Bestselling mystery novel ‘Listen for the Lie' is coming to TV
Universal will adapt the thriller novel into a drama series of the same name, the studio announced Sunday at the L.A. Times Festival of Books.
Author Amy Tintera's bestseller, published last March, follows Lucy on her quest to solve best friend Savvy's murder, in which she is the prime suspect. The TV series, written by Rachel Shukert ('Nine Perfect Strangers,' 'The Baby-Sitters Club') and executive produced by Tintera, Shukert and Dinner Party Productions' Sue Naegle and Ali Krug ('Pam & Tommy'), is in development at UCP, a division of Universal Studio Group.
At the start of the novel, it's been five years since Lucy was found wandering the streets covered in her best friend Savvy's blood shortly after she was murdered. After moving to L.A. to start a new life, Lucy is forced to revisit her small Texas hometown — and the circumstances of Savvy's death — when the host of the hit true crime podcast 'Listen for the Lie' makes the case the focus of his next investigation.
Tintera, Naegle, Shukert and Jordan Moblo, the executive vice president of creative acquisitions and IP management at Universal Studio Group, first announced the project Sunday at the L.A. Times Festival of Books, where the group joined The Times' Matt Brennan for a panel discussion about book-to-TV adaptation titled 'A Novel Approach to a Television Series.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jurassic World Rebirth studio Universal Pictures is cracking down on AI in a big way with a warning threatening legal action at the end of all its new movies
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Universal Pictures is continuing its crackdown on generative AI with new messaging, threatening legal action against anyone who uses its movies to train AI systems, at the end of all its new movies. The legal warning says Universal's movies "may not be used to train AI" and appears during the end credits of its releases. "This motion picture is protected under the laws of the United States and other countries," the warning reads. "Unauthorized duplication, distribution or exhibition may result in civil liability and criminal prosecution." Per The Hollywood Reporter, Universal thinks that "the worldwide insertion of the language adds another layer of protection against the theft of its movies for data mining and AI training purposes." The messaging has appeared at the end of Universal's biggest releases of the summer: How to Train Your Dragon, Jurassic World Rebirth, and The Bad Guys 2. Universal recently teamed up with Disney to sue AI company Midjourney, and the two studios called AI a "bottomless pit of plagiarism". An NBCUniversal spokesperson said that the company was suing the company to "protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us and the significant investment we make in our content." Just last month, Amazon backed a new AI service, Showrunner, that uses material from existing TV shows to allow users to create their own episodes. The CEO of Fable, the company behind the software, said that "Hollywood streaming services are about to become two-way entertainment." For more on what to watch, check out our guide to the best upcoming movies still to come in 2025. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Universal Adds ‘No AI Training' Warnings to Films as Midjourney Claims ‘Fair Use'
American film studio Universal Pictures has begun warning AI companies not to use its movies for training by adding legal notices to film credits stating that the content "may not be used to train AI." The warning, which has appeared on recent releases including "How to Train Your Dragon" and "Jurassic World Rebirth,' is part of Hollywood's efforts to protect copyrighted content from AI training, according to The Hollywood Reporter. The move comes as AI image generator Midjourney mounted its first response against accusations of "vast, intentional, and unrelenting copyright infringement" brought by major Hollywood studios like Disney and Universal in June. The lawsuit alleged Midjourney systematically violated copyright by enabling users to create unauthorized reproductions of iconic characters from Star Wars, Marvel superheroes, and Disney animated films. Midjourney claims 'fair use' Midjourney challenged the studios on multiple fronts, first disputing claims about AI training, in the 43-page court filing. "Copyright law does not confer absolute control over the use of copyrighted works," the filing says. "The limited monopoly granted by copyright must give way to fair use, which safeguards countervailing public interests in the free flow of ideas and information." Disney, Universal, DreamWorks Sue Midjourney, Call It a 'Bottomless Pit of Plagiarism' The San Francisco-based company pointed to recent federal court rulings supporting AI training as 'transformative fair use,' citing decisions in cases where authors sued Meta and Anthropic over alleged unauthorized use of their books to train AI models. 