logo
How Trump Is Undermining U.S.-Vietnam Postwar Reconciliation

How Trump Is Undermining U.S.-Vietnam Postwar Reconciliation

Yahoo30-04-2025
Spectators watch as soldiers take part in a parade to mark the 50th anniversary of the end of the Vietnam War, in Ho Chi Minh City on April 30, 2025. Credit - Manan Vatsyayana—AFP/Getty Images
April 30 has been called different things: Liberation Day, Reunification Day, Unity Day, Victory Day. But five decades after the collapse of the U.S.-backed South Vietnamese government, it's less the name of the commemoration and more America's legacy in Vietnam and future relationship with the Southeast Asian country that is mired in uncertainty.
Over 20 years of fighting, the Vietnam War—or American War, as it's known in Vietnam—cost the lives of almost 60,000 American servicemembers and more than 3 million Vietnamese and left a lasting mark on both nations. In the 50 years since, particularly the past 30 after formal relations were normalized in 1995, Washington has pursued reconciliation efforts with Hanoi, including a number of programs that sought to repair some of the damage the war wrought on generations of Vietnamese.
In 2023 the two governments upgraded ties to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, the highest-level cooperative agreement under Vietnamese standards.
'We've come a long way, and it's profoundly changed the nature of our relations from former enemies to now partners,' says Tim Rieser, who served for 37 years as a foreign policy aide of then-Senator Patrick Leahy (D, Vt.), who was known for leading humanitarian efforts between the U.S. and Vietnam, and now serves as a senior policy advisor to Sen. Peter Welch (D, Vt.).
But under President Donald Trump's second-term administration, which marks its 100th day also on April 30, 2025, that progress is now at risk, Rieser and others tell TIME.
In recent months, the Trump Administration announced a freeze on a majority of foreign aid contracts via USAID, which in Vietnam helped to fund a number of reconciliation projects, including cleanup and rehabilitation programs addressing the effects of toxic herbicides used in the war, such as Agent Orange. The State Department also temporarily suspended global mine-clearing programs, including groups in Vietnam that have worked to clear unexploded ordnance (UXO) left behind from the war.
The Trump Administration has since backtracked on some of these moves. Some USAID programs related to Vietnam have been 'unterminated,' after a group of senators, including Welch, penned a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Meanwhile, the State Department order on demining was meant to last three months, and a State Department spokesperson tells TIME that 'U.S. demining programs in Vietnam are active with clearance operations ongoing.' Still, the Washington Post reported Wednesday that at least 34 of 43 USAID contracts with Vietnam have been axed and about 100 USAID employees let go.
The State Department spokesperson explained to TIME: 'Programs that have been terminated were determined to not fit within the standards laid out by Secretary Rubio for U.S. foreign assistance, which must make the United States stronger, safer, or more prosperous. The United States remains committed to strengthening its partnership with Vietnam. Ensuring we have the right mix of programs to support U.S. national security and other core national interests of the United States requires an agile approach. We will continue to make changes as needed. The United States and Vietnam have a robust bilateral relationship and we are committed to deepening and broadening those ties. We look forward to working with the Vietnamese government and people to address shared challenges and opportunities.'
But some damage has already been done.
'This Administration has done severe damage to the credibility of this country in the perceptions of people around the world that we're no longer a reliable partner,' says Rieser. 'It's the consequence of actions by people in Washington who have little sense of history, who know nothing of the importance of what we've done to build this relationship over many years.'
