NPA says overturned Cholota extradition will not affect Ace Magashule trial

IOL News

2 days ago

The National Prosecuting Authority is considering its options after Moroadi Cholota's extradition was overturned
Image: Supplied
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) said the judgment by the Bloemfontein High Court in upholding Moroadi Cholota's special plea of lack of jurisdiction will not impact the trial of the rest of the accused.
It will meanwhile consider its options, including possibly appealing against the judgment.
'The NPA will specifically consider options to appeal considering the potential impact of the judgment in respect of the case against Ms Cholota, and broader extradition processes,' NPA spokesperson Mthunzi Mhaga said.
He explained that it should be noted that this judgment has no bearing on the trial against the other accused that is expected to resume on Wednesday (June 4) as Cholota was an accused person and not a state witness.
The NPA remains confident in the strength of its case against the accused in this matter and is ready to proceed when the trial resumes.
'The members of the prosecuting team always acted with the highest standards of ethical conduct, guided by the evidence and information available at any given time,' Mhaga said.
The court found on Tuesday that it has no jurisdiction to try the former Free State premier Ace Magashule's personal assistant in the R255-million asbestos case, as her extradition from the United States of America was unlawful.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
The judge upheld her special plea regarding the asbestos removal tender following a trial-within-a trial to ascertain whether Cholota's extradition process by the South African authorities was done lawfully.
While a Free State director of Public Prosecutions applied for Cholota's extradition, Judge Philip Loubser found that this power lies with the Justice Minister and with the National Prosecuting Authority. Thus, he said, the extradition was not done lawfully and it is not valid.
'This court does not have the power to try you. You are free to leave,' the judge told Cholota. Cholota was one of the 18 accused in the high-profile trial where the accused are facing a host of charges relating to alleged fraud, corruption and money laundering. All of the accused had pleaded not guilty and vehemently denied any involvement in the allegations against them.
Cholota was studying in the USA at the time of her extradition and at first regarded as a state witness, before it was decided to add her as accused no 17 to the criminal trial. In challenging her extradition, Cholota claimed that the State had lied or misrepresented to the US authorities that there was a case for her to answer in South Africa.
In delivering his judgment, Judge Loubser said there was no need to go into these arguments, as he found the extradition process was wrong in law. The only two witnesses who testified during the extradition challenge were Hawks officials. The Cholota camp did not call any witnesses.