logo
How Donald Trump is exploiting tensions in Los Angeles to toughen his immigration policy

How Donald Trump is exploiting tensions in Los Angeles to toughen his immigration policy

LeMonde10 hours ago

Donald Trump decided, on the evening of June 7, to deploy the National Guard in response to highly localized scenes of urban violence in two cities in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, in a calculated and premeditated overreaction, a legally questionable one with unpredictable consequences. The controversial move allowed the president to bypass the Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, leading to the deployment of the first 300 soldiers on Sunday, June 8, to proactively protect federal buildings.
On Sunday, several gatherings – initially peaceful, later marred by a few clashes – took place in the city and on Highway 101 amid heightened tensions. The narrative sought by the White House was clear: federal order versus chaos, with the pursuit of undocumented migrants hampered by what it called lax Democratic officials and extremist rioters. "They spit, we hit," Trump summed up on Sunday. The blunt phrase was intended to convey toughness, but it also underscored how the real threat was being exaggerated in the social media echo chamber, despite dramatic footage of driverless Waymo taxis set on fire and covered in graffiti.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dozens held after Trump-ordered immigration raids in Los Angeles
Dozens held after Trump-ordered immigration raids in Los Angeles

France 24

time2 hours ago

  • France 24

Dozens held after Trump-ordered immigration raids in Los Angeles

06:33 09/06/2025 LA immigration raid protests intensify after Trump deploys National Guard Americas 09/06/2025 Trump's travel ban: Citizens from 12 countries barred entry to US Americas 09/06/2025 Los Angeles: Residents protest Donald Trump's immigration policies Americas 09/06/2025 LA immigration raid protests intensify after Trump deploys National Guard Americas 09/06/2025 Protests intensify in Los Angeles after Trump deploys National Guard Americas 09/06/2025 Protests intensify in LA: Governor compares Trump to 'a dictator' Americas 08/06/2025 Colombian senator in critical condition after being shot, suspect arrested Americas 08/06/2025 Trump sends military force to LA: 'The knives are out' between federal and state govt Americas 08/06/2025 Colombian senator and presidential hopeful shot and wounded at rally Americas

What is the high seas treaty?
What is the high seas treaty?

France 24

time3 hours ago

  • France 24

What is the high seas treaty?

The treaty was adopted by UN member states in June 2023. It has been ratified by 31 nations plus the European Union, and comes into force 120 days after its 60th ratification. But at the UN Ocean Conference this week, hosts France said around 50 countries have ratified the pact, bringing it within reach of enactment. The United States signed the treaty in 2023 under Joe Biden but is not expected to ratify it while Donald Trump is president. Here are the key points of the treaty text: International waters The treaty covers international waters, which fall outside the jurisdiction of any single state, and account for more than 60 percent of the world's oceans. Specifically, it applies to waters beyond countries' exclusive economic zones, which extend up to 200 nautical miles from the coast. It also covers what is known as "the Area", shorthand for seabed and subsoil beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. The Area comprises just over half of the planet's seabed. Once enacted, a decision-making body -- a Conference of the Parties (COP) -- would have to work with regional and global organizations that already oversee different aspects of the oceans. These include regional fisheries bodies and the International Seabed Authority, the arena where nations are hotly contesting a proposed set of rules to govern deep-sea mining. Trump's decision to sidestep the authority -- to which the US is not a member -- and issue deep-sea mining permits in international waters has raised tricky questions of jurisdiction. Marine protected areas Currently, almost all protected marine areas (MPAs) are within national territorial waters. The treaty, however, allows for these reserves to be created in the open ocean. Most decisions would be taken by a consensus of the COP, but an MPA can be voted into existence with a three-quarters majority, to prevent deadlock caused by a single country. One crucial shortcoming: the text does not say how these conservation measures will be monitored and enforced over remote swathes of the ocean -- a task that will fall to the COP. Some experts say satellites could be used to spot infractions. Individual countries are already responsible for certain activities on the high seas that they have jurisdiction over, such as those of ships flying their flags. Sharing the bounty? On the high seas, countries and entities under their jurisdiction will be allowed to collect animal, plant, or microbial matter whose genetic material might prove useful, even commercially. Scientists, for example, have discovered molecules with the potential to treat cancer or other diseases in microbes scooped up in sediment, or produced by sponges or marine mollusks. Benefits-sharing of those resources has been a key point of contention between wealthy and poorer nations. The treaty establishes frameworks for the transfer of marine research technologies to developing countries and a strengthening of their research capacities, as well as open access to data. But it's left to the COP to decide exactly how any monetary benefits will eventually be shared, with options including a system based on specific commercialized products, or more generalized payment systems. Environmental impact studies The treaty requires signatories to assess the environmental impacts of planned activities under their control on the high seas before they are authorized in instances when such activities may have more than a minor or transitory effect. It also calls for countries to assess the potential impact on international waters of activities within national jurisdictions that may cause "substantial pollution" or harm the high sea marine environment. Ultimately, states are responsible for giving the green light to any potentially harmful activity -- a role NGOs hoped would go to the COP, to make controversial approvals more difficult. The treaty also requires states to publish updates on an activity's environmental impacts. Approvals can be called into question if unanticipated impacts arise. Though they are not specifically listed in the treaty, activities that could come under regulation include transport and fishing, as well as more controversial subjects such as deep-sea mining or even geo-engineering initiatives to mitigate global warming. © 2025 AFP