A 2006 study led by Charles Bailey, who worked in Vietnam from 1997 to 2007 as a representative of the Ford Foundation, found that there were three hot spots of dioxin—a toxic contaminant in Agent Orange, an herbicide used by U.S. forces during the war that has caused a range of disabilities among millions of Vietnamese: Phu Cat, which was cleaned up without U.S. aid; Da Nang, which was cleaned up through a USAID-funded project that was completed in 2018; and Bien Hoa, which was the worst contaminated.
The U.S. launched a campaign to decontaminate Bien Hoa during Trump's first term in 2019. The project would take 10 years and cost a total $450 million, funded by USAID and the Department of Defense.
But amid USAID cuts, workers on the project at Bien Hoa Air Base on the outskirts of Ho Chi Minh City, were suddenly told in February to stop working. According to ProPublica, pits of contaminated soil were left exposed or covered with flimsy tarps before the U.S. appeared to reverse course a week later, but Bailey tells TIME it's not certain for how long funding will continue or how the project will fare once most USAID staffers leave Vietnam later this year.
In addition to clean-up programs, USAID provided $30 million of annual funding to Agent Orange-related disability rehabilitation programs in 10 provinces in Vietnam, some of which have resumed. But Bailey says several organizations lacked the financial resources to 'bridge the gap between the original termination and the resumption,' so even when funds slowly began to flow in again, they had to let some staff go. 'The practical matter is that they are not fully functioning,' says Bailey.
Demining programs were also paused as part of the U.S. freeze on foreign aid. The halt at least temporarily cost some 1,000 people their jobs in Quang Tri, according to the province's foreign affairs department. The province is believed to have the highest number of unexploded mines in Vietnam. Vietnamese media have estimated that UXO are responsible for some 40,000 deaths and 60,000 injuries since the end of the war in 1975.
The State Department told TIME that 'war legacy projects including dioxin remediation programs in Bien Hoa and demining programs in Quang Tri remain active and running.'
Another program started during Trump's first term and paused during his second is the Vietnam Wartime Accounting Initiative, a $15 million effort to help Vietnam locate and identify the remains of hundreds of thousands of people missing from the war that USAID and the Department of Defense began funding in 2020. Thao Griffiths, a commissioner of the International Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP) tells TIME that the Trump Administration terminated the program and put it under review, before reinstating it around a month later. It took around another month to hire and train new staff to get the program running again.
Rieser says addressing the war's legacy in Vietnam has long been important to the U.S. because lingering problems like Agent Orange, UXO, and unaccounted-for persons were 'a source of continuing anger and resentment' for the Vietnamese. 'There's hardly a family in Vietnam that didn't lose somebody or that doesn't know someone who died during the war and has never been accounted for,' he says. 'We couldn't get to ways of cooperating in other areas, whether it's maritime security, law enforcement, higher education, climate change, or public health, unless we first dealt with this.'
At the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, photographs of the 1968 My Lai massacre in which American soldiers killed hundreds of unarmed Vietnamese civilians line the walls. There's an exhibit of the Con Dao prison, which was built by French colonists in 1861 but used by the Americans during the war to hold prisoners, who were routinely abused and kept shackled in cramped 'tiger cages.' Another exhibit shows photographs of the devastating effects of U.S. napalm bombs and Agent Orange.
It's 'essentially a museum of American war crimes,' Rieser says. But 'there's another chapter to the story, and that is what we've done since the war to deal with the terrible things that happened.'
'The dominant cultural memory in Vietnam has centered around heroic national resistance and sacrifices to defend the nation against foreign invaders,' including the U.S., says Phan Xuan Dung, a Vietnam Studies researcher at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute and a PhD candidate at the Australian National University, but cooperation in addressing legacies of the war 'helped to build trust' between the two sides.
