Kids could be breathing in plasticizer chemicals from their mattresses, new study suggests
Babies and children up to age four could be breathing in plasticizers and other chemicals from their mattresses while they sleep, a Canadian study suggests.
Federal regulations set limits on some phthalates or plasticizers, which are substances added to products to make them more flexible.
Miriam Diamond, an environmental chemist at the University of Toronto, and her team designed an experiment to estimate how much of the compounds are released into a child's sleeping area from 16 different mattresses.
In Tuesday's issue of the journal Environmental Science & Technology, the researchers reported that two of the mattresses tested did not comply with Canadian regulations for two phthalates and two plasticizers in consumer products.
The regulations are based on potential harm to human health and the environment. For instance, when babies are exposed to phthalates in house dust, studies suggest it is associated with higher risk of asthma.
Miriam Diamond cuts a sample of a mattress in the laboratory at University of Toronto. (Kemeisha McDonald/University of Toronto)
Diamond said she was motivated to try to understand the impact of the chemicals on kids, given that babies sleep up to 18 hours a day.
"They're in intimate contact with their mattress in that sleeping environment," Diamond said in an interview. "Kids inhale 10 times more air than adults, so that gives the opportunity to be exposed to airborne chemicals a lot more than adults."
The study did not include brand names, but the researchers said mattresses were purchased for $50 to $105 from leading retail stores in Canada.
Mitigation measures suggested
Diamond's lab has previously reported on how children can be exposed to phthalates and plasticizers by inhaling them, absorbing them through the skin, ingesting dust or by putting their hands, clothes and toys in their mouth.
The researchers said the chemicals found in mattresses are known to be associated with developmental and hormonal disorders.
Diamond suggested that parents wash bedding and pyjamas frequently, since they are protective barriers from mattresses, and cut back on the number of items on children's beds, like toys.
The researchers also suggested manufacturers improve the oversight of their products so they comply with regulations and their own product certifications. They should also improve manufacturing practices to minimize unintentional contamination, and to only use such chemicals when necessary.
Specifically, the researchers found one mattress contained high levels of tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate, or TCEP, which has been prohibited from use in Canada since 2014 and is considered a carcinogen.
Chris Carlsten, a medicine professor at the University of British Columbia, has studied how phthalates can harm human airways.
"These are chemicals I think we all should justifiably not want to have in these mattresses of children," said Carlsten, who was not involved with the latest research.
He called the recommendation to use non-toxic bedding and clothing "wise," adding that holds for adults, as well.
Children are more susceptible given their developing bodies, Carlsten noted.
Health Canada said it is carefully reviewing the findings and other available information to identify any risks to human health or non-compliance with legislative or regulatory requirements, and that it will "take appropriate action to protect people in Canada."
Funding for the research was provided by a University of Toronto Fellowship and Ontario Graduate Scholarship and by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.\
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
AIDS 5K Walk/Run cancelled due to wildfire smoke
LIVERPOOL, N.Y. (WSYR-TV) — The Canadian wildfire smoke in Central New York has caused the AIDS 5K Walk/Run to be cancelled. The run was originally scheduled for Sunday, June 8, 2025 at Onondaga Lake Park in Liverpool at the Saw Mill Creek Shelter. The decision to cancel the event was made because the air quality at this level can affect sensitive groups and others, especially during physical activity. The Air Quality Alert for Central New York will last until Sunday, 11:59 June 8. Organizers will share more information in the coming days. If anyone who has already registered for the event wishes to request a refund, they can contact klowe@ Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists shaken by alarming discovery inside collapsing bee colonies — here's what they found
The honey bee population continues to decline at an alarming rate, putting our access to food at risk. Neonicotinoid pesticides negatively impact honey bee health, as the chemicals have been found to slow the insect's ability to forage pollen, according to a study from Environmental Science and Technology. While the pesticide doesn't immediately increase bee mortality rates, the researchers stated that pollen foraging is crucial to brood development; thus, decreased foraging impacts colony health. Meanwhile, the honey bee colonies continue to shrink, so any threat to colony health exacerbates this issue. In March, Washington State University researchers found that commercial honey bee colony losses in the U.S. could reach 60-70% in 2025. Bees are one of our most important pollinators, meaning they fertilize our plants and crops. Without them, about 35% of global crop production is at risk, according to the World Economic Forum. As crop yields become more unpredictable due to rising temperatures causing extreme weather, declining bee populations further impact our global food supply chain. These environmental stressors have led to scarce harvests, which can lead to high costs at the grocery store and decreased access to our favorite ingredients. Beyond assisting the global agricultural industry, bees are critical to our diverse ecosystem because they help pollinate plants and flowers that beautify our communities. We may not be able to stop declining bee populations overnight, but there are ways we can combat the issue at both a mass scale and an individual level. The University of Georgia Bee Program has suggestions for food growers to protect pollinators, including tips for strategically timing the use of certain pesticides so that bees are less likely to be exposed to them or using less toxic pesticides. In an article for the Tahoe Daily Tribune, Cal Orey, an author who has interviewed beekeepers about colony collapses, also pointed to the importance of supporting researchers working to protect our bees. Individuals can also ensure that their yards and gardens are friendly to pollinators. This can be done by avoiding pesticides, growing flowering native plants, and providing hydration for bees, just to name a few examples. Which of these groups has the biggest role to play in reducing food waste? Grocery stores Restaurants Individuals The government Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Spending Review to include £86bn science and tech package
An £86bn package for the science and technology sector will help fund research into drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries, the government has said ahead of Wednesday's Spending Review. The package also includes up to £500m for regions across the UK with local leaders having a say on how it is spent, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, whose review will outline day-to-day departmental and investment budgets over the next few years, said investing in the sector would create jobs and boost security. But research backers have warned that the government needs to do more to secure the UK's reputation for science on the world stage. Spending Review: Massive cheques from the chancellor for some - but what do totals hide? Reeves admits some will lose out in spending review Spending Review: When is it and what might Rachel Reeves announce? Reeves will set out departmental spending plans on Wednesday, with the package for science and technology expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by 2029. DSIT said "every corner of the country" would benefit, with communities able to direct funding to expertise specific to their areas. In Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery. Northern Ireland will receive money to develop defence equipment, while south Wales will use the money to design microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The chancellor said: "Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the plan for change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off." Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the Institute of Physics, welcomed the funding but said the government would need to commit to a decade-long plan to train workers. "This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy," he said. John-Arne Rottingen, chief executive of Britain's biggest non-governmental research funder Wellcome, warned that visa costs for scientists from overseas, financial challenges at universities and a budget that was not adjusted for inflation could hamper the government's ambitions. "The UK should be aiming to lead the G7 in research intensity, to bring about economic growth and the advances in health, science and technology that benefit us all." The shadow technology secretary, Alan Mak, said the investment for the sector seemed to be a "copy and paste" of Conservative plans set out in its manifesto last year. "As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back," he added. Earlier this week, Reeves admitted that not every government department would "get everything they want" in Wednesday's review, saying she had turned down requests from ministers and argued a squeeze on funding was a "product of economic reality". Reeves said her fiscal rules on borrowing to pay for public services were "non-negotiable" and insisted they were necessary because of "Conservative maltreatment" of the economy. The Treasury said earlier this year that the chancellor's fiscal rules would ensure day-to-day spending was matched by tax revenues, meaning the government would only borrow to invest. Big chunks will go to favoured departments, with suggestions of an extra £30 billion for the NHS over three years. Whitehall insiders have told the BBC they expect the spending review will be "ugly", and that ministers have been fighting over winning small amounts of cash for their respective departments.