'Many dozens of Midjourney subscribers are associated with Plaintiffs' corporate email addresses," the filing notes, suggesting Disney and Universal employees actively use the service they're suing over. The company also noted that Midjourney is popular among visual effects companies working directly for the plaintiff studios. "Plaintiffs cannot have it both ways, seeking to profit—through their use of Midjourney and other generative AI tools—from industry-standard AI training practices on the one hand, while on the other hand accusing Midjourney of wrongdoing for the same," the response added. 'Training on large datasets has been standard practice, but now the industry is being forced to rethink what counts as fair use,' Midhun Krishna M, MLOps engineer at Juno AI, told Decrypt. 'If any visual similarity is treated as infringement, it risks setting a precedent that could restrict how all generative AI tools are built and used,' he added. The filing quotes Disney CEO Bob Iger's recent comments praising AI as an "invaluable tool for artists" to bolster its case that studios benefit from the same technology they're attacking in court. Indian Production Company Faces Backlash for Releasing AI Altered Film Without Director's Consent Midjourney noted that generating images with popular characters can serve legitimate purposes, including "non-commercial fan art, experimentation and ideation, and social commentary and criticism." The AI firm also said the studios failed to follow proper takedown procedures under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, making broad claims instead of identifying specific images and URLs. The studios have not yet responded to Midjourney's filing. The case comes amid rising AI use in entertainment, with streaming service Netflix recently saying it used generative AI to speed up a building collapse scene in the Argentine series "The Eternaut." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Materialists review: Pedro Pascal and Dakota Johnson explore modern love
Just in case you haven't had enough of Pedro Pascal after The Last of Us, Fantastic Four and the forthcoming Eddington, the in-demand A-lister forms one corner of a very glamorous love triangle in romantic drama Materialists. Dakota Johnson plays Lucy, a single New Yorker who makes a great living as a professional matchmaker, pairing 'high-value' individuals based on their physical and financial attributes. Her scientific approach to love is rooted in an upbringing that left her fearful of poverty – something that ended her previous relationship. Her ex, broke actor John (Chris Evans), re-enters her life just as she begins dating Harry (Pascal), whose wealth and attention are everything she wants on paper. But an incident at work makes her question her entire outlook on love. The synopsis might sound like the setup for a cut-and-paste romantic comedy – a cynical matchmaker caught between two hunks – but happily, director Celine Song is aiming for something more grown-up. Her stunning debut, 2023's Past Lives, explored the idea of romantic kismet and soulmates. She returns to similar territory here, asking whether true love is something intangible – and if so, how do we know when we find it? There's a healthy degree of cynicism in the storytelling, but not where you might expect. Rather than tearing down the idea of true love to appear subversive, the film instead questions those who believe a life partner can be found through a checklist of 'must-haves'. While Johnson's sharp Manhattanite initially presents her system as perfectly reasonable, the idea of picking a potential partner like one would choose a new car gradually begins to feel absurd. Yet no one is mocked – every character gets a chance to express their feelings, building a vision of romance that doesn't rely on tired tropes. Johnson makes Lucy's weaknesses as compelling as her strengths, portraying someone whose past makes her crave security over spark. She's the perfect lead for Song, whose previous film favoured quiet, intense emotion over theatrics – and she shares genuine chemistry with both leading men. Star of the moment Pascal oozes class as the financier whose goals appear to align with Lucy's, while Evans has scruffy charm as the broke ex who loves her deeply. It may be obvious early on whom Lucy belongs with, but the joy lies in the emotional journey. Materialists ends quite neatly, but its mature take on the more vapid side of dating is nuanced enough to make that conclusion satisfying. Once again, Song explores the quiet, honest corners of the heart to share a message that is anything but superficial. • Materialists is in cinemas from 15 August
