logo
Tom Athron is new Walpole chair as Michael Ward becomes president emeritus

Tom Athron is new Walpole chair as Michael Ward becomes president emeritus

Fashion Network30-06-2025
Walpole has named Fortnum & Mason CEO Tom Athron as its new chair, succeeding Harrods MD Michael Ward who moves to a new advisory role.
The body that represents British luxury brands said Ward steps down 'after serving the maximum tenure of nine successful years as chair' but clearly isn't cutting his close ties to the group as he takes on a newly created advisory role as president emeritus.
Athron has led luxury-foods-focused Fortnum & Mason since December 2020 and before that was COO at Matchesfashion. He also spent 13 years at the John Lewis Partnership. One of his roles there was group development director on the main board, founding its innovation arm, JLP Ventures.
He takes up his additional job this week and said it's a 'privilege' to take on a task to 'promote, protect, and develop the British luxury sector, both in the UK and internationally'.
Meanwhile, Ward added: 'Over what has been an exceptionally turbulent nine years for business, I am incredibly proud of the role Walpole has played in shaping public perceptions of British luxury and in championing the sector. Thanks to this work, our industry is now well positioned for continued recognition and growth. My warmest congratulations to Tom, I am delighted he has agreed to take on the role of chair and sincere thanks also go to Walpole's board and to [CEO Helen Brocklebank]. I am honoured to become president emeritus and to continue supporting the upward trajectory of both Walpole and the sector as a whole.'
Ward also remains president of the European Creative and Cultural Industries Alliance (ECCIA), the group that brings together all the European luxury associations under one umbrella. That role runs until January 2026 when Walpole's two-year rolling presidency ends.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mind the skills gap: Older workers falling behind in training
Mind the skills gap: Older workers falling behind in training

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

Mind the skills gap: Older workers falling behind in training

Working life and skills are changing fast. Some jobs are booming, others are disappearing, says the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025. The OECD warns: 'There is an urgent need to boost the skills of older workers.' However, older workers (55–65 year-olds) take part in non-formal learning and training much less than those aged 25–54 year-olds, the OECD finds. On average, the rate is 32% versus 49% in 23 European countries, though the gap differs across countries. Where do older people learn the most—and the least? What do experts and the OECD recommend? When do we stop learning? According to the OECD Employment Outlook 2025 report, participation in formal and non-formal adult learning declines with age. In 2023, only a third of 60–65 year-olds took part in adult learning in the 12 months before the survey, compared with more than half of 25–44 year-olds. The averages cover 29 countries, 22 of which are in Europe. The share of the population participating in adult learning is over 60% among 25–29 year-olds, but drops to 39% for those aged 55–59 and to 31% for those aged 60–65. This share starts to decline clearly after the age of 45. Non-formal training was far more common than formal learning (training leading to a qualification) across all age groups. This was especially true for older individuals, with only 1% of 60–65 year-olds participating in formal learning. Learning by doing also decreases with age. Why do older people take part in learning less? Lower participation in non-formal learning among older individuals may be due to less willingness to train or other barriers, such as time constraints or course costs. According to the report, a lower willingness to train is likely a key factor. The share of people who wanted to participate in training—whether or not they actually did—falls from about 60% among 25–44 year-olds to 37% among those aged 60–65. A similar pattern appears in the share of people who participated in less training than they wanted, which drops from 28% among 25–34 year-olds to 17% among those aged 55–65. The report shows that time constraints are less of a barrier to training for older people than for younger groups. Among 55–65-year-olds, 7% took part in less training than they wanted due to time constraints—5% citing work-related reasons and 2% family reasons. In contrast, 15% of 35–44 year-olds reported time constraints as a barrier, with 8% pointing to work and 7% to family responsibilities. Large differences across European countries In every OECD country, including all European ones in the list, older individuals (55–65 year-olds) take part in non-formal learning less than the prime-age group (25–54 year-olds). However, both their participation rates and the size of the age gap vary greatly. The highest participation in non-formal training among 55–65 year-olds is seen in the Nordic countries—Norway, Finland, and Denmark—at around 50%. Sweden ranks fifth with 43%. The European average (22 countries) is 31.7%, compared with 34.9% across the OECD (29 countries). The lowest participation in non-formal training for this age group was in Poland, Slovakia, and Hungary, all below 18%. Outside the Nordic countries, England has the highest participation at 43.5%, followed by the Netherlands (41.7%) and Ireland (40.9%). Among Europe's five largest economies, Italy has the lowest participation at 18.5%, followed by France at 21.7%. Germany stands at 34.9%, slightly above the average. The participation gap between 25–54-year-olds and 55–65-year-olds is widest in Portugal at 24.7 percentage points (pp) and smallest in Italy at 8.9 pp. However, this does not mean older people are doing better in Italy, as their participation rate is the fourth lowest in Europe. Is this a surprise? Not at all One reason older people are less likely to engage in training—and employers are less likely to fund it—is the lower expected return on such investment due to shorter remaining working lives, the report notes. This is no surprise in economic theory. According to ManpowerGroup, 75% of employers in 21 European countries were unable to find workers with the right skills in 2023. 'Continuous learning is essential' Pawel Adrjan, Director of Economic Research at Indeed, told Euronews Business that continuous learning is essential in a fast-evolving market. As with previous technological innovations, professionals who proactively learn new tools, platforms, and methodologies will be better positioned to work efficiently with emerging technologies. The OECD noted that higher employment rates among older workers can help employers preserve valuable knowledge and skills while boosting productivity. 'There is an urgent need to boost the skills of older workers and promote their participation in well-targeted training,' the organisation recommends. How can governments respond? OECD offers four main actions that the governments can do. They included: Focus on boosting skills of older workers Address barriers to job-to-job mobility Confront ageism and other forms of discrimination Revive productivity growth, including through AI and automation Across the EU, people are living longer than in past decades. Many countries have responded by raising the retirement age, keeping people in the workforce for more years.