A new exhibit meant to open in July, which was spearheaded by former Sen. Leahy and Rieser and backed by $2 million in USAID funding, was supposed to highlight American reconciliation efforts and positive U.S.-Vietnam cooperation. According to Rieser, it would have shown that 'the United States didn't just walk away from the past and that we've tried to address it as best we can.' But the exhibit, like other war legacy programs, has also fallen victim to the Trump Administration's ruthless slashing. 'We've been working very hard to meet that deadline, and then suddenly, some anonymous uninformed person in Washington stops the funding with no idea what this is, or why it's important, or the consequences,' says Rieser.
What's at stake is U.S. credibility, says Phan. The Trump Administration's recent actions, which also include the high tariffs on global trading partners that the White House announced earlier in April then temporarily paused, 'reinforce Vietnam's belief that the U.S. is not a reliable partner, and thus Vietnam needs to avoid being reliant on the U.S., even on assistance to deal with the aftermath of U.S. wartime actions.'
Rieser says that it is particularly critical to maintain strong ties with Vietnam in order to counter the influence of China in Southeast Asia and protect U.S. interests in the region. Chinese troops marched through the streets of Ho Chi Minh City at this year's military parade for the first time, following Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Vietnam earlier this month. The invitation to China to participate in the Vietnamese parade—alongside representatives from neighbors Laos and Cambodia—was framed as a move to celebrate the 'long-standing traditional friendship and bonds' between the countries and their support for Vietnam in its struggle for independence, even as China and Vietnam clashed over their border from 1979, didn't officially normalize relations until 1991, and continue to dispute territory in the South China Sea.
'For us to be taking steps that cause uncertainty in our relations with Vietnam, whether it's by suddenly imposing large tariffs or walking away from war legacy programs that are important to both countries, to downgrading our engagement with Vietnam,' says Rieser, 'it's the polar opposite of what a sensible U.S. foreign policy should look like in that part of the world.'
Just days before the 50th anniversary of the end of the war, the New York Times reported that the Trump Administration told its senior diplomats in Vietnam—including U.S. ambassador to Vietnam Marc Knapper—not to participate in April 30 commemoration events, citing four unnamed sources. Vietnamese officials, however, said they still expected U.S. officials to attend, and the Times later reported that the U.S. Consul General Susan Burns ended up doing so.
Historically, U.S. diplomats have not attended annual Vietnamese Victory day parades, instead holding separate ceremonies on April 30 and coming together later in the year to commemorate the anniversary of normalized ties.
But a number of Americans had been planning to attend commemorative events for the 50th anniversary of the end of the war—and a number still did, including John Terzano, a veteran of the Vietnam War and cofounder of the 1997 Nobel Peace Prize-winning Campaign for a Landmine Free World, who is frustrated by the Trump Administration's 'fickle' approach to diplomacy.
'Vietnam is a country and a people that deeply believes in symbolism. What makes the current [U.S.] ambassador and his presence or non-presence here so symbolic is he's the son of a Vietnam veteran,' Terzano tells TIME. 'He represents, in my opinion, the passing of the torch from one generation to another.'
The Trump Administration's recent actions, on the other hand, show a lack of understanding of the historical significance of the U.S. and Vietnam's relationship, Terzano says. 'April 30 is a day of peace. It is a day of commemoration and acknowledging sacrifices of people made on both sides, but it's also a day of looking forward,' he says. 'The United States is really still stuck in the past.'
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House mocks ‘unserious' NJ Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver after she claims ‘Liberation Day' is ‘racist' and code for ‘white power'
White House mocks ‘unserious' NJ Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver after she claims ‘Liberation Day' is ‘racist' and code for ‘white power'