NATO Chief Rutte to call for 'quantum leap' in defence spending
NATO Chief Rutte to call for 'quantum leap' in defence spending

Euronews

time7 hours ago

  • Euronews

NATO Chief Rutte to call for 'quantum leap' in defence spending

NATO Chief Mark Rutte will tell members that a "quantum leap" in collective security is necessary as he meets UK leader Keir Starmer in London on Monday. The secretary-general of the military alliance is expected to renew calls for member states to swiftly boost defence spending in response to mounting global threats, particularly from Russia A "400% increase in air and missile defences" and thousands more armoured vehicles and shells are needed to maintain deterrence and defence, according to excerpts of Rutte's speech released by NATO. "We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies" Rutte is expected to say. Rutte will meet Starmer at Downing Street ahead of a NATO summit in the Netherlands where the alliance's 32 member countries are expected to commit to a huge hike in military spending. The alliance's leader has proposed a target of 3.5% of each countries GDP on military spending and another 1.5% on "defence-related expenditure" such as bridges, airfields, sea ports and roads. Rutte's proposed new target would deliver on longstanding demands made by US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly criticised the alliance's 2% goal as inadequate. NATO's current target, agreed at a summit in 2014, is 2% of GDP. Currently, 22 of the 32 member countries meet or exceed the current target. Only Poland exceeds the 3.5% target at 4.32%. The US defence budget, the largest in the alliance, amounts to 3.4% of its GDP. A majority of NATO member countries have recently signalled plans to bolster their defence capabilities in response to Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine and mounting pressure from US President Donald Trump for European allies to take greater responsibility for their own security. In the UK, Starmer has pledged to hike the country's defence spending to 2.5% of its GDP, and an additional 3% by 2034. Last week, the UK government unveiled a plan to build 12 new attack submarines and six ammunition factories, marking the most sweeping overhaul of British defences in more than three decades. Germany has also pledged a substantial increase in military spending for 2025. Its parliament recently approved a constitutional amendment exempting defence spending exceeding 1% of GDP from the country's debt-brake, a move enabling significantly more investment from a nation historically hesitant to be a leader in European military spending. A total of 27 were arrested in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday as thousands of protesters took to the streets in response to US President Donald Trump's ICE raids and deployment of National Guard troops. At least 10 people were detained during scuffles between police officers and demonstrators in downtown Los Angeles, LAPD Police Chief Jim McDonnell said during a news conference Sunday evening local time. Decrying the escalation of violence as "disgusting", McDonnell said Molotov cocktails, fireworks, rocks and other objects were being used to target officers. "It's escalated now since the beginning of this incident," McDonnell said, calling the protests "increasingly worse and more violent." Another 17 were arrested by the California Highway Patrol, clearing protesters from busy highways. Separately, around 60 people were detained on Sunday in the city of San Francisco following a protest outside the Immigration Services building that turned violent. Hundreds had gathered outside the building to rally against the agency's raids and deportations across California as ordered by the Trump administration. The initially peaceful protest escalated into a tense standoff with San Francisco police officers wearing riot gear, according to local media reports. Another 29 people were also apprehended on Saturday, adding to the tally of 56 arrested in Los Angeles over the weekend in connection with the protests. Sunday's skirmishes in Los Angeles were sparked by protests that began on Friday after it emerged Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers were carrying out raids across the city in predominantly Hispanic neighbourhoods. Trump has ramped up immigration raids during his tenure, asking federal agents last month to arrest 3,000 people a day. Under his directive, ICE officials are allowed to locate, detain and deport illegal immigrants living in the US. Tensions escalated and protests became increasingly violent as demonstrators took to the streets in response to the deployment of some 300 National Guard soldiers, blocking off a major freeway and setting fire to self-driving cars. Police officers used tear gas, rubber bullets and flash bangs to try to quell the unrest. California Governor Gavin Newsom has requested Trump remove the guard troops in a letter Sunday afternoon, calling their deployment a "serious breach of state sovereignty.' His comments were echoed by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, who said the escalation of violence on Sunday was "provoked" by the Trump administration's use of National Guard troops, who are typically deployed in exceptional circumstances. In response, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said it is a "bald-faced lie for Newsom to claim there was no problem in Los Angeles before President Trump got involved." Trump himself has insisted the troops are necessary and demanded that additional Marine units be deployed to the area in response to the unrest. "Looking really bad in LA. Bring in the troops," the US president posted on his Truth Social platform on Sunday. About 500 Marines are stationed at Twentynine Palms, close to Los Angeles, where they were in a 'prepared to deploy status' Sunday afternoon, according to the US Northern Command.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store