
From Benjamin Franklin to Pony Express to anthrax: How the US Postal Service shaped a nation
Advertisement
A new postal service
In those early days, creating an American postal system was a key priority for the nation's founders, who needed to communicate with the Continental Army and the colonies. When the Continental Congress met in 1775, it appointed Franklin as the first postmaster because he had served in the British postal service for North America.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The early postal system also became crucial to unifying the diverse, fragmented colonies into a nation by spreading ideas of liberty and independence through letters, newspapers and pamphlets.
'People were reading, getting ideas of what it would be like to be an independent country,' Kochersperger said.
Westward expansion
When the U.S. Constitution was ratified, Congress was granted power to establish post offices and mail routes that were first used by mail carriers on horseback and later upgraded for stagecoaches. Some evolved into highways still used today.
Advertisement
Initially running north–south along the East Coast, post roads later extended westward. Historians have said this aided settler expansion into Native lands and was intertwined with the displacement of tribes.
As western migration accelerated, mail was sent by ship from New York to Central America and on to California. Delivery typically took two to three months.
The Pony Express, operated by private carriers, was started to speed things up. A relay system of riders on horseback carried mail from California to Missouri, the furthest westward railroad stop. The 1,800-mile (2,900-kilometer) journey took 10 days.
While legendary, it only lasted about 18 months, until Oct. 26, 1861. The service was scuttled by the Civil War and made obsolete with the advent of the telegraph, said Daniel Piazza, chief curator of philately at the Smithsonian National Postal Museum.
Later, the transcontinental railroad reduced mail delivery from months to days.
New types of delivery
Free mail delivery to homes began in earnest in 1863 in the nation's largest cities. It was initially created as a response to grief during the Civil War. At the time, the only communication from a father, brother, husband or son usually came through letter-writing. Women lined up daily at post offices, awaiting word. They sometimes got their own letters back, with a note saying their loved one had been killed.
Postal officials in Cleveland decided to take mail to people's homes out of compassion.
Enthusiasm for home delivery spread quickly, and people living in rural areas wanted it, too. Despite logistical challenges, rural free delivery began expanding rapidly around 1900. By the 1920s, mail carriers mostly had replaced horse-drawn wagons with automobiles.
Advertisement
Around that time, mail started being sent by airplane as well. The nation's first regularly scheduled airmail service began on May 15, 1918. The initial routes were between Washington, D.C., Philadelphia and New York, using Army pilots and planes.
The post office soon took over air mail, running operations for nine years until turning to fledgling private airline companies, some of which remain major airlines.
In the early days, flights were so dangerous that some pilots dubbed themselves the Suicide Club. Thirty-two pilots were killed.
Major changes to the system
The postal service saw major growth during President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's time in office. His New Deal plan to address the Great Depression put people to work building 2,000 new post offices.
After World War II, a booming economy and growing population led to a surge in mail. To handle the increasing volume, the post office needed a faster alternative to manual sorting.
So, on July 1, 1963, each post office was given a five-digit ZIP code. Previously, clerks had to memorize thousands of points of address information so they could sort the mail, Kochersperger said.
The public was skeptical at first, balking at more numbers. So, the post office came up with a friendly cartoon character named Mr. ZIP, who helped convince people their mail would arrive faster.
By 1970, postal workers were angry over low wages and a strike was called by leaders of the National Association of Letter Carriers union in New York. Eventually about 200,000 workers joined the postal stoppage, which led to the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970. It authorized collective bargaining rights for postal workers and transformed the taxpayer-supported Post Office Department into the United States Postal Service, a financially self-sustaining and independent agency within the executive branch.
Advertisement
In more recent times, U.S. Postal Service workers have faced various threats, including anthrax, a serious infectious bacterial disease. Weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, four threatening letters contaminated with anthrax were sent through the mail. Two workers at a mail distribution center in Washington, D.C. died after breathing in the spores, and thousands were potentially exposed.
Three other people were killed, and more than a dozen were sickened.
The anthrax scare led to major changes in how mail was monitored and sorted and how USPS workers protected themselves. Years later, they'd be designated essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and don protective gear again.