Why Swatch is facing tough times
Why Swatch is facing tough times

Fashion Network

time17 hours ago

  • Fashion Network

Why Swatch is facing tough times

The Swatch brand is credited with having saved a Swiss watch industry that had been laid low by the so-called quartz revolution. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, these less expensive and more accurate watches from an ascendant Japan upended European mechanical watchmaking. Swatch's response? Tap into the '80s zeitgeist with colourful, low-priced designs—funky, artistic, eclectic and made for collectors along with a whole new demographic that saw them as fashion, not function. Swatch used its skyrocketing revenue to support its more staid, traditional brands while acquiring new ones. But fast forward to today, and the market's changed: phones and smartwatches have undercut low-cost watches, leaving luxury as the main engine for growth. And a new set of problems, from low sales in China to Donald Trump 's tariffs, have made matters even worse. The luxury spending slowdown in China has hurt all brands, but Swatch got hit more than most, given that 27% of its 2024 sales were attributable to the Asian nation. While the company said last month that sales data now show a possible turnaround, any recovery in China is expected to be slow. Meanwhile, Trump's radical imposition of a 39% tariff on imports from Switzerland puts high-end watch brands in a corner, since they can't raise prices much more in the current environment. Simultaneously, investors have been calling out Swatch, urging it to capitalise on the still-lucrative high-end segment. Steven Wood, founder and chief investment officer of New York-based GreenWood Investors, even mounted a campaign to win a seat on Swatch's board. He was defeated, but his intervention may underline the frustration among investors worried about the company's future. The Hayek family, which controls more than 40% of Swatch voting rights, has pushed back by saying it shouldn't just be making watches for the wealthy. To be sure, Swatch managed some mainstream success as recently as 2022, with the MoonSwatch. The quartz-driven timepiece leaned on the heritage and look of the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch, an iconic watch worn on Apollo moon missions. Swatch sold more than a million of them that year, but it's struggled to generate the same sort of buzz across the rest of the group.

Why Swatch is facing tough times
Why Swatch is facing tough times

Fashion Network

time17 hours ago

  • Fashion Network

Why Swatch is facing tough times

The Swatch brand is credited with having saved a Swiss watch industry that had been laid low by the so-called quartz revolution. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, these less expensive and more accurate watches from an ascendant Japan upended European mechanical watchmaking. Swatch's response? Tap into the '80s zeitgeist with colourful, low-priced designs—funky, artistic, eclectic and made for collectors along with a whole new demographic that saw them as fashion, not function. Swatch used its skyrocketing revenue to support its more staid, traditional brands while acquiring new ones. But fast forward to today, and the market's changed: phones and smartwatches have undercut low-cost watches, leaving luxury as the main engine for growth. And a new set of problems, from low sales in China to Donald Trump 's tariffs, have made matters even worse. The luxury spending slowdown in China has hurt all brands, but Swatch got hit more than most, given that 27% of its 2024 sales were attributable to the Asian nation. While the company said last month that sales data now show a possible turnaround, any recovery in China is expected to be slow. Meanwhile, Trump's radical imposition of a 39% tariff on imports from Switzerland puts high-end watch brands in a corner, since they can't raise prices much more in the current environment. Simultaneously, investors have been calling out Swatch, urging it to capitalise on the still-lucrative high-end segment. Steven Wood, founder and chief investment officer of New York-based GreenWood Investors, even mounted a campaign to win a seat on Swatch's board. He was defeated, but his intervention may underline the frustration among investors worried about the company's future. The Hayek family, which controls more than 40% of Swatch voting rights, has pushed back by saying it shouldn't just be making watches for the wealthy. To be sure, Swatch managed some mainstream success as recently as 2022, with the MoonSwatch. The quartz-driven timepiece leaned on the heritage and look of the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch, an iconic watch worn on Apollo moon missions. Swatch sold more than a million of them that year, but it's struggled to generate the same sort of buzz across the rest of the group.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store