Ukrainian drone operators say fiber-optic and AI drones are rare but could radically change the fight because of how hard it is to defeat them
Ukraine's special drone unit Typhoon said it hasn't seen systematic application of these technologies.
But once they become widespread, they'll change drone warfare because they're hard to beat.
Constant intense electronic warfare in Russia's war against Ukraine has led to the rise of drones that are resistant to signal jamming. It's still early days, but these things could be game changers, drone operators say.
These fiber-optic and artificial intelligence-driven drones are not yet being widely used, a special Ukrainian drone unit told Business Insider, but once they become as prolific as some other technologies, they'll completely change how drone warfare is fought.
The war in Ukraine has been defined by the use of uncrewed vehicles, the majority of which rely on radio frequencies to maintain a connection with their operators. In response, both sides have employed electronic warfare capabilities able to jam drones and seize control from the operators or cut video feeds, leaving pilots flying blind.
Operators needed a way around electronic warfare.
Ukraine first documented the Russians using fiber-optic drones last spring. They became more prominent in the fall. These systems are guided by a hardwire cable similar to a US-made anti-tank TOW missile. The cable maintains a connection between the operator and drone, ensuring the system can't be jammed.
At the time, it was unclear if fiber-optic drones would be widely adopted as the next evolution in drone warfare, but it was clear they had promise. Drone experts and top war watchers assessed that they'd have useful applications in some environments and situations but probably weren't a catch-all solution. The cables could get caught or cut, for example, and the systems would have shorter ranges.
The development indicated that both Ukraine and Russia would continue coming up with new solutions.
As of now, Ukraine's special drone unit Typhoon doesn't see a systematic application of fiber-optic drones or systems controlled by AI, another adaptation to electronic warfare that is highly sought after but still experimental.
"However," Typhoon told Business Insider, "if widely adopted, these technologies would fundamentally change drone warfare."
Typhoon is a newer National Guard of Ukraine drone unit. Unveiled last fall, Typhoon consists of engineers and operators specialized in uncrewed systems. Right now, Typhoon operates a diverse range of uncrewed aerial systems, mostly supplied by the National Guard and domestic innovation outfits.
The unit's short-range reconnaissance drones, such as the first-person view DJI Mavic, are used for gathering intelligence, assessing targets, and guiding strikes. Its short-range strike drones are deployed for precision hits on enemy personnel, positions, and equipment, as well as against aerial targets.
Typhoon also operates bomber drones like HeavyShot and Vampire, which are mostly used at night because they're larger in size and easier to spot. Fixed-wing reconnaissance drones and strike drones are also often used for longer-range missions.
But the unit is also actively integrating emerging technologies, such as fiber-optic drones and "machine vision tracking with homing capabilities," which would help improve targeting. Each drone serves a specific purpose in missions, and part of Typhoon's mission is the training of operators for those specific skill sets.
With fiber-optic and AI-driven drones, the challenges for front-line forces will be even greater.
Both of these systems are harder to take down than the regular radio frequency drones because they are invulnerable to electronic warfare. A drone flown by an autonomous terminal guidance system, once locked onto its target, would still maintain its flight path even if it's jammed, effectively making it a fire-and-forget weapon.
Fiber-optic drones are a less-expensive, lower-tech solution, keeping a hard connection so that operators can ignore any electronic warfare and continue to fly the drone towards its target.
Typhoon said the options for destroying fiber-optic drones are relatively limited right now. Because they don't "rely on radio signals that can be detected by conventional electronic warfare systems," the unit said, "the only way to counter them is through timely visual detection and physical destruction."
Simply put, that means they have to see it and shoot it. The Ukrainians have deployed shotguns as a counter-drone tool. But they aren't always easy to detect, which means warfighters may have limited time to react for a kinetic kill.
These systems aren't seeing constant or consistent use just yet, but the Ukrainian forces have praised them for their accuracy and ease of use. Ukrainian and Western drone companies are now racing to churn them out.
Read the original article on Business Insider

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Apple's 10% Stock Pop: Time to Invest in the Technology Giant Embracing America?
