'Democracy dies when guns speak.'Political analyst Hassan Askari Rizvi called the White House meeting 'a kind of special gesture given by President Trump.' And it's clear that the symbolism of this meeting was not lost on Pakistan's state-run media either. Pakistan Television called it 'important and historic,' claiming it showed 'growing confidence' in the country's military visit is set to continue with meetings with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to reports from Pakistani outlets. Analysts believe the discussions may go beyond just reported by Bloomberg, Michael Kugelman, a senior fellow at the Asia Pacific Foundation, said, 'The Pakistani army chief is a powerful figure, and this army chief is especially powerful. He has a very large portfolio.' He noted that talks may also touch on crypto policy and critical Bagchi, head of the Delhi-based Ananta Centre, observed, 'The Trump administration is discovering new ways or new reasons to engage the Pakistan army and Pakistan.' Historically, the US has leaned on Pakistan's military to manage regional security threats, from Afghanistan to meeting has raised eyebrows in India, particularly given the fragile state of US-India ties. On 22 April, 26 tourists were killed in a deadly terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir. New Delhi blamed Pakistan, calling it an orchestrated act of terrorism. Islamabad denied any and Pakistan—both nuclear powers—came dangerously close to open conflict in May. Trump later claimed credit for brokering a ceasefire using trade as leverage. India rejected the assertion. In a call with Trump, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi made it clear: 'At no time, at any level, were there any talks on issues like India-US trade deal or mediation between India and Pakistan through America,' Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said in a video had been expected to meet Trump at the G-7 summit in Canada, but Trump cut his trip short, citing urgent developments in the Middle East. Modi, not a G-7 member, had been invited as a guest by Canadian Prime Minister Mark India and the US have maintained strong ties across successive administrations—largely to counter China—the latest developments suggest friction. US-India trade talks have stalled, and New Delhi remains firmly against any US attempt to mediate with diplomats negotiated in hushed rooms, the internet had its own take. Social media erupted with memes mocking the Trump-Munir meeting, comparing it to scenes from vintage Bollywood user posted an image captioned, 'Donald Trump after meeting Asim Munir,' alongside a screenshot from the 1997 film Ishq featuring Sadashiv Amrapurkar. Another likened the encounter to a dramatic father-son showdown from Rishtey (2002).Others shared doctored clips claiming to show 'Donald Trump and Asim Munir's exclusive video from the White House.' The mood online was clear—cynical, irreverent, and steeped in cultural closed-door meeting with Pakistan's army chief reflects shifting priorities as Washington recalibrates its Middle East approach. At the same time, it signals a subtle realignment of regional partnerships—with Pakistan asserting its diplomatic muscle, India hardening its stance, and the US still trying to keep one foot in each tensions high, and alliances fluid, the world is watching. And as memes continue to fly, what happens behind closed doors could shape the next chapter of regional politics.(With inputs from Bloomberg)


India Gazette
36 minutes ago
- India Gazette
"Hope...would not use this one": Senior Iranian diplomat over Asim Munir's US visit and possibility of Pak airspace being used for operations against Iran
New Delhi [India] June 18 (ANI): Amid speculation over Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir's meeting with US President Donald Trump amid Iran's conflict with Israel, a senior Iranian diplomat has hoped that Pakistan airspace and airbases will not be used for operations against his country. In an interview with ANI, Iranian Deputy Chief of Mission in India, Mohammad Javad Hosseini answered queries on a range of issues and said his country has not talked of mediation and has called upon the international community to stop 'aggression' by Israel as it is not beneficial to anyone. He hoped the United States would not enter the conflict because it would 'not benefit' any of the players in the region. 'I hope it would not use this one,' Hosseini said when asked about Asim Munir's meeting with Trump on Wednesday and the possibility that Pakistan airspace and airbases could be used for operations against Iran. 'The truth is that since June 13, we were attacked by the Israeli regime in an aggression which is a flagrant violation of international law and a violation of the sovereignty of an independent state. It was highly expected that the free nations would condemn such aggression, a blatant international law violation. We are in a position to defend our people, our government, our country in the best way. We have shown that we are able and we will continue because we are under attack and we have to defend,' he said. Hosseini said his country's retaliatory action is based on self-defence, which is enshrined in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, 'which gives us this power to defend our people'. 'The Israeli government and the Israeli officials officially announced some threats against Iranian high-ranking officials. They assassinated some of the Iranian military officials, which is totally against any regulations,' he said. He also referred to Iran cancelling next round of nuclear talks with the United States amid rising tensions in the Middle East. 'We were at the negotiating table. It was America that gave the green light to the Israelis to have these military attacks against Iran. They have made a lot of accusations, but there was no proof... We are still at the negotiation table, but nobody can force us to do whatever they want. They cannot tell us to stop or continue the war, or defend ourselves. We hope that America doesn't enter into this conflict because it would be to the benefit of none of the players in the region,' Hosseini said. US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said 'we' now have 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran' and 'we know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding'. 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' Trump wrote on his social media 'Truth Social'.' 'Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American-made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff.' Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA,' he said in a post. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin,' he added. Israel launched a series of airstrikes on Iranian military and nuclear targets, prompting retaliatory attacks from Tehran. Trump has been vocal in his support for Israel, emphasising that Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. Earlier, speaking aboard Air Force One, Trump emphasised the need for a 'real end' to the conflict, arguing it's better than a ceasefire while also suggesting that giving up entirely on negotiating is a possibility. Trump said, 'an end, a real end, not a ceasefire. An end. Or giving entirely. That's OK, too.' 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. It's very simple -- you don't have to go to too deep into it. They just can't have a nuclear weapon,' he added. Trump said that he expects the next 48 hours will reveal more about whether Israel plans to slow down or accelerate its attacks on Iran, as per CNN. 'You're going to find out. Nobody's slowed up so far,' Trump said. Trump left the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, after Monday night's dinner, citing the need to attend to pressing matters in the Middle East. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on Wednesday warned Israel and said that the 'Zionist regime made a grave mistake' and will face the consequences of its actions. 'Our nation will not forsake the blood of their martyrs, nor will they remain silent in the face of violations of their airspace,' Iran's First International News Network reported Khamenei's statement. Iran 'will stand firm against an imposed war, just as it will stand firm against an imposed peace', the supreme leader said in a televised address reported by the Tasnim news agency. 'This nation will not surrender to anyone in the face of imposition,' he said. Khamenei also pointed to statements made by Trump, saying those who know Iran and its history 'know that Iranians do not answer well to the language of threat'. 'And the Americans should know that any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable consequences,' he stated. Earlier in the day, he also said that Tehran will harshly retaliate against Israel's attacks as aerial attacks between the two nations continued overnight, marking the sixth day of the war.' We must give a strong response to the terrorist Zionist regime. We will show the Zionists no mercy,' Ayatollah Ali Khamenei wrote in English on X. Meanwhile, the Iranian armed forces chief warned of imminent 'punitive operations' against Israel.' Chairman of the Chiefs of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces: The operations carried out so far have been a warning for deterrence, and punitive operations will be forthcoming,' IRNA News Agency posted on X. (ANI)