Haigh reported from Hartford, Conn.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Fathers In College Face Competing Demands, Unlikely To Seek Help
Male college student with baby stroller at bus stop Fathers in college spend less time caring for their children than student mothers, but they also face different financial pressures, with a much higher percentage saying they are financially responsible for other family members than student mothers. Parenting students account for one out of every five undergraduate college students, according to research from the Urban Institutes SPARK Collaborative, a collaborative project lead by the urban Institute, The Pregnant Scholar and Child Trends. The majority of student parents are mothers, but 30% are fathers, accounting for approximately 800,000 of the more than three million undergraduate student parents enrolled at American colleges and universities. students. In some cases, student fathers face fewer responsibilities outside of college than their female peers, but once you dig into the details, student fathers face distinct obstacles to success in college that require different supports and solutions. What Does the Data Say About Fathers In College? New research from Trellis Strategies, based on responses to their annual Student Financial Wellness Survey, digs into the nuances of parenting father's experience in college, and how colleges and universities can change and improve support to student fathers to ensure their success. Trellis' 2024 SFW survey gathered data from more than 53,000 students enrolled at 104 colleges and universities around the country. The survey has been running since 2018, and in that time, Trellis has surveyed 3.8 million students. This latest report hones in on the responses form the 1,300 student fathers who responded to this year's survey. Similar to their female peers, student fathers tended to be older than other students, and face huge demands on their time. Data from the Spark Collaborative shows that 46% percent of student fathers are 30-39 years old. Student fathers are more likely to be working full time while in college, with 68% working full time, compared to 53% of student mothers. Student fathers tend to spend less time caring for their children than mothers in college, with 44% spending 40 or more hours on childcare each week, compared to 62% of student mothers. This mirrors the general pattern of women shouldering more of the burden for child care than men. But student fathers were more likely to face additional financial pressures than student mothers. Fathers in college were more likely to be providing financial support to a partner or spouse, parents, or other family members. What Challenges Do Fathers In College Face? Even though student fathers face more financial demands, they were less likely to apply for financial aid than student mothers. 'I think this ties into broader trends by gender where men are less likely to complete the FAFSA compared to women. Approximately 26% of our male parents did not complete the FAFSA in the 2024 SFWS.' said Allyson Cornett, the author of the brief, via email. The FAFSA, is the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. The form is used to determine eligibility for the Pell Grant, the main federal grant program to help students pay for college, as well as federal student loans and Work-Study. Most states and colleges also use FAFSA information to decide eligibility for state and institutional financial aid. Cornett noted that they asked students who did not complete the FAFSA follow up questions about why they did not apply for financial aid. The most common responses from student fathers were a fear of taking out student loans, that they were paying for school without financial aid, or a lack of information. Lower FAFSA filing rates could be seen as a positive at first glance if viewed as part of lower borrowing rates. However, student fathers might be missing out on better ways to pay for college. They tended to rely more on personal savings, current income, and credit cards to pay for college expenses. Federal student loans have much lower interest rates than credit cards, and come with more protections. The choice to use credit versus student loans may actually be harming student fathers, as they will pay more over time than with a traditional student loan. Not applying for financial aid also means some student fathers are missing out on grants and scholarships they would not need to repay. Changes to FAFSA signed into law at the end of President Trump's first term mean college students with children are more likely to qualify for Pell grants than they were previously, especially single parents. Single fathers in college are especially likely to stop out of college, based on research from Aspen Ascend, so increasing the rates FAFSA filing for student fathers could help relieve financial pressure on them. What Support Do Fathers In College Need? Cornett noted that student fathers were generally less likely to seek help compared to student mothers. 'This is in line with the broader data on student fathers from the SFWS 2024 – where we are still seeing high levels of need, but lower utilization of federal aid and other programs. In fact, 72% experienced financial difficulties (compared to 82% of mothers), 48% were food insecure (vs. 55% of mothers), and 54% were housing insecure (vs. 65% of mothers), but rates of public assistance were much lower than their female peers'. As college demographics continue to change, it is increasingly important to ensure that parenting students can enroll, feel at home, and succeed in college. Trellis' data suggest schools need to think about the different types of support students fathers may need in order to succeed. 'Student parents are often treated as a monolithic group – and much of the conversation is focused on student mothers (which makes sense as only 30% are fathers). Cornett emphasized the importance of colleges thinking carefully about which supports fathers in college need that are distinct from mothers, saying that, "when we disaggregate the data… a more nuanced picture emerges. Our findings stress that student fathers, in particular, may benefit from more targeted financial aid counseling and communication, as well as awareness of public benefit programs and other resources available to them. On-campus or subsidized childcare might not be the best solution for student fathers, as evidenced by the SFWS data. This all culminates in the importance of institutions recognizing the diverse and competing priorities student parents face. Their needs differ not only from their non-parenting peers but also across gender lines,' said Cornett.


