logo
Bill Maher drops bomb about his political affiliation: ‘I never was a Democrat'

Bill Maher drops bomb about his political affiliation: ‘I never was a Democrat'

New York Post6 hours ago

Bill Maher says he never left the Democratic Party because he was never there to begin with.
'I never was a Democrat to begin with,' Maher said during his 'Club Random' podcast released on Saturday with his guest, actor Esai Morales. 'I always like caucus with the Democrats and I generally vote for them,' the comedian added.
But Maher said that he is anticipating the day when the Democratic Party will be as 'insane' as the Republican Party.
'I think, always vote for them, but I always look at it and like no, I'm gonna actually make up my mind, they just always are less scary and insane than the Republicans, but I wait for the day when it evens out,' Maher said.
He added that, 'We're approaching that because they have gotten crazier, and that's a lot of what you're referencing. But I never said I left the party 'cause I wasn't there to begin with.'
Earlier in the discussion, Morales, who stars in the new 'Mission: Impossible' movie, had said he heard Maher say that the Democratic Party had 'left' him.
Maher corrected him, saying he 'didn't say that,' and Morales was 'conflating what people have said in the past about leaving parties – I know me better than you – you're putting a title on something that somewhat accurately expresses my point of view.'
4 Bill Maher claimed on his 'Club Random' podcast that he has never officially been a Democrat.
YouTube/Club Random Podcast
4 Maher said he believes Democrats to be 'less scary and insane than the Republicans' — but anticipates the parties will even out.
NBAE via Getty Images
Maher has become increasingly critical of the Democratic Party.
On Friday, he said that Democrats need to 'do something' about 'The View,' and called out Whoopi Goldberg when she said that life for Black Americans is the same as the plight Iranian women face living under their country's regime.
Maher also recently agreed with Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., who said that Democrats' defense of the Los Angeles anti-ICE protests would be 'good for Trump.'
4 Maher previously agreed with Sen. John Fetterman that Democrats' reaction to the LA riots would help Trump.
Youtube/ Real Time with Bill Maher
'When they see it in a campaign ad, when they see the guy with the Mexican flag and the Waymo burning behind him, it's going to be good for Trump,' Maher said.
During Maher's podcast on Saturday, Morales said that he agreed with Maher's affection for the term 'woke supremacist.'
'This is brilliant. Somebody is a woke supremacist pretending to be all, what's the word, tolerant, and they're the most intolerant sometimes… and they want to cancel people at the drop of a hat, like that's somebody's living relax,' Morales said.
4 Maher made the claims on an episode with 'Mission: Impossible' actor Esai Morales.
YouTube/Club Random Podcast
Morales said he has 'always identified with the Democratic Party and I still identify as a liberal at heart,' adding that his 'definition of liberal is someone who wants to change the status quo for the better.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dermot Mulroney Pulls The Cord On 14-Year Marriage With Money Move
Dermot Mulroney Pulls The Cord On 14-Year Marriage With Money Move

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dermot Mulroney Pulls The Cord On 14-Year Marriage With Money Move

Dermot Mulroney's marriage life is getting a serious shake-up. The actor has officially filed to end his 14-year marriage to his wife, Prima Apollinaare, and he is not leaving any stone unturned when it comes to finances. Dermot Mulroney and Prima Apollinaare tied the knot in 2008 and are parents to two daughters. The actor was previously married to actress Catherine Keener before their split in 2007. The American actor beelined it to court with one intention only- to call it quits on his union with Apollinaare. Mulroney also requested that the court order his estranged wife to pay him spousal support, but he wants to prevent her from requesting such support from him. The TV star reportedly filled in the blanks for the standard dissolution of marriage. He is currently sharing custody of their two minor kids with his estranged wife. However, TMZ reports that child support and custody talks are lurking in the shadows of their divorce. As for their mailing address, the pair reportedly still shares the same Sherman Oaks address. When the singer and Mulroney initially met, she went by the name Tharita Cutulle. According to PEOPLE, by 2015, the songwriter filed to change her name to Prima Apollinaare officially. She refused to disclose her reason for this name change, but her estranged husband seemingly got with the program when he addressed his estranged wife by her new name, "Prima," in various interviews. In their professional life, Apollinaare and her ex have collaborated on a few visual projects together. The singer was also listed as a producing partner for Mulroney's 2010 biopic, which he directed. The former couple also shares a familiar sense of humor. For Mulroney, his first name always poses a problem for people, as they usually misspell or mispronounce it. Although Mulroney won hearts for his acting prowess, he carried a burning passion for making music, just like his estranged wife. Apollinaare began her career as a solo artist in 2017 and released the music video for her debut single, "Stand Up for Love," on YouTube in December of that year. Since then, Apollinaare has added one album, two EPs, and several singles to her music catalog on Spotify. Mulroney has tried his hand at music and even succeeded while at it. In 2023, the actor spoke about his reality as a professional cellist who had performed in an orchestra for several film projects. His resume includes "Planet of the Apes" and a few movies from the "Mission Impossible" franchise. The actor starred in the 1997 flick "My Best Friend's Wedding" alongside Julia Roberts, Rupert Everett, and Cameron Diaz. While the movie performed well at the box office, Mulroney claimed it spelled doom for his career for a year. Hollywood Reporter shared that the actor confessed he was waiting for the big roles to come his way due to the movie's popularity, but nothing materialized for a long time. "I chalked it up to me being so tiny on the poster, the little guy on the cake. I thought, gosh, you guys, if you'd made me a little bigger, maybe I could have gotten a job," Mulroney explained his coping mechanism for that period in his life. The star eventually bounced back from his trying time and went on to play more roles in other big projects. The 61-year-old began his illustrious acting career in the 1980, making his mark with movies such as "Young Guns," "Longtime Companion," and "Where The Day Takes You." His role in "My Best Friend's Wedding" introduced him to a broader audience and established him as a figure in Hollywood. He subsequently appeared in other projects such as "About Schmidt" and "Zodiac," among others. He was nominated for a Screen Actors Guild Award in the Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture category for his role in "August: Osage County" in 2013. In 1992, the actor won the Best Actor Award for his role in "Where The Day Takes You" at the Seattle International Film Festival. Will Dermot Mulroney and Prima Apollinaare's divorce get messy?