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

White House mocks ‘unserious' NJ Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver after she claims ‘Liberation Day' is ‘racist' and code for ‘white power'

The White House slammed New Jersey Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver on Monday after she argued that President Trump's 'Liberation Day' mantra is code for 'white power.' McIver — who was hit with federal charges in June accusing her of assaulting and interfering with immigration officers outside a New Jersey detention center — leveled the accusation as she railed against Trump's crime crackdown in Washington, DC, which she fears 'will start a civil war' if he tries it in other Democrat-run cities. 3 The White House dismissed McIver's accusations and mocked her alleged role in a 'catfight' outside a Newark ICE facility. 'I think there's an ultimate agenda of this administration to do these types of things,' the congresswoman said of the president's decision to take control of DC's police department and deploy federal law enforcement and National Guard troops in the nation's capital, during an interview on the 'Defending Democracy with Marc Elias' podcast last week. 'Sic the military on the very people that they're supposed to be protecting in these cities and then expect a certain response so that it can escalate – I truly believe that that's what the president hopes for,' McIver argued, before calling the effort – and Trump's 'Liberation Day' for DC label – 'racist.' 'When he says, oh, you know, it's Liberation Day, and all of these things, those are, you know, ways of him saying, oh, it's white power,' McIver said. 'Those are racist remarks,' she argued. 'His number one targets are cities that are led by black mayors.' McIver went on to bemoan that Trump's 'number one targets are sanctuary cities that, you know, support immigration.' The New Jersey Democrat charged that Trump's push to clean up DC and end sanctuary city policies 'show us each and every day how much of a bigot he is.' 3 McIver argued that Trump's actions to tackle crime in the nation's capital demonstrate he is 'a bigot.' REUTERS 3 McIver has pleaded not guilty to three counts of assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering with federal officials related to her alleged role in the ICE facility dustup. AP The White House brushed off McIver's allegations, mocking her 'attempted catfight' outside the Newark ICE facility that landed her in trouble with the feds. 'LaMonica McIver, whose claim to fame was assaulting federal agents, is an unserious person whose comments are nothing more than a political stunt, much like her attempted catfight in front of an ICE facility,' White House spokesman Harrison Fields told The Post. 'Congress would be better off if she left, and the people of New Jersey would benefit greatly if she pursued her apparent passion for street fighting,' he added. McIver's office did not respond to a request for comment. The congresswoman has pleaded not guilty to three counts of assaulting, resisting, impeding and interfering with federal officials related to her alleged role in the ICE facility dustup.

More than 6,000 college students have had their visas revoked under Trump, administration says
More than 6,000 college students have had their visas revoked under Trump, administration says

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

More than 6,000 college students have had their visas revoked under Trump, administration says

The Trump administration has revoked more than 6,000 student visas since January 20 this year, the State Department has said. Officials told Fox News Digital that around 200 to 300 people had their visas cancelled due to "supporting terrorism", while another 4,000 had broken the law. Those people were among roughly 40,000 who have had their papers rescinded during the second Trump era, compared to 16,000 during the same time frame under Biden. "Every single student visa revoked under the Trump Administration has happened because the individual has either broken the law or expressed support for terrorism while in the United States," a senior State Department official told Fox. "About 4,000 visas alone have been revoked because these visitors broke the law while visiting our country, including records of assault and DUIs." Officials did not give a breakdown of those incidents, or say how many were violent crimes, stating only that they included burglary, assault, and driving under the influence. An unknown number of students were also told to leave due to overstaying their visas which is generally a civil violation rather than a crime. It comes as the White House expands its efforts to police foreign students' political beliefs, instructing all U.S. embassies to vet applicants' social media profiles for signs of "hostility" towards the "citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States". The administration has particularly targeted pro-Palestinian activists, claiming — sometimes with little evidence — that they are supporters of the U.S.-designated terrorist group Hamas. Earlier this month Trump's border czar Tom Homan vowed to continue trying to deport Columbia University graduate and green card holder Mahmoud Khalil, despite several court rulings in his favor. The administration has repeatedly sought to block Harvard University from enrolling students and teachers from abroad as it tries to force the 400-year-old institution to crack down on student protests and hire more conservatives. These new policies appear to be having a chilling effect on prospective students, with the industry body NAFSA predicting a 30 to 40 percent drop in new foreign enrollments by fall 2025. An alliance of college professors is suing the U.S. government alleging it violated their First Amendment rights by targeting and detaining pro-Palestinian students and faculty. "We don't deport people based on ideology," insisted Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin.

Trump Falls For Europe's Charm Offensive
Trump Falls For Europe's Charm Offensive

Time​ Magazine

time7 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Trump Falls For Europe's Charm Offensive