Key Points Apple has increased its spending plans in the United States from $500 billion to $600 billion. There are positives and negatives to the announcement from an investor's perspective. Shares of Apple stock look expensive today relative to its growth rate. 10 stocks we like better than Apple › Investors are back on the Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) train. The stock of the multinational technology giant is still down slightly in 2025 but popped over 10% in the last week after management announced new planned spending in the U.S. CEO Tim Cook even visited the White House in a joint press conference with President Donald Trump to announce this new planned spending on components for the iPhone as well as other Apple products in America. It has helped the company achieve some breathing room around potential tariffs on semiconductors, iPhone components, and iPhones themselves getting imported to America. Apple's stock got its mojo back on this upsized spending news, but should you actually buy shares today? Here's what the numbers say. A $600 billion investment Earlier this year, Apple announced that it would spend $500 billion over the next four years in the United States. Last week, it upped its estimate to $600 billion, or $150 billion annually. This is different than a company's announced capital expenditure plans, such as when Amazon promises $100 billion in investments related to data centers and its delivery network. Apple is spending money with its suppliers, including advanced glass screens and various semiconductor manufacturers. It is more of an announcement around committed orders for products, which will spur demand for factory work in the United States. Apple is a sprawling company, and the announced spending will occur in all 50 states, impact 450,000 jobs, and involve 79 different factories. It is astounding how complex Apple's supply chain for the iPhone and other computing hardware is today. However, Apple is still not at the point of a "Made in America iPhone" as assembly and other services are performed in China and India, with Apple negotiating with the U.S. government around what is feasible to bring to the United States. Investors applauded the spending plans as a way to shy away from tariff risks on iPhone and semiconductor imports, which could have added huge costs to Apple's supply chain, damaging its profits. Now, it seems to be in good standing with the U.S. government and regulation authorities again. Does the announcement matter? In regard to tariffs, this spending announcement won't necessarily hurt the company, it just prevents Apple from having future cost increases across its supply chain. However, since the U.S. has higher salaries and labor standards, this investment may lead to higher input costs for product components, which could lead to margin compression. Apple's operating margin has steadily risen since the COVID-19 pandemic, hitting a record high of 32% over the last 12 months. Sourcing components in the United States may reverse this expansion. What matters more at the end of the day is demand for Apple's products. Last quarter, the company released solid figures for the three months ending in June. Total revenue grew just under 10% year over year, driven by services revenue and iPhone revenue growth. Even though the iPhone is almost 20 years old, it remains the bread and butter of Apple's business today. This puts the company in a tough spot. Even though the iPhone remains wildly popular, unit volumes have stagnated for years, meaning Apple is only able to grow revenue by increasing prices. This is not an ideal position to be in. Price increases may be necessary just to maintain profit margins in the future if input costs grow due to the Made-in-America investments. All in all, this announcement does matter. It just might be a negative for Apple's business, contrary to the stock's initial reaction. The truth about Apple stock There are a lot of arguments to be made -- both bearish and bullish -- for Apple stock. Bulls might say this is a fantastic brand with major lock-in effects along with a growing services division with strong profit margins. Bears may say that Apple's unit volumes for the iPhone have fallen with no new successful products coming down the pipeline. For example, the Apple Vision Pro has turned into a total product bust, likely losing the company billions if not tens of billions of dollars. A deciding factor in this debate could be the stock's valuation. Apple's price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) is 35. This is quite expensive for a business with low revenue growth. Compare that to Alphabet, which has grown its revenue significantly faster than Apple over the last few years but trades at a more reasonable P/E ratio of 22. Apple may be a great business, but that doesn't mean you should ignore the price you pay when analyzing its stock. Avoid buying shares of Apple after this post-announcement pop. Should you invest $1,000 in Apple right now? Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Brett Schafer has positions in Alphabet and Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, and Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Apple's 10% Stock Pop: Time to Invest in the Technology Giant Embracing America? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA (NVDA) Stock Gets Bullish Call Amid U.S.–China Chip Agreement Reports
NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the . On August 12, Bank of America reiterated the stock as 'Buy.' The firm said that it is sticking with the stock after reports of a favorable deal for Nvidia to receive chip export licenses. 'Busy period of interactions between the US Government (USG)/White House (WH) and major US chipmakers. The critical nature of semis is likely to enhance these interactions that will continue to be both positive and a headwind/source of volatility. Recent news involves: 15% potential tax/levy on sales of specific AI chips in return for China approvals: a net positive and we maintain Buys on NVDA, AMD.' Analysts on Wall Street currently have a consensus 'Buy' rating on the stock. The average price target of $190 implies a 5.10% upside; however, the Street-high target of $250 implies an upside of 38%. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) specializes in AI-driven solutions, offering platforms for data centers, self-driving cars, robotics, and cloud services. While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
4 Things That Will Vanish In 20 Years
Some goodbyes hurt more than others. I suspect some things will never die. You'll still see tree-killing junk mail in 2199. You'll still be checking your Facebook in 20 years — unless you uninstall it. The good news: some things are on the way out and we'll all be better off as a result. The war on spam calls has finally begun As usual, the US government has moved with the speed of an iceberg to react to a problem. But they are finally taking action. Mobile providers are required to implement a new anti-spam software called Shaken. It isn't a perfect or final solution. Yet it will slow down the avalanche of calls everyone gets. Yes, those annoying spammers will continue to find ways to circumvent it — but the writing is on the wall: spam calls are ending. Consumer demand has finally gotten the attention of regulators. It'll be 99% gone within 20 years, maybe even 10. You are legally entitled to $500 every time a spam caller calls you after you've asked them to stop calling. Additionally, don't listen to that 'Press x to be added to the Do Not Call list'. Spammers use that to determine if you are a human who will answer — then sell that information to other spammers. The death of Cable TV Older folks still love their cable TV but that will only sustain providers for so long. My local cable company has gone through two buyouts (and name changes) due to bankruptcy in the past 10 years. When I called to cancel my cable, my agent sounded so desperate. It was like the agent's manager was holding a gun to his head. 'S-s-s-s-ir…are…are you sure you want to cancel? H-h-how about a free month of HBO?' People are sick of watching eight minutes of ads for every three minutes of programming. They're tired of the disruptive, loud, head-trauma-inducing car commercials. Don't hold your breath if you think commercials are going away. Product placements are already infiltrating movies. Sometimes it's laughably obvious. The most blatant I've seen was in World War Z when, in the middle of running from zombies, Brad Pitt pauses to drink a Pepsi: I was waiting for Brad to smile at the camera and a Pepsi logo to flash on the screen. We'll still need to pay to escape commercials. I use YouTube Premium and it's easily my favorite add-on service (No. I wasn't paid to say this.) Every YouTube Star You follow The shelf life of an influencer is shorter than a pancake. For example, think of the YouTubers you followed a decade ago. I just thought of three and only one of them is still active — but just barely. Oddly enough, I sat in front of a famous YouTuber in a college class (I'm not naming him because I don't want to put him on blast). We even played Call of Duty together online once or twice a week. He had every opportunity to tell me he was YouTube famous but never did. I found out why when I stumbled across his already-dead channel. He had a famous channel with him and his girlfriend. It was one of those cutesy couple's vlog ('We Finally Moved in Together!!'). The channel was super feminine which is probably why he didn't tell me. As soon as they broke up, that gravy train crashed. His content mill broke and the followers all turned on him and blamed him for the breakup. Internet fame is fleeting. For all their controversy, Logan and Jake Paul made brilliant pivots into other venues. Both are making a fortune with 'professional' boxing. Logan now has a podcast that is wildly popular. And look — it isn't lost upon me that I'm in a similar predicament. I make my living by having visibility online and surviving the algorithm gauntlet. A platform is either dying or getting more competitive. To those like me, diversify and plan for your future. The tides of internet notoriety come and go without mercy. Ageism is even worse online than it is in the office. The vast majority of cryptocurrencies Crypto Bros are better at marketing their crypto than understanding its actual purpose. I know several people who have gone from crypto evangelists to complaining about losing money on those investments. These idiot collectives retweet each other's content to growth hack the algorithm. Then, millions of views later, a bunch of suckers to buy in. Crypto is a religion that spawns its insufferable zealots. The moment you say anything wrong about Poodlecoin, it summons a bunch of yappers to your comment section. Most of them aren't even in it because they believe in the product. It's all for a quick buck. Mark my words — 95% of these cryptos will be gone or flirting with zero in 20 years. There will be a trail of tears along the way. The moment regulators drop the hammer, it's going to smash half of these junk currencies. Invest in an index fund. I will continue to pound the war-drum: buy the S&P 500 Index fund. If you'd bought $8000 in 1980, it'd be worth $1,000,000 today. By the time randoms are telling you to buy something, it is already too late. Recap for memory: things going away in two decades Spam calls. If they aren't gone in 10, I'm starting a political party to end them. Most YouTubers (Content creators — diversify). Cable TV as we know it. Most cryptocurrencies, with a few survivors taking the spoils. Solve the daily Crossword