Former Dilworth housemaster denied parole again
Former Dilworth housemaster Ian Wilson, who is in jail for sexually abusing several students, has been grilled on whether there are other victims he has yet to disclose.
"Not to my knowledge. I would be very surprised if any other people come forward," Wilson told the Parole Board today.
But panel convenor Judge Arthur Tompkins rejected Wilson's response, stating it was "not an answer".
"What does that mean - 'not to your knowledge'?" he asked.
Wilson repeated his response, claiming he was not aware of anyone else whom he had sexually abused, who had not already laid a complaint against him.
Judge Tompkins reminded Wilson that previously, he had only admitted his offending in sequential stages, when confronted with credible accounts by victims as they spoke up.
Wilson claimed he had repressed memories of his previous actions. He said he "didn't dwell" on the abuse he inflicted, and it was only on hearing accounts from his victims that he thought, "yes, there's truth to that".
"I had put them [memories] away, I tried to move on."
The panel pressed him on whether it was a possibility that Wilson had repressed memories of there being further victims.
He said there was always that possibility, but repeated he would be "very surprised".
One of Wilson's supporters spoke to the board about how Wilson had been reading the Bible and praying to God to reveal any abuse that he may be holding back.
"And nothing has been revealed," said the man, who cannot be named.
Wilson, who worked at Dilworth from February 1971 until his resignation in December 1996, was arrested in 2020 as part of Operation Beverly, a long-running investigation into historical sexual abuse by several staff at the Auckland-based boys-only boarding school.
He was jailed in March 2021 for three years and seven months for indecently assaulting five students between 1975 and 1992 - some of them more than once and over several years.
Wilson was still in jail when he had one year and 11 months added to his sentence in August last year after belatedly admitting to having abused five others.
At today's hearing, Wilson was denied parole for the sixth time, leaving him to serve most, if not all, of his prison sentence.
The board determined he remained an undue risk and scheduled his next hearing for July 2026. His statutory release date is September 22 in that year.
If granted parole in July, he would be released with parole conditions. However, if he were again declined, he would serve the remaining two months of his sentence and then be served with release conditions.
The outcome was welcomed by one of Wilson's victims, Neil Harding, who has fought to keep the former housemaster behind bars for the duration of his sentence.
"It's really, really good. I'm really comfortable with that. I'm grateful to the Parole Board that they listened," Harding told NZME.
Before the hearing, Harding made submissions to the board, imploring it to ask Wilson if there were other victims.
He said he believed there were at least two other people who had yet to come forward.
"Of course, if he were truly remorseful, he would tell the truth," Harding said.
In his submissions, Harding pointed out that Wilson was part of the school's senior management and claimed Wilson played a significant role in covering up abuse by other parties, as well as his own offending.
"The Royal Commission into Abuse in Care named Dilworth School first in institutions that had the highest prevalence of sexual abuse in New Zealand between 1950-1999.
"Ian Wilson was responsible, along with others, for the cover-up of sexual abuse of hundreds of young boys."
He said Wilson was "sadistic and inhumane" towards students and described him as "a monster".
More than 40 former pupils have taken their own lives after the decades of abuse that went on at the school, Harding submitted.
"The impact of [Wilson's] abuse, and the role he played, is incalculable."
Wilson has denied knowing others were sexually abusing students.
"He most definitely knew other paedophiles were active at Dilworth," Harding told the board.
He said Wilson continued to lie, including when he claimed his offending ended, and when asked about further victims.
Harding rejected Wilson's claims that he had reformed and was remorseful.
"If you believe that he has been rehabilitated, then he has again duped and conned the system."
At the hearing, Wilson's lawyer submitted that Wilson was an eligible candidate for parole, given that he had a support network that held him accountable, and had approved interim accommodation.
Wilson's ill-health, proposed special conditions, safety plan and the treatment he underwent in prison were additional factors for consideration.