Buzz Feed
5 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
37 Infuriating People Who Don't Think They're A Problem
This entitled mom who thinks the world (and this cake, apparently) revolves around her: This person, who can probably stop wondering why they're still on a dating app: This American who didn't like when their logic was used against them: The hotel that advertised this "Kids Eat Free" breakfast that was, uh, not free to say the least: The person who wrote this question, because everyone knows a shared ping pong table at work is way more important than a livable wage: This aunt who decided to hijack a relative's Facebook post announcing the birth of their literal child, because her great grandson turned 1 month old on the same day: The hotel owner who decided that "breakfast included with stay" means a Pop-Tart, some Sunny D, and a bag of Ruffles: This a-hole who is so out of touch, he literally responded to his friend being short on cash by saying, "Come have some LOBSTER with us": This girlypop who will not be impressed unless you break the bank to woo her: The passive-aggressive coworker who put up these signs about *checks notes* sniffling: This CAT shampoo that says "cat" in the title, in the instructions, AND has a massive cat on the bottle, but in teeny tiny font says, "for use on dogs only": This absolutely bonkers HOA with a policy requiring all dog owners to register their dogs' DNA for $86 each so they can test any poop they find in the neighborhood: Here's what the letter says:"Dog Registration Policy All dogs that live in or visit the [REDACTED] are required to be registered in a DNA database. This program is run by [REDACTED] for Poo Prints and works by creating a unique DNA profile for each dog in the community. The DNA is collected by swabbing the inside of the dog's mouth to collect cheek cells. The DNA profiles of all the dogs in the community are entered into a database stored by [REDACTED] Lab. When a waste sample is found, it is collected by our management company and sent to the lab. The DNA in the dog's feces is matched to a dog in the system and the violator is fined and charged for the cost of the analysis. New and existing dogs and visiting dogs of existing owners are required to be registered within 2 weeks of program implementation or occupancy or visit. The cost for the DNA program registration is $86.14 per dog. This cost covers the DNA swabbing, DNA collection kit, and database registration. Payment can be made with your regular monthly assessment. Pet Registration is [REDACTED] regular scheduled times at the community clubhouse or by appointment at [REDACTED]. Please email DNA Program Manager [REDACTED] with any questions or to make an appointment. FINE SCHEDULE First Fine = Analysis and test fee and postage Second Fine = $150 plus analysis fee and postage Third Fine = $150 plus analysis fee and postage Analysis fee and postage = $147.30 Failure to register a dog within 2 weeks of move in = Progressive fines starting at $150, up to $500 per month." This Uber driver who is putting both of their lives in jeopardy because he can't go ten minutes without watching a TikTok: This mom who got mad at her kid for "stealing her birthday weekend" (spoiler alert: it was her idea and she didn't remember, so she decided to make it everyone else's problem): This (hopefully ex) friend who was certainly not happy that his "bro" thoughtfully commissioned some art of him and his recently deceased dog instead of getting something more flashy for his birthday: The genius who asked for a photo of the item missing in this person's order (which they can't get a refund or replacement without): The bank employee who saved this girl's number when she opened an account and texted her to go dancing?? As if she'd find that anything other than wildly creepy?: This supervisor who apparently has never heard someone say, "Your poor planning does not constitute an emergency for me.": This Airbnb host who tried to charge a customer ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS for turning down the thermostat: The grinches, I mean, residents of this apartment complex who went to a building-wide game night and stole all the games and snacks so nobody else could have fun: This person who not only took three years to pay their friend back, but also did in in the pettiest way possible: This shopper who said, "Oh, you know where I should leave this raw chicken I picked up and no longer want? In the food warmer!" like an entitled a-hole: The landlord who is renting out a $1,200 apartment with NO KITCHEN: This landlord who agreed to give the tenant leaving the house a 24-hour warning before bringing new tenants for a decidedly did not: The chef who put sausage and peppers on the appetizer then proceeded to plate them like this: This waiter, who really tried to sneak an $87 tip from a customer on an order that was $38: For context, the tip was intended to be $7, and the order total was written as $45.23 on the receipt. The fast-food employee who read "extra cheese" and maliciously complied: This online shop that asks for tips at checkout, because apparently, we do that everywhere now: This Facebook Marketplace seller who had a customer driving 45 minutes to purchase a bookshelf, but decided to sell it to someone else while the original customer was on the way: This grocery store bakery that could really use an in-house editor: This Amtrak employee who said, "I can't see the problem, so there is none, bye!" This boss who asked an employee to work a 17-hour shift (3:30 p.m. to 8:30 a.m.) on the 4th of July so he didn't have to work for 12 hours: This company that sent out a whole ass package that definitely could've just been an email: The designer who wrapped a bunch of planks together, called it a table, and said, "Here, damn!": The person who left this warning on someone's car literalllllly right in front of the "visitors parking" sign: The neighbor who saw absolutely nothing wrong with blocking the street for several days so other people can't access their homes while they renovate their own: And finally, this person, who expressed feelings for their roommate (who is in a long-term relationship), was expectedly turned down, then decided to send them a cute little text out of the blue saying they need to move out:


