Globe New Hampshire wins 6 New Hampshire Press Association editorial awards
Get N.H. Morning Report
A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Spot News reporting
Advertisement
As protests roiled college campuses, students at Dartmouth and UNH set up tents and joined the fray. Steven Porter and Amanda Gokee
Advertisement
Health reporting
The Northeast has the second highest percentage of hospital-owned practices in the country, with nearly 46 percent of physicians employed by hospitals, according to the Physicians Advocacy Institute. But unlike other New England states, lawmakers in New Hampshire haven't taken action to curtail facility fees by enacting consumer or public notice requirements. Amanda Gokee
Political reporting
Steven Porter won second place for his coverage of New Hampshire's Libertarian party and how, instead of supporting their official candidate for president, the party
Steven Porter and Amanda Gokee spread out across New Hampshire in 2024 to regularly explore how the state's demographics and voting patterns have changed since 2020 and evaluate whether they might affect the 2024 elections, from the presidential race to down-ballot contests. Stories that earned them a first place award in this category included:
Social Media
Social media manager Sadie Layher won second place for her outstanding use of
The New Hampshire Press Association Excellence in Journalism Awards celebrates exceptional work by New Hampshire journalists on all platforms, including print, digital, television, and radio.
Advertisement
Lylah Alphonse can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump Teases 300% Chip Tariffs--Apple May Get a Pass, Others Could Pay Big
President Donald Trump said he plans to set new tariffs on semiconductors in the coming weeks, intensifying his push to reshape global supply chains. Speaking aboard Air Force One, Trump stated he would implement levies next week and the week after targeting steel and possibly semiconductors. While he already raised steel duties to 50% in June, the mention of chips marks a potential escalation in his trade strategy, especially as the Commerce Department continues national security investigations into the semiconductor and pharmaceutical sectors. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with UNH. Trump had earlier floated a 100% tariff on imported semiconductors, with possible exemptions for companies relocating manufacturing to the U.S. During a meeting last week with Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) CEO Tim Cook, Trump hinted Apple could qualify for an exemption given its pledged $600 billion investment in domestic production. However, he offered no specifics on how those carve-outs would be structured. On Friday, he went further, suggesting duties could rise to 200%, 300%, adding uncertainty for chipmakers and artificial intelligence firms dependent on international supply chains. The president also linked his tariff plans to geopolitical discussions, suggesting the topic could surface during his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump noted that Russian business leaders would be attending the meeting but indicated that deeper trade cooperation would depend on progress toward ending the war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, Trump has continued threatening tariffs elsewhere, including a 50% levy on Indian goods and potential increases on Russian energy imports if talks stall. Investors watching the semiconductor space, including firms like Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Apple, are likely weighing how such moves could ripple through production costs and global sourcing strategies. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Boston Globe
4 days ago
- Boston Globe
‘Wake-up call': N.H. ranked last in US in higher education funding, new report shows
Low levels of state funding can drive tuition and fees paid by students and families even higher. And the report warned that 'underinvestment' in higher education could contribute to workforce shortages in the coming years. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up Four-year public colleges in New Hampshire have bumped up tuition between 2.5 percent to 4.9 percent, while community colleges have seen a nearly 7 percent increase for the 2025 to 2026 school year, the report found. Advertisement At the University of New Hampshire in Durham, tuition and fees for this school year for an in-state student are $19,682. Including room and board bumps the total up to $34,386 per year. For an out-of-state student, tuition, fees, room and board now total $55,548. 'Our findings should serve as a wake-up call,' said Heller. 'Underfunding our public colleges and universities not only makes it harder for Granite Staters to afford to pursue college degrees, it also risks leaving the state unprepared to meet its workforce needs,' she said. Advertisement The report found that the gap between New Hampshire and other states could widen in coming years, given the last state budget, which allocated 17.6 percent less to the University System than it previously received. New Hampshire ranked last in the nation for the state's contribution to higher education, according to a new report the New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute released on Aug. 14, 2025. Courtesy of NHFPI For the University System of New Hampshire, which includes two universities and one college, that amounted to $35 million less compared to the last two-year budget period. After New Hampshire, Vermont's contribution to higher education is the second lowest in the nation, followed by Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Delaware. Illinois is the state that contributed the most to higher education in 2024, at $25,529 per full-time equivalent student. Connecticut ranked fifth highest at about $16,800, and Massachusetts ranked ninth at about $14,400, according to the Here's how the New England states compare in funding per full-time equivalent student: New Hampshire: $4,629 Vermont: $5,300 Rhode Island: $7,800 Maine: $9,500 Massachusetts: $14,400 Connecticut: $16,800 This story appeared in Globe NH | Morning Report, a free newsletter focused on New Hampshire, including great coverage from the Boston Globe and links to interesting articles elsewhere. To receive it via email Monday through Friday, . Amanda Gokee can be reached at
Boston Globe
6 days ago
- Boston Globe
Children in state care were sexually abused in N.H. How much money are they owed?