This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME's politics newsletter. Sign up here to get stories like this sent to your inbox. The Europeans made the pilgrimage to Washington on a moment's notice. They flattered their host, President Donald Trump, with praise for his ability to convene an impromptu peace summit with their Ukrainian counterpart, who in turn updated his fashion choices to fall in line with what White House officials expect from visitors. Above all, they made Trump feel every bit like the most powerful person on the planet. What's more, Trump took their bait. From the moment a week ago that Trump announced that he would meet that Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, European leaders have come together with an Avengers-like unity to have the back of Ukrainian President counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky, whose nation was invaded more than three years ago by Putin's forces. The leaders of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Finland, plus the heads of the European Commission and NATO, took part in a largely harmonious charm offensive meant to guide Trump back to a footing of support for the U.S. ally facing Russian belligerence. They heaped compliments on Trump in what can only be described as a diplomatic plea for a ceasefire that just days ago Trump walked away from. In turn, Trump did not rule out sending U.S. forces to help defend Ukraine. For the Europeans, things seemed to go as well as they could have imagined. In fact, it almost seemed the most unlikely of qualities in Trump's Washington: normal. Unlike Zelensky's first trip back to Trump's White House this term, there was none of the made-for-TV stage fighting. In February, with the world watching, Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance ambushed Zelensky in the Oval Office and proceeded to kick him and his delegation out. It made for drama but it left the wartime President unsure if Washington would keep in Kyiv's column of supporters. Since then, Trump has softened slightly toward Zelensky, as Trump has grown frustrated that his charisma alone has not delivered an offramp for a brutal battle that has continued without pause, even amid Trump's meetings with Putin and Zelensky. Trump is famously fickle and famously susceptible to shameless praise, even when it seems to most outside observers as feigned. Sycophancy is a survival skill in the President's orbit, and survivors know its currency. Cabinet meetings with Trump are ultimately a tour of department chiefs, each of whom knows to come ready with lavish compliments for their boss. Trump, as expected, responds with a wide grin. Zelensky, having learned his lesson after a disastrous visit in February, returned on Monday with gratitude being shoveled in spades. Not only that, he traded in the military wardrobe he's favored since Russia's invasion in 2022 for one of an all-black field jacket and buttoned-up dress shirt. It set the stage for a warmer welcome from Trump, who from the start seemed pleased to have forced a wardrobe update based on his whims. To be clear: This is not how the United States—or any rational government, really—should be deciding on strategy. It is obviously in the United States' security interests to side with European nations standing with ally Ukraine against Russia, which now occupies about one-fifth of its neighbor. Europeans rightly worry an expanding Russia that is indifferent to sovereign borders is a threat to post-Cold War norms. A strong NATO alliance that includes the United States remains crucial for keeping a creeping post-Soviet Russia from metastasizing. But those global currents matter less to Trump than his fragile ego. So the Europeans traded geopolitical arguments over decades of curbing Moscow's ambitions for cheap praise. For the moment, it seems to have worked as Trump returned to the prospect of a trilateral summit with Ukraine and Russia, and himself as the arbiter. 'Everyone around this table wants peace,' French President Emmanuel Macron told Trump. Like others, Macron said Trump has a unique ability to convene a session where that peace may be scored—the latest example of Macron's unique ability among European leaders to be their Trump whisperer. The Europeans clearly had coordinated their approach and were speaking with one message if in eight different voices. 'The next steps ahead are the more complicated ones,'' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said, being upfront with his host. 'I can't imagine the next meeting will take place without a ceasefire,' he told Trump. But Trump has said a ceasefire was not necessary. 'If we can get a cease-fire, great,'' Trump responded. He also said that it would be up to Zelensky and Putin to negotiate any such pause to the fighting. 'As of this moment it's not happening.' Thus, it returns to a sequencing order: which comes first, a ceasefire or a trilateral meeting? That's the question that seemed to persist even as the meetings unfolded across the White House's campus. But one thing was clear: he who gives Trump the biggest ego boost is likely to come out ahead. 'I think he wants to make a deal with me—you understand that?—as crazy as it sounds,' Trump was heard on a hot mic making small talk ahead of that one-way praise fest. It remains a matter of debate, though, if Trump is correct or just projecting there. Given the opportunity to press their luck, the Europeans instead decided to push laudatory comments that would not draw any backlash. Ultimately, that strategy may preserve Ukraine and settle the borders of Europe's map. Make sense of what matters in Washington. Sign up for the D.C. Brief newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store