- By Tara Shaskey
Open Justice multimedia journalist from NZ Herald
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
6 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Cyclist dies in crash in Auckland
Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER A cyclist has died following a crash with a vehicle in Auckland. The police say the crash happened on Neilson Street in Onehunga just before 3pm on Thursday. The cyclist died at the scene. The Serious Crash Unit attended, and the circumstances of the crash are being investigated.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Kiwis in the dark over Instagram, Facebook account suspensions
Auckland based dancer Assryia Brady, who mainly posts dance videos, said Meta's claims about her account were baseless and had harmed her reputation. Photo: Supplied A dancer, a dumpling restaurant owner and a makeup-artist are among New Zealanders whose Instagram and Facebook accounts have been suspended, as thousands globally call for Meta to be held accountable for what they say are wrongful bans based on false accusations. More than 37,000 people around the world have signed an online petition advocating for ordinary users impacted - who they said were being silenced by Meta's "broken AI enforcement systems". Meanwhile, Meta said it was using a combination of humans and technology to take down accounts that break its rules - with content such as child sexual abuse material. In June it admitted to a glitch in the system that resulted in Facebook groups being wrongly taken down - however, it said that had been fixed. Auckland dancer Assryia Brady said her Instagram account was suspended in June, after Meta told her she had breached community standards with child exploitation material. Brady, who mainly posts dance videos, said the claim was baseless and had harmed her reputation. She said despite being a Meta Verified user, paying $30 a month, she received no support from the company to get her account back. Auckland based dancer Assryia Brady, who still has no access to her Instagram account, said job opportunities have been taken away from her as a result. Photo: Supplied Freelance make-up artist Tallulah McLean had her Instagram account suspended earlier this month on the grounds of breaching community standards relating to child exploitation, abuse and nudity. She said the only child photos she had on her account was of her doing make up for her brother when she was a child. McLean said the ban was devastating for her livelihood. "I do all my work as it comes through Instagram, it's my online portfolio, it's where I can meet people, like clients, and form connections with other make up brands, PR brands. It's everything, so this has impacted every form of income for me, like my business, my livelihood, it's shattered it," she said. McLean said her efforts to contact Meta to appeal the ban were met with chat bots and automated responses. She received two calls from overseas call centres after telling Meta she would be sending legal letters to them. She said the callers told her there was nothing they could do, and she needed to wait. Auckland based freelance make-up artist Tallulah McLean, who relies on Instagram to reach her clients, said her income was hit after her Instagram account was wrongly suspended. Photo: Supplied Meta reinstated McLean's account within hours after RNZ sent queries about her complaint, but it refused to explain why McLean's account was suspended. Auckland dumpling restaurant Sumthin Dumplin also had its business Instagram account suspended for breaching community standards about two months ago despite only posting photos and videos of food and its staff. Its owner Shane Liu said the response from Meta was almost "non-existent" other than chat bot stock responses, even though he was paying about $2000 for his Meta-verified account. "I didn't know what to do, what do you do? Did the sales dip? Of course it did. Thank God I built a brand that was beyond just an Instagram page, and it didn't dip that much, but I was definitely affected." Liu said he paid thousands of dollars to a marketing company in Dubai, who eventually helped him reinstate his account. Sumthin Dumplin's Instagram account - with nearly 30,000 followers - was only reinstated after its owner Shane Liu paid thousands of dollars to a Dubai based marketing company to help communicate with Meta. Photo: Screenshot Meta said it took action on accounts that violated its policies, and people could appeal if they thought it had made a mistake. "We use a combination of people and technology to find and remove accounts that break our rules," it said in a statement. "We're always working to improve the enforcement of all our policies - including our child nudity and exploitation policy - to help keep our community safe. No system is perfect, which is why we give people the opportunity to appeal decisions if they think we've got it wrong," it added. The tech giant did not answer RNZ's questions about how many accounts had been wrongly cut off, and insisted that it had not seen evidence of a significant increase in incorrect enforcement of its rules. In July, Meta said it was expanding on teen account protections and child safety features, and cracking down on accounts breaking rules. The BBC reported that Meta was removing 635,000 Instagram and Facebook accounts over sexualised comments and imagery in relation to children. Artificial intelligence expert from Victoria University Dr Andrew Lensen said the recent shift was surprising, as he thought Meta had in the past taken a conservative approach to suspensions - often not taking down violent and sexual content. Now they had gone too far in the other direction, he said. Dr Lensen said while social media platforms had been using automated systems to moderate accounts for a decade, they continued to be increasingly reliant on automated tools. He said the increasing sophistication of AI powered moderation tools could be a double-edged sword. "It's really hard to increase your detection of the really bad stuff, without also accidentally increasing your mis-detection of accounts that are actually legitimate," he said. Dr Lensen said it was hard to know what the motives behind Meta's recent shift were. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