Senate Democrats hunker down ahead of war powers confrontation
Senate Democrats hunker down ahead of war powers confrontation

Axios

time40 minutes ago

  • Axios

Senate Democrats hunker down ahead of war powers confrontation

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said he and his colleagues want to see what comes out of their classified briefing Tuesday before scheduling a vote on his war powers resolution, which could come as soon as Wednesday. Why it matters: The procedural vote will allow Democrats to register their objections to President Trump's strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities. But it will also put pro-Israel Democrats in a potentially difficult position. A vote will force them to choose between their party's base, which distrusts Trump, and their deeply-held policy positions. Trump announced an Iran-Israel ceasefire on Monday, and told Congress that he ordered the strike against Iran under his constitutional authority. Democrats, and even some Republicans, argue the president needed to seek approval from the Capitol first. What they are saying:"I think everybody wants to get this briefing tomorrow afternoon," Kaine told Axios. "It's one thing to launch some bombs, but the next thing is: How do you predict what's going to happen next?" Kaine told Axios. Driving the news: The vote would also serve as a foreign policy interlude from the Senate's main business of the week, passing their version of Trump's " one big, beautiful bill." In the House, there's a bipartisan war powers resolution by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), to restrict the president's ability to escalate in Iran. "This is not Constitutional," Massie said on X over the weekend. Allies of Trump are accelerating their efforts to defeat him in a primary. Zoom out: Some Democrats, like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), are seething over Trump's unilateral actions against Iran, which administration officials say was a success and has led to a ceasefire. There is also broader concern in the party that top Democrats were essentially left in the dark about the strikes and didn't receive the kind of notification they expect before the U.S. military engages in hostilities. Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrats on the Senate and House Intelligence panels, weren't briefed before the attack, sources familiar told Axios on Saturday.

Republicans order key panel to score extension of Trump tax cuts as budget neutral
Republicans order key panel to score extension of Trump tax cuts as budget neutral

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans order key panel to score extension of Trump tax cuts as budget neutral

Senate Republicans have directed the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) to score the cost of extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts as a continuation of current policy that would not add significantly to federal deficits, which would allow them to make those tax rates permanent. The joint panel on taxation, which projects the deficit impact of all tax bills, scored the extension of 26 provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as a continuation of 'current policy' and therefore budget neutral, which dramatically lowers the projected cost of President Trump's megabill. In a score released Saturday, the JCT projects tax-related provisions of the Republican bill as adding $441.5 billion to the deficit over the next decade, instead of the $4 trillion that Democrats say would be the projected cost of the tax provisions if they were scored on a 'current law' baseline. Much of the 2017 tax law, including a reduction in individual income tax rates, is due to expire at the end of 2025. 'Republicans finally showed their hand, and it's completely dishonest. 'Current policy baseline' is a budget gimmick that is nothing more than smoke and mirrors instead of honest accounting. This bill will add trillions upon trillions of dollars to the national debt to fund tax breaks for billionaires — while Republicans want everyone to think it adds zero,' said Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the ranking member of the Budget Committee. 'Republicans who claim to care about fiscal responsibility should be outraged and doing everything they can to stop it. This is the Great Betrayal of working families where families lose, and billionaires win,' Merkley said. Senate Republicans have argued for months that Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has authority under the 1974 Budget and Impoundment Control Act to determine the baseline for scoring the budget reconciliation bill. Republicans argue that Congress has used an asymmetrical system for scoring spending bills and tax bills in recent decades, as extensions of spending authorizations are often scored as extensions of current policy and therefore as budget neutral, while extensions of expiring tax law are scored as adding to the deficit. Democrats could challenge the Republicans' use of a 'current policy' baseline to score the extension of the expiring 2017 tax cuts as a violation of the Byrd Rule. The Byrd Rule states that changes in law that increase the deficit for fiscal years beyond the 10-year budget window are subject to a 60-vote point-of-order objection. If the parliamentarian rules that scoring the extension of the 2017 tax cuts as largely budget neutral in the years beyond 2034 would be a violation of the Byrd Rule, Republicans may have to vote to override the parliamentarian or rewrite the bill. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store