Associated Press
6 hours ago
- Associated Press
IAS Services Helps Family Overcome UK Visa Rejection with Successful Appeal
Obtaining Further Leave to Remain (FLR) in the UK can be complex, especially when it involves families. When the Home Office rejects an application, affected individuals who have lived in the UK for some time will face an emotionally challenging journey of having to leave the country. But with the proper immigration support, families can find hope and success, even after a disappointing start. This article discusses how a UK-based family, after being rejected for an FLR application by the Home Office, received a second chance through the assistance of immigration lawyers. Their experience highlights the importance of seeking professional support in improving the outcome when applying for Further Leave to Remain. The Background: A Family's Struggle After Rejection The story begins with a young family who had built a life together in the UK. The primary resident, a settled person, was supporting their spouse, who had been residing in the country under the UK Spouse visa for the past 33 months. During the spouse's time in the UK, they welcomed a child, who automatically acquired British citizenship. As their current visas neared expiration, the non-British spouse applied for leave to remain, hoping to maintain their lawful immigration status and continue building a family life in the UK. Unfortunately, their hopes were shaken when the Home Office refused their application. This rejection risked separating the family, as the non-British spouse was no longer legally allowed to remain in the UK. Instead of giving up, the family sought help from experienced UK immigration advisors. What Went Wrong With Their Application The application for further leave to remain under the family route was rejected because the family failed to provide sufficient evidence of their income. The British partner's employment situation had changed since the initial Spouse visa application was submitted. With the FLR application, they were combining their savings with their salaried income. However, some of the key gaps in their documentation included: Though they met the income threshold in practice, the lack of complete supporting documents led to a refusal. These are common mistakes in visa applications, particularly when applicants handle the process independently. The Role of Immigration Advisors After reviewing the rejection letter, the immigration lawyers advised the couple to submit a fresh application with stronger supporting documents. They immediately began working on a new application for FLR under the family route. The immigration advisors thoroughly assessed the family's situation, collected and reviewed all supporting documents, and helped them clearly demonstrate their right to remain in the UK with their new application. A crucial element of the new application was demonstrating the best interests of their UK-born child, a factor that UK immigration law gives significant weight to in family-based cases. Thanks to the expert guidance, the family's new application was approved. This meant the non-British spouse could continue living, working, and raising their child in the UK legally. The applicant also has a clear pathway to settlement in the future, as long as they meet the conditions. Understanding Further Leave to Remain Further Leave to Remain (FLR) allows individuals already in the UK to extend their stay. It's essential for spouses, partners, children, or parents living with family in the UK. Depending on your circumstances, you may apply under different FLR categories, including: In this case, the family applied under the FLR(M) category because the non-British spouse was in the UK under the Family visa route. The advisors carefully matched their application to this route, ensuring compliance with all requirements. Tips to Strengthen Your FLR Application If you are applying for leave to remain, here are some tips to increase your chances of success: Why Professional Help Matters Many visa refusals stem from misunderstandings of the legal process or the absence of key evidence. The UK immigration system is complex, and even minor mistakes can lead to major delays or denials. In this family's case, working with experienced immigration advisers made all the difference. They understood how to interpret and apply the immigration rules, handle the application process, and communicate with the Home Office. Their guidance strengthened the family's application and gave them peace of mind during a stressful time. If your visa has been refused and you're unsure how to proceed, seeking professional help can save you time, reduce stress, and increase your chances of success. Qualified immigration lawyers and advisers can: For families building a life in the UK and wanting to avoid disruptions in their stay, this support can be a valuable investment in long-term stability and peace of mind. Conclusion Immigration is often about building a family life and a future in a new country. This case study shows that rejection doesn't have to be the end of a hopeful family future. With the proper support, families can handle the UK immigration system successfully. If you're facing a challenge with your visa application, consider working with an immigration lawyer. Their help can make all the difference between rejection and approval. Media Contact Company Name: IAS Services Contact Person: John Davis Email: Send Email City: London Country: United Kingdom Website: Press Release Distributed by To view the original version on ABNewswire visit: IAS Services Helps Family Overcome UK Visa Rejection with Successful Appeal