If murder it was, killing of reporter must be independently investigated
Israel must allow independent investigations of the killing of journalists, Peter Greste writes. The New York-based media freedom organisation, the Committee to Protect Journalists, is scrupulous with its words. So, when the organisation described the killing of six Palestinian journalists in an Israeli air strike as "murder", the word was a carefully considered CPJ defines "murder" as the "deliberate killing of journalists for their work". Israeli authorities said they were targeting one man — a 28-year-old Al Jazeera reporter named Anas al-Sharif — who they said was the leader of a Hamas "cell". They also accused him of "advancing rocket attacks against Israeli civilians and (Israeli) troops". Israel made no claims about the other five; three of them were al-Sharif's Al Jazeera colleagues and the other two were freelance journalists. In a post on X, an Israeli military spokesman said: "Prior to the strike, we obtained current intelligence indicating that Sharif was an active Hamas military wing operative at the time of his elimination." The evidence the Israeli authorities claimed to have was circumstantial at best: "personnel rosters, lists of terrorist training courses, phone directories and salary documents". Israeli military spokesman Avichay Adraee also posted undated photos on X that appeared to show al-Sharif in an embrace with Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas mastermind of the October 2023 attack on Israel. Israel says it has further classified evidence that includes more damning detail. Without seeing it all, it is impossible to verify the claims but the photograph itself is hardly proof. Front-line journalists (myself included) will have selfies with those they have interviewed, including some very unpleasant characters. Many will have phone numbers of extremists — they will appear in call logs and records of meetings. None of it is evidence of anything other than a well-connected reporter doing their job. Of course, Israel may well be right. Despite the vigorous denials from Al Jazeera, it is still possible al-Sharif was working for Hamas. And if he was, the Israeli authorities should have no problem allowing independent investigators complete access to verify the claims and settle the matter. But the strike also fits a disturbing pattern. With 190 media workers now killed since the October 7 attacks, this is the deadliest conflict for journalists since the CPJ began keeping records. While some of the victims were inevitably caught in the violence along with so many other civilians, many of them died in rocket strikes aimed squarely at their homes, their clearly marked vehicles, or while they were wearing body armour labelled "PRESS". In all, the CPJ has identified 24 journalists who appeared to have been targeted — murdered, in the group's words — specifically because of their work. The number may well be far higher but those figures alone raise disturbing questions about Israel's tolerance for critical media reporting. They also demand answers from independent investigators. We receive horrific reports from Gaza daily, but Israel repeatedly dismisses them as Hamas propaganda. "A terrorist is a terrorist, even if Al Jazeera gives him a press badge", the Israeli foreign ministry posted on social media. If Israel believes the journalism from Palestinian reporters is nothing more than Hamas propaganda, the solution is straightforward: let foreign correspondents in. It is worth recalling the reason we cherish media freedom is not because we want to privilege a particular class of individual. It is because we recognise the vital importance accurate, independent reporting plays in informing public debate. Without it, we are blind and deaf. International news organisations have repeatedly called for access to Gaza. Now, a group of more than 1000 international journalists have signed a petition demanding to be let in (I am one of the signatories). Israel has so far refused. The government says it cannot guarantee their security in such an active battlefield. But that cannot be justification alone. All those who have signed the petition know well the risks of reporting from hostile environments. Many have crossed active war front lines themselves. Most have friends who have died in other conflicts. Some have been wounded, arrested or kidnapped themselves. None are naive to the dangers and all are committed to the principles behind media freedom. Calling for foreign journalists to be let into Gaza is not to deny the extraordinary sacrifice of Anas al-Sharif or any of the other Palestinians who have been killed while doing their jobs. Rather, it is to assert the importance of the fundamental right of all — the right to information. That applies as much in Gaza as it does in Ukraine, or Russia, or Sudan, or any other crisis where the public needs accurate, reliable information to support good policy. — ■ Peter Greste is a professor of journalism and communications at Macquarie University.