Governor Kelly Ayotte, a Republican who took office this year, also Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up 'It's like the criminal on trial gets to say, 'I don't like this, let's change it,'' said Corrine Moon, a plaintiff in the class action who has described years of sexual abuse by state employees. 'How is that fair? Why does the state get to keep revictimizing us?' Advertisement New Hampshire is grappling with a wrenching moral question: How much should it pay to those who suffered devastating damage as young people in its care? It's an issue faced by states across the country, including California and Maryland, as the costs of settlements have soared -- reaching billions of dollars in some cases. And with state budgets tight, lawmakers are weighing their commitments to victims against other fiscal priorities, including crucial services and, in some cases, promised tax cuts. Advertisement The tensions signal a shift away from the legislative impulse that prevailed 20 years ago, when the reach of the Roman Catholic Church's child sex abuse crisis became clear. Back then, many states changed laws to ease the way for victim compensation. The abuse described by victims in New Hampshire, at three state youth detention centers, included serial beating, sex crimes, choking, strip searches and weekslong solitary confinement. Most victims came from poor families, often with absent or abusive parents. Their offenses as minors included drug use, truancy and theft. The oldest to come forward was 78, describing abuse from 1968. The youngest, 19, detailed abuse from 2018. The Sununu Youth Services Center in Manchester, N.H., stands among trees, Jan. 28, 2020. Charles Krupa/Associated Press A state report in 1978 found deficiencies in training at the facilities. In 1980, the attorney general warned of problems that could lead to lawsuits. But the state did not launch a full investigation until around 2020, as victims came forward and filed lawsuits. Moon said she was raped repeatedly by state employees after she ended up, at age 14, in state custody. She said she never knew when male staff members would show up in her room in the middle of the night to assault her. Moon, 44, was one of the first victims to sue the state, speaking publicly in hopes of forcing changes. She said she now longed to put the fight behind her and opted into the state fund to find a swifter, gentler resolution. Victims elsewhere, too, face cost containment measures. Advertisement In Maryland, recent legislation reduced the cap on abuse settlements by more than half. The state faces potential liability of more than $3 billion from thousands of abuse claims in juvenile facilities. In Washington, costs have increased since courts broadened liability and statutes of limitations for some abuse claims. Since 2022, annual payouts for claims against the Department of Children, Youth and Families have roughly tripled, according to a 2024 report by the state's risk management office. To cover costs, lawmakers overdrew an account that helps pay such expenses this year. After California made suing institutions easier in 2019 for victims of child sex abuse, claims against municipalities and school districts more than doubled, according to the nonprofit California Association of Joint Powers Authorities, which helps public entities manage risk. Los Angeles County alone agreed in April to pay $4 billion to settle more than 6,800 sex abuse claims dating to the late 1950s, with annual payments through 2051. Municipalities and school districts have warned of budget cuts and layoffs, and legislative remedies have been floated to rein in future payouts. Lorena Gonzalez, the former California legislator who wrote the 2019 law, said she thought officials would take abuse complaints more seriously. On this count, she said, the law worked. But she never envisioned what she described as a rush of specialized, well-financed lawyers 'bankrupting cities' and 'making billions from public resources.' Gonzalez, now a labor leader, said she has a new appreciation for the state's challenges. 'If the payouts are so large that we're getting rid of, say, child protective services and social workers, then we're doing a disservice to kids today,' she said. Advertisement Plaintiff David Meehan listens to testimony of Michael Gilpatrick, a former youth detention center resident, during a civil trial seeking to hold the state accountable for alleged abuse at the Sununu Youth Services Center, formerly called the Youth Development Center, Wednesday, April 17, 2024, at Rockingham County Superior Court in Brentwood, N.H. On the screen is so called "hit squad" members including Bradley Asbury, clockwise from to left, James Woodlock, Stephen Murphy and Jeffrey Buskey. All four are charged with sexual assault or being an accomplice to the assault against Gilpatrick. David Lane/Associated Press In New Hampshire, Ayotte stressed fiscal caution as she campaigned across the state last fall. New Hampshire, known for its lack of income tax, has also in recent years reduced business taxes and phased out its tax on interest and dividends, changes that have cost the state millions in revenue. In February, Ayotte proposed a budget that cut spending by $150 million. And she did not include the $75 million previously pledged for abuse settlements, an annual commitment made under her predecessor, Chris Sununu. In June, lawmakers changed the rules for the settlement fund, giving the governor power to fire the program administrator and the attorney general authority over settlements. The governor's office referred questions about the changes to the attorney general's office, which said in a statement that the restructuring was driven by concerns about mounting legal fees. Payments to lawyers representing victims have totaled more than $72 million, according to the statement, with many lawyers taking up to a third of each victim's total award 'in full and upfront.' Under a previous agreement between the two sides, intended to add financial stability for both victims and the state, many victims were paid over multiple years. Lawyers were paid all at once. The former fund administrator, John Broderick Jr., said the attorney general could have ordered lawyers' payments to be spread out as well. Instead, he said, the state chose to politicize a process that was working. 'The abuse was a black mark for half a century, before the legislature did the right thing,' he said. 'Now this will be another black mark.' Chuck Miles, 57, said he was abused in youth homes beginning in fifth grade, and counts a substandard education and lifelong trauma among his lasting scars. He rejected the state's claim of a money grab by lawyers. Advertisement 'The money grab is the governor removing funds from the settlement fund,' he said. David Vicinanzo, a lawyer with the firm Nixon Peabody, which represents 1,500 victims, said the state set the rules for lawyers' payments. By blaming lawyers, he said, the state was trying to deflect attention from its own maneuvering to spend less. 'They'll attack the messenger,' he said, 'and hope that victims lose heart and go away.' The victims may now face a protracted legal battle. By participating in the fund, they had agreed not to pursue their cases individually in court. Those agreements, lawyers said, could now be reversed. Court cases could be pricey for the state. Last year, a jury awarded $38 million to David Meehan, who testified about hundreds of assaults in the 1990s at a state detention center. The award was reduced to $475,000 under a state cap on damages; the State Supreme Court is now weighing the cap's constitutionality. Some experts say the solution will not be found in the courtroom. States that now find themselves in 'panic mode' should cut long-term costs by investing in science-based prevention, said Marci Hamilton, who runs Child USA, which advocates for child abuse victims. 'If they do this right and fix it,' she said, 'it's a short-term emergency, not a permanent budget line.' This article originally appeared in .
